Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
To assess the cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy (RT) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). A Markov model was constructed for a theoretical cohort of 55-year-old women with DCIS over a life-time horizon. Probability estimates for local noninvas...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2005-03, Vol.61 (4), p.1054-1061 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1061 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1054 |
container_title | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Suh, W. Warren Hillner, Bruce E. Pierce, Lori J. Hayman, James A. |
description | To assess the cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy (RT) in patients with ductal carcinoma
in situ (DCIS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS).
A Markov model was constructed for a theoretical cohort of 55-year-old women with DCIS over a life-time horizon. Probability estimates for local noninvasive (N-INV), local invasive (INV), and distant recurrences were obtained from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-17. Utilities for eight nonmetastatic health states were collected from both healthy women and DCIS patients. Direct medical (2002 Medicare fee schedule) and nonmedical costs (time and transportation) of RT were ascertained.
For BCS + RT vs. BCS alone, the estimated N-INV and INV rates at 12 years were 9% and 8% vs. 16% and 18%, respectively. The incremental cost of adding RT was $3300 despite an initial RT cost of $8700 due to higher local recurrence-related salvage costs incurred with the BCS alone strategy. An increase of 0.09 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) primarily reflected the lower risk of INV with RT, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $36,700/QALY. Sensitivity analyses revealed the ICER to be affected by baseline probability of a local recurrence, relative efficacy of RT in preventing INV, negative impact of an INV on quality of life, and cost of initial RT. Cost of salvage BCS + RT and source of utilities (healthy women vs. DCIS patients) influenced the ICER albeit to a lesser degree.
Addition of RT following BCS for patients with DCIS should not be withheld because of concerns regarding its cost-effectiveness. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.713 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20696133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360301604021091</els_id><sourcerecordid>67496009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-603cf4f4f0316231b7d0e5650304e7c433469b1de3c06564da22f352cb8015593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMo7uzqNxAJCN66rXT-dV8EGdQVFrwoeAvpdPVuhp7ObJKeZb-9aXrAm-RQh_zq1at6hLxjUDNg6tOh9ocY-lPdAIgadK0Zf0F2rNVdxaX885LsgCuoeIGvyHVKBwBgTIvX5IpJLZu2FTvyuA8pVziO6LI_44wp0TDSaAdvsw8zzQ8Y7emZjmGawpOf76kLc8J4titP0xLvMa7fkQ6Ly3aizkbn53C01M80-bysgkWG9hFtym_Iq9FOCd9e6g35_e3rr_1tdffz-4_9l7vK8bbNlQLuRlEecKYazno9AEolgYNA7QTnQnU9G5A7UFKJwTbNyGXj-haYlB2_IR823bKgN8n5jO6heJ_LpqYB1SnGeaE-btQphscFUzZHnxxOk50xLMkoLToFsMqJDXQxpBRxNKfojzY-GwZmDcQczBaIWQMxoE0JpLS9v-gv_RGHf02XBArweQOw3OLsMa5WcXY4-Lg6HYL__4S_pxafCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67496009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Suh, W. Warren ; Hillner, Bruce E. ; Pierce, Lori J. ; Hayman, James A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Suh, W. Warren ; Hillner, Bruce E. ; Pierce, Lori J. ; Hayman, James A.</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy (RT) in patients with ductal carcinoma
in situ (DCIS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS).
A Markov model was constructed for a theoretical cohort of 55-year-old women with DCIS over a life-time horizon. Probability estimates for local noninvasive (N-INV), local invasive (INV), and distant recurrences were obtained from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-17. Utilities for eight nonmetastatic health states were collected from both healthy women and DCIS patients. Direct medical (2002 Medicare fee schedule) and nonmedical costs (time and transportation) of RT were ascertained.
For BCS + RT vs. BCS alone, the estimated N-INV and INV rates at 12 years were 9% and 8% vs. 16% and 18%, respectively. The incremental cost of adding RT was $3300 despite an initial RT cost of $8700 due to higher local recurrence-related salvage costs incurred with the BCS alone strategy. An increase of 0.09 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) primarily reflected the lower risk of INV with RT, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $36,700/QALY. Sensitivity analyses revealed the ICER to be affected by baseline probability of a local recurrence, relative efficacy of RT in preventing INV, negative impact of an INV on quality of life, and cost of initial RT. Cost of salvage BCS + RT and source of utilities (healthy women vs. DCIS patients) influenced the ICER albeit to a lesser degree.
Addition of RT following BCS for patients with DCIS should not be withheld because of concerns regarding its cost-effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.713</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15752884</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - economics ; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Carcinoma in Situ - economics ; Carcinoma in Situ - radiotherapy ; Carcinoma in Situ - surgery ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - economics ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - radiotherapy ; CARCINOMAS ; COST ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Cost-effectiveness ; Decision Trees ; Ductal carcinoma in situ ; Female ; Humans ; MAMMARY GLANDS ; Markov Chains ; MARKOV PROCESS ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - economics ; PATIENTS ; PROBABILITY ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Radiation ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; RADIOTHERAPY ; Radiotherapy - economics ; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; SURGERY ; WOMEN</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2005-03, Vol.61 (4), p.1054-1061</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-603cf4f4f0316231b7d0e5650304e7c433469b1de3c06564da22f352cb8015593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-603cf4f4f0316231b7d0e5650304e7c433469b1de3c06564da22f352cb8015593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.713$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15752884$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/20696133$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suh, W. Warren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillner, Bruce E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Lori J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayman, James A.</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>To assess the cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy (RT) in patients with ductal carcinoma
in situ (DCIS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS).
A Markov model was constructed for a theoretical cohort of 55-year-old women with DCIS over a life-time horizon. Probability estimates for local noninvasive (N-INV), local invasive (INV), and distant recurrences were obtained from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-17. Utilities for eight nonmetastatic health states were collected from both healthy women and DCIS patients. Direct medical (2002 Medicare fee schedule) and nonmedical costs (time and transportation) of RT were ascertained.
For BCS + RT vs. BCS alone, the estimated N-INV and INV rates at 12 years were 9% and 8% vs. 16% and 18%, respectively. The incremental cost of adding RT was $3300 despite an initial RT cost of $8700 due to higher local recurrence-related salvage costs incurred with the BCS alone strategy. An increase of 0.09 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) primarily reflected the lower risk of INV with RT, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $36,700/QALY. Sensitivity analyses revealed the ICER to be affected by baseline probability of a local recurrence, relative efficacy of RT in preventing INV, negative impact of an INV on quality of life, and cost of initial RT. Cost of salvage BCS + RT and source of utilities (healthy women vs. DCIS patients) influenced the ICER albeit to a lesser degree.
Addition of RT following BCS for patients with DCIS should not be withheld because of concerns regarding its cost-effectiveness.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - economics</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - economics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - radiotherapy</subject><subject>CARCINOMAS</subject><subject>COST</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Cost-effectiveness</subject><subject>Decision Trees</subject><subject>Ductal carcinoma in situ</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>MAMMARY GLANDS</subject><subject>Markov Chains</subject><subject>MARKOV PROCESS</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - economics</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>PROBABILITY</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - economics</subject><subject>SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>SURGERY</subject><subject>WOMEN</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMo7uzqNxAJCN66rXT-dV8EGdQVFrwoeAvpdPVuhp7ObJKeZb-9aXrAm-RQh_zq1at6hLxjUDNg6tOh9ocY-lPdAIgadK0Zf0F2rNVdxaX885LsgCuoeIGvyHVKBwBgTIvX5IpJLZu2FTvyuA8pVziO6LI_44wp0TDSaAdvsw8zzQ8Y7emZjmGawpOf76kLc8J4titP0xLvMa7fkQ6Ly3aizkbn53C01M80-bysgkWG9hFtym_Iq9FOCd9e6g35_e3rr_1tdffz-4_9l7vK8bbNlQLuRlEecKYazno9AEolgYNA7QTnQnU9G5A7UFKJwTbNyGXj-haYlB2_IR823bKgN8n5jO6heJ_LpqYB1SnGeaE-btQphscFUzZHnxxOk50xLMkoLToFsMqJDXQxpBRxNKfojzY-GwZmDcQczBaIWQMxoE0JpLS9v-gv_RGHf02XBArweQOw3OLsMa5WcXY4-Lg6HYL__4S_pxafCw</recordid><startdate>20050315</startdate><enddate>20050315</enddate><creator>Suh, W. Warren</creator><creator>Hillner, Bruce E.</creator><creator>Pierce, Lori J.</creator><creator>Hayman, James A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050315</creationdate><title>Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast</title><author>Suh, W. Warren ; Hillner, Bruce E. ; Pierce, Lori J. ; Hayman, James A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-603cf4f4f0316231b7d0e5650304e7c433469b1de3c06564da22f352cb8015593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - economics</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - economics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - radiotherapy</topic><topic>CARCINOMAS</topic><topic>COST</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Cost-effectiveness</topic><topic>Decision Trees</topic><topic>Ductal carcinoma in situ</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>MAMMARY GLANDS</topic><topic>Markov Chains</topic><topic>MARKOV PROCESS</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - economics</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>PROBABILITY</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - economics</topic><topic>SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>SURGERY</topic><topic>WOMEN</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suh, W. Warren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillner, Bruce E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Lori J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayman, James A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suh, W. Warren</au><au>Hillner, Bruce E.</au><au>Pierce, Lori J.</au><au>Hayman, James A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2005-03-15</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1054</spage><epage>1061</epage><pages>1054-1061</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><abstract>To assess the cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy (RT) in patients with ductal carcinoma
in situ (DCIS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS).
A Markov model was constructed for a theoretical cohort of 55-year-old women with DCIS over a life-time horizon. Probability estimates for local noninvasive (N-INV), local invasive (INV), and distant recurrences were obtained from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-17. Utilities for eight nonmetastatic health states were collected from both healthy women and DCIS patients. Direct medical (2002 Medicare fee schedule) and nonmedical costs (time and transportation) of RT were ascertained.
For BCS + RT vs. BCS alone, the estimated N-INV and INV rates at 12 years were 9% and 8% vs. 16% and 18%, respectively. The incremental cost of adding RT was $3300 despite an initial RT cost of $8700 due to higher local recurrence-related salvage costs incurred with the BCS alone strategy. An increase of 0.09 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) primarily reflected the lower risk of INV with RT, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $36,700/QALY. Sensitivity analyses revealed the ICER to be affected by baseline probability of a local recurrence, relative efficacy of RT in preventing INV, negative impact of an INV on quality of life, and cost of initial RT. Cost of salvage BCS + RT and source of utilities (healthy women vs. DCIS patients) influenced the ICER albeit to a lesser degree.
Addition of RT following BCS for patients with DCIS should not be withheld because of concerns regarding its cost-effectiveness.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15752884</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.713</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-3016 |
ispartof | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2005-03, Vol.61 (4), p.1054-1061 |
issn | 0360-3016 1879-355X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20696133 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - economics Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy Breast Neoplasms - surgery Carcinoma in Situ - economics Carcinoma in Situ - radiotherapy Carcinoma in Situ - surgery Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - economics Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - radiotherapy CARCINOMAS COST Cost-Benefit Analysis Cost-effectiveness Decision Trees Ductal carcinoma in situ Female Humans MAMMARY GLANDS Markov Chains MARKOV PROCESS Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - economics PATIENTS PROBABILITY Quality-Adjusted Life Years Radiation RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE RADIOTHERAPY Radiotherapy - economics SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Sensitivity and Specificity SURGERY WOMEN |
title | Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A39%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-effectiveness%20of%20radiation%20therapy%20following%20conservative%20surgery%20for%20ductal%20carcinoma%20in%20situ%20of%20the%20breast&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Suh,%20W.%20Warren&rft.date=2005-03-15&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1054&rft.epage=1061&rft.pages=1054-1061&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.713&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E67496009%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67496009&rft_id=info:pmid/15752884&rft_els_id=S0360301604021091&rfr_iscdi=true |