Particle and Gas Emissions from a Simulated Coal-Burning Household Fire Pit
An open fire was assembled with firebricks to simulate the household fire pit used in rural China, and 15 different coals from this area were burned to measure the gaseous and particulate emissions. Particle size distribution was studied with a microorifice uniform-deposit impactor (MOUDI). Over 90%...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science & technology 2008-04, Vol.42 (7), p.2503-2508 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2508 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 2503 |
| container_title | Environmental science & technology |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Tian, Linwei Lucas, Donald Fischer, Susan L Lee, S. C Hammond, S. Katharine Koshland, Catherine P |
| description | An open fire was assembled with firebricks to simulate the household fire pit used in rural China, and 15 different coals from this area were burned to measure the gaseous and particulate emissions. Particle size distribution was studied with a microorifice uniform-deposit impactor (MOUDI). Over 90% of the particulate mass was attributed to sub-micrometer particles. The carbon balance method was used to calculate the emission factors. Emission factors for four pollutants (particulate matter, CO2, total hydrocarbons, and NO x ) were 2–4 times higher for bituminous coals than for anthracites. In past inventories of carbonaceous emissions used for climate modeling, these two types of coal were not treated separately. The dramatic emission factor difference between the two types of coal warrants attention in the future development of emission inventories. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1021/es0716610 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21049828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20686628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a533t-4f9c1b3c042eae55a15f1715771ace6fd172f492a1c52596beb9272ee00a51a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCgS-ALBBIHAIzThw7x7L9s6iVWKkFcbNmvQ51SeJiJ1L59njZ1VaCA6c5vJ-e3pvH2AuE9wgCP7gECusa4RGboRRQSC3xMZsBYFk0Zf3tgB2mdAsAogT9lB2gllA1Ws_YxZLi6G3nOA1rfk6Jn_Y-JR-GxNsYek78yvdTR6Nb83mgrvg4xcEP3_kiTMndhG7Nz3x0fOnHZ-xJS11yz3f3iH05O72eL4rLz-ef5seXBcmyHIuqbSyuSguVcOSkJJQtKpRKIVlXt2tUoq0aQWilkE29cqtGKOEcAEmkqjxir7e-IY3eJOtHZ29sGAZnRyNw00zoTL3dUncx_JxcGk0uZl3X0eBydKNAaQRV_RcUUOu6_uP46i_wNuRn5Kom_xUrLeXG7d0WsjGkFF1r7qLvKf4yCGazltmvldmXO8Np1bv1A7mbJwNvdgAlS10babA-7TkBQuRsKnPFlvNpdPd7neIPk1UlzfXyyogTfbE4-VrmsHtfsumhxL8BfwOgubNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230148554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Particle and Gas Emissions from a Simulated Coal-Burning Household Fire Pit</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Tian, Linwei ; Lucas, Donald ; Fischer, Susan L ; Lee, S. C ; Hammond, S. Katharine ; Koshland, Catherine P</creator><creatorcontrib>Tian, Linwei ; Lucas, Donald ; Fischer, Susan L ; Lee, S. C ; Hammond, S. Katharine ; Koshland, Catherine P</creatorcontrib><description>An open fire was assembled with firebricks to simulate the household fire pit used in rural China, and 15 different coals from this area were burned to measure the gaseous and particulate emissions. Particle size distribution was studied with a microorifice uniform-deposit impactor (MOUDI). Over 90% of the particulate mass was attributed to sub-micrometer particles. The carbon balance method was used to calculate the emission factors. Emission factors for four pollutants (particulate matter, CO2, total hydrocarbons, and NO x ) were 2–4 times higher for bituminous coals than for anthracites. In past inventories of carbonaceous emissions used for climate modeling, these two types of coal were not treated separately. The dramatic emission factor difference between the two types of coal warrants attention in the future development of emission inventories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es0716610</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18504988</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT ; 09 BIOMASS FUELS ; Airborne particulates ; ANTHRACITE ; Applied sciences ; Atmospheric models ; BITUMINOUS COAL ; CARBON DIOXIDE ; CARBON MONOXIDE ; CHINA ; COAL ; DISTRIBUTION ; EMISSION ; Emissions ; Environmental Measurements Methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; FIREPLACES ; Gases ; HOUSEHOLDS ; HYDROCARBONS ; INVENTORIES ; NITROGEN OXIDES ; PARTICLE SIZE ; PARTICULATES ; Pollution ; RESIDENTIAL SECTOR ; RURAL AREAS ; Simulation ; STOVES ; Studies ; WOOD FUELS</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & technology, 2008-04, Vol.42 (7), p.2503-2508</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Apr 1, 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a533t-4f9c1b3c042eae55a15f1715771ace6fd172f492a1c52596beb9272ee00a51a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a533t-4f9c1b3c042eae55a15f1715771ace6fd172f492a1c52596beb9272ee00a51a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es0716610$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es0716610$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,2766,27080,27928,27929,56742,56792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20226867$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18504988$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/21049828$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tian, Linwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Susan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, S. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, S. Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koshland, Catherine P</creatorcontrib><title>Particle and Gas Emissions from a Simulated Coal-Burning Household Fire Pit</title><title>Environmental science & technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>An open fire was assembled with firebricks to simulate the household fire pit used in rural China, and 15 different coals from this area were burned to measure the gaseous and particulate emissions. Particle size distribution was studied with a microorifice uniform-deposit impactor (MOUDI). Over 90% of the particulate mass was attributed to sub-micrometer particles. The carbon balance method was used to calculate the emission factors. Emission factors for four pollutants (particulate matter, CO2, total hydrocarbons, and NO x ) were 2–4 times higher for bituminous coals than for anthracites. In past inventories of carbonaceous emissions used for climate modeling, these two types of coal were not treated separately. The dramatic emission factor difference between the two types of coal warrants attention in the future development of emission inventories.</description><subject>01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT</subject><subject>09 BIOMASS FUELS</subject><subject>Airborne particulates</subject><subject>ANTHRACITE</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>BITUMINOUS COAL</subject><subject>CARBON DIOXIDE</subject><subject>CARBON MONOXIDE</subject><subject>CHINA</subject><subject>COAL</subject><subject>DISTRIBUTION</subject><subject>EMISSION</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental Measurements Methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>FIREPLACES</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>HOUSEHOLDS</subject><subject>HYDROCARBONS</subject><subject>INVENTORIES</subject><subject>NITROGEN OXIDES</subject><subject>PARTICLE SIZE</subject><subject>PARTICULATES</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>RESIDENTIAL SECTOR</subject><subject>RURAL AREAS</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>STOVES</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>WOOD FUELS</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCgS-ALBBIHAIzThw7x7L9s6iVWKkFcbNmvQ51SeJiJ1L59njZ1VaCA6c5vJ-e3pvH2AuE9wgCP7gECusa4RGboRRQSC3xMZsBYFk0Zf3tgB2mdAsAogT9lB2gllA1Ws_YxZLi6G3nOA1rfk6Jn_Y-JR-GxNsYek78yvdTR6Nb83mgrvg4xcEP3_kiTMndhG7Nz3x0fOnHZ-xJS11yz3f3iH05O72eL4rLz-ef5seXBcmyHIuqbSyuSguVcOSkJJQtKpRKIVlXt2tUoq0aQWilkE29cqtGKOEcAEmkqjxir7e-IY3eJOtHZ29sGAZnRyNw00zoTL3dUncx_JxcGk0uZl3X0eBydKNAaQRV_RcUUOu6_uP46i_wNuRn5Kom_xUrLeXG7d0WsjGkFF1r7qLvKf4yCGazltmvldmXO8Np1bv1A7mbJwNvdgAlS10babA-7TkBQuRsKnPFlvNpdPd7neIPk1UlzfXyyogTfbE4-VrmsHtfsumhxL8BfwOgubNg</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Tian, Linwei</creator><creator>Lucas, Donald</creator><creator>Fischer, Susan L</creator><creator>Lee, S. C</creator><creator>Hammond, S. Katharine</creator><creator>Koshland, Catherine P</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Particle and Gas Emissions from a Simulated Coal-Burning Household Fire Pit</title><author>Tian, Linwei ; Lucas, Donald ; Fischer, Susan L ; Lee, S. C ; Hammond, S. Katharine ; Koshland, Catherine P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a533t-4f9c1b3c042eae55a15f1715771ace6fd172f492a1c52596beb9272ee00a51a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT</topic><topic>09 BIOMASS FUELS</topic><topic>Airborne particulates</topic><topic>ANTHRACITE</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>BITUMINOUS COAL</topic><topic>CARBON DIOXIDE</topic><topic>CARBON MONOXIDE</topic><topic>CHINA</topic><topic>COAL</topic><topic>DISTRIBUTION</topic><topic>EMISSION</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental Measurements Methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>FIREPLACES</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>HOUSEHOLDS</topic><topic>HYDROCARBONS</topic><topic>INVENTORIES</topic><topic>NITROGEN OXIDES</topic><topic>PARTICLE SIZE</topic><topic>PARTICULATES</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>RESIDENTIAL SECTOR</topic><topic>RURAL AREAS</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>STOVES</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>WOOD FUELS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tian, Linwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Susan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, S. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, S. Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koshland, Catherine P</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tian, Linwei</au><au>Lucas, Donald</au><au>Fischer, Susan L</au><au>Lee, S. C</au><au>Hammond, S. Katharine</au><au>Koshland, Catherine P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Particle and Gas Emissions from a Simulated Coal-Burning Household Fire Pit</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2503</spage><epage>2508</epage><pages>2503-2508</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>An open fire was assembled with firebricks to simulate the household fire pit used in rural China, and 15 different coals from this area were burned to measure the gaseous and particulate emissions. Particle size distribution was studied with a microorifice uniform-deposit impactor (MOUDI). Over 90% of the particulate mass was attributed to sub-micrometer particles. The carbon balance method was used to calculate the emission factors. Emission factors for four pollutants (particulate matter, CO2, total hydrocarbons, and NO x ) were 2–4 times higher for bituminous coals than for anthracites. In past inventories of carbonaceous emissions used for climate modeling, these two types of coal were not treated separately. The dramatic emission factor difference between the two types of coal warrants attention in the future development of emission inventories.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>18504988</pmid><doi>10.1021/es0716610</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0013-936X |
| ispartof | Environmental science & technology, 2008-04, Vol.42 (7), p.2503-2508 |
| issn | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21049828 |
| source | MEDLINE; American Chemical Society Journals |
| subjects | 01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT 09 BIOMASS FUELS Airborne particulates ANTHRACITE Applied sciences Atmospheric models BITUMINOUS COAL CARBON DIOXIDE CARBON MONOXIDE CHINA COAL DISTRIBUTION EMISSION Emissions Environmental Measurements Methods Exact sciences and technology FIREPLACES Gases HOUSEHOLDS HYDROCARBONS INVENTORIES NITROGEN OXIDES PARTICLE SIZE PARTICULATES Pollution RESIDENTIAL SECTOR RURAL AREAS Simulation STOVES Studies WOOD FUELS |
| title | Particle and Gas Emissions from a Simulated Coal-Burning Household Fire Pit |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T07%3A47%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Particle%20and%20Gas%20Emissions%20from%20a%20Simulated%20Coal-Burning%20Household%20Fire%20Pit&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Tian,%20Linwei&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2503&rft.epage=2508&rft.pages=2503-2508&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es0716610&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E20686628%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230148554&rft_id=info:pmid/18504988&rfr_iscdi=true |