Local Recurrences After Different Treatment Strategies for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Population-Based Study in the East Netherlands

Purpose Outcomes after different treatment strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast were analyzed for a geographically defined population in the East Netherlands. Methods and Materials A total of 798 patients with a first diagnosis of DCIS between January 1989 and December 2003 w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2007-11, Vol.69 (3), p.703-710
Hauptverfasser: Schouten van der Velden, Arjan P., M.D, van Vugt, Roel, M.D, Van Dijck, Jos A.A.M., Ph.D, Leer, Jan Willem H., M.D., Ph.D, Wobbes, Theo, M.D., Ph.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 710
container_issue 3
container_start_page 703
container_title International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
container_volume 69
creator Schouten van der Velden, Arjan P., M.D
van Vugt, Roel, M.D
Van Dijck, Jos A.A.M., Ph.D
Leer, Jan Willem H., M.D., Ph.D
Wobbes, Theo, M.D., Ph.D
description Purpose Outcomes after different treatment strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast were analyzed for a geographically defined population in the East Netherlands. Methods and Materials A total of 798 patients with a first diagnosis of DCIS between January 1989 and December 2003 were included and their medical records were reviewed. Survival rates for ipsilateral recurrences were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the prognostic significance of different variables. Results The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 75% for breast conserving surgery (BCS) alone (237 patients) compared with 91% for BCS followed by radiation therapy (RT; 153 patients) and 99% for mastectomy (408 patients, p  < 0.01). Independent risk factors for local recurrences were treatment strategy, symptomatically detected DCIS, and presence of comedo necrosis. Margin status reached statistical significance only for patients treated by BCS (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–4.0) whereas significance of other prognostic variables did not change. Conclusions In a defined population outside a trial setting, RT after BCS for DCIS lowered recurrence rates. Besides the use of RT, a microscopically complete excision of DCIS is essential. This is especially true for patients with symptomatically detected DCIS and with tumors that contain comedo necrosis, as these groups are at particular high risk for recurrent disease.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.062
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21039571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0360301607006761</els_id><sourcerecordid>17544591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-8eee98cf81be7bcfd8c5f5cb25c02900916006563289fd1d59fbd21cb60dfa7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt2KFDEQhRtR3HH1DUQCXndb6fSvF8LsuOrCoOKs4F1IJxU3bU8yJGlhnsMXNm0vCN54lSJ8p1I5p7LsOYWCAm1ejYUZvRtORQnQFsAKaMoH2YZ2bZ-zuv72MNsAayBnCb7InoQwAgClbfU4u6BtXVV1TzfZr72TYiJfUM7eo5UYyFZH9OSt0RrTTSS3HkU8LtUhehHxu0mQdgmZZUzanfDSWHcU5MaSg4kzcZrEOyRXSRjia7Iln91pnkQ0zuZXIqBKnWZ1Jsb-4a4TRT5iKv0krApPs0daTAGf3Z-X2dd317e7D_n-0_ub3Xafy6piMe8Qse-k7uiA7SC16mStazmUtYSyB-hpA9DUDSu7Xiuq6l4PqqRyaEBp0SK7zF6ufV2IhgdpIso76axFGXlJgfV1SxNVrZT0LgSPmp-8OQp_5hT4kgQf-ZoEX5LgwHhKIslerLLTPBxR_RXdW5-ANyuA6Ys_DfplgiUBZfwygHLmfy_820BOxpoU5w88Yxjd7G2yj1MeSg78sGzDsgzQJlvahrLfUpGycQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Local Recurrences After Different Treatment Strategies for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Population-Based Study in the East Netherlands</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schouten van der Velden, Arjan P., M.D ; van Vugt, Roel, M.D ; Van Dijck, Jos A.A.M., Ph.D ; Leer, Jan Willem H., M.D., Ph.D ; Wobbes, Theo, M.D., Ph.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Schouten van der Velden, Arjan P., M.D ; van Vugt, Roel, M.D ; Van Dijck, Jos A.A.M., Ph.D ; Leer, Jan Willem H., M.D., Ph.D ; Wobbes, Theo, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Outcomes after different treatment strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast were analyzed for a geographically defined population in the East Netherlands. Methods and Materials A total of 798 patients with a first diagnosis of DCIS between January 1989 and December 2003 were included and their medical records were reviewed. Survival rates for ipsilateral recurrences were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the prognostic significance of different variables. Results The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 75% for breast conserving surgery (BCS) alone (237 patients) compared with 91% for BCS followed by radiation therapy (RT; 153 patients) and 99% for mastectomy (408 patients, p  &lt; 0.01). Independent risk factors for local recurrences were treatment strategy, symptomatically detected DCIS, and presence of comedo necrosis. Margin status reached statistical significance only for patients treated by BCS (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–4.0) whereas significance of other prognostic variables did not change. Conclusions In a defined population outside a trial setting, RT after BCS for DCIS lowered recurrence rates. Besides the use of RT, a microscopically complete excision of DCIS is essential. This is especially true for patients with symptomatically detected DCIS and with tumors that contain comedo necrosis, as these groups are at particular high risk for recurrent disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17544591</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Breast ; Breast Neoplasms - mortality ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - mortality ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - therapy ; CARCINOMAS ; Combined Modality Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; DIAGNOSIS ; Ductal carcinoma in situ ; Female ; HEALTH HAZARDS ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; MAMMARY GLANDS ; Mastectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Mastectomy, Segmental - statistics &amp; numerical data ; MEDICAL RECORDS ; Middle Aged ; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS ; NECROSIS ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention &amp; control ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; PATIENTS ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Radiation Injuries - complications ; Radiology ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; RADIOTHERAPY ; Radiotherapy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Recurrences ; Risk factors ; SURGERY ; Survival Rate ; Treatment ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2007-11, Vol.69 (3), p.703-710</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2007 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-8eee98cf81be7bcfd8c5f5cb25c02900916006563289fd1d59fbd21cb60dfa7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-8eee98cf81be7bcfd8c5f5cb25c02900916006563289fd1d59fbd21cb60dfa7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301607006761$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17544591$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/21039571$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schouten van der Velden, Arjan P., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vugt, Roel, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Dijck, Jos A.A.M., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leer, Jan Willem H., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wobbes, Theo, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><title>Local Recurrences After Different Treatment Strategies for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Population-Based Study in the East Netherlands</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose Outcomes after different treatment strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast were analyzed for a geographically defined population in the East Netherlands. Methods and Materials A total of 798 patients with a first diagnosis of DCIS between January 1989 and December 2003 were included and their medical records were reviewed. Survival rates for ipsilateral recurrences were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the prognostic significance of different variables. Results The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 75% for breast conserving surgery (BCS) alone (237 patients) compared with 91% for BCS followed by radiation therapy (RT; 153 patients) and 99% for mastectomy (408 patients, p  &lt; 0.01). Independent risk factors for local recurrences were treatment strategy, symptomatically detected DCIS, and presence of comedo necrosis. Margin status reached statistical significance only for patients treated by BCS (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–4.0) whereas significance of other prognostic variables did not change. Conclusions In a defined population outside a trial setting, RT after BCS for DCIS lowered recurrence rates. Besides the use of RT, a microscopically complete excision of DCIS is essential. This is especially true for patients with symptomatically detected DCIS and with tumors that contain comedo necrosis, as these groups are at particular high risk for recurrent disease.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - therapy</subject><subject>CARCINOMAS</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>DIAGNOSIS</subject><subject>Ductal carcinoma in situ</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>HEALTH HAZARDS</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>MAMMARY GLANDS</subject><subject>Mastectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>MEDICAL RECORDS</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS</subject><subject>NECROSIS</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Radiation Injuries - complications</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Recurrences</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>SURGERY</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt2KFDEQhRtR3HH1DUQCXndb6fSvF8LsuOrCoOKs4F1IJxU3bU8yJGlhnsMXNm0vCN54lSJ8p1I5p7LsOYWCAm1ejYUZvRtORQnQFsAKaMoH2YZ2bZ-zuv72MNsAayBnCb7InoQwAgClbfU4u6BtXVV1TzfZr72TYiJfUM7eo5UYyFZH9OSt0RrTTSS3HkU8LtUhehHxu0mQdgmZZUzanfDSWHcU5MaSg4kzcZrEOyRXSRjia7Iln91pnkQ0zuZXIqBKnWZ1Jsb-4a4TRT5iKv0krApPs0daTAGf3Z-X2dd317e7D_n-0_ub3Xafy6piMe8Qse-k7uiA7SC16mStazmUtYSyB-hpA9DUDSu7Xiuq6l4PqqRyaEBp0SK7zF6ufV2IhgdpIso76axFGXlJgfV1SxNVrZT0LgSPmp-8OQp_5hT4kgQf-ZoEX5LgwHhKIslerLLTPBxR_RXdW5-ANyuA6Ys_DfplgiUBZfwygHLmfy_820BOxpoU5w88Yxjd7G2yj1MeSg78sGzDsgzQJlvahrLfUpGycQ</recordid><startdate>20071101</startdate><enddate>20071101</enddate><creator>Schouten van der Velden, Arjan P., M.D</creator><creator>van Vugt, Roel, M.D</creator><creator>Van Dijck, Jos A.A.M., Ph.D</creator><creator>Leer, Jan Willem H., M.D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Wobbes, Theo, M.D., Ph.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071101</creationdate><title>Local Recurrences After Different Treatment Strategies for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Population-Based Study in the East Netherlands</title><author>Schouten van der Velden, Arjan P., M.D ; van Vugt, Roel, M.D ; Van Dijck, Jos A.A.M., Ph.D ; Leer, Jan Willem H., M.D., Ph.D ; Wobbes, Theo, M.D., Ph.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-8eee98cf81be7bcfd8c5f5cb25c02900916006563289fd1d59fbd21cb60dfa7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - therapy</topic><topic>CARCINOMAS</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>DIAGNOSIS</topic><topic>Ductal carcinoma in situ</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>HEALTH HAZARDS</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>MAMMARY GLANDS</topic><topic>Mastectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>MEDICAL RECORDS</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS</topic><topic>NECROSIS</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Radiation Injuries - complications</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Recurrences</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>SURGERY</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schouten van der Velden, Arjan P., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vugt, Roel, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Dijck, Jos A.A.M., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leer, Jan Willem H., M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wobbes, Theo, M.D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schouten van der Velden, Arjan P., M.D</au><au>van Vugt, Roel, M.D</au><au>Van Dijck, Jos A.A.M., Ph.D</au><au>Leer, Jan Willem H., M.D., Ph.D</au><au>Wobbes, Theo, M.D., Ph.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Local Recurrences After Different Treatment Strategies for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Population-Based Study in the East Netherlands</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2007-11-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>703</spage><epage>710</epage><pages>703-710</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><abstract>Purpose Outcomes after different treatment strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast were analyzed for a geographically defined population in the East Netherlands. Methods and Materials A total of 798 patients with a first diagnosis of DCIS between January 1989 and December 2003 were included and their medical records were reviewed. Survival rates for ipsilateral recurrences were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the prognostic significance of different variables. Results The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 75% for breast conserving surgery (BCS) alone (237 patients) compared with 91% for BCS followed by radiation therapy (RT; 153 patients) and 99% for mastectomy (408 patients, p  &lt; 0.01). Independent risk factors for local recurrences were treatment strategy, symptomatically detected DCIS, and presence of comedo necrosis. Margin status reached statistical significance only for patients treated by BCS (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–4.0) whereas significance of other prognostic variables did not change. Conclusions In a defined population outside a trial setting, RT after BCS for DCIS lowered recurrence rates. Besides the use of RT, a microscopically complete excision of DCIS is essential. This is especially true for patients with symptomatically detected DCIS and with tumors that contain comedo necrosis, as these groups are at particular high risk for recurrent disease.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17544591</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.062</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-3016
ispartof International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2007-11, Vol.69 (3), p.703-710
issn 0360-3016
1879-355X
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_21039571
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Breast
Breast Neoplasms - mortality
Breast Neoplasms - therapy
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - mortality
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - therapy
CARCINOMAS
Combined Modality Therapy - statistics & numerical data
DIAGNOSIS
Ductal carcinoma in situ
Female
HEALTH HAZARDS
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
MAMMARY GLANDS
Mastectomy - statistics & numerical data
Mastectomy, Segmental - statistics & numerical data
MEDICAL RECORDS
Middle Aged
MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS
NECROSIS
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention & control
Netherlands - epidemiology
PATIENTS
Proportional Hazards Models
Radiation Injuries - complications
Radiology
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
RADIOTHERAPY
Radiotherapy - statistics & numerical data
Recurrences
Risk factors
SURGERY
Survival Rate
Treatment
Treatment Outcome
title Local Recurrences After Different Treatment Strategies for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Population-Based Study in the East Netherlands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T03%3A55%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Local%20Recurrences%20After%20Different%20Treatment%20Strategies%20for%20Ductal%20Carcinoma%20In%20Situ%20of%20the%20Breast:%20A%20Population-Based%20Study%20in%20the%20East%20Netherlands&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Schouten%20van%20der%20Velden,%20Arjan%20P.,%20M.D&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=703&rft.epage=710&rft.pages=703-710&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.062&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_osti_%3E17544591%3C/pubmed_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/17544591&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0360301607006761&rfr_iscdi=true