Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey
Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was used to determine the optimum municipal solid waste (MSW) management strategy for Eskisehir city. Eskisehir is one of the developing cities of Turkey where a total of approximately 750 tons/day of waste is generated. An effective MSW management system is n...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Waste management (Elmsford) 2009-01, Vol.29 (1), p.54-62 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 62 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 54 |
| container_title | Waste management (Elmsford) |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Banar, Mufide Cokaygil, Zerrin Ozkan, Aysun |
| description | Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was used to determine the optimum municipal solid waste (MSW) management strategy for Eskisehir city. Eskisehir is one of the developing cities of Turkey where a total of approximately 750
tons/day of waste is generated. An effective MSW management system is needed in this city since the generated MSW is dumped in an unregulated dumping site that has no liner, no biogas capture, etc. Therefore, five different scenarios were developed as alternatives to the current waste management system. Collection and transportation of waste, a material recovery facility (MRF), recycling, composting, incineration and landfilling processes were considered in these scenarios. SimaPro7 libraries were used to obtain background data for the life cycle inventory. One ton of municipal solid waste of Eskisehir was selected as the functional unit. The alternative scenarios were compared through the CML 2000 method and these comparisons were carried out from the abiotic depletion, global warming, human toxicity, acidification, eutrophication and photochemical ozone depletion points of view. According to the comparisons and sensitivity analysis, composting scenario, S3, is the more environmentally preferable alternative.
In this study waste management alternatives were investigated only on an environmental point of view. For that reason, it might be supported with other decision-making tools that consider the economic and social effects of solid waste management. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.006 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21215952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956053X0800007X</els_id><sourcerecordid>14020934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-2de20fcccca04168c23f228dc5c6eedfc9709c4a6f676c8b1e34b214d2c4fe6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-P0zAQxS0EYsvCN0AoEoITCR7HdpILElotf6QiLovEzXInY9bdNCmeFNRvj6tUcGPn4sP85j3rPSGeg6xAgn27rX573vmxUlI2FahKSvtArKBtulJpYx-KleyMLaWpv1-IJ8xbKUG3IB-LC2hVK5saVuLLOgYq8IgDFZ6ZmHc0zsUUCp6G2BfZY6Yi2_gftGz2c5xGLsKUimu-i0y3Mb0pbg7pjo5PxaPgB6Zn5_dSfPtwfXP1qVx__fj56v26RAMwl6onJQPm8VKDbVHVQam2R4OWqA_YNbJD7W2wjcV2A1TrjQLdK9SB7Ka-FC8X3Ynn6BjjTHiL0zgSzk6BAtMZlanXC7VP088D8ex2kZGGwY80HdjV2shWQnMvmBM20Ci4FwQtlexqnUG9gJgm5kTB7VPc-XR0IN2pPrd1S30n8caBcrm-fPbirH_Y7Kj_d3TuKwOvzoBn9ENIfsTIf7lsDq02debeLRzlFn5FSqeQaETqYzpl1E_x_z_5A1V-uho</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14020934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Banar, Mufide ; Cokaygil, Zerrin ; Ozkan, Aysun</creator><creatorcontrib>Banar, Mufide ; Cokaygil, Zerrin ; Ozkan, Aysun</creatorcontrib><description>Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was used to determine the optimum municipal solid waste (MSW) management strategy for Eskisehir city. Eskisehir is one of the developing cities of Turkey where a total of approximately 750
tons/day of waste is generated. An effective MSW management system is needed in this city since the generated MSW is dumped in an unregulated dumping site that has no liner, no biogas capture, etc. Therefore, five different scenarios were developed as alternatives to the current waste management system. Collection and transportation of waste, a material recovery facility (MRF), recycling, composting, incineration and landfilling processes were considered in these scenarios. SimaPro7 libraries were used to obtain background data for the life cycle inventory. One ton of municipal solid waste of Eskisehir was selected as the functional unit. The alternative scenarios were compared through the CML 2000 method and these comparisons were carried out from the abiotic depletion, global warming, human toxicity, acidification, eutrophication and photochemical ozone depletion points of view. According to the comparisons and sensitivity analysis, composting scenario, S3, is the more environmentally preferable alternative.
In this study waste management alternatives were investigated only on an environmental point of view. For that reason, it might be supported with other decision-making tools that consider the economic and social effects of solid waste management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-053X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18280731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Cities ; COMPOSTING ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental Pollution - prevention & control ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; EUTROPHICATION ; Exact sciences and technology ; General treatment and storage processes ; GREENHOUSE EFFECT ; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT ; MATERIALS RECOVERY ; Other wastes and particular components of wastes ; PHOTOCHEMISTRY ; Pollution ; RECYCLING ; Refuse Disposal - economics ; Refuse Disposal - methods ; SOLID WASTES ; TOXICITY ; Turkey ; Urban and domestic wastes ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Waste management (Elmsford), 2009-01, Vol.29 (1), p.54-62</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-2de20fcccca04168c23f228dc5c6eedfc9709c4a6f676c8b1e34b214d2c4fe6b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-2de20fcccca04168c23f228dc5c6eedfc9709c4a6f676c8b1e34b214d2c4fe6b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20918453$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18280731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/21215952$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Banar, Mufide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cokaygil, Zerrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozkan, Aysun</creatorcontrib><title>Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey</title><title>Waste management (Elmsford)</title><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><description>Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was used to determine the optimum municipal solid waste (MSW) management strategy for Eskisehir city. Eskisehir is one of the developing cities of Turkey where a total of approximately 750
tons/day of waste is generated. An effective MSW management system is needed in this city since the generated MSW is dumped in an unregulated dumping site that has no liner, no biogas capture, etc. Therefore, five different scenarios were developed as alternatives to the current waste management system. Collection and transportation of waste, a material recovery facility (MRF), recycling, composting, incineration and landfilling processes were considered in these scenarios. SimaPro7 libraries were used to obtain background data for the life cycle inventory. One ton of municipal solid waste of Eskisehir was selected as the functional unit. The alternative scenarios were compared through the CML 2000 method and these comparisons were carried out from the abiotic depletion, global warming, human toxicity, acidification, eutrophication and photochemical ozone depletion points of view. According to the comparisons and sensitivity analysis, composting scenario, S3, is the more environmentally preferable alternative.
In this study waste management alternatives were investigated only on an environmental point of view. For that reason, it might be supported with other decision-making tools that consider the economic and social effects of solid waste management.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>COMPOSTING</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental Pollution - prevention & control</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>EUTROPHICATION</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General treatment and storage processes</subject><subject>GREENHOUSE EFFECT</subject><subject>LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT</subject><subject>MATERIALS RECOVERY</subject><subject>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</subject><subject>PHOTOCHEMISTRY</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>RECYCLING</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal - economics</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal - methods</subject><subject>SOLID WASTES</subject><subject>TOXICITY</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Urban and domestic wastes</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0956-053X</issn><issn>1879-2456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-P0zAQxS0EYsvCN0AoEoITCR7HdpILElotf6QiLovEzXInY9bdNCmeFNRvj6tUcGPn4sP85j3rPSGeg6xAgn27rX573vmxUlI2FahKSvtArKBtulJpYx-KleyMLaWpv1-IJ8xbKUG3IB-LC2hVK5saVuLLOgYq8IgDFZ6ZmHc0zsUUCp6G2BfZY6Yi2_gftGz2c5xGLsKUimu-i0y3Mb0pbg7pjo5PxaPgB6Zn5_dSfPtwfXP1qVx__fj56v26RAMwl6onJQPm8VKDbVHVQam2R4OWqA_YNbJD7W2wjcV2A1TrjQLdK9SB7Ka-FC8X3Ynn6BjjTHiL0zgSzk6BAtMZlanXC7VP088D8ex2kZGGwY80HdjV2shWQnMvmBM20Ci4FwQtlexqnUG9gJgm5kTB7VPc-XR0IN2pPrd1S30n8caBcrm-fPbirH_Y7Kj_d3TuKwOvzoBn9ENIfsTIf7lsDq02debeLRzlFn5FSqeQaETqYzpl1E_x_z_5A1V-uho</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Banar, Mufide</creator><creator>Cokaygil, Zerrin</creator><creator>Ozkan, Aysun</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey</title><author>Banar, Mufide ; Cokaygil, Zerrin ; Ozkan, Aysun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-2de20fcccca04168c23f228dc5c6eedfc9709c4a6f676c8b1e34b214d2c4fe6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>COMPOSTING</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental Pollution - prevention & control</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>EUTROPHICATION</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General treatment and storage processes</topic><topic>GREENHOUSE EFFECT</topic><topic>LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT</topic><topic>MATERIALS RECOVERY</topic><topic>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</topic><topic>PHOTOCHEMISTRY</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>RECYCLING</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal - economics</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal - methods</topic><topic>SOLID WASTES</topic><topic>TOXICITY</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Urban and domestic wastes</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Banar, Mufide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cokaygil, Zerrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozkan, Aysun</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Banar, Mufide</au><au>Cokaygil, Zerrin</au><au>Ozkan, Aysun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey</atitle><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>54</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>54-62</pages><issn>0956-053X</issn><eissn>1879-2456</eissn><abstract>Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was used to determine the optimum municipal solid waste (MSW) management strategy for Eskisehir city. Eskisehir is one of the developing cities of Turkey where a total of approximately 750
tons/day of waste is generated. An effective MSW management system is needed in this city since the generated MSW is dumped in an unregulated dumping site that has no liner, no biogas capture, etc. Therefore, five different scenarios were developed as alternatives to the current waste management system. Collection and transportation of waste, a material recovery facility (MRF), recycling, composting, incineration and landfilling processes were considered in these scenarios. SimaPro7 libraries were used to obtain background data for the life cycle inventory. One ton of municipal solid waste of Eskisehir was selected as the functional unit. The alternative scenarios were compared through the CML 2000 method and these comparisons were carried out from the abiotic depletion, global warming, human toxicity, acidification, eutrophication and photochemical ozone depletion points of view. According to the comparisons and sensitivity analysis, composting scenario, S3, is the more environmentally preferable alternative.
In this study waste management alternatives were investigated only on an environmental point of view. For that reason, it might be supported with other decision-making tools that consider the economic and social effects of solid waste management.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>18280731</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.006</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0956-053X |
| ispartof | Waste management (Elmsford), 2009-01, Vol.29 (1), p.54-62 |
| issn | 0956-053X 1879-2456 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21215952 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Applied sciences Cities COMPOSTING Conservation of Natural Resources ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Environmental Monitoring - methods Environmental Pollution - prevention & control ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUTROPHICATION Exact sciences and technology General treatment and storage processes GREENHOUSE EFFECT LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT MATERIALS RECOVERY Other wastes and particular components of wastes PHOTOCHEMISTRY Pollution RECYCLING Refuse Disposal - economics Refuse Disposal - methods SOLID WASTES TOXICITY Turkey Urban and domestic wastes Wastes |
| title | Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T01%3A30%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Life%20cycle%20assessment%20of%20solid%20waste%20management%20options%20for%20Eskisehir,%20Turkey&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20(Elmsford)&rft.au=Banar,%20Mufide&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=54&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=54-62&rft.issn=0956-053X&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E14020934%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14020934&rft_id=info:pmid/18280731&rft_els_id=S0956053X0800007X&rfr_iscdi=true |