MASS MEASUREMENTS OF BLACK HOLES IN X-RAY TRANSIENTS: IS THERE A MASS GAP?

We explore possible systematic errors in the mass measurements of stellar mass black holes (BHs). We find that significant errors can arise from the assumption of zero or constant emission from the accretion flow, which is commonly used when determining orbital inclination by modeling ellipsoidal va...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astrophysical journal 2012-09, Vol.757 (1), p.1-17
Hauptverfasser: KREIDBERG, Laura, BAILYN, Charles D, FARR, Will M, KALOGERA, Vicky
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title The Astrophysical journal
container_volume 757
creator KREIDBERG, Laura
BAILYN, Charles D
FARR, Will M
KALOGERA, Vicky
description We explore possible systematic errors in the mass measurements of stellar mass black holes (BHs). We find that significant errors can arise from the assumption of zero or constant emission from the accretion flow, which is commonly used when determining orbital inclination by modeling ellipsoidal variations. For A0620-00, the system with the best available data, we show that typical data sets and analysis procedures can lead to systematic underestimates of the inclination by 10[degrees] or more. A careful examination of the available data for the 15 other X-ray transients with low-mass donors suggests that this effect may significantly reduce the BH mass estimates in several other cases, most notably that of GRO J0422+32. Assuming that GRO J0422+32 behaves similarly to A0620-00, the reduction in the mass of GRO J0422+32 fills the mass gap between the low end of the distribution and the maximum theoretical neutron star mass, as has been identified in previous studies. Otherwise, we find that the mass distribution retains other previously identified characteristics, namely a peak around 8 M sub([middot in circle]), a paucity of sources with masses below 5 M sub([middot in circle]), and a sharp drop-off above 10 M sub([middot in circle]).
doi_str_mv 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/36
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22092279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1712564934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-61dcbd1f0f24ae25bb61ca6a5b22e84914804ebdbfbf783317e5171c6f75ee23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLw0AUhQdRsD7-gKsBEdzEzp1n4kZiSR_ahzQRdDVMphOM1KRm4sJ_b2Ola1eXC9_5FucgdAHkBkgY9gkhPJBMvfSVUH3oM3mAeiBYGHAm1CHq7YFjdOL9e_fSKOqhh1mcpniWxOnzMpkl8yzFiyG-n8aDRzxeTJMUT-b4JVjGrzhbxvN00iG3eJLibJwsExzjX8Eofro7Q0eFWXt3_ndPUTZMssE4mC5Gk0E8DSwH0QYSVjZfQUEKyo2jIs8lWCONyCl1IY-Ah4S7fJUXeaFCxkA5AQqsLJRwjrJTdLnT1r4ttbdl6-ybravK2VZTSiJKVbSlrnfUpqk_v5xv9UfprVuvTeXqL69BMQKEsRD-gQIVkkeMb1G6Q21Te9-4Qm-a8sM03xqI7obQXbG661lvh9CgmdyGrv78xluzLhpT2dLvk1SykAvB2Q9bBn-J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1712564934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MASS MEASUREMENTS OF BLACK HOLES IN X-RAY TRANSIENTS: IS THERE A MASS GAP?</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>KREIDBERG, Laura ; BAILYN, Charles D ; FARR, Will M ; KALOGERA, Vicky</creator><creatorcontrib>KREIDBERG, Laura ; BAILYN, Charles D ; FARR, Will M ; KALOGERA, Vicky</creatorcontrib><description>We explore possible systematic errors in the mass measurements of stellar mass black holes (BHs). We find that significant errors can arise from the assumption of zero or constant emission from the accretion flow, which is commonly used when determining orbital inclination by modeling ellipsoidal variations. For A0620-00, the system with the best available data, we show that typical data sets and analysis procedures can lead to systematic underestimates of the inclination by 10[degrees] or more. A careful examination of the available data for the 15 other X-ray transients with low-mass donors suggests that this effect may significantly reduce the BH mass estimates in several other cases, most notably that of GRO J0422+32. Assuming that GRO J0422+32 behaves similarly to A0620-00, the reduction in the mass of GRO J0422+32 fills the mass gap between the low end of the distribution and the maximum theoretical neutron star mass, as has been identified in previous studies. Otherwise, we find that the mass distribution retains other previously identified characteristics, namely a peak around 8 M sub([middot in circle]), a paucity of sources with masses below 5 M sub([middot in circle]), and a sharp drop-off above 10 M sub([middot in circle]).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-637X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4357</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/36</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ASJOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP</publisher><subject>ASTRONOMY ; ASTROPHYSICS ; ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY ; BLACK HOLES ; Black holes (astronomy) ; Constants ; Earth, ocean, space ; Emission ; Exact sciences and technology ; INCLINATION ; MASS ; MASS DISTRIBUTION ; NEUTRON STARS ; STAR ACCRETION ; Systematic errors ; TRANSIENTS ; VARIATIONS ; X RADIATION ; X-rays</subject><ispartof>The Astrophysical journal, 2012-09, Vol.757 (1), p.1-17</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-61dcbd1f0f24ae25bb61ca6a5b22e84914804ebdbfbf783317e5171c6f75ee23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26384554$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22092279$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KREIDBERG, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAILYN, Charles D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FARR, Will M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KALOGERA, Vicky</creatorcontrib><title>MASS MEASUREMENTS OF BLACK HOLES IN X-RAY TRANSIENTS: IS THERE A MASS GAP?</title><title>The Astrophysical journal</title><description>We explore possible systematic errors in the mass measurements of stellar mass black holes (BHs). We find that significant errors can arise from the assumption of zero or constant emission from the accretion flow, which is commonly used when determining orbital inclination by modeling ellipsoidal variations. For A0620-00, the system with the best available data, we show that typical data sets and analysis procedures can lead to systematic underestimates of the inclination by 10[degrees] or more. A careful examination of the available data for the 15 other X-ray transients with low-mass donors suggests that this effect may significantly reduce the BH mass estimates in several other cases, most notably that of GRO J0422+32. Assuming that GRO J0422+32 behaves similarly to A0620-00, the reduction in the mass of GRO J0422+32 fills the mass gap between the low end of the distribution and the maximum theoretical neutron star mass, as has been identified in previous studies. Otherwise, we find that the mass distribution retains other previously identified characteristics, namely a peak around 8 M sub([middot in circle]), a paucity of sources with masses below 5 M sub([middot in circle]), and a sharp drop-off above 10 M sub([middot in circle]).</description><subject>ASTRONOMY</subject><subject>ASTROPHYSICS</subject><subject>ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY</subject><subject>BLACK HOLES</subject><subject>Black holes (astronomy)</subject><subject>Constants</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Emission</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>INCLINATION</subject><subject>MASS</subject><subject>MASS DISTRIBUTION</subject><subject>NEUTRON STARS</subject><subject>STAR ACCRETION</subject><subject>Systematic errors</subject><subject>TRANSIENTS</subject><subject>VARIATIONS</subject><subject>X RADIATION</subject><subject>X-rays</subject><issn>0004-637X</issn><issn>1538-4357</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUtLw0AUhQdRsD7-gKsBEdzEzp1n4kZiSR_ahzQRdDVMphOM1KRm4sJ_b2Ola1eXC9_5FucgdAHkBkgY9gkhPJBMvfSVUH3oM3mAeiBYGHAm1CHq7YFjdOL9e_fSKOqhh1mcpniWxOnzMpkl8yzFiyG-n8aDRzxeTJMUT-b4JVjGrzhbxvN00iG3eJLibJwsExzjX8Eofro7Q0eFWXt3_ndPUTZMssE4mC5Gk0E8DSwH0QYSVjZfQUEKyo2jIs8lWCONyCl1IY-Ah4S7fJUXeaFCxkA5AQqsLJRwjrJTdLnT1r4ttbdl6-ybravK2VZTSiJKVbSlrnfUpqk_v5xv9UfprVuvTeXqL69BMQKEsRD-gQIVkkeMb1G6Q21Te9-4Qm-a8sM03xqI7obQXbG661lvh9CgmdyGrv78xluzLhpT2dLvk1SykAvB2Q9bBn-J</recordid><startdate>20120920</startdate><enddate>20120920</enddate><creator>KREIDBERG, Laura</creator><creator>BAILYN, Charles D</creator><creator>FARR, Will M</creator><creator>KALOGERA, Vicky</creator><general>IOP</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120920</creationdate><title>MASS MEASUREMENTS OF BLACK HOLES IN X-RAY TRANSIENTS: IS THERE A MASS GAP?</title><author>KREIDBERG, Laura ; BAILYN, Charles D ; FARR, Will M ; KALOGERA, Vicky</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-61dcbd1f0f24ae25bb61ca6a5b22e84914804ebdbfbf783317e5171c6f75ee23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>ASTRONOMY</topic><topic>ASTROPHYSICS</topic><topic>ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY</topic><topic>BLACK HOLES</topic><topic>Black holes (astronomy)</topic><topic>Constants</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Emission</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>INCLINATION</topic><topic>MASS</topic><topic>MASS DISTRIBUTION</topic><topic>NEUTRON STARS</topic><topic>STAR ACCRETION</topic><topic>Systematic errors</topic><topic>TRANSIENTS</topic><topic>VARIATIONS</topic><topic>X RADIATION</topic><topic>X-rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KREIDBERG, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAILYN, Charles D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FARR, Will M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KALOGERA, Vicky</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KREIDBERG, Laura</au><au>BAILYN, Charles D</au><au>FARR, Will M</au><au>KALOGERA, Vicky</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MASS MEASUREMENTS OF BLACK HOLES IN X-RAY TRANSIENTS: IS THERE A MASS GAP?</atitle><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle><date>2012-09-20</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>757</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>1-17</pages><issn>0004-637X</issn><eissn>1538-4357</eissn><coden>ASJOAB</coden><abstract>We explore possible systematic errors in the mass measurements of stellar mass black holes (BHs). We find that significant errors can arise from the assumption of zero or constant emission from the accretion flow, which is commonly used when determining orbital inclination by modeling ellipsoidal variations. For A0620-00, the system with the best available data, we show that typical data sets and analysis procedures can lead to systematic underestimates of the inclination by 10[degrees] or more. A careful examination of the available data for the 15 other X-ray transients with low-mass donors suggests that this effect may significantly reduce the BH mass estimates in several other cases, most notably that of GRO J0422+32. Assuming that GRO J0422+32 behaves similarly to A0620-00, the reduction in the mass of GRO J0422+32 fills the mass gap between the low end of the distribution and the maximum theoretical neutron star mass, as has been identified in previous studies. Otherwise, we find that the mass distribution retains other previously identified characteristics, namely a peak around 8 M sub([middot in circle]), a paucity of sources with masses below 5 M sub([middot in circle]), and a sharp drop-off above 10 M sub([middot in circle]).</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP</pub><doi>10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/36</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-637X
ispartof The Astrophysical journal, 2012-09, Vol.757 (1), p.1-17
issn 0004-637X
1538-4357
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22092279
source IOP Publishing Free Content; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects ASTRONOMY
ASTROPHYSICS
ASTROPHYSICS, COSMOLOGY AND ASTRONOMY
BLACK HOLES
Black holes (astronomy)
Constants
Earth, ocean, space
Emission
Exact sciences and technology
INCLINATION
MASS
MASS DISTRIBUTION
NEUTRON STARS
STAR ACCRETION
Systematic errors
TRANSIENTS
VARIATIONS
X RADIATION
X-rays
title MASS MEASUREMENTS OF BLACK HOLES IN X-RAY TRANSIENTS: IS THERE A MASS GAP?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A22%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MASS%20MEASUREMENTS%20OF%20BLACK%20HOLES%20IN%20X-RAY%20TRANSIENTS:%20IS%20THERE%20A%20MASS%20GAP?&rft.jtitle=The%20Astrophysical%20journal&rft.au=KREIDBERG,%20Laura&rft.date=2012-09-20&rft.volume=757&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=1-17&rft.issn=0004-637X&rft.eissn=1538-4357&rft.coden=ASJOAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/36&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1712564934%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1712564934&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true