Comparison of Ultrasonography-Guided Central Venous Catheterization Between Adult and Pediatric Populations
The purpose of this study was to compare the technical success and complication rates of ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization between adult and pediatric patients which have not been reported previously. In a 4-year period, 859 ultrasonography-guided central vein catheterizations in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2008-05, Vol.31 (3), p.575-580 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 580 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 575 |
container_title | Cardiovascular and interventional radiology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Tercan, Fahri Oguzkurt, Levent Ozkan, Ugur Eker, Hatice Evren |
description | The purpose of this study was to compare the technical success and complication rates of ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization between adult and pediatric patients which have not been reported previously. In a 4-year period, 859 ultrasonography-guided central vein catheterizations in 688 adult patients and 247 catheterizations in 156 pediatric patients were retrospectively evaluated. Mean age was 56.3 years (range, 18 to 95 years) for adults and 3.3 years (range, 0.1 to 16.3 years) for children. The preferred catheterization site was internal jugular vein in 97% of adults and 85% of children. The technical success rate, mean number of punctures, and rate of single wall puncture were 99.4%, 1.04 (range, 1–3), and 83% for adults and 90.3%, 1.25 (range, 1–5), and 49% for children, respectively. All the differences were statistically significant (
p
0.05). Major complications such as pneumothorax and hemothorax were not seen in any group. In conclusion, ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization has a high technical success rate, lower puncture attempt rate, and higher single wall puncture rate in adults compared to children. Complication rates are comparable in the two groups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00270-008-9315-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21094136</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69183264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-2321f7f3881c38f3e6d50e90dee6f118f164757ccc9df5d081a6970de28d3ae73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1rFTEUhgdR7G31B7iRQaG70Zxk8jHLOmgVCnZhxV2IyZne1LnJNckg9deb61woCK4Scp7zJidP07wA8gYIkW8zIVSSjhDVDQx4Jx81G-gZ7YgS3x43GwKy74BzOGlOc74jBLii_GlzAooxIhhsmh9j3O1N8jmGNk7tzVySqft4m8x-e99dLt6ha0cM9Xxuv2KIS25HU7ZYMPnfpvja-A7LL8TQXrhlLq0Jrr1G501J3rbXcb_Mf7H8rHkymTnj8-N61tx8eP9l_Nhdfb78NF5cdbYXrHSUUZjkxJQCy9TEUDhOcCAOUUwAagLRSy6ttYObuCMKjBhkLVPlmEHJzprXa27MxetsfUG7tTEEtEVTIEMPTFTqfKX2Kf5cMBe989niPJuAdUgthvpLVPQVfPUPeBeXFOoEmlLJOGeCVwhWyKaYc8JJ75PfmXSvgeiDLL3K0lWWPsjSh3e-PAYv33foHjqOdipAVyDXUrjF9HDz_1P_ADisn7M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>227355365</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Ultrasonography-Guided Central Venous Catheterization Between Adult and Pediatric Populations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tercan, Fahri ; Oguzkurt, Levent ; Ozkan, Ugur ; Eker, Hatice Evren</creator><creatorcontrib>Tercan, Fahri ; Oguzkurt, Levent ; Ozkan, Ugur ; Eker, Hatice Evren</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the technical success and complication rates of ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization between adult and pediatric patients which have not been reported previously. In a 4-year period, 859 ultrasonography-guided central vein catheterizations in 688 adult patients and 247 catheterizations in 156 pediatric patients were retrospectively evaluated. Mean age was 56.3 years (range, 18 to 95 years) for adults and 3.3 years (range, 0.1 to 16.3 years) for children. The preferred catheterization site was internal jugular vein in 97% of adults and 85% of children. The technical success rate, mean number of punctures, and rate of single wall puncture were 99.4%, 1.04 (range, 1–3), and 83% for adults and 90.3%, 1.25 (range, 1–5), and 49% for children, respectively. All the differences were statistically significant (
p
< 0.05). Complication rates were 2.3% and 2.4% for adults and children, respectively (
p
> 0.05). Major complications such as pneumothorax and hemothorax were not seen in any group. In conclusion, ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization has a high technical success rate, lower puncture attempt rate, and higher single wall puncture rate in adults compared to children. Complication rates are comparable in the two groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0174-1551</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-086X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00270-008-9315-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18330631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY ; Cardiology ; Carotid Artery Injuries - diagnostic imaging ; Carotid Artery Injuries - etiology ; Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects ; Catheterization, Central Venous - methods ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Clinical Investigation ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging ; Infant ; Jugular Veins - diagnostic imaging ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nuclear Medicine ; PEDIATRICS ; Probability ; Punctures ; Radiography ; Radiology ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Subclavian Vein - diagnostic imaging ; ULTRASONOGRAPHY ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Ultrasound ; VASCULAR DISEASES ; VEINS</subject><ispartof>Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2008-05, Vol.31 (3), p.575-580</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-2321f7f3881c38f3e6d50e90dee6f118f164757ccc9df5d081a6970de28d3ae73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-2321f7f3881c38f3e6d50e90dee6f118f164757ccc9df5d081a6970de28d3ae73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00270-008-9315-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00270-008-9315-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18330631$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/21094136$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tercan, Fahri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oguzkurt, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozkan, Ugur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eker, Hatice Evren</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Ultrasonography-Guided Central Venous Catheterization Between Adult and Pediatric Populations</title><title>Cardiovascular and interventional radiology</title><addtitle>Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the technical success and complication rates of ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization between adult and pediatric patients which have not been reported previously. In a 4-year period, 859 ultrasonography-guided central vein catheterizations in 688 adult patients and 247 catheterizations in 156 pediatric patients were retrospectively evaluated. Mean age was 56.3 years (range, 18 to 95 years) for adults and 3.3 years (range, 0.1 to 16.3 years) for children. The preferred catheterization site was internal jugular vein in 97% of adults and 85% of children. The technical success rate, mean number of punctures, and rate of single wall puncture were 99.4%, 1.04 (range, 1–3), and 83% for adults and 90.3%, 1.25 (range, 1–5), and 49% for children, respectively. All the differences were statistically significant (
p
< 0.05). Complication rates were 2.3% and 2.4% for adults and children, respectively (
p
> 0.05). Major complications such as pneumothorax and hemothorax were not seen in any group. In conclusion, ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization has a high technical success rate, lower puncture attempt rate, and higher single wall puncture rate in adults compared to children. Complication rates are comparable in the two groups.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Carotid Artery Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carotid Artery Injuries - etiology</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Clinical Investigation</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Jugular Veins - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>PEDIATRICS</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Punctures</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Subclavian Vein - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>ULTRASONOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>VASCULAR DISEASES</subject><subject>VEINS</subject><issn>0174-1551</issn><issn>1432-086X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1rFTEUhgdR7G31B7iRQaG70Zxk8jHLOmgVCnZhxV2IyZne1LnJNckg9deb61woCK4Scp7zJidP07wA8gYIkW8zIVSSjhDVDQx4Jx81G-gZ7YgS3x43GwKy74BzOGlOc74jBLii_GlzAooxIhhsmh9j3O1N8jmGNk7tzVySqft4m8x-e99dLt6ha0cM9Xxuv2KIS25HU7ZYMPnfpvja-A7LL8TQXrhlLq0Jrr1G501J3rbXcb_Mf7H8rHkymTnj8-N61tx8eP9l_Nhdfb78NF5cdbYXrHSUUZjkxJQCy9TEUDhOcCAOUUwAagLRSy6ttYObuCMKjBhkLVPlmEHJzprXa27MxetsfUG7tTEEtEVTIEMPTFTqfKX2Kf5cMBe989niPJuAdUgthvpLVPQVfPUPeBeXFOoEmlLJOGeCVwhWyKaYc8JJ75PfmXSvgeiDLL3K0lWWPsjSh3e-PAYv33foHjqOdipAVyDXUrjF9HDz_1P_ADisn7M</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><creator>Tercan, Fahri</creator><creator>Oguzkurt, Levent</creator><creator>Ozkan, Ugur</creator><creator>Eker, Hatice Evren</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Comparison of Ultrasonography-Guided Central Venous Catheterization Between Adult and Pediatric Populations</title><author>Tercan, Fahri ; Oguzkurt, Levent ; Ozkan, Ugur ; Eker, Hatice Evren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-2321f7f3881c38f3e6d50e90dee6f118f164757ccc9df5d081a6970de28d3ae73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Carotid Artery Injuries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carotid Artery Injuries - etiology</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - methods</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Clinical Investigation</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Jugular Veins - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>PEDIATRICS</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Punctures</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Subclavian Vein - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>ULTRASONOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>VASCULAR DISEASES</topic><topic>VEINS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tercan, Fahri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oguzkurt, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozkan, Ugur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eker, Hatice Evren</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Cardiovascular and interventional radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tercan, Fahri</au><au>Oguzkurt, Levent</au><au>Ozkan, Ugur</au><au>Eker, Hatice Evren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Ultrasonography-Guided Central Venous Catheterization Between Adult and Pediatric Populations</atitle><jtitle>Cardiovascular and interventional radiology</jtitle><stitle>Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol</addtitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>575</spage><epage>580</epage><pages>575-580</pages><issn>0174-1551</issn><eissn>1432-086X</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to compare the technical success and complication rates of ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization between adult and pediatric patients which have not been reported previously. In a 4-year period, 859 ultrasonography-guided central vein catheterizations in 688 adult patients and 247 catheterizations in 156 pediatric patients were retrospectively evaluated. Mean age was 56.3 years (range, 18 to 95 years) for adults and 3.3 years (range, 0.1 to 16.3 years) for children. The preferred catheterization site was internal jugular vein in 97% of adults and 85% of children. The technical success rate, mean number of punctures, and rate of single wall puncture were 99.4%, 1.04 (range, 1–3), and 83% for adults and 90.3%, 1.25 (range, 1–5), and 49% for children, respectively. All the differences were statistically significant (
p
< 0.05). Complication rates were 2.3% and 2.4% for adults and children, respectively (
p
> 0.05). Major complications such as pneumothorax and hemothorax were not seen in any group. In conclusion, ultrasonography-guided central venous catheterization has a high technical success rate, lower puncture attempt rate, and higher single wall puncture rate in adults compared to children. Complication rates are comparable in the two groups.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>18330631</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00270-008-9315-7</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0174-1551 |
ispartof | Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2008-05, Vol.31 (3), p.575-580 |
issn | 0174-1551 1432-086X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21094136 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY Cardiology Carotid Artery Injuries - diagnostic imaging Carotid Artery Injuries - etiology Catheterization, Central Venous - adverse effects Catheterization, Central Venous - methods Chi-Square Distribution Child Child, Preschool Clinical Investigation Cohort Studies Female Humans Imaging Infant Jugular Veins - diagnostic imaging Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Nuclear Medicine PEDIATRICS Probability Punctures Radiography Radiology RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Sensitivity and Specificity Subclavian Vein - diagnostic imaging ULTRASONOGRAPHY Ultrasonography, Interventional Ultrasound VASCULAR DISEASES VEINS |
title | Comparison of Ultrasonography-Guided Central Venous Catheterization Between Adult and Pediatric Populations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T00%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Ultrasonography-Guided%20Central%20Venous%20Catheterization%20Between%20Adult%20and%20Pediatric%20Populations&rft.jtitle=Cardiovascular%20and%20interventional%20radiology&rft.au=Tercan,%20Fahri&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=575&rft.epage=580&rft.pages=575-580&rft.issn=0174-1551&rft.eissn=1432-086X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00270-008-9315-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E69183264%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227355365&rft_id=info:pmid/18330631&rfr_iscdi=true |