Comment on "Radiation damage of biosystems mediated by secondary electrons: Resonant precursors for uracil molecules" [J. Chem. Phys. 120, 7446 (2004)]

Resonances computed by Gianturco and Lucchese are incorrectly correlated with those observed experimentally. A shift of their pi* resonances by 2 eV gives satisfactory agreement. Arguments for determining whether a resonance is a suitable precursor for the fragmentation products are too simplistic,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of chemical physics 2005-02, Vol.122 (8), p.87105-87105
1. Verfasser: Burrow, P D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 87105
container_issue 8
container_start_page 87105
container_title The Journal of chemical physics
container_volume 122
creator Burrow, P D
description Resonances computed by Gianturco and Lucchese are incorrectly correlated with those observed experimentally. A shift of their pi* resonances by 2 eV gives satisfactory agreement. Arguments for determining whether a resonance is a suitable precursor for the fragmentation products are too simplistic, and in one example, incorrect.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.1850460
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20662316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67751940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-1175e8b0b4941ddc3ca8f94a5543d16cc2d7c0b24a996b888ed8c66e878b35773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkV9r1EAUxQdR7Fp98AvIUEEsNPFOMpk_vsmitVJQij6JDJPJjRtJMuvc5GE_iV_XKbvQp3vg_jhwzmHspYBSgKrfiVKYBqSCR2wjwNhCKwuP2QagEoVVoM7YM6I_ACB0JZ-yM9GYWoE1G_ZvG6cJ54XHmV_c-W7wy5Bl5yf_G3nseTtEOtCCE_EJ79_Y8fbACUOcO58OHEcMS4ozved3SHH22WyfMKyJYiLex8TX5MMw8ilmdB2RLvjPLyXf7nAq-bfdgUouKrjiWkrF31YA8vLXc_ak9yPhi9M9Zz8-ffy-_Vzcfr2-2X64LUIt1VIIoRs0LbTSStF1oQ7e9Fb6ppF1J1QIVacDtJX01qrWGIOdCUqh0aatG63rc_b66BtpGRyFYcGwy9HmHMpVoFRVC5WpN0dqn-LfFWlx00ABx9HPGFdySutGWAkZvDyCIUWihL3bp2HKNTkB7n4rJ9xpq8y-Opmuba72gTyNU_8H1h2L4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67751940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment on "Radiation damage of biosystems mediated by secondary electrons: Resonant precursors for uracil molecules" [J. Chem. Phys. 120, 7446 (2004)]</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>AIP Digital Archive</source><creator>Burrow, P D</creator><creatorcontrib>Burrow, P D</creatorcontrib><description>Resonances computed by Gianturco and Lucchese are incorrectly correlated with those observed experimentally. A shift of their pi* resonances by 2 eV gives satisfactory agreement. Arguments for determining whether a resonance is a suitable precursor for the fragmentation products are too simplistic, and in one example, incorrect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9606</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.1850460</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15836098</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ; BIOLOGICAL RADIATION EFFECTS ; ELECTRON BEAMS ; EV RANGE 01-10 ; FRAGMENTATION ; MATERIALS SCIENCE ; RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGANISMS AND BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS ; URACILS</subject><ispartof>The Journal of chemical physics, 2005-02, Vol.122 (8), p.87105-87105</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-1175e8b0b4941ddc3ca8f94a5543d16cc2d7c0b24a996b888ed8c66e878b35773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-1175e8b0b4941ddc3ca8f94a5543d16cc2d7c0b24a996b888ed8c66e878b35773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15836098$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/20662316$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burrow, P D</creatorcontrib><title>Comment on "Radiation damage of biosystems mediated by secondary electrons: Resonant precursors for uracil molecules" [J. Chem. Phys. 120, 7446 (2004)]</title><title>The Journal of chemical physics</title><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><description>Resonances computed by Gianturco and Lucchese are incorrectly correlated with those observed experimentally. A shift of their pi* resonances by 2 eV gives satisfactory agreement. Arguments for determining whether a resonance is a suitable precursor for the fragmentation products are too simplistic, and in one example, incorrect.</description><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</subject><subject>BIOLOGICAL RADIATION EFFECTS</subject><subject>ELECTRON BEAMS</subject><subject>EV RANGE 01-10</subject><subject>FRAGMENTATION</subject><subject>MATERIALS SCIENCE</subject><subject>RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGANISMS AND BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS</subject><subject>URACILS</subject><issn>0021-9606</issn><issn>1089-7690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkV9r1EAUxQdR7Fp98AvIUEEsNPFOMpk_vsmitVJQij6JDJPJjRtJMuvc5GE_iV_XKbvQp3vg_jhwzmHspYBSgKrfiVKYBqSCR2wjwNhCKwuP2QagEoVVoM7YM6I_ACB0JZ-yM9GYWoE1G_ZvG6cJ54XHmV_c-W7wy5Bl5yf_G3nseTtEOtCCE_EJ79_Y8fbACUOcO58OHEcMS4ozved3SHH22WyfMKyJYiLex8TX5MMw8ilmdB2RLvjPLyXf7nAq-bfdgUouKrjiWkrF31YA8vLXc_ak9yPhi9M9Zz8-ffy-_Vzcfr2-2X64LUIt1VIIoRs0LbTSStF1oQ7e9Fb6ppF1J1QIVacDtJX01qrWGIOdCUqh0aatG63rc_b66BtpGRyFYcGwy9HmHMpVoFRVC5WpN0dqn-LfFWlx00ABx9HPGFdySutGWAkZvDyCIUWihL3bp2HKNTkB7n4rJ9xpq8y-Opmuba72gTyNU_8H1h2L4w</recordid><startdate>20050222</startdate><enddate>20050222</enddate><creator>Burrow, P D</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050222</creationdate><title>Comment on "Radiation damage of biosystems mediated by secondary electrons: Resonant precursors for uracil molecules" [J. Chem. Phys. 120, 7446 (2004)]</title><author>Burrow, P D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-1175e8b0b4941ddc3ca8f94a5543d16cc2d7c0b24a996b888ed8c66e878b35773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</topic><topic>BIOLOGICAL RADIATION EFFECTS</topic><topic>ELECTRON BEAMS</topic><topic>EV RANGE 01-10</topic><topic>FRAGMENTATION</topic><topic>MATERIALS SCIENCE</topic><topic>RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGANISMS AND BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS</topic><topic>URACILS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burrow, P D</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burrow, P D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment on "Radiation damage of biosystems mediated by secondary electrons: Resonant precursors for uracil molecules" [J. Chem. Phys. 120, 7446 (2004)]</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><date>2005-02-22</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>87105</spage><epage>87105</epage><pages>87105-87105</pages><issn>0021-9606</issn><eissn>1089-7690</eissn><abstract>Resonances computed by Gianturco and Lucchese are incorrectly correlated with those observed experimentally. A shift of their pi* resonances by 2 eV gives satisfactory agreement. Arguments for determining whether a resonance is a suitable precursor for the fragmentation products are too simplistic, and in one example, incorrect.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>15836098</pmid><doi>10.1063/1.1850460</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9606
ispartof The Journal of chemical physics, 2005-02, Vol.122 (8), p.87105-87105
issn 0021-9606
1089-7690
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20662316
source AIP Journals Complete; AIP Digital Archive
subjects 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
BIOLOGICAL RADIATION EFFECTS
ELECTRON BEAMS
EV RANGE 01-10
FRAGMENTATION
MATERIALS SCIENCE
RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGANISMS AND BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS
URACILS
title Comment on "Radiation damage of biosystems mediated by secondary electrons: Resonant precursors for uracil molecules" [J. Chem. Phys. 120, 7446 (2004)]
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T15%3A45%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment%20on%20%22Radiation%20damage%20of%20biosystems%20mediated%20by%20secondary%20electrons:%20Resonant%20precursors%20for%20uracil%20molecules%22%20%5BJ.%20Chem.%20Phys.%20120,%207446%20(2004)%5D&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20chemical%20physics&rft.au=Burrow,%20P%20D&rft.date=2005-02-22&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=87105&rft.epage=87105&rft.pages=87105-87105&rft.issn=0021-9606&rft.eissn=1089-7690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.1850460&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E67751940%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67751940&rft_id=info:pmid/15836098&rfr_iscdi=true