Anatomic-Based Three-Dimensional Planning Precludes Use of Catheter-Delivered Contrast for Treatment of Prostate Cancer
Purpose Retrograde urethrography is a standard method to identify the prostatic apex during planning for prostate cancer radiotherapy. This is an invasive and uncomfortable procedure. With modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning, we explored whether retrograde urethrography was still n...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2008-05, Vol.71 (1), p.51-57 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 57 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 51 |
container_title | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Boersma, Melisa, M.D Swanson, Gregory, M.D Baacke, Diana, C.M.D Eng, Tony, M.D |
description | Purpose Retrograde urethrography is a standard method to identify the prostatic apex during planning for prostate cancer radiotherapy. This is an invasive and uncomfortable procedure. With modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning, we explored whether retrograde urethrography was still necessary to accurately identify the prostatic apex. Methods and Materials Fifteen patients underwent computed tomography simulation with and without bladder, urethral, and rectal contrast. The prostatic base and apex were identified on both scans, using contrast and anatomy, respectively. The anatomic location of the prostatic apex as defined by these methods was confirmed in another 57 patients with postbrachytherapy imaging. Results The prostatic base and apex were within a mean of 3.8 mm between the two scans. In every case, the beak of the retrograde urethrogram abutted the line drawn parallel to, and bisecting, the pubic bone on the lateral films. With these anatomic relationships defined, in the postbrachytherapy patients, the distance from the prostatic apex to the point at which the urethra traversed the pelvic floor was an average of 11.7 mm. On lateral films, we found that the urethra exited the pelvis an average of 16.6 mm below the posterior-most fusion of the pubic symphysis. On axial images, this occurred at a mean separation of the ischia of about 25 mm. Conclusion With a knowledge of the anatomic relationships and modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning equipment, the prostatic apex can be easily and consistently identified, obviating the need to subject patients to retrograde urethrography. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.041 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21124181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0360301607042514</els_id><sourcerecordid>70501374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-abfbfa74c49ef21079f35ef09e1c5159592e37d00206251b84914177e046a7803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFklGL1DAUhYso7rj6D0QKgm-t97Zp074I66y7CgsOOAu-hTS9dVI7yZikK_vvTemA4ItPefnOuTfn3CR5jZAjYP1-zPXobHfKCwCeQ5sDwyfJBhveZmVVfX-abKCsISsjfJG88H4EAETOnicX2GDNmqrYJL-vjAz2qFX2UXrq0_3BEWXX-kjGa2vklO4maYw2P9KdIzXNPfn03lNqh3Qrw4ECueyaJv1ALsq31gQnfUgH69K9IxmiUVjgnbM-yEBRZRS5l8mzQU6eXp3fy-T-5tN--zm7-3r7ZXt1lynGypDJbugGyZliLQ0FAm-HsqIBWkJVYdVWbUEl7wEKqIsKu4a1yJBzAlZL3kB5mbxdfeN0LbzSgdRBWWNIBVEgFixmEal3K3Vy9tdMPoij9oqm-HWysxccKsCSswiyFVTxO97RIE5OH6V7FAhiqUWMYq1FLLUIaEWsJcrenP3n7kj9X9G5hwh8WAGKWTxocsuqFIPqtVs27a3-34R_DdSkjVZy-kmP5Ec7u1imFyh8IUB8W05juQzgwGJwrPwDWoS0jg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70501374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anatomic-Based Three-Dimensional Planning Precludes Use of Catheter-Delivered Contrast for Treatment of Prostate Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Boersma, Melisa, M.D ; Swanson, Gregory, M.D ; Baacke, Diana, C.M.D ; Eng, Tony, M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Melisa, M.D ; Swanson, Gregory, M.D ; Baacke, Diana, C.M.D ; Eng, Tony, M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Retrograde urethrography is a standard method to identify the prostatic apex during planning for prostate cancer radiotherapy. This is an invasive and uncomfortable procedure. With modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning, we explored whether retrograde urethrography was still necessary to accurately identify the prostatic apex. Methods and Materials Fifteen patients underwent computed tomography simulation with and without bladder, urethral, and rectal contrast. The prostatic base and apex were identified on both scans, using contrast and anatomy, respectively. The anatomic location of the prostatic apex as defined by these methods was confirmed in another 57 patients with postbrachytherapy imaging. Results The prostatic base and apex were within a mean of 3.8 mm between the two scans. In every case, the beak of the retrograde urethrogram abutted the line drawn parallel to, and bisecting, the pubic bone on the lateral films. With these anatomic relationships defined, in the postbrachytherapy patients, the distance from the prostatic apex to the point at which the urethra traversed the pelvic floor was an average of 11.7 mm. On lateral films, we found that the urethra exited the pelvis an average of 16.6 mm below the posterior-most fusion of the pubic symphysis. On axial images, this occurred at a mean separation of the ischia of about 25 mm. Conclusion With a knowledge of the anatomic relationships and modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning equipment, the prostatic apex can be easily and consistently identified, obviating the need to subject patients to retrograde urethrography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18164852</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; ANATOMY ; BLADDER ; CARCINOMAS ; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY ; Contrast Media - administration & dosage ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; PATIENTS ; PLANNING ; PROSTATE ; Prostate - diagnostic imaging ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiology ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; RADIOTHERAPY ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; RECTUM ; Retrograde urethrography ; SKELETON ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment planning ; Urethra - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2008-05, Vol.71 (1), p.51-57</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-abfbfa74c49ef21079f35ef09e1c5159592e37d00206251b84914177e046a7803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-abfbfa74c49ef21079f35ef09e1c5159592e37d00206251b84914177e046a7803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18164852$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/21124181$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Melisa, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Gregory, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baacke, Diana, C.M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eng, Tony, M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Anatomic-Based Three-Dimensional Planning Precludes Use of Catheter-Delivered Contrast for Treatment of Prostate Cancer</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose Retrograde urethrography is a standard method to identify the prostatic apex during planning for prostate cancer radiotherapy. This is an invasive and uncomfortable procedure. With modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning, we explored whether retrograde urethrography was still necessary to accurately identify the prostatic apex. Methods and Materials Fifteen patients underwent computed tomography simulation with and without bladder, urethral, and rectal contrast. The prostatic base and apex were identified on both scans, using contrast and anatomy, respectively. The anatomic location of the prostatic apex as defined by these methods was confirmed in another 57 patients with postbrachytherapy imaging. Results The prostatic base and apex were within a mean of 3.8 mm between the two scans. In every case, the beak of the retrograde urethrogram abutted the line drawn parallel to, and bisecting, the pubic bone on the lateral films. With these anatomic relationships defined, in the postbrachytherapy patients, the distance from the prostatic apex to the point at which the urethra traversed the pelvic floor was an average of 11.7 mm. On lateral films, we found that the urethra exited the pelvis an average of 16.6 mm below the posterior-most fusion of the pubic symphysis. On axial images, this occurred at a mean separation of the ischia of about 25 mm. Conclusion With a knowledge of the anatomic relationships and modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning equipment, the prostatic apex can be easily and consistently identified, obviating the need to subject patients to retrograde urethrography.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>ANATOMY</subject><subject>BLADDER</subject><subject>CARCINOMAS</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Contrast Media - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>PLANNING</subject><subject>PROSTATE</subject><subject>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>RECTUM</subject><subject>Retrograde urethrography</subject><subject>SKELETON</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment planning</subject><subject>Urethra - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFklGL1DAUhYso7rj6D0QKgm-t97Zp074I66y7CgsOOAu-hTS9dVI7yZikK_vvTemA4ItPefnOuTfn3CR5jZAjYP1-zPXobHfKCwCeQ5sDwyfJBhveZmVVfX-abKCsISsjfJG88H4EAETOnicX2GDNmqrYJL-vjAz2qFX2UXrq0_3BEWXX-kjGa2vklO4maYw2P9KdIzXNPfn03lNqh3Qrw4ECueyaJv1ALsq31gQnfUgH69K9IxmiUVjgnbM-yEBRZRS5l8mzQU6eXp3fy-T-5tN--zm7-3r7ZXt1lynGypDJbugGyZliLQ0FAm-HsqIBWkJVYdVWbUEl7wEKqIsKu4a1yJBzAlZL3kB5mbxdfeN0LbzSgdRBWWNIBVEgFixmEal3K3Vy9tdMPoij9oqm-HWysxccKsCSswiyFVTxO97RIE5OH6V7FAhiqUWMYq1FLLUIaEWsJcrenP3n7kj9X9G5hwh8WAGKWTxocsuqFIPqtVs27a3-34R_DdSkjVZy-kmP5Ec7u1imFyh8IUB8W05juQzgwGJwrPwDWoS0jg</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><creator>Boersma, Melisa, M.D</creator><creator>Swanson, Gregory, M.D</creator><creator>Baacke, Diana, C.M.D</creator><creator>Eng, Tony, M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Anatomic-Based Three-Dimensional Planning Precludes Use of Catheter-Delivered Contrast for Treatment of Prostate Cancer</title><author>Boersma, Melisa, M.D ; Swanson, Gregory, M.D ; Baacke, Diana, C.M.D ; Eng, Tony, M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-abfbfa74c49ef21079f35ef09e1c5159592e37d00206251b84914177e046a7803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>ANATOMY</topic><topic>BLADDER</topic><topic>CARCINOMAS</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Contrast Media - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>PLANNING</topic><topic>PROSTATE</topic><topic>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>RECTUM</topic><topic>Retrograde urethrography</topic><topic>SKELETON</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment planning</topic><topic>Urethra - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Melisa, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Gregory, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baacke, Diana, C.M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eng, Tony, M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boersma, Melisa, M.D</au><au>Swanson, Gregory, M.D</au><au>Baacke, Diana, C.M.D</au><au>Eng, Tony, M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anatomic-Based Three-Dimensional Planning Precludes Use of Catheter-Delivered Contrast for Treatment of Prostate Cancer</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>51-57</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><abstract>Purpose Retrograde urethrography is a standard method to identify the prostatic apex during planning for prostate cancer radiotherapy. This is an invasive and uncomfortable procedure. With modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning, we explored whether retrograde urethrography was still necessary to accurately identify the prostatic apex. Methods and Materials Fifteen patients underwent computed tomography simulation with and without bladder, urethral, and rectal contrast. The prostatic base and apex were identified on both scans, using contrast and anatomy, respectively. The anatomic location of the prostatic apex as defined by these methods was confirmed in another 57 patients with postbrachytherapy imaging. Results The prostatic base and apex were within a mean of 3.8 mm between the two scans. In every case, the beak of the retrograde urethrogram abutted the line drawn parallel to, and bisecting, the pubic bone on the lateral films. With these anatomic relationships defined, in the postbrachytherapy patients, the distance from the prostatic apex to the point at which the urethra traversed the pelvic floor was an average of 11.7 mm. On lateral films, we found that the urethra exited the pelvis an average of 16.6 mm below the posterior-most fusion of the pubic symphysis. On axial images, this occurred at a mean separation of the ischia of about 25 mm. Conclusion With a knowledge of the anatomic relationships and modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning equipment, the prostatic apex can be easily and consistently identified, obviating the need to subject patients to retrograde urethrography.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18164852</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.041</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-3016 |
ispartof | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2008-05, Vol.71 (1), p.51-57 |
issn | 0360-3016 1879-355X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21124181 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over ANATOMY BLADDER CARCINOMAS COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY Contrast Media - administration & dosage Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods Male Middle Aged PATIENTS PLANNING PROSTATE Prostate - diagnostic imaging Prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy Radiology RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE RADIOTHERAPY Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods RECTUM Retrograde urethrography SKELETON Tomography, X-Ray Computed Treatment planning Urethra - diagnostic imaging |
title | Anatomic-Based Three-Dimensional Planning Precludes Use of Catheter-Delivered Contrast for Treatment of Prostate Cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T07%3A56%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anatomic-Based%20Three-Dimensional%20Planning%20Precludes%20Use%20of%20Catheter-Delivered%20Contrast%20for%20Treatment%20of%20Prostate%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Boersma,%20Melisa,%20M.D&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=51-57&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E70501374%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70501374&rft_id=info:pmid/18164852&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0360301607042514&rfr_iscdi=true |