Cantilever spring constant calibration using laser Doppler vibrometry
Uncertainty in cantilever spring constants is a critical issue in atomic force microscopy (AFM) force measurements. Though numerous methods exist for calibrating cantilever spring constants, the accuracy of these methods can be limited by both the physical models themselves as well as uncertainties...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Review of scientific instruments 2007-06, Vol.78 (6), p.063701-063701-5 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 063701-5 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 063701 |
| container_title | Review of scientific instruments |
| container_volume | 78 |
| creator | Ohler, Benjamin |
| description | Uncertainty in cantilever spring constants is a critical issue in atomic force microscopy (AFM) force measurements. Though numerous methods exist for calibrating cantilever spring constants, the accuracy of these methods can be limited by both the physical models themselves as well as uncertainties in their experimental implementation. Here we report the results from two of the most common calibration methods, the thermal tune method and the Sader method. These were implemented on a standard AFM system as well as using laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV). Using LDV eliminates some uncertainties associated with optical lever detection on an AFM. It also offers considerably higher signal to noise deflection measurements. We find that AFM and LDV result in similar uncertainty in the calibrated spring constants, about 5%, using either the thermal tune or Sader methods provided that certain limitations of the methods and instrumentation are observed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1063/1.2743272 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20953469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70664985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-ebbd444e2032f8d10c4ff7dc62be9cd07faa1d314f91ecd19736c4ebf3e2e0c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK0e_AMSEAQPqfvV3eQiSK0fUPCi52WzmdVIkq3ZTaH_3q0J9ORcBmYeXl4ehC4JnhMs2B2ZU8kZlfQITQnO8lQKyo7RFGPGUyF5NkFn3n_jOAtCTtGESEG4IHiKVkvdhqqGLXSJ33RV-5kY1_oQr4nRdVV0OlSuTXq_f9XaR-7RbTZ13Nv4dQ2EbneOTqyuPVyMe4Y-nlbvy5d0_fb8unxYpybWCykURck5B4oZtVlJsOHWytIIWkBuSiyt1qRkhNucgClJLpkwHArLgAI2ks3Q9ZDrfKiUN1UA8xX7tmCCojhfMC7ySN0M1KZzPz34oJrKG6hr3YLrvZJYCJ5niwjeDqDpnPcdWBUNNLrbKYLV3qwiajQb2asxtC8aKA_kqDIC9wOwr_Un7f-0g3Q1SFfGsV8gHIlk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70664985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cantilever spring constant calibration using laser Doppler vibrometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>AIP Digital Archive</source><creator>Ohler, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ohler, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>Uncertainty in cantilever spring constants is a critical issue in atomic force microscopy (AFM) force measurements. Though numerous methods exist for calibrating cantilever spring constants, the accuracy of these methods can be limited by both the physical models themselves as well as uncertainties in their experimental implementation. Here we report the results from two of the most common calibration methods, the thermal tune method and the Sader method. These were implemented on a standard AFM system as well as using laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV). Using LDV eliminates some uncertainties associated with optical lever detection on an AFM. It also offers considerably higher signal to noise deflection measurements. We find that AFM and LDV result in similar uncertainty in the calibrated spring constants, about 5%, using either the thermal tune or Sader methods provided that certain limitations of the methods and instrumentation are observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6748</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.2743272</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17614610</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RSINAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>ACCURACY ; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY ; CALIBRATION ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure Analysis - instrumentation ; Equipment Failure Analysis - methods ; Equipment Failure Analysis - standards ; INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ; Laser-Doppler Flowmetry - methods ; Laser-Doppler Flowmetry - standards ; LASERS ; Microscopy, Atomic Force - instrumentation ; Microscopy, Atomic Force - methods ; Microscopy, Atomic Force - standards ; NOISE ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; SIGNALS ; SPRINGS ; Transducers ; United States ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>Review of scientific instruments, 2007-06, Vol.78 (6), p.063701-063701-5</ispartof><rights>2007 American Institute of Physics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-ebbd444e2032f8d10c4ff7dc62be9cd07faa1d314f91ecd19736c4ebf3e2e0c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-ebbd444e2032f8d10c4ff7dc62be9cd07faa1d314f91ecd19736c4ebf3e2e0c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/rsi/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/1.2743272$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,794,885,1559,4512,27924,27925,76384,76390</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17614610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/20953469$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ohler, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>Cantilever spring constant calibration using laser Doppler vibrometry</title><title>Review of scientific instruments</title><addtitle>Rev Sci Instrum</addtitle><description>Uncertainty in cantilever spring constants is a critical issue in atomic force microscopy (AFM) force measurements. Though numerous methods exist for calibrating cantilever spring constants, the accuracy of these methods can be limited by both the physical models themselves as well as uncertainties in their experimental implementation. Here we report the results from two of the most common calibration methods, the thermal tune method and the Sader method. These were implemented on a standard AFM system as well as using laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV). Using LDV eliminates some uncertainties associated with optical lever detection on an AFM. It also offers considerably higher signal to noise deflection measurements. We find that AFM and LDV result in similar uncertainty in the calibrated spring constants, about 5%, using either the thermal tune or Sader methods provided that certain limitations of the methods and instrumentation are observed.</description><subject>ACCURACY</subject><subject>ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY</subject><subject>CALIBRATION</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis - standards</subject><subject>INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>Laser-Doppler Flowmetry - methods</subject><subject>Laser-Doppler Flowmetry - standards</subject><subject>LASERS</subject><subject>Microscopy, Atomic Force - instrumentation</subject><subject>Microscopy, Atomic Force - methods</subject><subject>Microscopy, Atomic Force - standards</subject><subject>NOISE</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>SIGNALS</subject><subject>SPRINGS</subject><subject>Transducers</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>0034-6748</issn><issn>1089-7623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK0e_AMSEAQPqfvV3eQiSK0fUPCi52WzmdVIkq3ZTaH_3q0J9ORcBmYeXl4ehC4JnhMs2B2ZU8kZlfQITQnO8lQKyo7RFGPGUyF5NkFn3n_jOAtCTtGESEG4IHiKVkvdhqqGLXSJ33RV-5kY1_oQr4nRdVV0OlSuTXq_f9XaR-7RbTZ13Nv4dQ2EbneOTqyuPVyMe4Y-nlbvy5d0_fb8unxYpybWCykURck5B4oZtVlJsOHWytIIWkBuSiyt1qRkhNucgClJLpkwHArLgAI2ks3Q9ZDrfKiUN1UA8xX7tmCCojhfMC7ySN0M1KZzPz34oJrKG6hr3YLrvZJYCJ5niwjeDqDpnPcdWBUNNLrbKYLV3qwiajQb2asxtC8aKA_kqDIC9wOwr_Un7f-0g3Q1SFfGsV8gHIlk</recordid><startdate>20070601</startdate><enddate>20070601</enddate><creator>Ohler, Benjamin</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070601</creationdate><title>Cantilever spring constant calibration using laser Doppler vibrometry</title><author>Ohler, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-ebbd444e2032f8d10c4ff7dc62be9cd07faa1d314f91ecd19736c4ebf3e2e0c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>ACCURACY</topic><topic>ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY</topic><topic>CALIBRATION</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis - standards</topic><topic>INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>Laser-Doppler Flowmetry - methods</topic><topic>Laser-Doppler Flowmetry - standards</topic><topic>LASERS</topic><topic>Microscopy, Atomic Force - instrumentation</topic><topic>Microscopy, Atomic Force - methods</topic><topic>Microscopy, Atomic Force - standards</topic><topic>NOISE</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>SIGNALS</topic><topic>SPRINGS</topic><topic>Transducers</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ohler, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Review of scientific instruments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ohler, Benjamin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cantilever spring constant calibration using laser Doppler vibrometry</atitle><jtitle>Review of scientific instruments</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Sci Instrum</addtitle><date>2007-06-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>063701</spage><epage>063701-5</epage><pages>063701-063701-5</pages><issn>0034-6748</issn><eissn>1089-7623</eissn><coden>RSINAK</coden><abstract>Uncertainty in cantilever spring constants is a critical issue in atomic force microscopy (AFM) force measurements. Though numerous methods exist for calibrating cantilever spring constants, the accuracy of these methods can be limited by both the physical models themselves as well as uncertainties in their experimental implementation. Here we report the results from two of the most common calibration methods, the thermal tune method and the Sader method. These were implemented on a standard AFM system as well as using laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV). Using LDV eliminates some uncertainties associated with optical lever detection on an AFM. It also offers considerably higher signal to noise deflection measurements. We find that AFM and LDV result in similar uncertainty in the calibrated spring constants, about 5%, using either the thermal tune or Sader methods provided that certain limitations of the methods and instrumentation are observed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><pmid>17614610</pmid><doi>10.1063/1.2743272</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0034-6748 |
| ispartof | Review of scientific instruments, 2007-06, Vol.78 (6), p.063701-063701-5 |
| issn | 0034-6748 1089-7623 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20953469 |
| source | MEDLINE; AIP Journals Complete; AIP Digital Archive |
| subjects | ACCURACY ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY CALIBRATION Equipment Design Equipment Failure Analysis - instrumentation Equipment Failure Analysis - methods Equipment Failure Analysis - standards INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Laser-Doppler Flowmetry - methods Laser-Doppler Flowmetry - standards LASERS Microscopy, Atomic Force - instrumentation Microscopy, Atomic Force - methods Microscopy, Atomic Force - standards NOISE Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity SIGNALS SPRINGS Transducers United States Vibration |
| title | Cantilever spring constant calibration using laser Doppler vibrometry |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A45%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cantilever%20spring%20constant%20calibration%20using%20laser%20Doppler%20vibrometry&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20scientific%20instruments&rft.au=Ohler,%20Benjamin&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=063701&rft.epage=063701-5&rft.pages=063701-063701-5&rft.issn=0034-6748&rft.eissn=1089-7623&rft.coden=RSINAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.2743272&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E70664985%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70664985&rft_id=info:pmid/17614610&rfr_iscdi=true |