Community participation and environmental decision-making in the Niger Delta

The participation of communities in the process of environmental decision-making in Nigeria and the Niger Delta region in particular is a relatively new process. There are many practical problems ranging from financial support, methods used and the willingness of identified stakeholders to participa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental impact assessment review 2004-07, Vol.24 (5), p.495-518
Hauptverfasser: Adomokai, Rosemary, Sheate, William R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 518
container_issue 5
container_start_page 495
container_title Environmental impact assessment review
container_volume 24
creator Adomokai, Rosemary
Sheate, William R.
description The participation of communities in the process of environmental decision-making in Nigeria and the Niger Delta region in particular is a relatively new process. There are many practical problems ranging from financial support, methods used and the willingness of identified stakeholders to participate. This paper seeks to highlight recent developments in community participation and environmental decision-making in the Niger Delta, using the EIA Decree of 1992 as a reference point. The EIA Decree of 1992 is the only legislation that refers to participation of the communities when environmental decisions are being made. The study reported here aimed to examine differences and similarities between the identified stakeholders interviewed in the research, in order to highlight areas of improvement that will encourage positive changes to the process and foster better relations between the stakeholders. The paper provides a brief background to community participation in the Niger Delta region and reports on the research approach adopted. Interviews with stakeholders in the EIA process were undertaken to provide a better understanding of public participation in practice under the EIA Decree. While participation was found to be now firmly on the agenda, there is still much to do to engender greater awareness of EIA and the potential benefits participation can hold.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.01.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20650626</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195925504000228</els_id><sourcerecordid>14695781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-ea8feb57959acd051a6575bb5227ab9d5007cea05986bf16b72062181b2b6d903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVJoZs0fyAnQ6E3OyPtSrYgl7BtPmBJLu1ZyPJsMltb2kjaQP59ZTbn5DSHeZ6Bd17GLjg0HLi63DVINjYCYNUAbwDEF7bgXbus1WopTtgCuJa1FlJ-Y6cp7aBIWncLtlmHaTp4ym_V3sZMjvY2U_CV9UOF_pVi8BP6bMdqQEeprOrJ_iP_VJGv8jNWD_SEsfqFY7bf2detHROev88z9vfm95_1Xb15vL1fX29qt5KQa7TdFnvZaqmtG0Byq2Qr-14K0dpeDxKgdWhB6k71W676VoASvOO96NWgYXnGfhzvhpTJJEcZ3bML3qPLprCy4KpQP4_UPoaXA6ZsJkoOx9F6DIdklq0GobruU5Dr8jgu4XNwpbRsO15AcQRdDClF3Jp9pMnGN8PBzIWZnZkLM3NhBrgphRXp6ihhed0rYZyToXc4UJyDDYE-0v8D6yWdyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14695781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Community participation and environmental decision-making in the Niger Delta</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Adomokai, Rosemary ; Sheate, William R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adomokai, Rosemary ; Sheate, William R.</creatorcontrib><description>The participation of communities in the process of environmental decision-making in Nigeria and the Niger Delta region in particular is a relatively new process. There are many practical problems ranging from financial support, methods used and the willingness of identified stakeholders to participate. This paper seeks to highlight recent developments in community participation and environmental decision-making in the Niger Delta, using the EIA Decree of 1992 as a reference point. The EIA Decree of 1992 is the only legislation that refers to participation of the communities when environmental decisions are being made. The study reported here aimed to examine differences and similarities between the identified stakeholders interviewed in the research, in order to highlight areas of improvement that will encourage positive changes to the process and foster better relations between the stakeholders. The paper provides a brief background to community participation in the Niger Delta region and reports on the research approach adopted. Interviews with stakeholders in the EIA process were undertaken to provide a better understanding of public participation in practice under the EIA Decree. While participation was found to be now firmly on the agenda, there is still much to do to engender greater awareness of EIA and the potential benefits participation can hold.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9255</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6432</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.01.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Brackish ; COMMUNITIES ; Community participation ; DECISION MAKING ; Environment ; Environmental decision-making ; Environmental impact assessment (EIA) ; Environmental impact studies ; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ; Environmental policy ; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; Freshwater ; LEGISLATION ; Marine ; NIGER ; Niger delta ; NIGERIA ; Policy making ; Public participation ; Stakeholder ; Sustainability ; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT</subject><ispartof>Environmental impact assessment review, 2004-07, Vol.24 (5), p.495-518</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-ea8feb57959acd051a6575bb5227ab9d5007cea05986bf16b72062181b2b6d903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-ea8feb57959acd051a6575bb5227ab9d5007cea05986bf16b72062181b2b6d903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/20650626$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adomokai, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheate, William R.</creatorcontrib><title>Community participation and environmental decision-making in the Niger Delta</title><title>Environmental impact assessment review</title><description>The participation of communities in the process of environmental decision-making in Nigeria and the Niger Delta region in particular is a relatively new process. There are many practical problems ranging from financial support, methods used and the willingness of identified stakeholders to participate. This paper seeks to highlight recent developments in community participation and environmental decision-making in the Niger Delta, using the EIA Decree of 1992 as a reference point. The EIA Decree of 1992 is the only legislation that refers to participation of the communities when environmental decisions are being made. The study reported here aimed to examine differences and similarities between the identified stakeholders interviewed in the research, in order to highlight areas of improvement that will encourage positive changes to the process and foster better relations between the stakeholders. The paper provides a brief background to community participation in the Niger Delta region and reports on the research approach adopted. Interviews with stakeholders in the EIA process were undertaken to provide a better understanding of public participation in practice under the EIA Decree. While participation was found to be now firmly on the agenda, there is still much to do to engender greater awareness of EIA and the potential benefits participation can hold.</description><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>COMMUNITIES</subject><subject>Community participation</subject><subject>DECISION MAKING</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental decision-making</subject><subject>Environmental impact assessment (EIA)</subject><subject>Environmental impact studies</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>LEGISLATION</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>NIGER</subject><subject>Niger delta</subject><subject>NIGERIA</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT</subject><issn>0195-9255</issn><issn>1873-6432</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVJoZs0fyAnQ6E3OyPtSrYgl7BtPmBJLu1ZyPJsMltb2kjaQP59ZTbn5DSHeZ6Bd17GLjg0HLi63DVINjYCYNUAbwDEF7bgXbus1WopTtgCuJa1FlJ-Y6cp7aBIWncLtlmHaTp4ym_V3sZMjvY2U_CV9UOF_pVi8BP6bMdqQEeprOrJ_iP_VJGv8jNWD_SEsfqFY7bf2detHROev88z9vfm95_1Xb15vL1fX29qt5KQa7TdFnvZaqmtG0Byq2Qr-14K0dpeDxKgdWhB6k71W676VoASvOO96NWgYXnGfhzvhpTJJEcZ3bML3qPLprCy4KpQP4_UPoaXA6ZsJkoOx9F6DIdklq0GobruU5Dr8jgu4XNwpbRsO15AcQRdDClF3Jp9pMnGN8PBzIWZnZkLM3NhBrgphRXp6ihhed0rYZyToXc4UJyDDYE-0v8D6yWdyg</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Adomokai, Rosemary</creator><creator>Sheate, William R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7T4</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>Community participation and environmental decision-making in the Niger Delta</title><author>Adomokai, Rosemary ; Sheate, William R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-ea8feb57959acd051a6575bb5227ab9d5007cea05986bf16b72062181b2b6d903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>COMMUNITIES</topic><topic>Community participation</topic><topic>DECISION MAKING</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental decision-making</topic><topic>Environmental impact assessment (EIA)</topic><topic>Environmental impact studies</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>LEGISLATION</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>NIGER</topic><topic>Niger delta</topic><topic>NIGERIA</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adomokai, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheate, William R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Human Population &amp; Natural Resource Management</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Environmental impact assessment review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adomokai, Rosemary</au><au>Sheate, William R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Community participation and environmental decision-making in the Niger Delta</atitle><jtitle>Environmental impact assessment review</jtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>495</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>495-518</pages><issn>0195-9255</issn><eissn>1873-6432</eissn><abstract>The participation of communities in the process of environmental decision-making in Nigeria and the Niger Delta region in particular is a relatively new process. There are many practical problems ranging from financial support, methods used and the willingness of identified stakeholders to participate. This paper seeks to highlight recent developments in community participation and environmental decision-making in the Niger Delta, using the EIA Decree of 1992 as a reference point. The EIA Decree of 1992 is the only legislation that refers to participation of the communities when environmental decisions are being made. The study reported here aimed to examine differences and similarities between the identified stakeholders interviewed in the research, in order to highlight areas of improvement that will encourage positive changes to the process and foster better relations between the stakeholders. The paper provides a brief background to community participation in the Niger Delta region and reports on the research approach adopted. Interviews with stakeholders in the EIA process were undertaken to provide a better understanding of public participation in practice under the EIA Decree. While participation was found to be now firmly on the agenda, there is still much to do to engender greater awareness of EIA and the potential benefits participation can hold.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eiar.2004.01.002</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-9255
ispartof Environmental impact assessment review, 2004-07, Vol.24 (5), p.495-518
issn 0195-9255
1873-6432
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20650626
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Brackish
COMMUNITIES
Community participation
DECISION MAKING
Environment
Environmental decision-making
Environmental impact assessment (EIA)
Environmental impact studies
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Environmental policy
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Freshwater
LEGISLATION
Marine
NIGER
Niger delta
NIGERIA
Policy making
Public participation
Stakeholder
Sustainability
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
title Community participation and environmental decision-making in the Niger Delta
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A45%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Community%20participation%20and%20environmental%20decision-making%20in%20the%20Niger%20Delta&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20impact%20assessment%20review&rft.au=Adomokai,%20Rosemary&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=495&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=495-518&rft.issn=0195-9255&rft.eissn=1873-6432&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E14695781%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14695781&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0195925504000228&rfr_iscdi=true