Validation of a Score Predicting Post-Treatment Ambulatory Status After Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression

Purpose A score predicting post-radiotherapy (RT) ambulatory status was developed based on 2,096 retrospectively evaluated metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. This study aimed to validate the score in a prospective series. Methods and Materials The score included five factors associa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2011-04, Vol.79 (5), p.1503-1506
Hauptverfasser: Rades, Dirk, M.D, Douglas, Sarah, M.D, Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D, Rudat, Volker, M.D, Veninga, Theo, M.D, Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D, Basic, Hiba, M.D, Karstens, Johann H., M.D, Hoskin, Peter J., M.D, Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D, Schild, Steven E., M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1506
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1503
container_title International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
container_volume 79
creator Rades, Dirk, M.D
Douglas, Sarah, M.D
Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D
Rudat, Volker, M.D
Veninga, Theo, M.D
Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D
Basic, Hiba, M.D
Karstens, Johann H., M.D
Hoskin, Peter J., M.D
Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D
Schild, Steven E., M.D
description Purpose A score predicting post-radiotherapy (RT) ambulatory status was developed based on 2,096 retrospectively evaluated metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. This study aimed to validate the score in a prospective series. Methods and Materials The score included five factors associated with post-RT ambulatory status: tumor type, interval tumor diagnosis to MSCC, visceral metastases, pre-RT motor function, time developing motor deficits. Patients were divided into five groups: 21–28, 29–31, 32–34, 35–37, 38–44 points. In this study, 653 prospectively followed patients were divided into the same groups. Furthermore, the number of prognostic groups was reduced from five to three (21–28, 29–37, 38–44 points). Post-RT ambulatory rates from this series were compared with the retrospective series. Additionally, this series was compared with 104 patients receiving decompressive surgery plus RT (41 laminectomy, 63 laminectomy plus stabilization of vertebrae). Results In this study, post-RT ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 43.5% (29–31 points), 71.0% (32–34 points), 89.5% (35–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points). Ambulatory rates from the retrospective study were 6.2%, 43.5%, 70.0%, 86.1%, and 98.7%. After regrouping, ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 70.9% (29–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points) in this series, and 6.2%, 68.4%, and 98.7% in the retrospective series. Ambulatory rates were 0%, 62.5%, and 90.9% in the laminectomy plus RT group, and 14.3%, 83.9%, and 100% in the laminectomy + stabilization plus RT group. Conclusions Ambulatory rates in the different groups in this study were similar to those in the retrospective study demonstrating the validity of the score. Using only three groups is simplier for clinical routine.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21491699</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0360301610001239</els_id><sourcerecordid>857812715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-70afacaae556ff012fd17c79f82a214c16d3cb45f75ca0bf4ee5e11f1a1c31603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QCInrTMSdt-nEjDINfsOLirOJdOJOeuBnbpiapMPjnTZlRwQu9SSA8OSdvnpNlD4GvgEP1fL-ye-9200rwdMRhxUV5KzuHpm7zQsrPt7NzXlQ8LxJ8lt0LYc85B6jLu9mZ4BWXhYTz7Mcn7G2H0bqROcOQbbXzxK48dVZHO35hVy7E_NoTxoHGyNbDbu4xOn9g24hxDmxtInn2ATvr4g15nA7MOM_eUcSQCKvZdrIj9mzjfJeWYfIUQmp4P7tjsA_04LRfZB9fvbzevMkv379-u1lf5lrWRcxrjgY1IklZGcNBmA5qXbemESig1FB1hd6V0tRSI9-ZkkgSgAEEXUDFi4vs8bFuSmJV0DaSvtFuHElHlSq0ULVtop4eqcm7bzOFqAYbNPU9juTmoBpZNyBqkIl89k8SuBCygqopE1oeUe1dCJ6Mmrwd0B8SpBaNaq-OGtWiUXFQSWO69ujUYd4N1P2-9MtbAp6cAAwae-Nx1Db84UrghWyWUC-OHKX__W7JL_Fp1MmuX9J3zv7vJX8X0L0dber5lQ4U9m72SW3KrIJQXG2XkVsmDpZhE0Vb_ARoI9LU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1022561684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of a Score Predicting Post-Treatment Ambulatory Status After Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Rades, Dirk, M.D ; Douglas, Sarah, M.D ; Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D ; Rudat, Volker, M.D ; Veninga, Theo, M.D ; Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D ; Basic, Hiba, M.D ; Karstens, Johann H., M.D ; Hoskin, Peter J., M.D ; Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D ; Schild, Steven E., M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Rades, Dirk, M.D ; Douglas, Sarah, M.D ; Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D ; Rudat, Volker, M.D ; Veninga, Theo, M.D ; Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D ; Basic, Hiba, M.D ; Karstens, Johann H., M.D ; Hoskin, Peter J., M.D ; Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D ; Schild, Steven E., M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose A score predicting post-radiotherapy (RT) ambulatory status was developed based on 2,096 retrospectively evaluated metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. This study aimed to validate the score in a prospective series. Methods and Materials The score included five factors associated with post-RT ambulatory status: tumor type, interval tumor diagnosis to MSCC, visceral metastases, pre-RT motor function, time developing motor deficits. Patients were divided into five groups: 21–28, 29–31, 32–34, 35–37, 38–44 points. In this study, 653 prospectively followed patients were divided into the same groups. Furthermore, the number of prognostic groups was reduced from five to three (21–28, 29–37, 38–44 points). Post-RT ambulatory rates from this series were compared with the retrospective series. Additionally, this series was compared with 104 patients receiving decompressive surgery plus RT (41 laminectomy, 63 laminectomy plus stabilization of vertebrae). Results In this study, post-RT ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 43.5% (29–31 points), 71.0% (32–34 points), 89.5% (35–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points). Ambulatory rates from the retrospective study were 6.2%, 43.5%, 70.0%, 86.1%, and 98.7%. After regrouping, ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 70.9% (29–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points) in this series, and 6.2%, 68.4%, and 98.7% in the retrospective series. Ambulatory rates were 0%, 62.5%, and 90.9% in the laminectomy plus RT group, and 14.3%, 83.9%, and 100% in the laminectomy + stabilization plus RT group. Conclusions Ambulatory rates in the different groups in this study were similar to those in the retrospective study demonstrating the validity of the score. Using only three groups is simplier for clinical routine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20605351</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOBPD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ambulatory status ; Biological and medical sciences ; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM ; Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord ; COMPRESSION ; DISEASES ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Laminectomy - methods ; Medical sciences ; MEDICINE ; METASTASES ; Metastatic spinal cord compression ; NEOPLASMS ; NERVOUS SYSTEM ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; Prognosis ; Prognostic factors ; Prospective Studies ; RADIOLOGY ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; RADIOTHERAPY ; Retrospective Studies ; Scoring system ; Severity of Illness Index ; SPINAL CORD ; Spinal Cord Compression - pathology ; Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy ; Spinal Cord Compression - surgery ; Spinal Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Spinal Neoplasms - secondary ; Spinal Neoplasms - surgery ; Spine ; Surgery ; TESTING ; THERAPY ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; VALIDATION ; Vertebrae ; Walking - classification ; Walking - physiology</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2011-04, Vol.79 (5), p.1503-1506</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-70afacaae556ff012fd17c79f82a214c16d3cb45f75ca0bf4ee5e11f1a1c31603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-70afacaae556ff012fd17c79f82a214c16d3cb45f75ca0bf4ee5e11f1a1c31603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24103589$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20605351$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/21491699$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rades, Dirk, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Sarah, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudat, Volker, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veninga, Theo, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basic, Hiba, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karstens, Johann H., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskin, Peter J., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schild, Steven E., M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of a Score Predicting Post-Treatment Ambulatory Status After Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose A score predicting post-radiotherapy (RT) ambulatory status was developed based on 2,096 retrospectively evaluated metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. This study aimed to validate the score in a prospective series. Methods and Materials The score included five factors associated with post-RT ambulatory status: tumor type, interval tumor diagnosis to MSCC, visceral metastases, pre-RT motor function, time developing motor deficits. Patients were divided into five groups: 21–28, 29–31, 32–34, 35–37, 38–44 points. In this study, 653 prospectively followed patients were divided into the same groups. Furthermore, the number of prognostic groups was reduced from five to three (21–28, 29–37, 38–44 points). Post-RT ambulatory rates from this series were compared with the retrospective series. Additionally, this series was compared with 104 patients receiving decompressive surgery plus RT (41 laminectomy, 63 laminectomy plus stabilization of vertebrae). Results In this study, post-RT ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 43.5% (29–31 points), 71.0% (32–34 points), 89.5% (35–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points). Ambulatory rates from the retrospective study were 6.2%, 43.5%, 70.0%, 86.1%, and 98.7%. After regrouping, ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 70.9% (29–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points) in this series, and 6.2%, 68.4%, and 98.7% in the retrospective series. Ambulatory rates were 0%, 62.5%, and 90.9% in the laminectomy plus RT group, and 14.3%, 83.9%, and 100% in the laminectomy + stabilization plus RT group. Conclusions Ambulatory rates in the different groups in this study were similar to those in the retrospective study demonstrating the validity of the score. Using only three groups is simplier for clinical routine.</description><subject>Ambulatory status</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord</subject><subject>COMPRESSION</subject><subject>DISEASES</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laminectomy - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>MEDICINE</subject><subject>METASTASES</subject><subject>Metastatic spinal cord compression</subject><subject>NEOPLASMS</subject><subject>NERVOUS SYSTEM</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prognostic factors</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Scoring system</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>SPINAL CORD</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - pathology</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>TESTING</subject><subject>THERAPY</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>VALIDATION</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><subject>Walking - classification</subject><subject>Walking - physiology</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QCInrTMSdt-nEjDINfsOLirOJdOJOeuBnbpiapMPjnTZlRwQu9SSA8OSdvnpNlD4GvgEP1fL-ye-9200rwdMRhxUV5KzuHpm7zQsrPt7NzXlQ8LxJ8lt0LYc85B6jLu9mZ4BWXhYTz7Mcn7G2H0bqROcOQbbXzxK48dVZHO35hVy7E_NoTxoHGyNbDbu4xOn9g24hxDmxtInn2ATvr4g15nA7MOM_eUcSQCKvZdrIj9mzjfJeWYfIUQmp4P7tjsA_04LRfZB9fvbzevMkv379-u1lf5lrWRcxrjgY1IklZGcNBmA5qXbemESig1FB1hd6V0tRSI9-ZkkgSgAEEXUDFi4vs8bFuSmJV0DaSvtFuHElHlSq0ULVtop4eqcm7bzOFqAYbNPU9juTmoBpZNyBqkIl89k8SuBCygqopE1oeUe1dCJ6Mmrwd0B8SpBaNaq-OGtWiUXFQSWO69ujUYd4N1P2-9MtbAp6cAAwae-Nx1Db84UrghWyWUC-OHKX__W7JL_Fp1MmuX9J3zv7vJX8X0L0dber5lQ4U9m72SW3KrIJQXG2XkVsmDpZhE0Vb_ARoI9LU</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Rades, Dirk, M.D</creator><creator>Douglas, Sarah, M.D</creator><creator>Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D</creator><creator>Rudat, Volker, M.D</creator><creator>Veninga, Theo, M.D</creator><creator>Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D</creator><creator>Basic, Hiba, M.D</creator><creator>Karstens, Johann H., M.D</creator><creator>Hoskin, Peter J., M.D</creator><creator>Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D</creator><creator>Schild, Steven E., M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Validation of a Score Predicting Post-Treatment Ambulatory Status After Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</title><author>Rades, Dirk, M.D ; Douglas, Sarah, M.D ; Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D ; Rudat, Volker, M.D ; Veninga, Theo, M.D ; Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D ; Basic, Hiba, M.D ; Karstens, Johann H., M.D ; Hoskin, Peter J., M.D ; Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D ; Schild, Steven E., M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-70afacaae556ff012fd17c79f82a214c16d3cb45f75ca0bf4ee5e11f1a1c31603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory status</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord</topic><topic>COMPRESSION</topic><topic>DISEASES</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laminectomy - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>MEDICINE</topic><topic>METASTASES</topic><topic>Metastatic spinal cord compression</topic><topic>NEOPLASMS</topic><topic>NERVOUS SYSTEM</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prognostic factors</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Scoring system</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>SPINAL CORD</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - pathology</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>TESTING</topic><topic>THERAPY</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>VALIDATION</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><topic>Walking - classification</topic><topic>Walking - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rades, Dirk, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Sarah, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudat, Volker, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veninga, Theo, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basic, Hiba, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karstens, Johann H., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskin, Peter J., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schild, Steven E., M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rades, Dirk, M.D</au><au>Douglas, Sarah, M.D</au><au>Huttenlocher, Stefan, M.D</au><au>Rudat, Volker, M.D</au><au>Veninga, Theo, M.D</au><au>Stalpers, Lukas J.A., M.D</au><au>Basic, Hiba, M.D</au><au>Karstens, Johann H., M.D</au><au>Hoskin, Peter J., M.D</au><au>Adamietz, Irenaeus A., M.D</au><au>Schild, Steven E., M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of a Score Predicting Post-Treatment Ambulatory Status After Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1503</spage><epage>1506</epage><pages>1503-1506</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><coden>IOBPD3</coden><abstract>Purpose A score predicting post-radiotherapy (RT) ambulatory status was developed based on 2,096 retrospectively evaluated metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. This study aimed to validate the score in a prospective series. Methods and Materials The score included five factors associated with post-RT ambulatory status: tumor type, interval tumor diagnosis to MSCC, visceral metastases, pre-RT motor function, time developing motor deficits. Patients were divided into five groups: 21–28, 29–31, 32–34, 35–37, 38–44 points. In this study, 653 prospectively followed patients were divided into the same groups. Furthermore, the number of prognostic groups was reduced from five to three (21–28, 29–37, 38–44 points). Post-RT ambulatory rates from this series were compared with the retrospective series. Additionally, this series was compared with 104 patients receiving decompressive surgery plus RT (41 laminectomy, 63 laminectomy plus stabilization of vertebrae). Results In this study, post-RT ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 43.5% (29–31 points), 71.0% (32–34 points), 89.5% (35–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points). Ambulatory rates from the retrospective study were 6.2%, 43.5%, 70.0%, 86.1%, and 98.7%. After regrouping, ambulatory rates were 10.6% (21–28 points), 70.9% (29–37 points), and 98.5% (38–44 points) in this series, and 6.2%, 68.4%, and 98.7% in the retrospective series. Ambulatory rates were 0%, 62.5%, and 90.9% in the laminectomy plus RT group, and 14.3%, 83.9%, and 100% in the laminectomy + stabilization plus RT group. Conclusions Ambulatory rates in the different groups in this study were similar to those in the retrospective study demonstrating the validity of the score. Using only three groups is simplier for clinical routine.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20605351</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.024</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-3016
ispartof International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2011-04, Vol.79 (5), p.1503-1506
issn 0360-3016
1879-355X
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21491699
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Ambulatory status
Biological and medical sciences
CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
Cerebrospinal fluid. Meninges. Spinal cord
COMPRESSION
DISEASES
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Laminectomy - methods
Medical sciences
MEDICINE
METASTASES
Metastatic spinal cord compression
NEOPLASMS
NERVOUS SYSTEM
Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)
Neurology
NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Prognosis
Prognostic factors
Prospective Studies
RADIOLOGY
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
RADIOTHERAPY
Retrospective Studies
Scoring system
Severity of Illness Index
SPINAL CORD
Spinal Cord Compression - pathology
Spinal Cord Compression - radiotherapy
Spinal Cord Compression - surgery
Spinal Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Spinal Neoplasms - secondary
Spinal Neoplasms - surgery
Spine
Surgery
TESTING
THERAPY
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
VALIDATION
Vertebrae
Walking - classification
Walking - physiology
title Validation of a Score Predicting Post-Treatment Ambulatory Status After Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T15%3A06%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20a%20Score%20Predicting%20Post-Treatment%20Ambulatory%20Status%20After%20Radiotherapy%20for%20Metastatic%20Spinal%20Cord%20Compression&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Rades,%20Dirk,%20M.D&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1503&rft.epage=1506&rft.pages=1503-1506&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft.coden=IOBPD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E857812715%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1022561684&rft_id=info:pmid/20605351&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0360301610001239&rfr_iscdi=true