Review of recycling performance indicators: A study on collection rate in Taiwan
The Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (Taiwan EPA) launched a national Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system after integrating eight private recycling organizations in 1998. After that, the environmental performance of the EPR system brought a lot of attention to policy makers....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Waste management (Elmsford) 2009-08, Vol.29 (8), p.2248-2256 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2256 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2248 |
container_title | Waste management (Elmsford) |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Wen, Lihchyi Lin, Chun-hsu Lee, Soo-cheol |
description | The Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (Taiwan EPA) launched a national Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system after integrating eight private recycling organizations in 1998. After that, the environmental performance of the EPR system brought a lot of attention to policy makers. Many studies show positive environmental effects of the EPR system in Taiwan. However, there are controversial questions remained, such as whether the performance indicators used are the right choice to estimate the environmental effects of the recycling policy? Can those estimated results really reflect the performance of the system?
This paper would therefore like to more accurately evaluate the performance indicators of the EPR system based on data observed over the past decade in Taiwan. In the process of evaluating the performance indicators, we have found that the collection rates for durable goods are often ignored in countries that pursue a zero waste policy. This may affect the actual recycling outcome and resource direction targeted by producers. However, in order for the collection rate to be adopted as a policy indicator, how to estimate the amounts of retired or waste products during a period is critical. In this paper, we estimate the collection rate for electrical and electronic waste by using the survival analysis and ownership data analysis approaches. We also provide a comparison of both approaches and put forward suggestions for directions in the future in solid waste management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21269349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956053X09001044</els_id><sourcerecordid>34808884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-8e3a81eed4a3f325d78a271032fa4194cb5320ab186126f20ab98db7cca25bca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk2LFDEQhoMo7uzqPxBpEBcvPVblo5N4EJbFL1hQZAVvIZ1Oa4aezmzS4zD_3jQ96G33lDo89aaopwh5gbBGwObtZn2weWvHNQXQa2BroPQRWaGSuqZcNI_JCrRoahDs5xk5z3kDgFwhPCVnqJlWDPWKfPvu_wR_qGJfJe-Obgjjr2rnUx9TyXa-CmMXnJ1iyu-qqypP--5YxbFycRi8m0Ipk51mrLq14WDHZ-RJb4fsn5_eC_Lj44fb68_1zddPX66vbmonOJ9q5ZlV6H3HLesZFZ1UlkoERnvLUXPXCkbBtqgapE0_l1p1rXTOUtE6yy7IqyU35imY7MLk3W8Xx7FMZWjp0YzrQl0u1C7Fu73Pk9mG7Pww2NHHfTaMK1BK8QdBCpI3wGQB39wLopQSkXEhH8xEDiiFhgLyBXQp5px8b3YpbG06GgQzyzYbs8g2s2wDzBTZpe3lKX_fbn33v-lktwCvT4DNzg59KkZD_sdRbISkzfz_-4XzRVg5hzTv0xf7XUjzOrsY7p_kLwCWyCE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14017590</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of recycling performance indicators: A study on collection rate in Taiwan</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Wen, Lihchyi ; Lin, Chun-hsu ; Lee, Soo-cheol</creator><creatorcontrib>Wen, Lihchyi ; Lin, Chun-hsu ; Lee, Soo-cheol</creatorcontrib><description>The Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (Taiwan EPA) launched a national Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system after integrating eight private recycling organizations in 1998. After that, the environmental performance of the EPR system brought a lot of attention to policy makers. Many studies show positive environmental effects of the EPR system in Taiwan. However, there are controversial questions remained, such as whether the performance indicators used are the right choice to estimate the environmental effects of the recycling policy? Can those estimated results really reflect the performance of the system?
This paper would therefore like to more accurately evaluate the performance indicators of the EPR system based on data observed over the past decade in Taiwan. In the process of evaluating the performance indicators, we have found that the collection rates for durable goods are often ignored in countries that pursue a zero waste policy. This may affect the actual recycling outcome and resource direction targeted by producers. However, in order for the collection rate to be adopted as a policy indicator, how to estimate the amounts of retired or waste products during a period is critical. In this paper, we estimate the collection rate for electrical and electronic waste by using the survival analysis and ownership data analysis approaches. We also provide a comparison of both approaches and put forward suggestions for directions in the future in solid waste management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-053X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19398319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aluminum - economics ; Applied sciences ; Automobiles - economics ; Collection ; Conservation of Natural Resources - statistics & numerical data ; Conservation of Natural Resources - trends ; DATA ANALYSIS ; Electrical Equipment and Supplies - economics ; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ; Estimates ; Exact sciences and technology ; General treatment and storage processes ; Glass ; Global environmental pollution ; INDICATORS ; Industrial Waste - statistics & numerical data ; Iron - economics ; Lubricants - economics ; MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES ; Other wastes and particular components of wastes ; Performance evaluation ; Pesticides - economics ; Policies ; Pollution ; Product Packaging - economics ; RECYCLING ; SOLID WASTES ; Survival ; TAIWAN ; Waste Management - methods ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Waste management (Elmsford), 2009-08, Vol.29 (8), p.2248-2256</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-8e3a81eed4a3f325d78a271032fa4194cb5320ab186126f20ab98db7cca25bca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-8e3a81eed4a3f325d78a271032fa4194cb5320ab186126f20ab98db7cca25bca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21657260$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19398319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/21269349$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wen, Lihchyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chun-hsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Soo-cheol</creatorcontrib><title>Review of recycling performance indicators: A study on collection rate in Taiwan</title><title>Waste management (Elmsford)</title><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><description>The Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (Taiwan EPA) launched a national Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system after integrating eight private recycling organizations in 1998. After that, the environmental performance of the EPR system brought a lot of attention to policy makers. Many studies show positive environmental effects of the EPR system in Taiwan. However, there are controversial questions remained, such as whether the performance indicators used are the right choice to estimate the environmental effects of the recycling policy? Can those estimated results really reflect the performance of the system?
This paper would therefore like to more accurately evaluate the performance indicators of the EPR system based on data observed over the past decade in Taiwan. In the process of evaluating the performance indicators, we have found that the collection rates for durable goods are often ignored in countries that pursue a zero waste policy. This may affect the actual recycling outcome and resource direction targeted by producers. However, in order for the collection rate to be adopted as a policy indicator, how to estimate the amounts of retired or waste products during a period is critical. In this paper, we estimate the collection rate for electrical and electronic waste by using the survival analysis and ownership data analysis approaches. We also provide a comparison of both approaches and put forward suggestions for directions in the future in solid waste management.</description><subject>Aluminum - economics</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Automobiles - economics</subject><subject>Collection</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - trends</subject><subject>DATA ANALYSIS</subject><subject>Electrical Equipment and Supplies - economics</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General treatment and storage processes</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Global environmental pollution</subject><subject>INDICATORS</subject><subject>Industrial Waste - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Iron - economics</subject><subject>Lubricants - economics</subject><subject>MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES</subject><subject>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Pesticides - economics</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Product Packaging - economics</subject><subject>RECYCLING</subject><subject>SOLID WASTES</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>TAIWAN</subject><subject>Waste Management - methods</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0956-053X</issn><issn>1879-2456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk2LFDEQhoMo7uzqPxBpEBcvPVblo5N4EJbFL1hQZAVvIZ1Oa4aezmzS4zD_3jQ96G33lDo89aaopwh5gbBGwObtZn2weWvHNQXQa2BroPQRWaGSuqZcNI_JCrRoahDs5xk5z3kDgFwhPCVnqJlWDPWKfPvu_wR_qGJfJe-Obgjjr2rnUx9TyXa-CmMXnJ1iyu-qqypP--5YxbFycRi8m0Ipk51mrLq14WDHZ-RJb4fsn5_eC_Lj44fb68_1zddPX66vbmonOJ9q5ZlV6H3HLesZFZ1UlkoERnvLUXPXCkbBtqgapE0_l1p1rXTOUtE6yy7IqyU35imY7MLk3W8Xx7FMZWjp0YzrQl0u1C7Fu73Pk9mG7Pww2NHHfTaMK1BK8QdBCpI3wGQB39wLopQSkXEhH8xEDiiFhgLyBXQp5px8b3YpbG06GgQzyzYbs8g2s2wDzBTZpe3lKX_fbn33v-lktwCvT4DNzg59KkZD_sdRbISkzfz_-4XzRVg5hzTv0xf7XUjzOrsY7p_kLwCWyCE</recordid><startdate>20090801</startdate><enddate>20090801</enddate><creator>Wen, Lihchyi</creator><creator>Lin, Chun-hsu</creator><creator>Lee, Soo-cheol</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090801</creationdate><title>Review of recycling performance indicators: A study on collection rate in Taiwan</title><author>Wen, Lihchyi ; Lin, Chun-hsu ; Lee, Soo-cheol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-8e3a81eed4a3f325d78a271032fa4194cb5320ab186126f20ab98db7cca25bca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aluminum - economics</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Automobiles - economics</topic><topic>Collection</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - trends</topic><topic>DATA ANALYSIS</topic><topic>Electrical Equipment and Supplies - economics</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General treatment and storage processes</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Global environmental pollution</topic><topic>INDICATORS</topic><topic>Industrial Waste - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Iron - economics</topic><topic>Lubricants - economics</topic><topic>MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES</topic><topic>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Pesticides - economics</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Product Packaging - economics</topic><topic>RECYCLING</topic><topic>SOLID WASTES</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>TAIWAN</topic><topic>Waste Management - methods</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wen, Lihchyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chun-hsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Soo-cheol</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wen, Lihchyi</au><au>Lin, Chun-hsu</au><au>Lee, Soo-cheol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of recycling performance indicators: A study on collection rate in Taiwan</atitle><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><date>2009-08-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2248</spage><epage>2256</epage><pages>2248-2256</pages><issn>0956-053X</issn><eissn>1879-2456</eissn><abstract>The Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (Taiwan EPA) launched a national Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system after integrating eight private recycling organizations in 1998. After that, the environmental performance of the EPR system brought a lot of attention to policy makers. Many studies show positive environmental effects of the EPR system in Taiwan. However, there are controversial questions remained, such as whether the performance indicators used are the right choice to estimate the environmental effects of the recycling policy? Can those estimated results really reflect the performance of the system?
This paper would therefore like to more accurately evaluate the performance indicators of the EPR system based on data observed over the past decade in Taiwan. In the process of evaluating the performance indicators, we have found that the collection rates for durable goods are often ignored in countries that pursue a zero waste policy. This may affect the actual recycling outcome and resource direction targeted by producers. However, in order for the collection rate to be adopted as a policy indicator, how to estimate the amounts of retired or waste products during a period is critical. In this paper, we estimate the collection rate for electrical and electronic waste by using the survival analysis and ownership data analysis approaches. We also provide a comparison of both approaches and put forward suggestions for directions in the future in solid waste management.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19398319</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.022</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-053X |
ispartof | Waste management (Elmsford), 2009-08, Vol.29 (8), p.2248-2256 |
issn | 0956-053X 1879-2456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21269349 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Aluminum - economics Applied sciences Automobiles - economics Collection Conservation of Natural Resources - statistics & numerical data Conservation of Natural Resources - trends DATA ANALYSIS Electrical Equipment and Supplies - economics ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Estimates Exact sciences and technology General treatment and storage processes Glass Global environmental pollution INDICATORS Industrial Waste - statistics & numerical data Iron - economics Lubricants - economics MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES Other wastes and particular components of wastes Performance evaluation Pesticides - economics Policies Pollution Product Packaging - economics RECYCLING SOLID WASTES Survival TAIWAN Waste Management - methods Wastes |
title | Review of recycling performance indicators: A study on collection rate in Taiwan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A34%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20recycling%20performance%20indicators:%20A%20study%20on%20collection%20rate%20in%20Taiwan&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20(Elmsford)&rft.au=Wen,%20Lihchyi&rft.date=2009-08-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2248&rft.epage=2256&rft.pages=2248-2256&rft.issn=0956-053X&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E34808884%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14017590&rft_id=info:pmid/19398319&rft_els_id=S0956053X09001044&rfr_iscdi=true |