Review of recycling performance indicators: A study on collection rate in Taiwan

The Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (Taiwan EPA) launched a national Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system after integrating eight private recycling organizations in 1998. After that, the environmental performance of the EPR system brought a lot of attention to policy makers....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste management (Elmsford) 2009-08, Vol.29 (8), p.2248-2256
Hauptverfasser: Wen, Lihchyi, Lin, Chun-hsu, Lee, Soo-cheol
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2256
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2248
container_title Waste management (Elmsford)
container_volume 29
creator Wen, Lihchyi
Lin, Chun-hsu
Lee, Soo-cheol
description The Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (Taiwan EPA) launched a national Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system after integrating eight private recycling organizations in 1998. After that, the environmental performance of the EPR system brought a lot of attention to policy makers. Many studies show positive environmental effects of the EPR system in Taiwan. However, there are controversial questions remained, such as whether the performance indicators used are the right choice to estimate the environmental effects of the recycling policy? Can those estimated results really reflect the performance of the system? This paper would therefore like to more accurately evaluate the performance indicators of the EPR system based on data observed over the past decade in Taiwan. In the process of evaluating the performance indicators, we have found that the collection rates for durable goods are often ignored in countries that pursue a zero waste policy. This may affect the actual recycling outcome and resource direction targeted by producers. However, in order for the collection rate to be adopted as a policy indicator, how to estimate the amounts of retired or waste products during a period is critical. In this paper, we estimate the collection rate for electrical and electronic waste by using the survival analysis and ownership data analysis approaches. We also provide a comparison of both approaches and put forward suggestions for directions in the future in solid waste management.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21269349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956053X09001044</els_id><sourcerecordid>34808884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-8e3a81eed4a3f325d78a271032fa4194cb5320ab186126f20ab98db7cca25bca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk2LFDEQhoMo7uzqPxBpEBcvPVblo5N4EJbFL1hQZAVvIZ1Oa4aezmzS4zD_3jQ96G33lDo89aaopwh5gbBGwObtZn2weWvHNQXQa2BroPQRWaGSuqZcNI_JCrRoahDs5xk5z3kDgFwhPCVnqJlWDPWKfPvu_wR_qGJfJe-Obgjjr2rnUx9TyXa-CmMXnJ1iyu-qqypP--5YxbFycRi8m0Ipk51mrLq14WDHZ-RJb4fsn5_eC_Lj44fb68_1zddPX66vbmonOJ9q5ZlV6H3HLesZFZ1UlkoERnvLUXPXCkbBtqgapE0_l1p1rXTOUtE6yy7IqyU35imY7MLk3W8Xx7FMZWjp0YzrQl0u1C7Fu73Pk9mG7Pww2NHHfTaMK1BK8QdBCpI3wGQB39wLopQSkXEhH8xEDiiFhgLyBXQp5px8b3YpbG06GgQzyzYbs8g2s2wDzBTZpe3lKX_fbn33v-lktwCvT4DNzg59KkZD_sdRbISkzfz_-4XzRVg5hzTv0xf7XUjzOrsY7p_kLwCWyCE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14017590</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of recycling performance indicators: A study on collection rate in Taiwan</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Wen, Lihchyi ; Lin, Chun-hsu ; Lee, Soo-cheol</creator><creatorcontrib>Wen, Lihchyi ; Lin, Chun-hsu ; Lee, Soo-cheol</creatorcontrib><description>The Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (Taiwan EPA) launched a national Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system after integrating eight private recycling organizations in 1998. After that, the environmental performance of the EPR system brought a lot of attention to policy makers. Many studies show positive environmental effects of the EPR system in Taiwan. However, there are controversial questions remained, such as whether the performance indicators used are the right choice to estimate the environmental effects of the recycling policy? Can those estimated results really reflect the performance of the system? This paper would therefore like to more accurately evaluate the performance indicators of the EPR system based on data observed over the past decade in Taiwan. In the process of evaluating the performance indicators, we have found that the collection rates for durable goods are often ignored in countries that pursue a zero waste policy. This may affect the actual recycling outcome and resource direction targeted by producers. However, in order for the collection rate to be adopted as a policy indicator, how to estimate the amounts of retired or waste products during a period is critical. In this paper, we estimate the collection rate for electrical and electronic waste by using the survival analysis and ownership data analysis approaches. We also provide a comparison of both approaches and put forward suggestions for directions in the future in solid waste management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-053X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19398319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aluminum - economics ; Applied sciences ; Automobiles - economics ; Collection ; Conservation of Natural Resources - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Conservation of Natural Resources - trends ; DATA ANALYSIS ; Electrical Equipment and Supplies - economics ; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ; Estimates ; Exact sciences and technology ; General treatment and storage processes ; Glass ; Global environmental pollution ; INDICATORS ; Industrial Waste - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Iron - economics ; Lubricants - economics ; MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES ; Other wastes and particular components of wastes ; Performance evaluation ; Pesticides - economics ; Policies ; Pollution ; Product Packaging - economics ; RECYCLING ; SOLID WASTES ; Survival ; TAIWAN ; Waste Management - methods ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Waste management (Elmsford), 2009-08, Vol.29 (8), p.2248-2256</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-8e3a81eed4a3f325d78a271032fa4194cb5320ab186126f20ab98db7cca25bca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-8e3a81eed4a3f325d78a271032fa4194cb5320ab186126f20ab98db7cca25bca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21657260$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19398319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/21269349$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wen, Lihchyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chun-hsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Soo-cheol</creatorcontrib><title>Review of recycling performance indicators: A study on collection rate in Taiwan</title><title>Waste management (Elmsford)</title><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><description>The Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (Taiwan EPA) launched a national Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system after integrating eight private recycling organizations in 1998. After that, the environmental performance of the EPR system brought a lot of attention to policy makers. Many studies show positive environmental effects of the EPR system in Taiwan. However, there are controversial questions remained, such as whether the performance indicators used are the right choice to estimate the environmental effects of the recycling policy? Can those estimated results really reflect the performance of the system? This paper would therefore like to more accurately evaluate the performance indicators of the EPR system based on data observed over the past decade in Taiwan. In the process of evaluating the performance indicators, we have found that the collection rates for durable goods are often ignored in countries that pursue a zero waste policy. This may affect the actual recycling outcome and resource direction targeted by producers. However, in order for the collection rate to be adopted as a policy indicator, how to estimate the amounts of retired or waste products during a period is critical. In this paper, we estimate the collection rate for electrical and electronic waste by using the survival analysis and ownership data analysis approaches. We also provide a comparison of both approaches and put forward suggestions for directions in the future in solid waste management.</description><subject>Aluminum - economics</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Automobiles - economics</subject><subject>Collection</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - trends</subject><subject>DATA ANALYSIS</subject><subject>Electrical Equipment and Supplies - economics</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General treatment and storage processes</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Global environmental pollution</subject><subject>INDICATORS</subject><subject>Industrial Waste - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Iron - economics</subject><subject>Lubricants - economics</subject><subject>MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES</subject><subject>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Pesticides - economics</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Product Packaging - economics</subject><subject>RECYCLING</subject><subject>SOLID WASTES</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>TAIWAN</subject><subject>Waste Management - methods</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0956-053X</issn><issn>1879-2456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk2LFDEQhoMo7uzqPxBpEBcvPVblo5N4EJbFL1hQZAVvIZ1Oa4aezmzS4zD_3jQ96G33lDo89aaopwh5gbBGwObtZn2weWvHNQXQa2BroPQRWaGSuqZcNI_JCrRoahDs5xk5z3kDgFwhPCVnqJlWDPWKfPvu_wR_qGJfJe-Obgjjr2rnUx9TyXa-CmMXnJ1iyu-qqypP--5YxbFycRi8m0Ipk51mrLq14WDHZ-RJb4fsn5_eC_Lj44fb68_1zddPX66vbmonOJ9q5ZlV6H3HLesZFZ1UlkoERnvLUXPXCkbBtqgapE0_l1p1rXTOUtE6yy7IqyU35imY7MLk3W8Xx7FMZWjp0YzrQl0u1C7Fu73Pk9mG7Pww2NHHfTaMK1BK8QdBCpI3wGQB39wLopQSkXEhH8xEDiiFhgLyBXQp5px8b3YpbG06GgQzyzYbs8g2s2wDzBTZpe3lKX_fbn33v-lktwCvT4DNzg59KkZD_sdRbISkzfz_-4XzRVg5hzTv0xf7XUjzOrsY7p_kLwCWyCE</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>Wen, Lihchyi</creator><creator>Lin, Chun-hsu</creator><creator>Lee, Soo-cheol</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Review of recycling performance indicators: A study on collection rate in Taiwan</title><author>Wen, Lihchyi ; Lin, Chun-hsu ; Lee, Soo-cheol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-8e3a81eed4a3f325d78a271032fa4194cb5320ab186126f20ab98db7cca25bca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aluminum - economics</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Automobiles - economics</topic><topic>Collection</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - trends</topic><topic>DATA ANALYSIS</topic><topic>Electrical Equipment and Supplies - economics</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General treatment and storage processes</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Global environmental pollution</topic><topic>INDICATORS</topic><topic>Industrial Waste - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Iron - economics</topic><topic>Lubricants - economics</topic><topic>MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES</topic><topic>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Pesticides - economics</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Product Packaging - economics</topic><topic>RECYCLING</topic><topic>SOLID WASTES</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>TAIWAN</topic><topic>Waste Management - methods</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wen, Lihchyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chun-hsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Soo-cheol</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wen, Lihchyi</au><au>Lin, Chun-hsu</au><au>Lee, Soo-cheol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of recycling performance indicators: A study on collection rate in Taiwan</atitle><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2248</spage><epage>2256</epage><pages>2248-2256</pages><issn>0956-053X</issn><eissn>1879-2456</eissn><abstract>The Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (Taiwan EPA) launched a national Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system after integrating eight private recycling organizations in 1998. After that, the environmental performance of the EPR system brought a lot of attention to policy makers. Many studies show positive environmental effects of the EPR system in Taiwan. However, there are controversial questions remained, such as whether the performance indicators used are the right choice to estimate the environmental effects of the recycling policy? Can those estimated results really reflect the performance of the system? This paper would therefore like to more accurately evaluate the performance indicators of the EPR system based on data observed over the past decade in Taiwan. In the process of evaluating the performance indicators, we have found that the collection rates for durable goods are often ignored in countries that pursue a zero waste policy. This may affect the actual recycling outcome and resource direction targeted by producers. However, in order for the collection rate to be adopted as a policy indicator, how to estimate the amounts of retired or waste products during a period is critical. In this paper, we estimate the collection rate for electrical and electronic waste by using the survival analysis and ownership data analysis approaches. We also provide a comparison of both approaches and put forward suggestions for directions in the future in solid waste management.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19398319</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.022</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-053X
ispartof Waste management (Elmsford), 2009-08, Vol.29 (8), p.2248-2256
issn 0956-053X
1879-2456
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21269349
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aluminum - economics
Applied sciences
Automobiles - economics
Collection
Conservation of Natural Resources - statistics & numerical data
Conservation of Natural Resources - trends
DATA ANALYSIS
Electrical Equipment and Supplies - economics
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Estimates
Exact sciences and technology
General treatment and storage processes
Glass
Global environmental pollution
INDICATORS
Industrial Waste - statistics & numerical data
Iron - economics
Lubricants - economics
MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES
Other wastes and particular components of wastes
Performance evaluation
Pesticides - economics
Policies
Pollution
Product Packaging - economics
RECYCLING
SOLID WASTES
Survival
TAIWAN
Waste Management - methods
Wastes
title Review of recycling performance indicators: A study on collection rate in Taiwan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A34%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20recycling%20performance%20indicators:%20A%20study%20on%20collection%20rate%20in%20Taiwan&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20(Elmsford)&rft.au=Wen,%20Lihchyi&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2248&rft.epage=2256&rft.pages=2248-2256&rft.issn=0956-053X&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E34808884%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14017590&rft_id=info:pmid/19398319&rft_els_id=S0956053X09001044&rfr_iscdi=true