Anatomic-Based Three-Dimensional Planning Precludes Use of Catheter-Delivered Contrast for Treatment of Prostate Cancer

Purpose Retrograde urethrography is a standard method to identify the prostatic apex during planning for prostate cancer radiotherapy. This is an invasive and uncomfortable procedure. With modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning, we explored whether retrograde urethrography was still n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2008-05, Vol.71 (1), p.51-57
Hauptverfasser: Boersma, Melisa, M.D, Swanson, Gregory, M.D, Baacke, Diana, C.M.D, Eng, Tony, M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 57
container_issue 1
container_start_page 51
container_title International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
container_volume 71
creator Boersma, Melisa, M.D
Swanson, Gregory, M.D
Baacke, Diana, C.M.D
Eng, Tony, M.D
description Purpose Retrograde urethrography is a standard method to identify the prostatic apex during planning for prostate cancer radiotherapy. This is an invasive and uncomfortable procedure. With modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning, we explored whether retrograde urethrography was still necessary to accurately identify the prostatic apex. Methods and Materials Fifteen patients underwent computed tomography simulation with and without bladder, urethral, and rectal contrast. The prostatic base and apex were identified on both scans, using contrast and anatomy, respectively. The anatomic location of the prostatic apex as defined by these methods was confirmed in another 57 patients with postbrachytherapy imaging. Results The prostatic base and apex were within a mean of 3.8 mm between the two scans. In every case, the beak of the retrograde urethrogram abutted the line drawn parallel to, and bisecting, the pubic bone on the lateral films. With these anatomic relationships defined, in the postbrachytherapy patients, the distance from the prostatic apex to the point at which the urethra traversed the pelvic floor was an average of 11.7 mm. On lateral films, we found that the urethra exited the pelvis an average of 16.6 mm below the posterior-most fusion of the pubic symphysis. On axial images, this occurred at a mean separation of the ischia of about 25 mm. Conclusion With a knowledge of the anatomic relationships and modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning equipment, the prostatic apex can be easily and consistently identified, obviating the need to subject patients to retrograde urethrography.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.041
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21124181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0360301607042514</els_id><sourcerecordid>70501374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-abfbfa74c49ef21079f35ef09e1c5159592e37d00206251b84914177e046a7803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFklGL1DAUhYso7rj6D0QKgm-t97Zp074I66y7CgsOOAu-hTS9dVI7yZikK_vvTemA4ItPefnOuTfn3CR5jZAjYP1-zPXobHfKCwCeQ5sDwyfJBhveZmVVfX-abKCsISsjfJG88H4EAETOnicX2GDNmqrYJL-vjAz2qFX2UXrq0_3BEWXX-kjGa2vklO4maYw2P9KdIzXNPfn03lNqh3Qrw4ECueyaJv1ALsq31gQnfUgH69K9IxmiUVjgnbM-yEBRZRS5l8mzQU6eXp3fy-T-5tN--zm7-3r7ZXt1lynGypDJbugGyZliLQ0FAm-HsqIBWkJVYdVWbUEl7wEKqIsKu4a1yJBzAlZL3kB5mbxdfeN0LbzSgdRBWWNIBVEgFixmEal3K3Vy9tdMPoij9oqm-HWysxccKsCSswiyFVTxO97RIE5OH6V7FAhiqUWMYq1FLLUIaEWsJcrenP3n7kj9X9G5hwh8WAGKWTxocsuqFIPqtVs27a3-34R_DdSkjVZy-kmP5Ec7u1imFyh8IUB8W05juQzgwGJwrPwDWoS0jg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70501374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anatomic-Based Three-Dimensional Planning Precludes Use of Catheter-Delivered Contrast for Treatment of Prostate Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Boersma, Melisa, M.D ; Swanson, Gregory, M.D ; Baacke, Diana, C.M.D ; Eng, Tony, M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Melisa, M.D ; Swanson, Gregory, M.D ; Baacke, Diana, C.M.D ; Eng, Tony, M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Retrograde urethrography is a standard method to identify the prostatic apex during planning for prostate cancer radiotherapy. This is an invasive and uncomfortable procedure. With modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning, we explored whether retrograde urethrography was still necessary to accurately identify the prostatic apex. Methods and Materials Fifteen patients underwent computed tomography simulation with and without bladder, urethral, and rectal contrast. The prostatic base and apex were identified on both scans, using contrast and anatomy, respectively. The anatomic location of the prostatic apex as defined by these methods was confirmed in another 57 patients with postbrachytherapy imaging. Results The prostatic base and apex were within a mean of 3.8 mm between the two scans. In every case, the beak of the retrograde urethrogram abutted the line drawn parallel to, and bisecting, the pubic bone on the lateral films. With these anatomic relationships defined, in the postbrachytherapy patients, the distance from the prostatic apex to the point at which the urethra traversed the pelvic floor was an average of 11.7 mm. On lateral films, we found that the urethra exited the pelvis an average of 16.6 mm below the posterior-most fusion of the pubic symphysis. On axial images, this occurred at a mean separation of the ischia of about 25 mm. Conclusion With a knowledge of the anatomic relationships and modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning equipment, the prostatic apex can be easily and consistently identified, obviating the need to subject patients to retrograde urethrography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18164852</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; ANATOMY ; BLADDER ; CARCINOMAS ; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY ; Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; PATIENTS ; PLANNING ; PROSTATE ; Prostate - diagnostic imaging ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiology ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; RADIOTHERAPY ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; RECTUM ; Retrograde urethrography ; SKELETON ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment planning ; Urethra - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2008-05, Vol.71 (1), p.51-57</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2008 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-abfbfa74c49ef21079f35ef09e1c5159592e37d00206251b84914177e046a7803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-abfbfa74c49ef21079f35ef09e1c5159592e37d00206251b84914177e046a7803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18164852$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/21124181$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Melisa, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Gregory, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baacke, Diana, C.M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eng, Tony, M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Anatomic-Based Three-Dimensional Planning Precludes Use of Catheter-Delivered Contrast for Treatment of Prostate Cancer</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose Retrograde urethrography is a standard method to identify the prostatic apex during planning for prostate cancer radiotherapy. This is an invasive and uncomfortable procedure. With modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning, we explored whether retrograde urethrography was still necessary to accurately identify the prostatic apex. Methods and Materials Fifteen patients underwent computed tomography simulation with and without bladder, urethral, and rectal contrast. The prostatic base and apex were identified on both scans, using contrast and anatomy, respectively. The anatomic location of the prostatic apex as defined by these methods was confirmed in another 57 patients with postbrachytherapy imaging. Results The prostatic base and apex were within a mean of 3.8 mm between the two scans. In every case, the beak of the retrograde urethrogram abutted the line drawn parallel to, and bisecting, the pubic bone on the lateral films. With these anatomic relationships defined, in the postbrachytherapy patients, the distance from the prostatic apex to the point at which the urethra traversed the pelvic floor was an average of 11.7 mm. On lateral films, we found that the urethra exited the pelvis an average of 16.6 mm below the posterior-most fusion of the pubic symphysis. On axial images, this occurred at a mean separation of the ischia of about 25 mm. Conclusion With a knowledge of the anatomic relationships and modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning equipment, the prostatic apex can be easily and consistently identified, obviating the need to subject patients to retrograde urethrography.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>ANATOMY</subject><subject>BLADDER</subject><subject>CARCINOMAS</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>PLANNING</subject><subject>PROSTATE</subject><subject>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>RECTUM</subject><subject>Retrograde urethrography</subject><subject>SKELETON</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment planning</subject><subject>Urethra - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFklGL1DAUhYso7rj6D0QKgm-t97Zp074I66y7CgsOOAu-hTS9dVI7yZikK_vvTemA4ItPefnOuTfn3CR5jZAjYP1-zPXobHfKCwCeQ5sDwyfJBhveZmVVfX-abKCsISsjfJG88H4EAETOnicX2GDNmqrYJL-vjAz2qFX2UXrq0_3BEWXX-kjGa2vklO4maYw2P9KdIzXNPfn03lNqh3Qrw4ECueyaJv1ALsq31gQnfUgH69K9IxmiUVjgnbM-yEBRZRS5l8mzQU6eXp3fy-T-5tN--zm7-3r7ZXt1lynGypDJbugGyZliLQ0FAm-HsqIBWkJVYdVWbUEl7wEKqIsKu4a1yJBzAlZL3kB5mbxdfeN0LbzSgdRBWWNIBVEgFixmEal3K3Vy9tdMPoij9oqm-HWysxccKsCSswiyFVTxO97RIE5OH6V7FAhiqUWMYq1FLLUIaEWsJcrenP3n7kj9X9G5hwh8WAGKWTxocsuqFIPqtVs27a3-34R_DdSkjVZy-kmP5Ec7u1imFyh8IUB8W05juQzgwGJwrPwDWoS0jg</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><creator>Boersma, Melisa, M.D</creator><creator>Swanson, Gregory, M.D</creator><creator>Baacke, Diana, C.M.D</creator><creator>Eng, Tony, M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Anatomic-Based Three-Dimensional Planning Precludes Use of Catheter-Delivered Contrast for Treatment of Prostate Cancer</title><author>Boersma, Melisa, M.D ; Swanson, Gregory, M.D ; Baacke, Diana, C.M.D ; Eng, Tony, M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-abfbfa74c49ef21079f35ef09e1c5159592e37d00206251b84914177e046a7803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>ANATOMY</topic><topic>BLADDER</topic><topic>CARCINOMAS</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Contrast Media - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>PLANNING</topic><topic>PROSTATE</topic><topic>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>RECTUM</topic><topic>Retrograde urethrography</topic><topic>SKELETON</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment planning</topic><topic>Urethra - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boersma, Melisa, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Gregory, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baacke, Diana, C.M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eng, Tony, M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boersma, Melisa, M.D</au><au>Swanson, Gregory, M.D</au><au>Baacke, Diana, C.M.D</au><au>Eng, Tony, M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anatomic-Based Three-Dimensional Planning Precludes Use of Catheter-Delivered Contrast for Treatment of Prostate Cancer</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>51-57</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><abstract>Purpose Retrograde urethrography is a standard method to identify the prostatic apex during planning for prostate cancer radiotherapy. This is an invasive and uncomfortable procedure. With modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning, we explored whether retrograde urethrography was still necessary to accurately identify the prostatic apex. Methods and Materials Fifteen patients underwent computed tomography simulation with and without bladder, urethral, and rectal contrast. The prostatic base and apex were identified on both scans, using contrast and anatomy, respectively. The anatomic location of the prostatic apex as defined by these methods was confirmed in another 57 patients with postbrachytherapy imaging. Results The prostatic base and apex were within a mean of 3.8 mm between the two scans. In every case, the beak of the retrograde urethrogram abutted the line drawn parallel to, and bisecting, the pubic bone on the lateral films. With these anatomic relationships defined, in the postbrachytherapy patients, the distance from the prostatic apex to the point at which the urethra traversed the pelvic floor was an average of 11.7 mm. On lateral films, we found that the urethra exited the pelvis an average of 16.6 mm below the posterior-most fusion of the pubic symphysis. On axial images, this occurred at a mean separation of the ischia of about 25 mm. Conclusion With a knowledge of the anatomic relationships and modern three-dimensional computed tomography planning equipment, the prostatic apex can be easily and consistently identified, obviating the need to subject patients to retrograde urethrography.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18164852</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.041</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-3016
ispartof International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2008-05, Vol.71 (1), p.51-57
issn 0360-3016
1879-355X
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21124181
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
ANATOMY
BLADDER
CARCINOMAS
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
Contrast Media - administration & dosage
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Male
Middle Aged
PATIENTS
PLANNING
PROSTATE
Prostate - diagnostic imaging
Prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Radiology
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
RADIOTHERAPY
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
RECTUM
Retrograde urethrography
SKELETON
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment planning
Urethra - diagnostic imaging
title Anatomic-Based Three-Dimensional Planning Precludes Use of Catheter-Delivered Contrast for Treatment of Prostate Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T07%3A56%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anatomic-Based%20Three-Dimensional%20Planning%20Precludes%20Use%20of%20Catheter-Delivered%20Contrast%20for%20Treatment%20of%20Prostate%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Boersma,%20Melisa,%20M.D&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=51-57&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E70501374%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70501374&rft_id=info:pmid/18164852&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0360301607042514&rfr_iscdi=true