Transport policy making and SEA in Liverpool, Amsterdam and Berlin—1997 and 2002

The paper evaluates transport policy making and strategic environmental assessment (SEA) practice in the city regions of Liverpool (Merseyside), Amsterdam (Regional Body of Amsterdam, ROA) and Berlin at two points in time; 2002 and 1997. By 2002, all three examined regions had abolished either 1997...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental impact assessment review 2004-04, Vol.24 (3), p.319-336
1. Verfasser: Fischer, Thomas B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 336
container_issue 3
container_start_page 319
container_title Environmental impact assessment review
container_volume 24
creator Fischer, Thomas B.
description The paper evaluates transport policy making and strategic environmental assessment (SEA) practice in the city regions of Liverpool (Merseyside), Amsterdam (Regional Body of Amsterdam, ROA) and Berlin at two points in time; 2002 and 1997. By 2002, all three examined regions had abolished either 1997 policy-SEA practice or the intention to conduct policy-SEA. Furthermore, between 1997 and 2002, the three regions had been moving away from a possible ‘window of opportunity’ to formalise policy-SEA. Finally, transport policies in 2002 were found to be less strategic and more project-oriented than those in 1997.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20650617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195925503001823</els_id><sourcerecordid>37875935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c35b8413f6a9f0c515f99727aad86e0150220aabf82709f798063850c335d68b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1qGzEUhUVpoK7TF-hqoJBVZ3IlWX-QjWuSJmAIJM5ayBpNK3dGmkqTgHd5iDxhnqQzdtfJSnD0ncO99yD0FUOFAfPzXeW8SRUBoKNQARYf0AxLQUu-oOQjmgFWrFSEsU_oc847GE1KyRm62yQTch_TUPSx9XZfdOaPD78KE-ri_nJZ-FCs_ZNLfYzt92LZ5cGl2nSH_x8utT68Pr9gpcRBGQcgp-ikMW12X_6_c_RwdblZXZfr2583q-W6tAsGQ2kp28oFpg03qgHLMGvGFCKMqSV3gBkQAsZsG0kEqEYoCZxKBpZSVnO5pXP07Zgb8-B1tn5w9reNITg7aAKcAcdipM6OVJ_i30eXB935bF3bmuDiY9ZUSMEUZe-CeEwjVL2fiBdcAeFkBMkRtCnmnFyj--Q7k_Yag55q0zs91aan2iYNDvNeHE1uPN2Td2nazAXrap-mxero37L_A_1HnUM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14690262</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transport policy making and SEA in Liverpool, Amsterdam and Berlin—1997 and 2002</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Fischer, Thomas B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><description>The paper evaluates transport policy making and strategic environmental assessment (SEA) practice in the city regions of Liverpool (Merseyside), Amsterdam (Regional Body of Amsterdam, ROA) and Berlin at two points in time; 2002 and 1997. By 2002, all three examined regions had abolished either 1997 policy-SEA practice or the intention to conduct policy-SEA. Furthermore, between 1997 and 2002, the three regions had been moving away from a possible ‘window of opportunity’ to formalise policy-SEA. Finally, transport policies in 2002 were found to be less strategic and more project-oriented than those in 1997.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-9255</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6432</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Ecology ; Environment ; Environmental economics ; Environmental impact studies ; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ; Environmental policy ; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; Impact assessment ; LAND TRANSPORT ; PLANNING ; Policy making ; policy-SEA ; Regional planning ; Transport planning ; Transport policy ; URBAN AREAS</subject><ispartof>Environmental impact assessment review, 2004-04, Vol.24 (3), p.319-336</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c35b8413f6a9f0c515f99727aad86e0150220aabf82709f798063850c335d68b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c35b8413f6a9f0c515f99727aad86e0150220aabf82709f798063850c335d68b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/20650617$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><title>Transport policy making and SEA in Liverpool, Amsterdam and Berlin—1997 and 2002</title><title>Environmental impact assessment review</title><description>The paper evaluates transport policy making and strategic environmental assessment (SEA) practice in the city regions of Liverpool (Merseyside), Amsterdam (Regional Body of Amsterdam, ROA) and Berlin at two points in time; 2002 and 1997. By 2002, all three examined regions had abolished either 1997 policy-SEA practice or the intention to conduct policy-SEA. Furthermore, between 1997 and 2002, the three regions had been moving away from a possible ‘window of opportunity’ to formalise policy-SEA. Finally, transport policies in 2002 were found to be less strategic and more project-oriented than those in 1997.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Environmental impact studies</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Impact assessment</subject><subject>LAND TRANSPORT</subject><subject>PLANNING</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>policy-SEA</subject><subject>Regional planning</subject><subject>Transport planning</subject><subject>Transport policy</subject><subject>URBAN AREAS</subject><issn>0195-9255</issn><issn>1873-6432</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1qGzEUhUVpoK7TF-hqoJBVZ3IlWX-QjWuSJmAIJM5ayBpNK3dGmkqTgHd5iDxhnqQzdtfJSnD0ncO99yD0FUOFAfPzXeW8SRUBoKNQARYf0AxLQUu-oOQjmgFWrFSEsU_oc847GE1KyRm62yQTch_TUPSx9XZfdOaPD78KE-ri_nJZ-FCs_ZNLfYzt92LZ5cGl2nSH_x8utT68Pr9gpcRBGQcgp-ikMW12X_6_c_RwdblZXZfr2583q-W6tAsGQ2kp28oFpg03qgHLMGvGFCKMqSV3gBkQAsZsG0kEqEYoCZxKBpZSVnO5pXP07Zgb8-B1tn5w9reNITg7aAKcAcdipM6OVJ_i30eXB935bF3bmuDiY9ZUSMEUZe-CeEwjVL2fiBdcAeFkBMkRtCnmnFyj--Q7k_Yag55q0zs91aan2iYNDvNeHE1uPN2Td2nazAXrap-mxero37L_A_1HnUM</recordid><startdate>20040401</startdate><enddate>20040401</enddate><creator>Fischer, Thomas B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040401</creationdate><title>Transport policy making and SEA in Liverpool, Amsterdam and Berlin—1997 and 2002</title><author>Fischer, Thomas B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-c35b8413f6a9f0c515f99727aad86e0150220aabf82709f798063850c335d68b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Environmental impact studies</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Impact assessment</topic><topic>LAND TRANSPORT</topic><topic>PLANNING</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>policy-SEA</topic><topic>Regional planning</topic><topic>Transport planning</topic><topic>Transport policy</topic><topic>URBAN AREAS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Environmental impact assessment review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fischer, Thomas B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transport policy making and SEA in Liverpool, Amsterdam and Berlin—1997 and 2002</atitle><jtitle>Environmental impact assessment review</jtitle><date>2004-04-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>336</epage><pages>319-336</pages><issn>0195-9255</issn><eissn>1873-6432</eissn><abstract>The paper evaluates transport policy making and strategic environmental assessment (SEA) practice in the city regions of Liverpool (Merseyside), Amsterdam (Regional Body of Amsterdam, ROA) and Berlin at two points in time; 2002 and 1997. By 2002, all three examined regions had abolished either 1997 policy-SEA practice or the intention to conduct policy-SEA. Furthermore, between 1997 and 2002, the three regions had been moving away from a possible ‘window of opportunity’ to formalise policy-SEA. Finally, transport policies in 2002 were found to be less strategic and more project-oriented than those in 1997.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.017</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-9255
ispartof Environmental impact assessment review, 2004-04, Vol.24 (3), p.319-336
issn 0195-9255
1873-6432
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20650617
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Comparative analysis
Ecology
Environment
Environmental economics
Environmental impact studies
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Environmental policy
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Impact assessment
LAND TRANSPORT
PLANNING
Policy making
policy-SEA
Regional planning
Transport planning
Transport policy
URBAN AREAS
title Transport policy making and SEA in Liverpool, Amsterdam and Berlin—1997 and 2002
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A59%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transport%20policy%20making%20and%20SEA%20in%20Liverpool,%20Amsterdam%20and%20Berlin%E2%80%941997%20and%202002&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20impact%20assessment%20review&rft.au=Fischer,%20Thomas%20B.&rft.date=2004-04-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=336&rft.pages=319-336&rft.issn=0195-9255&rft.eissn=1873-6432&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E37875935%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14690262&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0195925503001823&rfr_iscdi=true