Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing
During subaperture tool grinding and polishing, overlaps of the tool influence function can result in undesirable mid-spatial frequency (MSF) errors in the form of surface ripples, which are often corrected using a smoothing polishing step. In this study, flat multi-layer smoothing polishing tools a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied optics (2004) 2023-03, Vol.62 (8) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Applied optics (2004) |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Suratwala, T. Tham, G. Steele, R. Wong, L. Menapace, J. Ray, N. Bauman, B. |
description | During subaperture tool grinding and polishing, overlaps of the tool
influence function can result in undesirable mid-spatial frequency
(MSF) errors in the form of surface ripples, which are often corrected
using a smoothing polishing step. In this study, flat multi-layer
smoothing polishing tools are designed and tested to simultaneously
(1) reduce or remove MSF errors, (2) minimize surface
figure degradation, and (3) maximize the material removal rate.
A time-dependent convergence model in which spatial material removal
varies with a workpiece-tool height mismatch, combined with a finite
element mechanical analysis to determine the interface contact
pressure distribution, was developed to evaluate various smoothing
tool designs as a function of tool material properties, thicknesses,
pad textures, and displacements. An improvement in smoothing tool
performance is achieved when the gap pressure constant,
h
¯ (which describes the inverse rate at
which the pressure drops with a workpiece-tool height mismatch), is
minimized for smaller spatial scale length surface features (namely,
MSF errors) and maximized for large spatial scale length features
(i.e., surface figure). Five specific smoothing tool designs
were experimentally evaluated. A two-layer smoothing tool using a
thin, grooved IC1000 polyurethane pad (with a high elastic modulus,
E
pad
=360MPa), thicker blue foam (with an
intermediate modulus,
E
foam
=5.3MPa) underlayer, and an optimized
displacement (
d
t
=1mm) provided the best overall
performance (namely, high MSF error convergence, minimal surface
figure degradation, and high material removal rate). |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>osti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_2203618</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2203618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_22036183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi8sOgjAUBRujifj4h8Y9CW0twtpo2OvCHamlQE3pJb3l_4XED3B1JpM5K5JwJmUqWC7XJJmxTBkvXluyQ_xkmZDn8pKQ6jEAxN76jkYARxuDtvNU-YaOJrQQBuW1oc0UlgSnt5p1nIKhnVOIdARncbkfyKZVDs3xt3tyut-e1yoFjLZGbaPRvQbvjY4155nIWSH-ir5cVz5T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing</title><source>Optica Publishing Group Journals</source><creator>Suratwala, T. ; Tham, G. ; Steele, R. ; Wong, L. ; Menapace, J. ; Ray, N. ; Bauman, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Suratwala, T. ; Tham, G. ; Steele, R. ; Wong, L. ; Menapace, J. ; Ray, N. ; Bauman, B. ; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>During subaperture tool grinding and polishing, overlaps of the tool
influence function can result in undesirable mid-spatial frequency
(MSF) errors in the form of surface ripples, which are often corrected
using a smoothing polishing step. In this study, flat multi-layer
smoothing polishing tools are designed and tested to simultaneously
(1) reduce or remove MSF errors, (2) minimize surface
figure degradation, and (3) maximize the material removal rate.
A time-dependent convergence model in which spatial material removal
varies with a workpiece-tool height mismatch, combined with a finite
element mechanical analysis to determine the interface contact
pressure distribution, was developed to evaluate various smoothing
tool designs as a function of tool material properties, thicknesses,
pad textures, and displacements. An improvement in smoothing tool
performance is achieved when the gap pressure constant,
h
¯ (which describes the inverse rate at
which the pressure drops with a workpiece-tool height mismatch), is
minimized for smaller spatial scale length surface features (namely,
MSF errors) and maximized for large spatial scale length features
(i.e., surface figure). Five specific smoothing tool designs
were experimentally evaluated. A two-layer smoothing tool using a
thin, grooved IC1000 polyurethane pad (with a high elastic modulus,
E
pad
=360MPa), thicker blue foam (with an
intermediate modulus,
E
foam
=5.3MPa) underlayer, and an optimized
displacement (
d
t
=1mm) provided the best overall
performance (namely, high MSF error convergence, minimal surface
figure degradation, and high material removal rate).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-128X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2155-3165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Optical Society of America</publisher><subject>Optics and optical instruments ; OTHER INSTRUMENTATION</subject><ispartof>Applied optics (2004), 2023-03, Vol.62 (8)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000000327244972 ; 0000000190861039</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/2203618$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suratwala, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menapace, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauman, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing</title><title>Applied optics (2004)</title><description>During subaperture tool grinding and polishing, overlaps of the tool
influence function can result in undesirable mid-spatial frequency
(MSF) errors in the form of surface ripples, which are often corrected
using a smoothing polishing step. In this study, flat multi-layer
smoothing polishing tools are designed and tested to simultaneously
(1) reduce or remove MSF errors, (2) minimize surface
figure degradation, and (3) maximize the material removal rate.
A time-dependent convergence model in which spatial material removal
varies with a workpiece-tool height mismatch, combined with a finite
element mechanical analysis to determine the interface contact
pressure distribution, was developed to evaluate various smoothing
tool designs as a function of tool material properties, thicknesses,
pad textures, and displacements. An improvement in smoothing tool
performance is achieved when the gap pressure constant,
h
¯ (which describes the inverse rate at
which the pressure drops with a workpiece-tool height mismatch), is
minimized for smaller spatial scale length surface features (namely,
MSF errors) and maximized for large spatial scale length features
(i.e., surface figure). Five specific smoothing tool designs
were experimentally evaluated. A two-layer smoothing tool using a
thin, grooved IC1000 polyurethane pad (with a high elastic modulus,
E
pad
=360MPa), thicker blue foam (with an
intermediate modulus,
E
foam
=5.3MPa) underlayer, and an optimized
displacement (
d
t
=1mm) provided the best overall
performance (namely, high MSF error convergence, minimal surface
figure degradation, and high material removal rate).</description><subject>Optics and optical instruments</subject><subject>OTHER INSTRUMENTATION</subject><issn>1559-128X</issn><issn>2155-3165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNi8sOgjAUBRujifj4h8Y9CW0twtpo2OvCHamlQE3pJb3l_4XED3B1JpM5K5JwJmUqWC7XJJmxTBkvXluyQ_xkmZDn8pKQ6jEAxN76jkYARxuDtvNU-YaOJrQQBuW1oc0UlgSnt5p1nIKhnVOIdARncbkfyKZVDs3xt3tyut-e1yoFjLZGbaPRvQbvjY4155nIWSH-ir5cVz5T</recordid><startdate>20230307</startdate><enddate>20230307</enddate><creator>Suratwala, T.</creator><creator>Tham, G.</creator><creator>Steele, R.</creator><creator>Wong, L.</creator><creator>Menapace, J.</creator><creator>Ray, N.</creator><creator>Bauman, B.</creator><general>Optical Society of America</general><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000327244972</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000190861039</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230307</creationdate><title>Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing</title><author>Suratwala, T. ; Tham, G. ; Steele, R. ; Wong, L. ; Menapace, J. ; Ray, N. ; Bauman, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_22036183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Optics and optical instruments</topic><topic>OTHER INSTRUMENTATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suratwala, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menapace, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauman, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Applied optics (2004)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suratwala, T.</au><au>Tham, G.</au><au>Steele, R.</au><au>Wong, L.</au><au>Menapace, J.</au><au>Ray, N.</au><au>Bauman, B.</au><aucorp>Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing</atitle><jtitle>Applied optics (2004)</jtitle><date>2023-03-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>1559-128X</issn><eissn>2155-3165</eissn><abstract>During subaperture tool grinding and polishing, overlaps of the tool
influence function can result in undesirable mid-spatial frequency
(MSF) errors in the form of surface ripples, which are often corrected
using a smoothing polishing step. In this study, flat multi-layer
smoothing polishing tools are designed and tested to simultaneously
(1) reduce or remove MSF errors, (2) minimize surface
figure degradation, and (3) maximize the material removal rate.
A time-dependent convergence model in which spatial material removal
varies with a workpiece-tool height mismatch, combined with a finite
element mechanical analysis to determine the interface contact
pressure distribution, was developed to evaluate various smoothing
tool designs as a function of tool material properties, thicknesses,
pad textures, and displacements. An improvement in smoothing tool
performance is achieved when the gap pressure constant,
h
¯ (which describes the inverse rate at
which the pressure drops with a workpiece-tool height mismatch), is
minimized for smaller spatial scale length surface features (namely,
MSF errors) and maximized for large spatial scale length features
(i.e., surface figure). Five specific smoothing tool designs
were experimentally evaluated. A two-layer smoothing tool using a
thin, grooved IC1000 polyurethane pad (with a high elastic modulus,
E
pad
=360MPa), thicker blue foam (with an
intermediate modulus,
E
foam
=5.3MPa) underlayer, and an optimized
displacement (
d
t
=1mm) provided the best overall
performance (namely, high MSF error convergence, minimal surface
figure degradation, and high material removal rate).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Optical Society of America</pub><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000327244972</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000190861039</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1559-128X |
ispartof | Applied optics (2004), 2023-03, Vol.62 (8) |
issn | 1559-128X 2155-3165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_2203618 |
source | Optica Publishing Group Journals |
subjects | Optics and optical instruments OTHER INSTRUMENTATION |
title | Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A18%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-osti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smoothing%20tool%20design%20and%20performance%20during%20subaperture%20glass%20polishing&rft.jtitle=Applied%20optics%20(2004)&rft.au=Suratwala,%20T.&rft.aucorp=Lawrence%20Livermore%20National%20Laboratory%20(LLNL),%20Livermore,%20CA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2023-03-07&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=1559-128X&rft.eissn=2155-3165&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Costi%3E2203618%3C/osti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |