Nitrous Oxide and Methane Emissions following Application of Animal Manures to Grassland
Nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions were measured from grassland following manure applications at three times of the year. Pig (Sus scrofa) slurry and dairy cow (Bos taurus) slurry were applied in April, at equal rates of ammoniacal‐N (NH+4‐N), and in July, at equal volumetric rates (50...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental quality 2000-01, Vol.29 (1), p.277-287 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 287 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 277 |
| container_title | Journal of environmental quality |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Chadwick, D. R. Pain, B. F. Brookman, S. K. E. |
| description | Nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions were measured from grassland following manure applications at three times of the year. Pig (Sus scrofa) slurry and dairy cow (Bos taurus) slurry were applied in April, at equal rates of ammoniacal‐N (NH+4‐N), and in July, at equal volumetric rates (50 m3 ha−1). I n October, five manure types were applied to grassland plots at typical application rates: pig slurry, dilute dairy cow effluent, pig farm yard manure (FYM), beef FYM and layer manure. Emissions were measured for 20, 22, and 24 d, respectively. In April, greater cumulative emissions of N2O‐N were measured following application of dairy cow slurry (1.51 kg ha−1) than pig slurry (0.77 kg ha−1). Cumulative CH4 emissions following application in April were significantly greater from the dairy cow slurry treatment (0.58 kg ha−1) than the pig slurry treatment (0.13 kg ha−1) (P < 0.05). In July, significantly greater N2O‐N emissions resulted from pig slurry‐treated plots (0.57 kg ha−1) than dairy cow slurry‐treated plots (0.34 kg ha−1). Cumulative net CH4 emissions were very low following July applications ( |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900010035x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20075833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14526716</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563X-a2977d81bf310dfe2d658518f18cd1d50ea1a03f279301fb711db3ceab4748603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV1rHCEUhqW00G3a_yD9yN0kx69x5qIXS9imCfmg0MJCL8R1tHExutFZkvz7OuxCoSmUCCrK43t834PQJwJHlDB-vLZ3FACOALiknAoA2tczAWDi4QWaEcFkQ-vyEs0mppmg1-hNKetKUZDtDC2v_JjTtuDrBz9YrOOAL-14o6PFi1tfik-xYJdCSPc-_sLzzSZ4o8d6jZPD8-hvdcCXOm6zLXhM-DTrUkKVeYteOR2KfbffD9CPL4vvJ1-bi-vTs5P5RWNEy5aNpr2UQ0dWjhEYnKVDKzpBOkc6M5BBgNVEA3NU9gyIW0lChhUzVq-45F0L7AB92OmmMnpVjB-tuTEpRmtGVeORomOsUoc7apPT3daWUVVzxob6U1vdKyJFX1OD_4Nc0FaStoLv_wLXaZtjtapIL1nP-45W6PMOMjmVkq1Tm1wTy4-KgJp6qPY9VP_sYX3_cV9EF6ODyzoaX_6IUA5tzyv2c4fd-2Afn1dDnS--0WnCNJ4CS_YblrSz5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197394982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nitrous Oxide and Methane Emissions following Application of Animal Manures to Grassland</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Chadwick, D. R. ; Pain, B. F. ; Brookman, S. K. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chadwick, D. R. ; Pain, B. F. ; Brookman, S. K. E. ; Inst. of Grassland and Environmental Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon (GB)</creatorcontrib><description>Nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions were measured from grassland following manure applications at three times of the year. Pig (Sus scrofa) slurry and dairy cow (Bos taurus) slurry were applied in April, at equal rates of ammoniacal‐N (NH+4‐N), and in July, at equal volumetric rates (50 m3 ha−1). I n October, five manure types were applied to grassland plots at typical application rates: pig slurry, dilute dairy cow effluent, pig farm yard manure (FYM), beef FYM and layer manure. Emissions were measured for 20, 22, and 24 d, respectively. In April, greater cumulative emissions of N2O‐N were measured following application of dairy cow slurry (1.51 kg ha−1) than pig slurry (0.77 kg ha−1). Cumulative CH4 emissions following application in April were significantly greater from the dairy cow slurry treatment (0.58 kg ha−1) than the pig slurry treatment (0.13 kg ha−1) (P < 0.05). In July, significantly greater N2O‐N emissions resulted from pig slurry‐treated plots (0.57 kg ha−1) than dairy cow slurry‐treated plots (0.34 kg ha−1). Cumulative net CH4 emissions were very low following July applications (<10 g ha−1). In October, the lowest N2O‐N emission resulted from application of dilute dairy effluent, 0.15 kg ha−1, with the greatest net emission from the application of pig slurry, 0.74 kg ha−1. Methane emissions were greatest from the plots that received pig FYM, resulting in a mean cumulative net emission of 2.39 kg ha−1.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900010035x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</publisher><subject>AGRICULTURAL WASTES ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal manures ; Applied sciences ; Atmospheric pollution ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bos taurus ; Dispersed sources and other ; EMISSION ; ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION ; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Grasslands ; GROUND DISPOSAL ; MANURES ; METHANE ; NITROUS OXIDE ; Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries ; Pollution ; Pollution sources. Measurement results ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; SOILS ; Sus scrofa ; WASTE MANAGEMENT ; WASTE PRODUCT UTILIZATION</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2000-01, Vol.29 (1), p.277-287</ispartof><rights>2000 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy, Inc. Jan/Feb 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563X-a2977d81bf310dfe2d658518f18cd1d50ea1a03f279301fb711db3ceab4748603</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fjeq2000.00472425002900010035x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fjeq2000.00472425002900010035x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,776,780,785,786,881,1411,23911,23912,25120,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1240694$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/20075833$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chadwick, D. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pain, B. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brookman, S. K. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inst. of Grassland and Environmental Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon (GB)</creatorcontrib><title>Nitrous Oxide and Methane Emissions following Application of Animal Manures to Grassland</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><description>Nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions were measured from grassland following manure applications at three times of the year. Pig (Sus scrofa) slurry and dairy cow (Bos taurus) slurry were applied in April, at equal rates of ammoniacal‐N (NH+4‐N), and in July, at equal volumetric rates (50 m3 ha−1). I n October, five manure types were applied to grassland plots at typical application rates: pig slurry, dilute dairy cow effluent, pig farm yard manure (FYM), beef FYM and layer manure. Emissions were measured for 20, 22, and 24 d, respectively. In April, greater cumulative emissions of N2O‐N were measured following application of dairy cow slurry (1.51 kg ha−1) than pig slurry (0.77 kg ha−1). Cumulative CH4 emissions following application in April were significantly greater from the dairy cow slurry treatment (0.58 kg ha−1) than the pig slurry treatment (0.13 kg ha−1) (P < 0.05). In July, significantly greater N2O‐N emissions resulted from pig slurry‐treated plots (0.57 kg ha−1) than dairy cow slurry‐treated plots (0.34 kg ha−1). Cumulative net CH4 emissions were very low following July applications (<10 g ha−1). In October, the lowest N2O‐N emission resulted from application of dilute dairy effluent, 0.15 kg ha−1, with the greatest net emission from the application of pig slurry, 0.74 kg ha−1. Methane emissions were greatest from the plots that received pig FYM, resulting in a mean cumulative net emission of 2.39 kg ha−1.</description><subject>AGRICULTURAL WASTES</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal manures</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bos taurus</subject><subject>Dispersed sources and other</subject><subject>EMISSION</subject><subject>ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>GROUND DISPOSAL</subject><subject>MANURES</subject><subject>METHANE</subject><subject>NITROUS OXIDE</subject><subject>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution sources. Measurement results</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>SOILS</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><subject>WASTE MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>WASTE PRODUCT UTILIZATION</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkV1rHCEUhqW00G3a_yD9yN0kx69x5qIXS9imCfmg0MJCL8R1tHExutFZkvz7OuxCoSmUCCrK43t834PQJwJHlDB-vLZ3FACOALiknAoA2tczAWDi4QWaEcFkQ-vyEs0mppmg1-hNKetKUZDtDC2v_JjTtuDrBz9YrOOAL-14o6PFi1tfik-xYJdCSPc-_sLzzSZ4o8d6jZPD8-hvdcCXOm6zLXhM-DTrUkKVeYteOR2KfbffD9CPL4vvJ1-bi-vTs5P5RWNEy5aNpr2UQ0dWjhEYnKVDKzpBOkc6M5BBgNVEA3NU9gyIW0lChhUzVq-45F0L7AB92OmmMnpVjB-tuTEpRmtGVeORomOsUoc7apPT3daWUVVzxob6U1vdKyJFX1OD_4Nc0FaStoLv_wLXaZtjtapIL1nP-45W6PMOMjmVkq1Tm1wTy4-KgJp6qPY9VP_sYX3_cV9EF6ODyzoaX_6IUA5tzyv2c4fd-2Afn1dDnS--0WnCNJ4CS_YblrSz5w</recordid><startdate>200001</startdate><enddate>200001</enddate><creator>Chadwick, D. R.</creator><creator>Pain, B. F.</creator><creator>Brookman, S. K. E.</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</general><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200001</creationdate><title>Nitrous Oxide and Methane Emissions following Application of Animal Manures to Grassland</title><author>Chadwick, D. R. ; Pain, B. F. ; Brookman, S. K. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563X-a2977d81bf310dfe2d658518f18cd1d50ea1a03f279301fb711db3ceab4748603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>AGRICULTURAL WASTES</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal manures</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bos taurus</topic><topic>Dispersed sources and other</topic><topic>EMISSION</topic><topic>ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>GROUND DISPOSAL</topic><topic>MANURES</topic><topic>METHANE</topic><topic>NITROUS OXIDE</topic><topic>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution sources. Measurement results</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>SOILS</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><topic>WASTE MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>WASTE PRODUCT UTILIZATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chadwick, D. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pain, B. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brookman, S. K. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inst. of Grassland and Environmental Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon (GB)</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chadwick, D. R.</au><au>Pain, B. F.</au><au>Brookman, S. K. E.</au><aucorp>Inst. of Grassland and Environmental Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon (GB)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nitrous Oxide and Methane Emissions following Application of Animal Manures to Grassland</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><date>2000-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>277</spage><epage>287</epage><pages>277-287</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>Nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions were measured from grassland following manure applications at three times of the year. Pig (Sus scrofa) slurry and dairy cow (Bos taurus) slurry were applied in April, at equal rates of ammoniacal‐N (NH+4‐N), and in July, at equal volumetric rates (50 m3 ha−1). I n October, five manure types were applied to grassland plots at typical application rates: pig slurry, dilute dairy cow effluent, pig farm yard manure (FYM), beef FYM and layer manure. Emissions were measured for 20, 22, and 24 d, respectively. In April, greater cumulative emissions of N2O‐N were measured following application of dairy cow slurry (1.51 kg ha−1) than pig slurry (0.77 kg ha−1). Cumulative CH4 emissions following application in April were significantly greater from the dairy cow slurry treatment (0.58 kg ha−1) than the pig slurry treatment (0.13 kg ha−1) (P < 0.05). In July, significantly greater N2O‐N emissions resulted from pig slurry‐treated plots (0.57 kg ha−1) than dairy cow slurry‐treated plots (0.34 kg ha−1). Cumulative net CH4 emissions were very low following July applications (<10 g ha−1). In October, the lowest N2O‐N emission resulted from application of dilute dairy effluent, 0.15 kg ha−1, with the greatest net emission from the application of pig slurry, 0.74 kg ha−1. Methane emissions were greatest from the plots that received pig FYM, resulting in a mean cumulative net emission of 2.39 kg ha−1.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900010035x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0047-2425 |
| ispartof | Journal of environmental quality, 2000-01, Vol.29 (1), p.277-287 |
| issn | 0047-2425 1537-2537 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_20075833 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | AGRICULTURAL WASTES Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Animal manures Applied sciences Atmospheric pollution Biological and medical sciences Bos taurus Dispersed sources and other EMISSION ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production Grasslands GROUND DISPOSAL MANURES METHANE NITROUS OXIDE Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries Pollution Pollution sources. Measurement results Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments SOILS Sus scrofa WASTE MANAGEMENT WASTE PRODUCT UTILIZATION |
| title | Nitrous Oxide and Methane Emissions following Application of Animal Manures to Grassland |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A24%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nitrous%20Oxide%20and%20Methane%20Emissions%20following%20Application%20of%20Animal%20Manures%20to%20Grassland&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Chadwick,%20D.%20R.&rft.aucorp=Inst.%20of%20Grassland%20and%20Environmental%20Research,%20North%20Wyke,%20Okehampton,%20Devon%20(GB)&rft.date=2000-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=277&rft.epage=287&rft.pages=277-287&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900010035x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E14526716%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197394982&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |