Strategic environmental assessment implementation in China — Five-year review and prospects
Through literature review and questionnaire survey, the purpose of this study is to understand current status and major fields of SEA implementation in China, and then to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, according to objective evaluation of the effectiveness of SEA implementation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental impact assessment review 2011-01, Vol.31 (1), p.77-84 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 84 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 77 |
container_title | Environmental impact assessment review |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Wu, Jing Chang, I-Shin Bina, Olivia Lam, Kin-Che Xu, He |
description | Through literature review and questionnaire survey, the purpose of this study is to understand current status and major fields of SEA implementation in China, and then to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, according to objective evaluation of the effectiveness of SEA implementation. Major types and fields of SEA implementation were firstly studied to conclude that the attitude of decision-makers and competent authority of SEA implementation does generate direct impacts on SEA implementation. Current status of SEA implementation were then studied, in terms of timing, techniques and methodologies, public participation, information disclosure, alternative, and review organization, to conclude that SEA implementation in China is “impact-based SEA” and the major problems of SEA implementation are resulted from deficient and defective management of SEA system, such as laws, regulations, and means of management. In order to have objective evaluation on the effectiveness of SEA implementation, to understand good practice of SEA implementation, and to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, it is necessary to establish reasonable and feasible evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation, based upon foreign experience and political, legislative, administrative and cultural characteristics of China. Various types and stages of SEA should be carefully considered to be included into the evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21499146</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195925510000715</els_id><sourcerecordid>1777156638</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-b0843995cddd2f3f3cacb4f33ea81f67ef297bff32f3e5d782245520871decc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtKBDEQDKLguvoDngJevMyY1zwCXmTxBYIH9Sghm-loltnMmsSVvfkRfqFfYsb17Kno7qqmqhA6pqSkhNZnixKcDiUjeUFEmWEHTWjb8KIWnO2iCaGyKiSrqn10EOOCZJGU7QQ9P6SgE7w4g8GvXRj8EnzSPdYxQozjgN1y1cPvOrnBY-fx7NV5jb8_v_CVW0OxAR1wgLWDD6x9h1dhiCswKR6iPav7CEd_OEVPV5ePs5vi7v76dnZxVxhe01TMSSu4lJXpuo5ZbrnRZi4s56BbausGLJPN3Fqej1B1TcuYqCpG2oZ2YIzgU3Sy_TvE5FQ0LoF5NYP32YRiVEhJRZ1Zp1tW9vf2DjGppYsG-l57GN6jok3T0KqueZupbEs1OUoMYNUquKUOG0WJGhtXCzU2rsbGFREqQxadb0WQo-YywugEvIHOhdFIN7j_5D_sjovy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777156638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategic environmental assessment implementation in China — Five-year review and prospects</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wu, Jing ; Chang, I-Shin ; Bina, Olivia ; Lam, Kin-Che ; Xu, He</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jing ; Chang, I-Shin ; Bina, Olivia ; Lam, Kin-Che ; Xu, He</creatorcontrib><description>Through literature review and questionnaire survey, the purpose of this study is to understand current status and major fields of SEA implementation in China, and then to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, according to objective evaluation of the effectiveness of SEA implementation. Major types and fields of SEA implementation were firstly studied to conclude that the attitude of decision-makers and competent authority of SEA implementation does generate direct impacts on SEA implementation. Current status of SEA implementation were then studied, in terms of timing, techniques and methodologies, public participation, information disclosure, alternative, and review organization, to conclude that SEA implementation in China is “impact-based SEA” and the major problems of SEA implementation are resulted from deficient and defective management of SEA system, such as laws, regulations, and means of management. In order to have objective evaluation on the effectiveness of SEA implementation, to understand good practice of SEA implementation, and to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, it is necessary to establish reasonable and feasible evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation, based upon foreign experience and political, legislative, administrative and cultural characteristics of China. Various types and stages of SEA should be carefully considered to be included into the evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9255</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6432</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Alternating current ; ASIA ; ATTITUDES ; CHINA ; Control ; Criteria ; DOCUMENT TYPES ; Effectiveness ; ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental impact assessments ; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS ; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; EVALUATION ; Evaluation criteria ; GOVERNMENT POLICIES ; Impact-based SEA ; IMPLEMENTATION ; LAWS ; MANAGEMENT ; REGULATIONS ; RISK ASSESSMENT ; Strategic environmental assessment ; Time measurements</subject><ispartof>Environmental impact assessment review, 2011-01, Vol.31 (1), p.77-84</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-b0843995cddd2f3f3cacb4f33ea81f67ef297bff32f3e5d782245520871decc43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-b0843995cddd2f3f3cacb4f33ea81f67ef297bff32f3e5d782245520871decc43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925510000715$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/21499146$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, I-Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bina, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Kin-Che</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, He</creatorcontrib><title>Strategic environmental assessment implementation in China — Five-year review and prospects</title><title>Environmental impact assessment review</title><description>Through literature review and questionnaire survey, the purpose of this study is to understand current status and major fields of SEA implementation in China, and then to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, according to objective evaluation of the effectiveness of SEA implementation. Major types and fields of SEA implementation were firstly studied to conclude that the attitude of decision-makers and competent authority of SEA implementation does generate direct impacts on SEA implementation. Current status of SEA implementation were then studied, in terms of timing, techniques and methodologies, public participation, information disclosure, alternative, and review organization, to conclude that SEA implementation in China is “impact-based SEA” and the major problems of SEA implementation are resulted from deficient and defective management of SEA system, such as laws, regulations, and means of management. In order to have objective evaluation on the effectiveness of SEA implementation, to understand good practice of SEA implementation, and to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, it is necessary to establish reasonable and feasible evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation, based upon foreign experience and political, legislative, administrative and cultural characteristics of China. Various types and stages of SEA should be carefully considered to be included into the evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation.</description><subject>Alternating current</subject><subject>ASIA</subject><subject>ATTITUDES</subject><subject>CHINA</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>DOCUMENT TYPES</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental impact assessments</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>EVALUATION</subject><subject>Evaluation criteria</subject><subject>GOVERNMENT POLICIES</subject><subject>Impact-based SEA</subject><subject>IMPLEMENTATION</subject><subject>LAWS</subject><subject>MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>REGULATIONS</subject><subject>RISK ASSESSMENT</subject><subject>Strategic environmental assessment</subject><subject>Time measurements</subject><issn>0195-9255</issn><issn>1873-6432</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtKBDEQDKLguvoDngJevMyY1zwCXmTxBYIH9Sghm-loltnMmsSVvfkRfqFfYsb17Kno7qqmqhA6pqSkhNZnixKcDiUjeUFEmWEHTWjb8KIWnO2iCaGyKiSrqn10EOOCZJGU7QQ9P6SgE7w4g8GvXRj8EnzSPdYxQozjgN1y1cPvOrnBY-fx7NV5jb8_v_CVW0OxAR1wgLWDD6x9h1dhiCswKR6iPav7CEd_OEVPV5ePs5vi7v76dnZxVxhe01TMSSu4lJXpuo5ZbrnRZi4s56BbausGLJPN3Fqej1B1TcuYqCpG2oZ2YIzgU3Sy_TvE5FQ0LoF5NYP32YRiVEhJRZ1Zp1tW9vf2DjGppYsG-l57GN6jok3T0KqueZupbEs1OUoMYNUquKUOG0WJGhtXCzU2rsbGFREqQxadb0WQo-YywugEvIHOhdFIN7j_5D_sjovy</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Wu, Jing</creator><creator>Chang, I-Shin</creator><creator>Bina, Olivia</creator><creator>Lam, Kin-Che</creator><creator>Xu, He</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Strategic environmental assessment implementation in China — Five-year review and prospects</title><author>Wu, Jing ; Chang, I-Shin ; Bina, Olivia ; Lam, Kin-Che ; Xu, He</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-b0843995cddd2f3f3cacb4f33ea81f67ef297bff32f3e5d782245520871decc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Alternating current</topic><topic>ASIA</topic><topic>ATTITUDES</topic><topic>CHINA</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>DOCUMENT TYPES</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental impact assessments</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>EVALUATION</topic><topic>Evaluation criteria</topic><topic>GOVERNMENT POLICIES</topic><topic>Impact-based SEA</topic><topic>IMPLEMENTATION</topic><topic>LAWS</topic><topic>MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>REGULATIONS</topic><topic>RISK ASSESSMENT</topic><topic>Strategic environmental assessment</topic><topic>Time measurements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, I-Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bina, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Kin-Che</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, He</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Environmental impact assessment review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Jing</au><au>Chang, I-Shin</au><au>Bina, Olivia</au><au>Lam, Kin-Che</au><au>Xu, He</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategic environmental assessment implementation in China — Five-year review and prospects</atitle><jtitle>Environmental impact assessment review</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>84</epage><pages>77-84</pages><issn>0195-9255</issn><eissn>1873-6432</eissn><abstract>Through literature review and questionnaire survey, the purpose of this study is to understand current status and major fields of SEA implementation in China, and then to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, according to objective evaluation of the effectiveness of SEA implementation. Major types and fields of SEA implementation were firstly studied to conclude that the attitude of decision-makers and competent authority of SEA implementation does generate direct impacts on SEA implementation. Current status of SEA implementation were then studied, in terms of timing, techniques and methodologies, public participation, information disclosure, alternative, and review organization, to conclude that SEA implementation in China is “impact-based SEA” and the major problems of SEA implementation are resulted from deficient and defective management of SEA system, such as laws, regulations, and means of management. In order to have objective evaluation on the effectiveness of SEA implementation, to understand good practice of SEA implementation, and to provide advice for future improvement of SEA system, it is necessary to establish reasonable and feasible evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation, based upon foreign experience and political, legislative, administrative and cultural characteristics of China. Various types and stages of SEA should be carefully considered to be included into the evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of SEA implementation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.010</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-9255 |
ispartof | Environmental impact assessment review, 2011-01, Vol.31 (1), p.77-84 |
issn | 0195-9255 1873-6432 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21499146 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Alternating current ASIA ATTITUDES CHINA Control Criteria DOCUMENT TYPES Effectiveness ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY Environmental assessment Environmental impact assessments ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EVALUATION Evaluation criteria GOVERNMENT POLICIES Impact-based SEA IMPLEMENTATION LAWS MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS RISK ASSESSMENT Strategic environmental assessment Time measurements |
title | Strategic environmental assessment implementation in China — Five-year review and prospects |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T05%3A32%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategic%20environmental%20assessment%20implementation%20in%20China%20%E2%80%94%20Five-year%20review%20and%20prospects&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20impact%20assessment%20review&rft.au=Wu,%20Jing&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=84&rft.pages=77-84&rft.issn=0195-9255&rft.eissn=1873-6432&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1777156638%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777156638&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0195925510000715&rfr_iscdi=true |