Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

To assess the cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy (RT) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). A Markov model was constructed for a theoretical cohort of 55-year-old women with DCIS over a life-time horizon. Probability estimates for local noninvas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2005-03, Vol.61 (4), p.1054-1061
Hauptverfasser: Suh, W. Warren, Hillner, Bruce E., Pierce, Lori J., Hayman, James A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1061
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1054
container_title International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
container_volume 61
creator Suh, W. Warren
Hillner, Bruce E.
Pierce, Lori J.
Hayman, James A.
description To assess the cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy (RT) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). A Markov model was constructed for a theoretical cohort of 55-year-old women with DCIS over a life-time horizon. Probability estimates for local noninvasive (N-INV), local invasive (INV), and distant recurrences were obtained from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-17. Utilities for eight nonmetastatic health states were collected from both healthy women and DCIS patients. Direct medical (2002 Medicare fee schedule) and nonmedical costs (time and transportation) of RT were ascertained. For BCS + RT vs. BCS alone, the estimated N-INV and INV rates at 12 years were 9% and 8% vs. 16% and 18%, respectively. The incremental cost of adding RT was $3300 despite an initial RT cost of $8700 due to higher local recurrence-related salvage costs incurred with the BCS alone strategy. An increase of 0.09 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) primarily reflected the lower risk of INV with RT, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $36,700/QALY. Sensitivity analyses revealed the ICER to be affected by baseline probability of a local recurrence, relative efficacy of RT in preventing INV, negative impact of an INV on quality of life, and cost of initial RT. Cost of salvage BCS + RT and source of utilities (healthy women vs. DCIS patients) influenced the ICER albeit to a lesser degree. Addition of RT following BCS for patients with DCIS should not be withheld because of concerns regarding its cost-effectiveness.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.713
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20696133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360301604021091</els_id><sourcerecordid>67496009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-603cf4f4f0316231b7d0e5650304e7c433469b1de3c06564da22f352cb8015593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMo7uzqNxAJCN66rXT-dV8EGdQVFrwoeAvpdPVuhp7ObJKeZb-9aXrAm-RQh_zq1at6hLxjUDNg6tOh9ocY-lPdAIgadK0Zf0F2rNVdxaX885LsgCuoeIGvyHVKBwBgTIvX5IpJLZu2FTvyuA8pVziO6LI_44wp0TDSaAdvsw8zzQ8Y7emZjmGawpOf76kLc8J4titP0xLvMa7fkQ6Ly3aizkbn53C01M80-bysgkWG9hFtym_Iq9FOCd9e6g35_e3rr_1tdffz-4_9l7vK8bbNlQLuRlEecKYazno9AEolgYNA7QTnQnU9G5A7UFKJwTbNyGXj-haYlB2_IR823bKgN8n5jO6heJ_LpqYB1SnGeaE-btQphscFUzZHnxxOk50xLMkoLToFsMqJDXQxpBRxNKfojzY-GwZmDcQczBaIWQMxoE0JpLS9v-gv_RGHf02XBArweQOw3OLsMa5WcXY4-Lg6HYL__4S_pxafCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67496009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Suh, W. Warren ; Hillner, Bruce E. ; Pierce, Lori J. ; Hayman, James A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Suh, W. Warren ; Hillner, Bruce E. ; Pierce, Lori J. ; Hayman, James A.</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy (RT) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). A Markov model was constructed for a theoretical cohort of 55-year-old women with DCIS over a life-time horizon. Probability estimates for local noninvasive (N-INV), local invasive (INV), and distant recurrences were obtained from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-17. Utilities for eight nonmetastatic health states were collected from both healthy women and DCIS patients. Direct medical (2002 Medicare fee schedule) and nonmedical costs (time and transportation) of RT were ascertained. For BCS + RT vs. BCS alone, the estimated N-INV and INV rates at 12 years were 9% and 8% vs. 16% and 18%, respectively. The incremental cost of adding RT was $3300 despite an initial RT cost of $8700 due to higher local recurrence-related salvage costs incurred with the BCS alone strategy. An increase of 0.09 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) primarily reflected the lower risk of INV with RT, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $36,700/QALY. Sensitivity analyses revealed the ICER to be affected by baseline probability of a local recurrence, relative efficacy of RT in preventing INV, negative impact of an INV on quality of life, and cost of initial RT. Cost of salvage BCS + RT and source of utilities (healthy women vs. DCIS patients) influenced the ICER albeit to a lesser degree. Addition of RT following BCS for patients with DCIS should not be withheld because of concerns regarding its cost-effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.713</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15752884</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - economics ; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Carcinoma in Situ - economics ; Carcinoma in Situ - radiotherapy ; Carcinoma in Situ - surgery ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - economics ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - radiotherapy ; CARCINOMAS ; COST ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Cost-effectiveness ; Decision Trees ; Ductal carcinoma in situ ; Female ; Humans ; MAMMARY GLANDS ; Markov Chains ; MARKOV PROCESS ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - economics ; PATIENTS ; PROBABILITY ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Radiation ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; RADIOTHERAPY ; Radiotherapy - economics ; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; SURGERY ; WOMEN</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2005-03, Vol.61 (4), p.1054-1061</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-603cf4f4f0316231b7d0e5650304e7c433469b1de3c06564da22f352cb8015593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-603cf4f4f0316231b7d0e5650304e7c433469b1de3c06564da22f352cb8015593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.713$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15752884$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/20696133$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suh, W. Warren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillner, Bruce E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Lori J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayman, James A.</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>To assess the cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy (RT) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). A Markov model was constructed for a theoretical cohort of 55-year-old women with DCIS over a life-time horizon. Probability estimates for local noninvasive (N-INV), local invasive (INV), and distant recurrences were obtained from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-17. Utilities for eight nonmetastatic health states were collected from both healthy women and DCIS patients. Direct medical (2002 Medicare fee schedule) and nonmedical costs (time and transportation) of RT were ascertained. For BCS + RT vs. BCS alone, the estimated N-INV and INV rates at 12 years were 9% and 8% vs. 16% and 18%, respectively. The incremental cost of adding RT was $3300 despite an initial RT cost of $8700 due to higher local recurrence-related salvage costs incurred with the BCS alone strategy. An increase of 0.09 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) primarily reflected the lower risk of INV with RT, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $36,700/QALY. Sensitivity analyses revealed the ICER to be affected by baseline probability of a local recurrence, relative efficacy of RT in preventing INV, negative impact of an INV on quality of life, and cost of initial RT. Cost of salvage BCS + RT and source of utilities (healthy women vs. DCIS patients) influenced the ICER albeit to a lesser degree. Addition of RT following BCS for patients with DCIS should not be withheld because of concerns regarding its cost-effectiveness.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - economics</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma in Situ - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - economics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - radiotherapy</subject><subject>CARCINOMAS</subject><subject>COST</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Cost-effectiveness</subject><subject>Decision Trees</subject><subject>Ductal carcinoma in situ</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>MAMMARY GLANDS</subject><subject>Markov Chains</subject><subject>MARKOV PROCESS</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - economics</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>PROBABILITY</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - economics</subject><subject>SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>SURGERY</subject><subject>WOMEN</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMo7uzqNxAJCN66rXT-dV8EGdQVFrwoeAvpdPVuhp7ObJKeZb-9aXrAm-RQh_zq1at6hLxjUDNg6tOh9ocY-lPdAIgadK0Zf0F2rNVdxaX885LsgCuoeIGvyHVKBwBgTIvX5IpJLZu2FTvyuA8pVziO6LI_44wp0TDSaAdvsw8zzQ8Y7emZjmGawpOf76kLc8J4titP0xLvMa7fkQ6Ly3aizkbn53C01M80-bysgkWG9hFtym_Iq9FOCd9e6g35_e3rr_1tdffz-4_9l7vK8bbNlQLuRlEecKYazno9AEolgYNA7QTnQnU9G5A7UFKJwTbNyGXj-haYlB2_IR823bKgN8n5jO6heJ_LpqYB1SnGeaE-btQphscFUzZHnxxOk50xLMkoLToFsMqJDXQxpBRxNKfojzY-GwZmDcQczBaIWQMxoE0JpLS9v-gv_RGHf02XBArweQOw3OLsMa5WcXY4-Lg6HYL__4S_pxafCw</recordid><startdate>20050315</startdate><enddate>20050315</enddate><creator>Suh, W. Warren</creator><creator>Hillner, Bruce E.</creator><creator>Pierce, Lori J.</creator><creator>Hayman, James A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050315</creationdate><title>Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast</title><author>Suh, W. Warren ; Hillner, Bruce E. ; Pierce, Lori J. ; Hayman, James A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-603cf4f4f0316231b7d0e5650304e7c433469b1de3c06564da22f352cb8015593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - economics</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma in Situ - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - economics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - radiotherapy</topic><topic>CARCINOMAS</topic><topic>COST</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Cost-effectiveness</topic><topic>Decision Trees</topic><topic>Ductal carcinoma in situ</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>MAMMARY GLANDS</topic><topic>Markov Chains</topic><topic>MARKOV PROCESS</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - economics</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>PROBABILITY</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - economics</topic><topic>SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>SURGERY</topic><topic>WOMEN</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suh, W. Warren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillner, Bruce E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Lori J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayman, James A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suh, W. Warren</au><au>Hillner, Bruce E.</au><au>Pierce, Lori J.</au><au>Hayman, James A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2005-03-15</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1054</spage><epage>1061</epage><pages>1054-1061</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><abstract>To assess the cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy (RT) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). A Markov model was constructed for a theoretical cohort of 55-year-old women with DCIS over a life-time horizon. Probability estimates for local noninvasive (N-INV), local invasive (INV), and distant recurrences were obtained from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-17. Utilities for eight nonmetastatic health states were collected from both healthy women and DCIS patients. Direct medical (2002 Medicare fee schedule) and nonmedical costs (time and transportation) of RT were ascertained. For BCS + RT vs. BCS alone, the estimated N-INV and INV rates at 12 years were 9% and 8% vs. 16% and 18%, respectively. The incremental cost of adding RT was $3300 despite an initial RT cost of $8700 due to higher local recurrence-related salvage costs incurred with the BCS alone strategy. An increase of 0.09 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) primarily reflected the lower risk of INV with RT, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $36,700/QALY. Sensitivity analyses revealed the ICER to be affected by baseline probability of a local recurrence, relative efficacy of RT in preventing INV, negative impact of an INV on quality of life, and cost of initial RT. Cost of salvage BCS + RT and source of utilities (healthy women vs. DCIS patients) influenced the ICER albeit to a lesser degree. Addition of RT following BCS for patients with DCIS should not be withheld because of concerns regarding its cost-effectiveness.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15752884</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.713</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-3016
ispartof International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2005-03, Vol.61 (4), p.1054-1061
issn 0360-3016
1879-355X
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20696133
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - economics
Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Carcinoma in Situ - economics
Carcinoma in Situ - radiotherapy
Carcinoma in Situ - surgery
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - economics
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - radiotherapy
CARCINOMAS
COST
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cost-effectiveness
Decision Trees
Ductal carcinoma in situ
Female
Humans
MAMMARY GLANDS
Markov Chains
MARKOV PROCESS
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - economics
PATIENTS
PROBABILITY
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Radiation
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
RADIOTHERAPY
Radiotherapy - economics
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Sensitivity and Specificity
SURGERY
WOMEN
title Cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy following conservative surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A39%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-effectiveness%20of%20radiation%20therapy%20following%20conservative%20surgery%20for%20ductal%20carcinoma%20in%20situ%20of%20the%20breast&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Suh,%20W.%20Warren&rft.date=2005-03-15&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1054&rft.epage=1061&rft.pages=1054-1061&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.713&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E67496009%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67496009&rft_id=info:pmid/15752884&rft_els_id=S0360301604021091&rfr_iscdi=true