PTA versus carbofilm-coated stents in infrapopliteal arteries: pilot study

To determine the primary success and short-term patency of stent application as a primary treatment modality for high-grade lesions of the infrapopliteal arteries compared with treatment with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in critical limb ischemia in a randomized prospective study. End...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2006-02, Vol.29 (1), p.29-38
Hauptverfasser: Rand, T, Basile, A, Cejna, M, Fleischmann, D, Funovics, M, Gschwendtner, M, Haumer, M, Von Katzler, I, Kettenbach, J, Lomoschitz, F, Luft, C, Minar, E, Schneider, B, Schoder, M, Lammer, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 38
container_issue 1
container_start_page 29
container_title Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
container_volume 29
creator Rand, T
Basile, A
Cejna, M
Fleischmann, D
Funovics, M
Gschwendtner, M
Haumer, M
Von Katzler, I
Kettenbach, J
Lomoschitz, F
Luft, C
Minar, E
Schneider, B
Schoder, M
Lammer, J
description To determine the primary success and short-term patency of stent application as a primary treatment modality for high-grade lesions of the infrapopliteal arteries compared with treatment with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in critical limb ischemia in a randomized prospective study. Endovascular therapy was performed on 95 lesions in 51 patients (mean age 72.0 years, range 47-80 years) who presented clinically with Fontaine stages III and IV. One patient underwent treatment in both limbs. After angiographic lesion identification, patients were randomized for treatment by PTA (53 lesions in 27 patients) or stent application (42 lesions in 24 patients). Follow-up by clinical investigation and conventional angiography or spiral CT angiography was performed in 37 patients (57 lesions) 6 to 12 months after the procedure, or when clinically indicated. Evaluation was performed by two observers, double-blinded, with thresholds for lesion restenosis of 50% and 70%. Statistical evaluation was performed on a lesion basis by Kaplan-Meier estimated probability rates, and log-rank and Wilcoxon tests. The primary endpoint was the angiographic patency rate of treated lesions. The inter-reader agreement was high (kappa = 0.82). For the stent group the cumulative primary patency at 6 months was 83.7% at the 70% restenosis threshold, and 79.7% at the 50% restenosis threshold. For PTA, the primary patency at 6 months was 61.1% at the 70% restenosis threshold and 45.6% at the 50% restenosis threshold. Both results were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Infrapopliteal stent application is an effective treatment modality for high-grade lesions in chronic critical limb ischemia. Compared with PTA, higher patency rates can be expected after 6 months.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00270-005-0276-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21091277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70682162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-9c45ba157a95e9e2ed6cae71e00d21d19f0efd8f8b29c0af6058593f16e4824c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVFLHTEQhYO06FX7A3yRpYW-pc7kbjZJ30Ra2yLog0LfQm52git7N2uSFfz3Ru6FQmFg5uE7w8w5jJ0hfEMAdZEBhAIOIHkdOm4O2ArbteCgu78f2ApQtRylxCN2nPMTAEot5CE7wk5IAcqs2J-7-8vmhVJecuNd2sQwjFvuoyvUN7nQVHIzTLVCcnOcx6GQGxuXCqWB8vdmHsZYKrj0r6fsY3Bjpk_7fsIefv64v_rFb26vf19d3nDfCijc-FZuHErljCRDgvrOO1JIAL3AHk0ACr0OeiOMBxc6kFqadcCOWi1avz5hX3Z7Yy6Dzb6e5B99nCbyxQoEg0KpSn3dUXOKzwvlYrdD9jSObqK4ZKug06L6UMHP_4FPcUlT_cAqobRptdIVwh3kU8w5UbBzGrYuvVoE-56F3WVhaxb2PQtrquZ8v3jZbKn_p9ibv34DsFaDzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>727894878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PTA versus carbofilm-coated stents in infrapopliteal arteries: pilot study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rand, T ; Basile, A ; Cejna, M ; Fleischmann, D ; Funovics, M ; Gschwendtner, M ; Haumer, M ; Von Katzler, I ; Kettenbach, J ; Lomoschitz, F ; Luft, C ; Minar, E ; Schneider, B ; Schoder, M ; Lammer, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Rand, T ; Basile, A ; Cejna, M ; Fleischmann, D ; Funovics, M ; Gschwendtner, M ; Haumer, M ; Von Katzler, I ; Kettenbach, J ; Lomoschitz, F ; Luft, C ; Minar, E ; Schneider, B ; Schoder, M ; Lammer, J</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the primary success and short-term patency of stent application as a primary treatment modality for high-grade lesions of the infrapopliteal arteries compared with treatment with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in critical limb ischemia in a randomized prospective study. Endovascular therapy was performed on 95 lesions in 51 patients (mean age 72.0 years, range 47-80 years) who presented clinically with Fontaine stages III and IV. One patient underwent treatment in both limbs. After angiographic lesion identification, patients were randomized for treatment by PTA (53 lesions in 27 patients) or stent application (42 lesions in 24 patients). Follow-up by clinical investigation and conventional angiography or spiral CT angiography was performed in 37 patients (57 lesions) 6 to 12 months after the procedure, or when clinically indicated. Evaluation was performed by two observers, double-blinded, with thresholds for lesion restenosis of 50% and 70%. Statistical evaluation was performed on a lesion basis by Kaplan-Meier estimated probability rates, and log-rank and Wilcoxon tests. The primary endpoint was the angiographic patency rate of treated lesions. The inter-reader agreement was high (kappa = 0.82). For the stent group the cumulative primary patency at 6 months was 83.7% at the 70% restenosis threshold, and 79.7% at the 50% restenosis threshold. For PTA, the primary patency at 6 months was 61.1% at the 70% restenosis threshold and 45.6% at the 50% restenosis threshold. Both results were statistically significant (p &lt; 0.05). Infrapopliteal stent application is an effective treatment modality for high-grade lesions in chronic critical limb ischemia. Compared with PTA, higher patency rates can be expected after 6 months.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0174-1551</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-086X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00270-005-0276-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16252079</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Angioplasty, Balloon ; ARTERIES ; BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY ; Carbon ; Coated Materials, Biocompatible ; Double-Blind Method ; EVALUATION ; Female ; Humans ; ISCHEMIA ; Ischemia - diagnostic imaging ; Ischemia - surgery ; Leg - blood supply ; LIMBS ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Middle Aged ; PATIENTS ; Pilot Projects ; Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging ; Popliteal Artery - surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Radiography ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Stents ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Patency</subject><ispartof>Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2006-02, Vol.29 (1), p.29-38</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-9c45ba157a95e9e2ed6cae71e00d21d19f0efd8f8b29c0af6058593f16e4824c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-9c45ba157a95e9e2ed6cae71e00d21d19f0efd8f8b29c0af6058593f16e4824c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16252079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/21091277$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rand, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basile, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cejna, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleischmann, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funovics, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gschwendtner, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haumer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Katzler, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kettenbach, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomoschitz, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luft, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minar, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoder, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lammer, J</creatorcontrib><title>PTA versus carbofilm-coated stents in infrapopliteal arteries: pilot study</title><title>Cardiovascular and interventional radiology</title><addtitle>Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol</addtitle><description>To determine the primary success and short-term patency of stent application as a primary treatment modality for high-grade lesions of the infrapopliteal arteries compared with treatment with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in critical limb ischemia in a randomized prospective study. Endovascular therapy was performed on 95 lesions in 51 patients (mean age 72.0 years, range 47-80 years) who presented clinically with Fontaine stages III and IV. One patient underwent treatment in both limbs. After angiographic lesion identification, patients were randomized for treatment by PTA (53 lesions in 27 patients) or stent application (42 lesions in 24 patients). Follow-up by clinical investigation and conventional angiography or spiral CT angiography was performed in 37 patients (57 lesions) 6 to 12 months after the procedure, or when clinically indicated. Evaluation was performed by two observers, double-blinded, with thresholds for lesion restenosis of 50% and 70%. Statistical evaluation was performed on a lesion basis by Kaplan-Meier estimated probability rates, and log-rank and Wilcoxon tests. The primary endpoint was the angiographic patency rate of treated lesions. The inter-reader agreement was high (kappa = 0.82). For the stent group the cumulative primary patency at 6 months was 83.7% at the 70% restenosis threshold, and 79.7% at the 50% restenosis threshold. For PTA, the primary patency at 6 months was 61.1% at the 70% restenosis threshold and 45.6% at the 50% restenosis threshold. Both results were statistically significant (p &lt; 0.05). Infrapopliteal stent application is an effective treatment modality for high-grade lesions in chronic critical limb ischemia. Compared with PTA, higher patency rates can be expected after 6 months.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon</subject><subject>ARTERIES</subject><subject>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>EVALUATION</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ISCHEMIA</subject><subject>Ischemia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ischemia - surgery</subject><subject>Leg - blood supply</subject><subject>LIMBS</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Popliteal Artery - surgery</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular Patency</subject><issn>0174-1551</issn><issn>1432-086X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkVFLHTEQhYO06FX7A3yRpYW-pc7kbjZJ30Ra2yLog0LfQm52git7N2uSFfz3Ru6FQmFg5uE7w8w5jJ0hfEMAdZEBhAIOIHkdOm4O2ArbteCgu78f2ApQtRylxCN2nPMTAEot5CE7wk5IAcqs2J-7-8vmhVJecuNd2sQwjFvuoyvUN7nQVHIzTLVCcnOcx6GQGxuXCqWB8vdmHsZYKrj0r6fsY3Bjpk_7fsIefv64v_rFb26vf19d3nDfCijc-FZuHErljCRDgvrOO1JIAL3AHk0ACr0OeiOMBxc6kFqadcCOWi1avz5hX3Z7Yy6Dzb6e5B99nCbyxQoEg0KpSn3dUXOKzwvlYrdD9jSObqK4ZKug06L6UMHP_4FPcUlT_cAqobRptdIVwh3kU8w5UbBzGrYuvVoE-56F3WVhaxb2PQtrquZ8v3jZbKn_p9ibv34DsFaDzA</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Rand, T</creator><creator>Basile, A</creator><creator>Cejna, M</creator><creator>Fleischmann, D</creator><creator>Funovics, M</creator><creator>Gschwendtner, M</creator><creator>Haumer, M</creator><creator>Von Katzler, I</creator><creator>Kettenbach, J</creator><creator>Lomoschitz, F</creator><creator>Luft, C</creator><creator>Minar, E</creator><creator>Schneider, B</creator><creator>Schoder, M</creator><creator>Lammer, J</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>PTA versus carbofilm-coated stents in infrapopliteal arteries: pilot study</title><author>Rand, T ; Basile, A ; Cejna, M ; Fleischmann, D ; Funovics, M ; Gschwendtner, M ; Haumer, M ; Von Katzler, I ; Kettenbach, J ; Lomoschitz, F ; Luft, C ; Minar, E ; Schneider, B ; Schoder, M ; Lammer, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-9c45ba157a95e9e2ed6cae71e00d21d19f0efd8f8b29c0af6058593f16e4824c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon</topic><topic>ARTERIES</topic><topic>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>EVALUATION</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ISCHEMIA</topic><topic>Ischemia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ischemia - surgery</topic><topic>Leg - blood supply</topic><topic>LIMBS</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Popliteal Artery - surgery</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular Patency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rand, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basile, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cejna, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleischmann, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funovics, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gschwendtner, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haumer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Katzler, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kettenbach, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomoschitz, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luft, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minar, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoder, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lammer, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Cardiovascular and interventional radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rand, T</au><au>Basile, A</au><au>Cejna, M</au><au>Fleischmann, D</au><au>Funovics, M</au><au>Gschwendtner, M</au><au>Haumer, M</au><au>Von Katzler, I</au><au>Kettenbach, J</au><au>Lomoschitz, F</au><au>Luft, C</au><au>Minar, E</au><au>Schneider, B</au><au>Schoder, M</au><au>Lammer, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PTA versus carbofilm-coated stents in infrapopliteal arteries: pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Cardiovascular and interventional radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol</addtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>29-38</pages><issn>0174-1551</issn><eissn>1432-086X</eissn><abstract>To determine the primary success and short-term patency of stent application as a primary treatment modality for high-grade lesions of the infrapopliteal arteries compared with treatment with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in critical limb ischemia in a randomized prospective study. Endovascular therapy was performed on 95 lesions in 51 patients (mean age 72.0 years, range 47-80 years) who presented clinically with Fontaine stages III and IV. One patient underwent treatment in both limbs. After angiographic lesion identification, patients were randomized for treatment by PTA (53 lesions in 27 patients) or stent application (42 lesions in 24 patients). Follow-up by clinical investigation and conventional angiography or spiral CT angiography was performed in 37 patients (57 lesions) 6 to 12 months after the procedure, or when clinically indicated. Evaluation was performed by two observers, double-blinded, with thresholds for lesion restenosis of 50% and 70%. Statistical evaluation was performed on a lesion basis by Kaplan-Meier estimated probability rates, and log-rank and Wilcoxon tests. The primary endpoint was the angiographic patency rate of treated lesions. The inter-reader agreement was high (kappa = 0.82). For the stent group the cumulative primary patency at 6 months was 83.7% at the 70% restenosis threshold, and 79.7% at the 50% restenosis threshold. For PTA, the primary patency at 6 months was 61.1% at the 70% restenosis threshold and 45.6% at the 50% restenosis threshold. Both results were statistically significant (p &lt; 0.05). Infrapopliteal stent application is an effective treatment modality for high-grade lesions in chronic critical limb ischemia. Compared with PTA, higher patency rates can be expected after 6 months.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16252079</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00270-005-0276-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0174-1551
ispartof Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2006-02, Vol.29 (1), p.29-38
issn 0174-1551
1432-086X
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21091277
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angioplasty, Balloon
ARTERIES
BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY
Carbon
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
Double-Blind Method
EVALUATION
Female
Humans
ISCHEMIA
Ischemia - diagnostic imaging
Ischemia - surgery
Leg - blood supply
LIMBS
Male
Medical imaging
Middle Aged
PATIENTS
Pilot Projects
Popliteal Artery - diagnostic imaging
Popliteal Artery - surgery
Prospective Studies
Radiography
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Statistics, Nonparametric
Stents
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Patency
title PTA versus carbofilm-coated stents in infrapopliteal arteries: pilot study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A51%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PTA%20versus%20carbofilm-coated%20stents%20in%20infrapopliteal%20arteries:%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Cardiovascular%20and%20interventional%20radiology&rft.au=Rand,%20T&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=29-38&rft.issn=0174-1551&rft.eissn=1432-086X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00270-005-0276-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E70682162%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=727894878&rft_id=info:pmid/16252079&rfr_iscdi=true