Strategic environmental assessment implementation in China — Five-year review and prospects

Through literature review and questionnaire survey, the purpose of this study is to understand current status and major fields of SEA implementation in China, and then to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, according to objective evaluation of the effectiveness of SEA implementation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental impact assessment review 2011-01, Vol.31 (1), p.77-84
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Jing, Chang, I-Shin, Bina, Olivia, Lam, Kin-Che, Xu, He
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 84
container_issue 1
container_start_page 77
container_title Environmental impact assessment review
container_volume 31
creator Wu, Jing
Chang, I-Shin
Bina, Olivia
Lam, Kin-Che
Xu, He
description Through literature review and questionnaire survey, the purpose of this study is to understand current status and major fields of SEA implementation in China, and then to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, according to objective evaluation of the effectiveness of SEA implementation. Major types and fields of SEA implementation were firstly studied to conclude that the attitude of decision-makers and competent authority of SEA implementation does generate direct impacts on SEA implementation. Current status of SEA implementation were then studied, in terms of timing, techniques and methodologies, public participation, information disclosure, alternative, and review organization, to conclude that SEA implementation in China is “impact-based SEA” and the major problems of SEA implementation are resulted from deficient and defective management of SEA system, such as laws, regulations, and means of management. In order to have objective evaluation on the effectiveness of SEA implementation, to understand good practice of SEA implementation, and to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, it is necessary to establish reasonable and feasible evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation, based upon foreign experience and political, legislative, administrative and cultural characteristics of China. Various types and stages of SEA should be carefully considered to be included into the evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21499146</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195925510000715</els_id><sourcerecordid>1777156638</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-b0843995cddd2f3f3cacb4f33ea81f67ef297bff32f3e5d782245520871decc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKBDEQDKLguvoDngJevMyY1zwCXmTxBYIH9Sghm-loltnMmsSVvfkRfqFfYsb17Kno7qqmqhA6pqSkhNZnixKcDiUjeUFEmWEHTWjb8KIWnO2iCaGyKiSrqn10EOOCZJGU7QQ9P6SgE7w4g8GvXRj8EnzSPdYxQozjgN1y1cPvOrnBY-fx7NV5jb8_v_CVW0OxAR1wgLWDD6x9h1dhiCswKR6iPav7CEd_OEVPV5ePs5vi7v76dnZxVxhe01TMSSu4lJXpuo5ZbrnRZi4s56BbausGLJPN3Fqej1B1TcuYqCpG2oZ2YIzgU3Sy_TvE5FQ0LoF5NYP32YRiVEhJRZ1Zp1tW9vf2DjGppYsG-l57GN6jok3T0KqueZupbEs1OUoMYNUquKUOG0WJGhtXCzU2rsbGFREqQxadb0WQo-YywugEvIHOhdFIN7j_5D_sjovy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777156638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategic environmental assessment implementation in China — Five-year review and prospects</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wu, Jing ; Chang, I-Shin ; Bina, Olivia ; Lam, Kin-Che ; Xu, He</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jing ; Chang, I-Shin ; Bina, Olivia ; Lam, Kin-Che ; Xu, He</creatorcontrib><description>Through literature review and questionnaire survey, the purpose of this study is to understand current status and major fields of SEA implementation in China, and then to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, according to objective evaluation of the effectiveness of SEA implementation. Major types and fields of SEA implementation were firstly studied to conclude that the attitude of decision-makers and competent authority of SEA implementation does generate direct impacts on SEA implementation. Current status of SEA implementation were then studied, in terms of timing, techniques and methodologies, public participation, information disclosure, alternative, and review organization, to conclude that SEA implementation in China is “impact-based SEA” and the major problems of SEA implementation are resulted from deficient and defective management of SEA system, such as laws, regulations, and means of management. In order to have objective evaluation on the effectiveness of SEA implementation, to understand good practice of SEA implementation, and to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, it is necessary to establish reasonable and feasible evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation, based upon foreign experience and political, legislative, administrative and cultural characteristics of China. Various types and stages of SEA should be carefully considered to be included into the evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9255</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6432</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Alternating current ; ASIA ; ATTITUDES ; CHINA ; Control ; Criteria ; DOCUMENT TYPES ; Effectiveness ; ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental impact assessments ; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS ; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; EVALUATION ; Evaluation criteria ; GOVERNMENT POLICIES ; Impact-based SEA ; IMPLEMENTATION ; LAWS ; MANAGEMENT ; REGULATIONS ; RISK ASSESSMENT ; Strategic environmental assessment ; Time measurements</subject><ispartof>Environmental impact assessment review, 2011-01, Vol.31 (1), p.77-84</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-b0843995cddd2f3f3cacb4f33ea81f67ef297bff32f3e5d782245520871decc43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-b0843995cddd2f3f3cacb4f33ea81f67ef297bff32f3e5d782245520871decc43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925510000715$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/21499146$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, I-Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bina, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Kin-Che</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, He</creatorcontrib><title>Strategic environmental assessment implementation in China — Five-year review and prospects</title><title>Environmental impact assessment review</title><description>Through literature review and questionnaire survey, the purpose of this study is to understand current status and major fields of SEA implementation in China, and then to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, according to objective evaluation of the effectiveness of SEA implementation. Major types and fields of SEA implementation were firstly studied to conclude that the attitude of decision-makers and competent authority of SEA implementation does generate direct impacts on SEA implementation. Current status of SEA implementation were then studied, in terms of timing, techniques and methodologies, public participation, information disclosure, alternative, and review organization, to conclude that SEA implementation in China is “impact-based SEA” and the major problems of SEA implementation are resulted from deficient and defective management of SEA system, such as laws, regulations, and means of management. In order to have objective evaluation on the effectiveness of SEA implementation, to understand good practice of SEA implementation, and to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, it is necessary to establish reasonable and feasible evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation, based upon foreign experience and political, legislative, administrative and cultural characteristics of China. Various types and stages of SEA should be carefully considered to be included into the evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation.</description><subject>Alternating current</subject><subject>ASIA</subject><subject>ATTITUDES</subject><subject>CHINA</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>DOCUMENT TYPES</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental impact assessments</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>EVALUATION</subject><subject>Evaluation criteria</subject><subject>GOVERNMENT POLICIES</subject><subject>Impact-based SEA</subject><subject>IMPLEMENTATION</subject><subject>LAWS</subject><subject>MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>REGULATIONS</subject><subject>RISK ASSESSMENT</subject><subject>Strategic environmental assessment</subject><subject>Time measurements</subject><issn>0195-9255</issn><issn>1873-6432</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtKBDEQDKLguvoDngJevMyY1zwCXmTxBYIH9Sghm-loltnMmsSVvfkRfqFfYsb17Kno7qqmqhA6pqSkhNZnixKcDiUjeUFEmWEHTWjb8KIWnO2iCaGyKiSrqn10EOOCZJGU7QQ9P6SgE7w4g8GvXRj8EnzSPdYxQozjgN1y1cPvOrnBY-fx7NV5jb8_v_CVW0OxAR1wgLWDD6x9h1dhiCswKR6iPav7CEd_OEVPV5ePs5vi7v76dnZxVxhe01TMSSu4lJXpuo5ZbrnRZi4s56BbausGLJPN3Fqej1B1TcuYqCpG2oZ2YIzgU3Sy_TvE5FQ0LoF5NYP32YRiVEhJRZ1Zp1tW9vf2DjGppYsG-l57GN6jok3T0KqueZupbEs1OUoMYNUquKUOG0WJGhtXCzU2rsbGFREqQxadb0WQo-YywugEvIHOhdFIN7j_5D_sjovy</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Wu, Jing</creator><creator>Chang, I-Shin</creator><creator>Bina, Olivia</creator><creator>Lam, Kin-Che</creator><creator>Xu, He</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Strategic environmental assessment implementation in China — Five-year review and prospects</title><author>Wu, Jing ; Chang, I-Shin ; Bina, Olivia ; Lam, Kin-Che ; Xu, He</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-b0843995cddd2f3f3cacb4f33ea81f67ef297bff32f3e5d782245520871decc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Alternating current</topic><topic>ASIA</topic><topic>ATTITUDES</topic><topic>CHINA</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>DOCUMENT TYPES</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental impact assessments</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>EVALUATION</topic><topic>Evaluation criteria</topic><topic>GOVERNMENT POLICIES</topic><topic>Impact-based SEA</topic><topic>IMPLEMENTATION</topic><topic>LAWS</topic><topic>MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>REGULATIONS</topic><topic>RISK ASSESSMENT</topic><topic>Strategic environmental assessment</topic><topic>Time measurements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, I-Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bina, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Kin-Che</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, He</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Environmental impact assessment review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Jing</au><au>Chang, I-Shin</au><au>Bina, Olivia</au><au>Lam, Kin-Che</au><au>Xu, He</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategic environmental assessment implementation in China — Five-year review and prospects</atitle><jtitle>Environmental impact assessment review</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>77-84</pages><issn>0195-9255</issn><eissn>1873-6432</eissn><abstract>Through literature review and questionnaire survey, the purpose of this study is to understand current status and major fields of SEA implementation in China, and then to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, according to objective evaluation of the effectiveness of SEA implementation. Major types and fields of SEA implementation were firstly studied to conclude that the attitude of decision-makers and competent authority of SEA implementation does generate direct impacts on SEA implementation. Current status of SEA implementation were then studied, in terms of timing, techniques and methodologies, public participation, information disclosure, alternative, and review organization, to conclude that SEA implementation in China is “impact-based SEA” and the major problems of SEA implementation are resulted from deficient and defective management of SEA system, such as laws, regulations, and means of management. In order to have objective evaluation on the effectiveness of SEA implementation, to understand good practice of SEA implementation, and to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, it is necessary to establish reasonable and feasible evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation, based upon foreign experience and political, legislative, administrative and cultural characteristics of China. Various types and stages of SEA should be carefully considered to be included into the evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.010</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-9255
ispartof Environmental impact assessment review, 2011-01, Vol.31 (1), p.77-84
issn 0195-9255
1873-6432
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21499146
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Alternating current
ASIA
ATTITUDES
CHINA
Control
Criteria
DOCUMENT TYPES
Effectiveness
ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY
Environmental assessment
Environmental impact assessments
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
EVALUATION
Evaluation criteria
GOVERNMENT POLICIES
Impact-based SEA
IMPLEMENTATION
LAWS
MANAGEMENT
REGULATIONS
RISK ASSESSMENT
Strategic environmental assessment
Time measurements
title Strategic environmental assessment implementation in China — Five-year review and prospects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T05%3A32%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategic%20environmental%20assessment%20implementation%20in%20China%20%E2%80%94%20Five-year%20review%20and%20prospects&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20impact%20assessment%20review&rft.au=Wu,%20Jing&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=77-84&rft.issn=0195-9255&rft.eissn=1873-6432&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1777156638%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777156638&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0195925510000715&rfr_iscdi=true