Validation of a Score Predicting Post-Treatment Ambulatory Status After Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression
Purpose A score predicting post-radiotherapy (RT) ambulatory status was developed based on 2,096 retrospectively evaluated metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. This study aimed to validate the score in a prospective series. Methods and Materials The score included five factors associa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2011-04, Vol.79 (5), p.1503-1506 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1506 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1503 |
container_title | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Rades, Dirk, M.D Douglas, Sarah, M.D Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D Rudat, Volker, M.D Veninga, Theo, M.D Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D Basic, Hiba, M.D Karstens, Johann H., M.D Hoskin, Peter J., M.D Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D Schild, Steven E., M.D |
description | Purpose A score predicting post-radiotherapy (RT) ambulatory status was developed based on 2,096 retrospectively evaluated metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. This study aimed to validate the score in a prospective series. Methods and Materials The score included five factors associated with post-RT ambulatory status: tumor type, interval tumor diagnosis to MSCC, visceral metastases, pre-RT motor function, time developing motor deficits. Patients were divided into five groups: 21–28, 29–31, 32–34, 35–37, 38–44 points. In this study, 653 prospectively followed patients were divided into the same groups. Furthermore, the number of prognostic groups was reduced from five to three (21–28, 29–37, 38–44 points). Post-RT ambulatory rates from this series were compared with the retrospective series. Additionally, this series was compared with 104 patients receiving decompressive surgery plus RT (41 laminectomy, 63 laminectomy plus stabilization of vertebrae). Results In this study, post-RT ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 43.5% (29–31 points), 71.0% (32–34 points), 89.5% (35–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points). Ambulatory rates from the retrospective study were 6.2%, 43.5%, 70.0%, 86.1%, and 98.7%. After regrouping, ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 70.9% (29–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points) in this series, and 6.2%, 68.4%, and 98.7% in the retrospective series. Ambulatory rates were 0%, 62.5%, and 90.9% in the laminectomy plus RT group, and 14.3%, 83.9%, and 100% in the laminectomy + stabilization plus RT group. Conclusions Ambulatory rates in the different groups in this study were similar to those in the retrospective study demonstrating the validity of the score. Using only three groups is simplier for clinical routine. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.024 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21491699</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0360301610001239</els_id><sourcerecordid>857812715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-70afacaae556ff012fd17c79f82a214c16d3cb45f75ca0bf4ee5e11f1a1c31603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QCInrTMSdt-nEjDINfsOLirOJdOJOeuBnbpiapMPjnTZlRwQu9SSA8OSdvnpNlD4GvgEP1fL-ye-9200rwdMRhxUV5KzuHpm7zQsrPt7NzXlQ8LxJ8lt0LYc85B6jLu9mZ4BWXhYTz7Mcn7G2H0bqROcOQbbXzxK48dVZHO35hVy7E_NoTxoHGyNbDbu4xOn9g24hxDmxtInn2ATvr4g15nA7MOM_eUcSQCKvZdrIj9mzjfJeWYfIUQmp4P7tjsA_04LRfZB9fvbzevMkv379-u1lf5lrWRcxrjgY1IklZGcNBmA5qXbemESig1FB1hd6V0tRSI9-ZkkgSgAEEXUDFi4vs8bFuSmJV0DaSvtFuHElHlSq0ULVtop4eqcm7bzOFqAYbNPU9juTmoBpZNyBqkIl89k8SuBCygqopE1oeUe1dCJ6Mmrwd0B8SpBaNaq-OGtWiUXFQSWO69ujUYd4N1P2-9MtbAp6cAAwae-Nx1Db84UrghWyWUC-OHKX__W7JL_Fp1MmuX9J3zv7vJX8X0L0dber5lQ4U9m72SW3KrIJQXG2XkVsmDpZhE0Vb_ARoI9LU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1022561684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of a Score Predicting Post-Treatment Ambulatory Status After Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Rades, Dirk, M.D ; Douglas, Sarah, M.D ; Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D ; Rudat, Volker, M.D ; Veninga, Theo, M.D ; Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D ; Basic, Hiba, M.D ; Karstens, Johann H., M.D ; Hoskin, Peter J., M.D ; Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D ; Schild, Steven E., M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Rades, Dirk, M.D ; Douglas, Sarah, M.D ; Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D ; Rudat, Volker, M.D ; Veninga, Theo, M.D ; Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D ; Basic, Hiba, M.D ; Karstens, Johann H., M.D ; Hoskin, Peter J., M.D ; Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D ; Schild, Steven E., M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose A score predicting post-radiotherapy (RT) ambulatory status was developed based on 2,096 retrospectively evaluated metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. This study aimed to validate the score in a prospective series. Methods and Materials The score included five factors associated with post-RT ambulatory status: tumor type, interval tumor diagnosis to MSCC, visceral metastases, pre-RT motor function, time developing motor deficits. Patients were divided into five groups: 21–28, 29–31, 32–34, 35–37, 38–44 points. In this study, 653 prospectively followed patients were divided into the same groups. Furthermore, the number of prognostic groups was reduced from five to three (21–28, 29–37, 38–44 points). Post-RT ambulatory rates from this series were compared with the retrospective series. Additionally, this series was compared with 104 patients receiving decompressive surgery plus RT (41 laminectomy, 63 laminectomy plus stabilization of vertebrae). Results In this study, post-RT ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 43.5% (29–31 points), 71.0% (32–34 points), 89.5% (35–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points). Ambulatory rates from the retrospective study were 6.2%, 43.5%, 70.0%, 86.1%, and 98.7%. After regrouping, ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 70.9% (29–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points) in this series, and 6.2%, 68.4%, and 98.7% in the retrospective series. Ambulatory rates were 0%, 62.5%, and 90.9% in the laminectomy plus RT group, and 14.3%, 83.9%, and 100% in the laminectomy + stabilization plus RT group. Conclusions Ambulatory rates in the different groups in this study were similar to those in the retrospective study demonstrating the validity of the score. Using only three groups is simplier for clinical routine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20605351</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOBPD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ambulatory status ; Biological and medical sciences ; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM ; Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord ; COMPRESSION ; DISEASES ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Laminectomy - methods ; Medical sciences ; MEDICINE ; METASTASES ; Metastatic spinal cord compression ; NEOPLASMS ; NERVOUS SYSTEM ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; Prognosis ; Prognostic factors ; Prospective Studies ; RADIOLOGY ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; RADIOTHERAPY ; Retrospective Studies ; Scoring system ; Severity of Illness Index ; SPINAL CORD ; Spinal Cord Compression - pathology ; Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy ; Spinal Cord Compression - surgery ; Spinal Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Spinal Neoplasms - secondary ; Spinal Neoplasms - surgery ; Spine ; Surgery ; TESTING ; THERAPY ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; VALIDATION ; Vertebrae ; Walking - classification ; Walking - physiology</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2011-04, Vol.79 (5), p.1503-1506</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-70afacaae556ff012fd17c79f82a214c16d3cb45f75ca0bf4ee5e11f1a1c31603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-70afacaae556ff012fd17c79f82a214c16d3cb45f75ca0bf4ee5e11f1a1c31603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24103589$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20605351$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/21491699$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rades, Dirk, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Sarah, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudat, Volker, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veninga, Theo, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basic, Hiba, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karstens, Johann H., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskin, Peter J., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schild, Steven E., M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of a Score Predicting Post-Treatment Ambulatory Status After Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose A score predicting post-radiotherapy (RT) ambulatory status was developed based on 2,096 retrospectively evaluated metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. This study aimed to validate the score in a prospective series. Methods and Materials The score included five factors associated with post-RT ambulatory status: tumor type, interval tumor diagnosis to MSCC, visceral metastases, pre-RT motor function, time developing motor deficits. Patients were divided into five groups: 21–28, 29–31, 32–34, 35–37, 38–44 points. In this study, 653 prospectively followed patients were divided into the same groups. Furthermore, the number of prognostic groups was reduced from five to three (21–28, 29–37, 38–44 points). Post-RT ambulatory rates from this series were compared with the retrospective series. Additionally, this series was compared with 104 patients receiving decompressive surgery plus RT (41 laminectomy, 63 laminectomy plus stabilization of vertebrae). Results In this study, post-RT ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 43.5% (29–31 points), 71.0% (32–34 points), 89.5% (35–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points). Ambulatory rates from the retrospective study were 6.2%, 43.5%, 70.0%, 86.1%, and 98.7%. After regrouping, ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 70.9% (29–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points) in this series, and 6.2%, 68.4%, and 98.7% in the retrospective series. Ambulatory rates were 0%, 62.5%, and 90.9% in the laminectomy plus RT group, and 14.3%, 83.9%, and 100% in the laminectomy + stabilization plus RT group. Conclusions Ambulatory rates in the different groups in this study were similar to those in the retrospective study demonstrating the validity of the score. Using only three groups is simplier for clinical routine.</description><subject>Ambulatory status</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord</subject><subject>COMPRESSION</subject><subject>DISEASES</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laminectomy - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>MEDICINE</subject><subject>METASTASES</subject><subject>Metastatic spinal cord compression</subject><subject>NEOPLASMS</subject><subject>NERVOUS SYSTEM</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prognostic factors</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Scoring system</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>SPINAL CORD</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - pathology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>TESTING</subject><subject>THERAPY</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>VALIDATION</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><subject>Walking - classification</subject><subject>Walking - physiology</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QCInrTMSdt-nEjDINfsOLirOJdOJOeuBnbpiapMPjnTZlRwQu9SSA8OSdvnpNlD4GvgEP1fL-ye-9200rwdMRhxUV5KzuHpm7zQsrPt7NzXlQ8LxJ8lt0LYc85B6jLu9mZ4BWXhYTz7Mcn7G2H0bqROcOQbbXzxK48dVZHO35hVy7E_NoTxoHGyNbDbu4xOn9g24hxDmxtInn2ATvr4g15nA7MOM_eUcSQCKvZdrIj9mzjfJeWYfIUQmp4P7tjsA_04LRfZB9fvbzevMkv379-u1lf5lrWRcxrjgY1IklZGcNBmA5qXbemESig1FB1hd6V0tRSI9-ZkkgSgAEEXUDFi4vs8bFuSmJV0DaSvtFuHElHlSq0ULVtop4eqcm7bzOFqAYbNPU9juTmoBpZNyBqkIl89k8SuBCygqopE1oeUe1dCJ6Mmrwd0B8SpBaNaq-OGtWiUXFQSWO69ujUYd4N1P2-9MtbAp6cAAwae-Nx1Db84UrghWyWUC-OHKX__W7JL_Fp1MmuX9J3zv7vJX8X0L0dber5lQ4U9m72SW3KrIJQXG2XkVsmDpZhE0Vb_ARoI9LU</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Rades, Dirk, M.D</creator><creator>Douglas, Sarah, M.D</creator><creator>Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D</creator><creator>Rudat, Volker, M.D</creator><creator>Veninga, Theo, M.D</creator><creator>Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D</creator><creator>Basic, Hiba, M.D</creator><creator>Karstens, Johann H., M.D</creator><creator>Hoskin, Peter J., M.D</creator><creator>Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D</creator><creator>Schild, Steven E., M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Validation of a Score Predicting Post-Treatment Ambulatory Status After Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</title><author>Rades, Dirk, M.D ; Douglas, Sarah, M.D ; Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D ; Rudat, Volker, M.D ; Veninga, Theo, M.D ; Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D ; Basic, Hiba, M.D ; Karstens, Johann H., M.D ; Hoskin, Peter J., M.D ; Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D ; Schild, Steven E., M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-70afacaae556ff012fd17c79f82a214c16d3cb45f75ca0bf4ee5e11f1a1c31603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory status</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord</topic><topic>COMPRESSION</topic><topic>DISEASES</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laminectomy - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>MEDICINE</topic><topic>METASTASES</topic><topic>Metastatic spinal cord compression</topic><topic>NEOPLASMS</topic><topic>NERVOUS SYSTEM</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prognostic factors</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Scoring system</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>SPINAL CORD</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - pathology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>TESTING</topic><topic>THERAPY</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>VALIDATION</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><topic>Walking - classification</topic><topic>Walking - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rades, Dirk, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Sarah, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudat, Volker, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veninga, Theo, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basic, Hiba, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karstens, Johann H., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskin, Peter J., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schild, Steven E., M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rades, Dirk, M.D</au><au>Douglas, Sarah, M.D</au><au>Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D</au><au>Rudat, Volker, M.D</au><au>Veninga, Theo, M.D</au><au>Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D</au><au>Basic, Hiba, M.D</au><au>Karstens, Johann H., M.D</au><au>Hoskin, Peter J., M.D</au><au>Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D</au><au>Schild, Steven E., M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of a Score Predicting Post-Treatment Ambulatory Status After Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1503</spage><epage>1506</epage><pages>1503-1506</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><coden>IOBPD3</coden><abstract>Purpose A score predicting post-radiotherapy (RT) ambulatory status was developed based on 2,096 retrospectively evaluated metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. This study aimed to validate the score in a prospective series. Methods and Materials The score included five factors associated with post-RT ambulatory status: tumor type, interval tumor diagnosis to MSCC, visceral metastases, pre-RT motor function, time developing motor deficits. Patients were divided into five groups: 21–28, 29–31, 32–34, 35–37, 38–44 points. In this study, 653 prospectively followed patients were divided into the same groups. Furthermore, the number of prognostic groups was reduced from five to three (21–28, 29–37, 38–44 points). Post-RT ambulatory rates from this series were compared with the retrospective series. Additionally, this series was compared with 104 patients receiving decompressive surgery plus RT (41 laminectomy, 63 laminectomy plus stabilization of vertebrae). Results In this study, post-RT ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 43.5% (29–31 points), 71.0% (32–34 points), 89.5% (35–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points). Ambulatory rates from the retrospective study were 6.2%, 43.5%, 70.0%, 86.1%, and 98.7%. After regrouping, ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 70.9% (29–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points) in this series, and 6.2%, 68.4%, and 98.7% in the retrospective series. Ambulatory rates were 0%, 62.5%, and 90.9% in the laminectomy plus RT group, and 14.3%, 83.9%, and 100% in the laminectomy + stabilization plus RT group. Conclusions Ambulatory rates in the different groups in this study were similar to those in the retrospective study demonstrating the validity of the score. Using only three groups is simplier for clinical routine.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20605351</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.024</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-3016 |
ispartof | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2011-04, Vol.79 (5), p.1503-1506 |
issn | 0360-3016 1879-355X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21491699 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Ambulatory status Biological and medical sciences CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord COMPRESSION DISEASES Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Laminectomy - methods Medical sciences MEDICINE METASTASES Metastatic spinal cord compression NEOPLASMS NERVOUS SYSTEM Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) Neurology NUCLEAR MEDICINE Prognosis Prognostic factors Prospective Studies RADIOLOGY RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE RADIOTHERAPY Retrospective Studies Scoring system Severity of Illness Index SPINAL CORD Spinal Cord Compression - pathology Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy Spinal Cord Compression - surgery Spinal Neoplasms - radiotherapy Spinal Neoplasms - secondary Spinal Neoplasms - surgery Spine Surgery TESTING THERAPY Treatment Outcome Tumors VALIDATION Vertebrae Walking - classification Walking - physiology |
title | Validation of a Score Predicting Post-Treatment Ambulatory Status After Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T15%3A06%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20a%20Score%20Predicting%20Post-Treatment%20Ambulatory%20Status%20After%20Radiotherapy%20for%20Metastatic%20Spinal%20Cord%20Compression&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Rades,%20Dirk,%20M.D&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1503&rft.epage=1506&rft.pages=1503-1506&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft.coden=IOBPD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E857812715%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1022561684&rft_id=info:pmid/20605351&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0360301610001239&rfr_iscdi=true |