Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing

During subaperture tool grinding and polishing, overlaps of the tool influence function can result in undesirable mid-spatial frequency (MSF) errors in the form of surface ripples, which are often corrected using a smoothing polishing step. In this study, flat multi-layer smoothing polishing tools a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied optics (2004) 2023-03, Vol.62 (8)
Hauptverfasser: Suratwala, T., Tham, G., Steele, R., Wong, L., Menapace, J., Ray, N., Bauman, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Applied optics (2004)
container_volume 62
creator Suratwala, T.
Tham, G.
Steele, R.
Wong, L.
Menapace, J.
Ray, N.
Bauman, B.
description During subaperture tool grinding and polishing, overlaps of the tool influence function can result in undesirable mid-spatial frequency (MSF) errors in the form of surface ripples, which are often corrected using a smoothing polishing step. In this study, flat multi-layer smoothing polishing tools are designed and tested to simultaneously (1) reduce or remove MSF errors, (2) minimize surface figure degradation, and (3) maximize the material removal rate. A time-dependent convergence model in which spatial material removal varies with a workpiece-tool height mismatch, combined with a finite element mechanical analysis to determine the interface contact pressure distribution, was developed to evaluate various smoothing tool designs as a function of tool material properties, thicknesses, pad textures, and displacements. An improvement in smoothing tool performance is achieved when the gap pressure constant, h ¯ (which describes the inverse rate at which the pressure drops with a workpiece-tool height mismatch), is minimized for smaller spatial scale length surface features (namely, MSF errors) and maximized for large spatial scale length features (i.e., surface figure). Five specific smoothing tool designs were experimentally evaluated. A two-layer smoothing tool using a thin, grooved IC1000 polyurethane pad (with a high elastic modulus, E pad =360MPa), thicker blue foam (with an intermediate modulus, E foam =5.3MPa) underlayer, and an optimized displacement ( d t =1mm) provided the best overall performance (namely, high MSF error convergence, minimal surface figure degradation, and high material removal rate).
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>osti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_2203618</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2203618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_22036183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi8sOgjAUBRujifj4h8Y9CW0twtpo2OvCHamlQE3pJb3l_4XED3B1JpM5K5JwJmUqWC7XJJmxTBkvXluyQ_xkmZDn8pKQ6jEAxN76jkYARxuDtvNU-YaOJrQQBuW1oc0UlgSnt5p1nIKhnVOIdARncbkfyKZVDs3xt3tyut-e1yoFjLZGbaPRvQbvjY4155nIWSH-ir5cVz5T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing</title><source>Optica Publishing Group Journals</source><creator>Suratwala, T. ; Tham, G. ; Steele, R. ; Wong, L. ; Menapace, J. ; Ray, N. ; Bauman, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Suratwala, T. ; Tham, G. ; Steele, R. ; Wong, L. ; Menapace, J. ; Ray, N. ; Bauman, B. ; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>During subaperture tool grinding and polishing, overlaps of the tool influence function can result in undesirable mid-spatial frequency (MSF) errors in the form of surface ripples, which are often corrected using a smoothing polishing step. In this study, flat multi-layer smoothing polishing tools are designed and tested to simultaneously (1) reduce or remove MSF errors, (2) minimize surface figure degradation, and (3) maximize the material removal rate. A time-dependent convergence model in which spatial material removal varies with a workpiece-tool height mismatch, combined with a finite element mechanical analysis to determine the interface contact pressure distribution, was developed to evaluate various smoothing tool designs as a function of tool material properties, thicknesses, pad textures, and displacements. An improvement in smoothing tool performance is achieved when the gap pressure constant, h ¯ (which describes the inverse rate at which the pressure drops with a workpiece-tool height mismatch), is minimized for smaller spatial scale length surface features (namely, MSF errors) and maximized for large spatial scale length features (i.e., surface figure). Five specific smoothing tool designs were experimentally evaluated. A two-layer smoothing tool using a thin, grooved IC1000 polyurethane pad (with a high elastic modulus, E pad =360MPa), thicker blue foam (with an intermediate modulus, E foam =5.3MPa) underlayer, and an optimized displacement ( d t =1mm) provided the best overall performance (namely, high MSF error convergence, minimal surface figure degradation, and high material removal rate).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-128X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2155-3165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Optical Society of America</publisher><subject>Optics and optical instruments ; OTHER INSTRUMENTATION</subject><ispartof>Applied optics (2004), 2023-03, Vol.62 (8)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000000327244972 ; 0000000190861039</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/2203618$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suratwala, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menapace, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauman, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing</title><title>Applied optics (2004)</title><description>During subaperture tool grinding and polishing, overlaps of the tool influence function can result in undesirable mid-spatial frequency (MSF) errors in the form of surface ripples, which are often corrected using a smoothing polishing step. In this study, flat multi-layer smoothing polishing tools are designed and tested to simultaneously (1) reduce or remove MSF errors, (2) minimize surface figure degradation, and (3) maximize the material removal rate. A time-dependent convergence model in which spatial material removal varies with a workpiece-tool height mismatch, combined with a finite element mechanical analysis to determine the interface contact pressure distribution, was developed to evaluate various smoothing tool designs as a function of tool material properties, thicknesses, pad textures, and displacements. An improvement in smoothing tool performance is achieved when the gap pressure constant, h ¯ (which describes the inverse rate at which the pressure drops with a workpiece-tool height mismatch), is minimized for smaller spatial scale length surface features (namely, MSF errors) and maximized for large spatial scale length features (i.e., surface figure). Five specific smoothing tool designs were experimentally evaluated. A two-layer smoothing tool using a thin, grooved IC1000 polyurethane pad (with a high elastic modulus, E pad =360MPa), thicker blue foam (with an intermediate modulus, E foam =5.3MPa) underlayer, and an optimized displacement ( d t =1mm) provided the best overall performance (namely, high MSF error convergence, minimal surface figure degradation, and high material removal rate).</description><subject>Optics and optical instruments</subject><subject>OTHER INSTRUMENTATION</subject><issn>1559-128X</issn><issn>2155-3165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNi8sOgjAUBRujifj4h8Y9CW0twtpo2OvCHamlQE3pJb3l_4XED3B1JpM5K5JwJmUqWC7XJJmxTBkvXluyQ_xkmZDn8pKQ6jEAxN76jkYARxuDtvNU-YaOJrQQBuW1oc0UlgSnt5p1nIKhnVOIdARncbkfyKZVDs3xt3tyut-e1yoFjLZGbaPRvQbvjY4155nIWSH-ir5cVz5T</recordid><startdate>20230307</startdate><enddate>20230307</enddate><creator>Suratwala, T.</creator><creator>Tham, G.</creator><creator>Steele, R.</creator><creator>Wong, L.</creator><creator>Menapace, J.</creator><creator>Ray, N.</creator><creator>Bauman, B.</creator><general>Optical Society of America</general><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000327244972</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000190861039</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230307</creationdate><title>Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing</title><author>Suratwala, T. ; Tham, G. ; Steele, R. ; Wong, L. ; Menapace, J. ; Ray, N. ; Bauman, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_22036183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Optics and optical instruments</topic><topic>OTHER INSTRUMENTATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suratwala, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menapace, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauman, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Applied optics (2004)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suratwala, T.</au><au>Tham, G.</au><au>Steele, R.</au><au>Wong, L.</au><au>Menapace, J.</au><au>Ray, N.</au><au>Bauman, B.</au><aucorp>Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing</atitle><jtitle>Applied optics (2004)</jtitle><date>2023-03-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>1559-128X</issn><eissn>2155-3165</eissn><abstract>During subaperture tool grinding and polishing, overlaps of the tool influence function can result in undesirable mid-spatial frequency (MSF) errors in the form of surface ripples, which are often corrected using a smoothing polishing step. In this study, flat multi-layer smoothing polishing tools are designed and tested to simultaneously (1) reduce or remove MSF errors, (2) minimize surface figure degradation, and (3) maximize the material removal rate. A time-dependent convergence model in which spatial material removal varies with a workpiece-tool height mismatch, combined with a finite element mechanical analysis to determine the interface contact pressure distribution, was developed to evaluate various smoothing tool designs as a function of tool material properties, thicknesses, pad textures, and displacements. An improvement in smoothing tool performance is achieved when the gap pressure constant, h ¯ (which describes the inverse rate at which the pressure drops with a workpiece-tool height mismatch), is minimized for smaller spatial scale length surface features (namely, MSF errors) and maximized for large spatial scale length features (i.e., surface figure). Five specific smoothing tool designs were experimentally evaluated. A two-layer smoothing tool using a thin, grooved IC1000 polyurethane pad (with a high elastic modulus, E pad =360MPa), thicker blue foam (with an intermediate modulus, E foam =5.3MPa) underlayer, and an optimized displacement ( d t =1mm) provided the best overall performance (namely, high MSF error convergence, minimal surface figure degradation, and high material removal rate).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Optical Society of America</pub><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000327244972</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000190861039</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1559-128X
ispartof Applied optics (2004), 2023-03, Vol.62 (8)
issn 1559-128X
2155-3165
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_2203618
source Optica Publishing Group Journals
subjects Optics and optical instruments
OTHER INSTRUMENTATION
title Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A18%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-osti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smoothing%20tool%20design%20and%20performance%20during%20subaperture%20glass%20polishing&rft.jtitle=Applied%20optics%20(2004)&rft.au=Suratwala,%20T.&rft.aucorp=Lawrence%20Livermore%20National%20Laboratory%20(LLNL),%20Livermore,%20CA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2023-03-07&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=1559-128X&rft.eissn=2155-3165&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Costi%3E2203618%3C/osti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true