Population variability in biological adaptive responses to DNA damage and the shapes of carcinogen dose–response curves

Carcinogen dose–response curves for both ionizing radiation and chemicals are typically assumed to be linear at environmentally relevant doses. This assumption is used to ensure protection of the public health in the absence of relevant dose–response data. A theoretical justification for the assumpt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Toxicology and applied pharmacology 2005-09, Vol.207 (2), p.570-575
Hauptverfasser: Conolly, Rory B., Gaylor, David W., Lutz, Werner K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 575
container_issue 2
container_start_page 570
container_title Toxicology and applied pharmacology
container_volume 207
creator Conolly, Rory B.
Gaylor, David W.
Lutz, Werner K.
description Carcinogen dose–response curves for both ionizing radiation and chemicals are typically assumed to be linear at environmentally relevant doses. This assumption is used to ensure protection of the public health in the absence of relevant dose–response data. A theoretical justification for the assumption has been provided by the argument that low dose linearity is expected when an exogenous agent adds to an ongoing endogenous process. Here, we use computational modeling to evaluate (1) how two biological adaptive processes, induction of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint control, may affect the shapes of dose–response curves for DNA-damaging carcinogens and (2) how the resulting dose–response behaviors may vary within a population. Each model incorporating an adaptive process was capable of generating not only monotonic dose–responses but also nonmonotonic (J-shaped) and threshold responses. Monte Carlo analysis suggested that all these dose–response behaviors could coexist within a population, as the spectrum of qualitative differences arose from quantitative changes in parameter values. While this analysis is largely theoretical, it suggests that (a) accurate prediction of the qualitative form of the dose–response requires a quantitative understanding of the mechanism, (b) significant uncertainty is associated with human health risk prediction in the absence of such quantitative understanding and (c) a stronger experimental and regulatory focus on biological mechanisms and interindividual variability would allow flexibility in regulatory treatment of environmental carcinogens without compromising human health.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.taap.2005.04.027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20721961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041008X05002358</els_id><sourcerecordid>20777671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-ac88085f5c005a1158dee7b567d4d5ed9679bc7f9deaa3559ec54cadc05e46c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-q1DAUh4Mo3vHqC7iQgOCuNWmbpgE3l3v9Bxd1oeAunCanMxk6SU3Sgdn5Dr6hT2LLjLhzdRb5fj_OyUfIc85Kznj7el9mgKmsGBMla0pWyQdkw5lqC1bX9UOyYazhBWPd9yvyJKU9Y0w1DX9MrrhQqm2V3JDTlzDNI2QXPD1CdNC70eUTdZ72Loxh6wyMFCxM2R2RRkxT8AkTzYHefbqhFg6wRQre0rxDmnYwLY9hoAaicT5s0VMbEv7--etvlpo5HjE9JY8GGBM-u8xr8u3d26-3H4r7z-8_3t7cF6auulyA6TrWiUGY5UzgXHQWUfailbaxAq1qpeqNHJRFgFoIhUY0BqxhApvWyPqavDz3hpSdTsZlNDsTvEeTdcVkxVXLF-rVmZpi-DFjyvrgksFxBI9hTisoZStXsDqDJoaUIg56iu4A8aQ506sWvderFr1q0azRi5Yl9OLSPvcHtP8iFw8L8OYM4PITR4dxXRS9QeviuqcN7n_9fwA9pqG8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20777671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Population variability in biological adaptive responses to DNA damage and the shapes of carcinogen dose–response curves</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Conolly, Rory B. ; Gaylor, David W. ; Lutz, Werner K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Conolly, Rory B. ; Gaylor, David W. ; Lutz, Werner K.</creatorcontrib><description>Carcinogen dose–response curves for both ionizing radiation and chemicals are typically assumed to be linear at environmentally relevant doses. This assumption is used to ensure protection of the public health in the absence of relevant dose–response data. A theoretical justification for the assumption has been provided by the argument that low dose linearity is expected when an exogenous agent adds to an ongoing endogenous process. Here, we use computational modeling to evaluate (1) how two biological adaptive processes, induction of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint control, may affect the shapes of dose–response curves for DNA-damaging carcinogens and (2) how the resulting dose–response behaviors may vary within a population. Each model incorporating an adaptive process was capable of generating not only monotonic dose–responses but also nonmonotonic (J-shaped) and threshold responses. Monte Carlo analysis suggested that all these dose–response behaviors could coexist within a population, as the spectrum of qualitative differences arose from quantitative changes in parameter values. While this analysis is largely theoretical, it suggests that (a) accurate prediction of the qualitative form of the dose–response requires a quantitative understanding of the mechanism, (b) significant uncertainty is associated with human health risk prediction in the absence of such quantitative understanding and (c) a stronger experimental and regulatory focus on biological mechanisms and interindividual variability would allow flexibility in regulatory treatment of environmental carcinogens without compromising human health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-008X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0333</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.04.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15996697</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological ; BIOLOGICAL RADIATION EFFECTS ; CARCINOGENS ; Carcinogens - toxicity ; CELL CYCLE ; DNA ; DNA Damage ; DNA DAMAGES ; DNA REPAIR ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Dose–response ; FORECASTING ; Genetics, Population ; Humans ; IONIZING RADIATIONS ; Low dose linear ; MONTE CARLO METHOD ; Nonmonotonic ; POPULATIONS ; PUBLIC HEALTH ; RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGANISMS AND BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS ; Threshold</subject><ispartof>Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2005-09, Vol.207 (2), p.570-575</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-ac88085f5c005a1158dee7b567d4d5ed9679bc7f9deaa3559ec54cadc05e46c73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2005.04.027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15996697$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/20721961$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conolly, Rory B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaylor, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, Werner K.</creatorcontrib><title>Population variability in biological adaptive responses to DNA damage and the shapes of carcinogen dose–response curves</title><title>Toxicology and applied pharmacology</title><addtitle>Toxicol Appl Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Carcinogen dose–response curves for both ionizing radiation and chemicals are typically assumed to be linear at environmentally relevant doses. This assumption is used to ensure protection of the public health in the absence of relevant dose–response data. A theoretical justification for the assumption has been provided by the argument that low dose linearity is expected when an exogenous agent adds to an ongoing endogenous process. Here, we use computational modeling to evaluate (1) how two biological adaptive processes, induction of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint control, may affect the shapes of dose–response curves for DNA-damaging carcinogens and (2) how the resulting dose–response behaviors may vary within a population. Each model incorporating an adaptive process was capable of generating not only monotonic dose–responses but also nonmonotonic (J-shaped) and threshold responses. Monte Carlo analysis suggested that all these dose–response behaviors could coexist within a population, as the spectrum of qualitative differences arose from quantitative changes in parameter values. While this analysis is largely theoretical, it suggests that (a) accurate prediction of the qualitative form of the dose–response requires a quantitative understanding of the mechanism, (b) significant uncertainty is associated with human health risk prediction in the absence of such quantitative understanding and (c) a stronger experimental and regulatory focus on biological mechanisms and interindividual variability would allow flexibility in regulatory treatment of environmental carcinogens without compromising human health.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>BIOLOGICAL RADIATION EFFECTS</subject><subject>CARCINOGENS</subject><subject>Carcinogens - toxicity</subject><subject>CELL CYCLE</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA Damage</subject><subject>DNA DAMAGES</subject><subject>DNA REPAIR</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Dose–response</subject><subject>FORECASTING</subject><subject>Genetics, Population</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IONIZING RADIATIONS</subject><subject>Low dose linear</subject><subject>MONTE CARLO METHOD</subject><subject>Nonmonotonic</subject><subject>POPULATIONS</subject><subject>PUBLIC HEALTH</subject><subject>RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGANISMS AND BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS</subject><subject>Threshold</subject><issn>0041-008X</issn><issn>1096-0333</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc-q1DAUh4Mo3vHqC7iQgOCuNWmbpgE3l3v9Bxd1oeAunCanMxk6SU3Sgdn5Dr6hT2LLjLhzdRb5fj_OyUfIc85Kznj7el9mgKmsGBMla0pWyQdkw5lqC1bX9UOyYazhBWPd9yvyJKU9Y0w1DX9MrrhQqm2V3JDTlzDNI2QXPD1CdNC70eUTdZ72Loxh6wyMFCxM2R2RRkxT8AkTzYHefbqhFg6wRQre0rxDmnYwLY9hoAaicT5s0VMbEv7--etvlpo5HjE9JY8GGBM-u8xr8u3d26-3H4r7z-8_3t7cF6auulyA6TrWiUGY5UzgXHQWUfailbaxAq1qpeqNHJRFgFoIhUY0BqxhApvWyPqavDz3hpSdTsZlNDsTvEeTdcVkxVXLF-rVmZpi-DFjyvrgksFxBI9hTisoZStXsDqDJoaUIg56iu4A8aQ506sWvderFr1q0azRi5Yl9OLSPvcHtP8iFw8L8OYM4PITR4dxXRS9QeviuqcN7n_9fwA9pqG8</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>Conolly, Rory B.</creator><creator>Gaylor, David W.</creator><creator>Lutz, Werner K.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>Population variability in biological adaptive responses to DNA damage and the shapes of carcinogen dose–response curves</title><author>Conolly, Rory B. ; Gaylor, David W. ; Lutz, Werner K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-ac88085f5c005a1158dee7b567d4d5ed9679bc7f9deaa3559ec54cadc05e46c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>BIOLOGICAL RADIATION EFFECTS</topic><topic>CARCINOGENS</topic><topic>Carcinogens - toxicity</topic><topic>CELL CYCLE</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA Damage</topic><topic>DNA DAMAGES</topic><topic>DNA REPAIR</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Dose–response</topic><topic>FORECASTING</topic><topic>Genetics, Population</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IONIZING RADIATIONS</topic><topic>Low dose linear</topic><topic>MONTE CARLO METHOD</topic><topic>Nonmonotonic</topic><topic>POPULATIONS</topic><topic>PUBLIC HEALTH</topic><topic>RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGANISMS AND BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS</topic><topic>Threshold</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conolly, Rory B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaylor, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, Werner K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Toxicology and applied pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conolly, Rory B.</au><au>Gaylor, David W.</au><au>Lutz, Werner K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Population variability in biological adaptive responses to DNA damage and the shapes of carcinogen dose–response curves</atitle><jtitle>Toxicology and applied pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol Appl Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>207</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>570</spage><epage>575</epage><pages>570-575</pages><issn>0041-008X</issn><eissn>1096-0333</eissn><abstract>Carcinogen dose–response curves for both ionizing radiation and chemicals are typically assumed to be linear at environmentally relevant doses. This assumption is used to ensure protection of the public health in the absence of relevant dose–response data. A theoretical justification for the assumption has been provided by the argument that low dose linearity is expected when an exogenous agent adds to an ongoing endogenous process. Here, we use computational modeling to evaluate (1) how two biological adaptive processes, induction of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint control, may affect the shapes of dose–response curves for DNA-damaging carcinogens and (2) how the resulting dose–response behaviors may vary within a population. Each model incorporating an adaptive process was capable of generating not only monotonic dose–responses but also nonmonotonic (J-shaped) and threshold responses. Monte Carlo analysis suggested that all these dose–response behaviors could coexist within a population, as the spectrum of qualitative differences arose from quantitative changes in parameter values. While this analysis is largely theoretical, it suggests that (a) accurate prediction of the qualitative form of the dose–response requires a quantitative understanding of the mechanism, (b) significant uncertainty is associated with human health risk prediction in the absence of such quantitative understanding and (c) a stronger experimental and regulatory focus on biological mechanisms and interindividual variability would allow flexibility in regulatory treatment of environmental carcinogens without compromising human health.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15996697</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.taap.2005.04.027</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-008X
ispartof Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2005-09, Vol.207 (2), p.570-575
issn 0041-008X
1096-0333
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20721961
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adaptation, Physiological
BIOLOGICAL RADIATION EFFECTS
CARCINOGENS
Carcinogens - toxicity
CELL CYCLE
DNA
DNA Damage
DNA DAMAGES
DNA REPAIR
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Dose–response
FORECASTING
Genetics, Population
Humans
IONIZING RADIATIONS
Low dose linear
MONTE CARLO METHOD
Nonmonotonic
POPULATIONS
PUBLIC HEALTH
RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGANISMS AND BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS
Threshold
title Population variability in biological adaptive responses to DNA damage and the shapes of carcinogen dose–response curves
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T04%3A48%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Population%20variability%20in%20biological%20adaptive%20responses%20to%20DNA%20damage%20and%20the%20shapes%20of%20carcinogen%20dose%E2%80%93response%20curves&rft.jtitle=Toxicology%20and%20applied%20pharmacology&rft.au=Conolly,%20Rory%20B.&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=207&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=570&rft.epage=575&rft.pages=570-575&rft.issn=0041-008X&rft.eissn=1096-0333&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.taap.2005.04.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E20777671%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20777671&rft_id=info:pmid/15996697&rft_els_id=S0041008X05002358&rfr_iscdi=true