Slip velocity boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann modeling of microchannel flows
Slip flows in ducts are important in numerous engineering applications, most notably in microchannel flows. Compared to the standard no‐slip Dirichlet condition, the case of slip formulates as a Robin‐type condition for the fluid tangential velocity. Such an increase in mathematical complexity is ac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal for numerical methods in fluids 2022-12, Vol.94 (12), p.2104-2136 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2136 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2104 |
container_title | International journal for numerical methods in fluids |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Silva, Goncalo Ginzburg, Irina |
description | Slip flows in ducts are important in numerous engineering applications, most notably in microchannel flows. Compared to the standard no‐slip Dirichlet condition, the case of slip formulates as a Robin‐type condition for the fluid tangential velocity. Such an increase in mathematical complexity is accompanied by a more challenging numerical transcription. The present work concerns with this topic, addressing the modeling of the slip velocity boundary condition in the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) applied to steady slow viscous flows inside ducts of nontrivial shapes. As novelty, we extend the newly revised local second‐order boundary (LSOB) Dirichlet fluid flow method [Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 378, 20190404 (2020)] to implement the slip velocity condition within the two‐relaxation‐time (TRT) framework. The LSOB follows an in‐node philosophy where its operation principle seeks to explicitly reconstruct the unknown boundary populations in the form of a third‐order accurate Chapman–Enskog expansion, where the wall slip condition is built‐in as a normal Taylor‐type condition. The key point of this approach is that the required first‐ and second‐order momentum derivatives, rather than computed through nonlocal finite difference approximations, are locally determined through a simple local linear algebra procedure, whose formulation is particularly aided by the TRT symmetry argument. To express the obtained derivatives, two approaches are considered, called Lnode$$ \mathrm{Lnode} $$ and Lwall$$ \mathrm{Lwall} $$, which operate with node and wall variables, respectively. These two formulations are developed to prescribe the physical slip condition over plane and curved walls, including the corners. Their consistency and accuracy characteristics are examined against alternative linkwise strategies to impose the wall slip velocity, such as the kinetic‐based diffusive bounce‐back scheme, the central linear interpolation slip scheme, and the multireflection slip scheme. The several slip schemes are tested over different 3D microchannel configurations, with walls not conforming with the LBM uniform mesh. Numerical tests confirm the advanced accuracy characteristics of the proposed LSOB slip boundary scheme, revealing the added challenge of the wall slip modeling, and that parabolic accuracy is a necessary requirement to reach second‐order accuracy within this problem class.
Slip flows in ducts are important in numerous engineering applications, most notably in microch |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/fld.5138 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1996045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2731755787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-9af5d198b8026d5030751b6812cf55af99463c488f8fef28cac4d2a2fdeb7c903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10cFqGzEQBmARWqibFvoIork0h01npNWudEyTJikYemhy6UXIWilWkFfOSk5wnr5yN_TW08DwMczPT8gnhDMEYF99HM4EcnlEFgiqb4B3_A1ZAOuxYaDwHXmf8wMAKCb5gvz-FcOWPrmYbCh7ukq7cTDTnto0DqGENGbq00TL2tFoSgnW0W8plpeNGUe6SYOLYbynydNNsFOy67p2kfqYnvMH8tabmN3H13lM7q6-317cNMuf1z8uzpeN5VLKRhkvBlRyJYF1gwAOvcBVJ5FZL4TxSrUdt62UXnrnmbTGtgMzzA9u1VsF_Jh8nu-mXILONYez6_r_6GzRqFQHrajodEZrE_V2CpsaUicT9M35Uh920AJKRHzCak9mu53S487loh_SbhprBs16jr0Qveyr-jKrmjvnyfl_ZxH0oQpdq9CHKiptZvocotv_1-mr5eVf_wdoc4ll</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2731755787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Slip velocity boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann modeling of microchannel flows</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Silva, Goncalo ; Ginzburg, Irina</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, Goncalo ; Ginzburg, Irina</creatorcontrib><description>Slip flows in ducts are important in numerous engineering applications, most notably in microchannel flows. Compared to the standard no‐slip Dirichlet condition, the case of slip formulates as a Robin‐type condition for the fluid tangential velocity. Such an increase in mathematical complexity is accompanied by a more challenging numerical transcription. The present work concerns with this topic, addressing the modeling of the slip velocity boundary condition in the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) applied to steady slow viscous flows inside ducts of nontrivial shapes. As novelty, we extend the newly revised local second‐order boundary (LSOB) Dirichlet fluid flow method [Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 378, 20190404 (2020)] to implement the slip velocity condition within the two‐relaxation‐time (TRT) framework. The LSOB follows an in‐node philosophy where its operation principle seeks to explicitly reconstruct the unknown boundary populations in the form of a third‐order accurate Chapman–Enskog expansion, where the wall slip condition is built‐in as a normal Taylor‐type condition. The key point of this approach is that the required first‐ and second‐order momentum derivatives, rather than computed through nonlocal finite difference approximations, are locally determined through a simple local linear algebra procedure, whose formulation is particularly aided by the TRT symmetry argument. To express the obtained derivatives, two approaches are considered, called Lnode$$ \mathrm{Lnode} $$ and Lwall$$ \mathrm{Lwall} $$, which operate with node and wall variables, respectively. These two formulations are developed to prescribe the physical slip condition over plane and curved walls, including the corners. Their consistency and accuracy characteristics are examined against alternative linkwise strategies to impose the wall slip velocity, such as the kinetic‐based diffusive bounce‐back scheme, the central linear interpolation slip scheme, and the multireflection slip scheme. The several slip schemes are tested over different 3D microchannel configurations, with walls not conforming with the LBM uniform mesh. Numerical tests confirm the advanced accuracy characteristics of the proposed LSOB slip boundary scheme, revealing the added challenge of the wall slip modeling, and that parabolic accuracy is a necessary requirement to reach second‐order accuracy within this problem class.
Slip flows in ducts are important in numerous engineering applications, most notably in microchannel flows.
The present work proposes a local and highly accurate approach to model the slip velocity boundary condition in the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) applied to the simulation of steady slow viscous flows inside ducts of nontrivial shapes.
The work focuses on the recently revived local second‐order boundary (LSOB) approach, extending it from no‐slip to slip walls of arbitrary shape.
Based on numerical tests performed in several microchannel discretizations, it is shown that the numerical accuracy of the LSOB‐slip scheme here proposed competes (or even supersedes) against the numerical accuracy of state‐of‐the‐art LBM slip schemes either implemented in local or nonlocal form.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-2091</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0363</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/fld.5138</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Boundary conditions ; Dirichlet problem ; Ducts ; Environmental Sciences ; Finite difference method ; Finite element method ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Interpolation ; lattice Boltzmann method ; Linear algebra ; Mathematical models ; Microchannels ; Modelling ; Momentum ; rarefied gases ; slip boundary conditions ; Slip flow ; Slip velocity ; Transcription ; two‐relaxation‐time ; Velocity ; Viscous flow ; Wall slip</subject><ispartof>International journal for numerical methods in fluids, 2022-12, Vol.94 (12), p.2104-2136</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-9af5d198b8026d5030751b6812cf55af99463c488f8fef28cac4d2a2fdeb7c903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-9af5d198b8026d5030751b6812cf55af99463c488f8fef28cac4d2a2fdeb7c903</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2660-350X ; 0000-0001-5719-799X ; 000000015719799X ; 000000022660350X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ffld.5138$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ffld.5138$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04018111$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1996045$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, Goncalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginzburg, Irina</creatorcontrib><title>Slip velocity boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann modeling of microchannel flows</title><title>International journal for numerical methods in fluids</title><description>Slip flows in ducts are important in numerous engineering applications, most notably in microchannel flows. Compared to the standard no‐slip Dirichlet condition, the case of slip formulates as a Robin‐type condition for the fluid tangential velocity. Such an increase in mathematical complexity is accompanied by a more challenging numerical transcription. The present work concerns with this topic, addressing the modeling of the slip velocity boundary condition in the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) applied to steady slow viscous flows inside ducts of nontrivial shapes. As novelty, we extend the newly revised local second‐order boundary (LSOB) Dirichlet fluid flow method [Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 378, 20190404 (2020)] to implement the slip velocity condition within the two‐relaxation‐time (TRT) framework. The LSOB follows an in‐node philosophy where its operation principle seeks to explicitly reconstruct the unknown boundary populations in the form of a third‐order accurate Chapman–Enskog expansion, where the wall slip condition is built‐in as a normal Taylor‐type condition. The key point of this approach is that the required first‐ and second‐order momentum derivatives, rather than computed through nonlocal finite difference approximations, are locally determined through a simple local linear algebra procedure, whose formulation is particularly aided by the TRT symmetry argument. To express the obtained derivatives, two approaches are considered, called Lnode$$ \mathrm{Lnode} $$ and Lwall$$ \mathrm{Lwall} $$, which operate with node and wall variables, respectively. These two formulations are developed to prescribe the physical slip condition over plane and curved walls, including the corners. Their consistency and accuracy characteristics are examined against alternative linkwise strategies to impose the wall slip velocity, such as the kinetic‐based diffusive bounce‐back scheme, the central linear interpolation slip scheme, and the multireflection slip scheme. The several slip schemes are tested over different 3D microchannel configurations, with walls not conforming with the LBM uniform mesh. Numerical tests confirm the advanced accuracy characteristics of the proposed LSOB slip boundary scheme, revealing the added challenge of the wall slip modeling, and that parabolic accuracy is a necessary requirement to reach second‐order accuracy within this problem class.
Slip flows in ducts are important in numerous engineering applications, most notably in microchannel flows.
The present work proposes a local and highly accurate approach to model the slip velocity boundary condition in the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) applied to the simulation of steady slow viscous flows inside ducts of nontrivial shapes.
The work focuses on the recently revived local second‐order boundary (LSOB) approach, extending it from no‐slip to slip walls of arbitrary shape.
Based on numerical tests performed in several microchannel discretizations, it is shown that the numerical accuracy of the LSOB‐slip scheme here proposed competes (or even supersedes) against the numerical accuracy of state‐of‐the‐art LBM slip schemes either implemented in local or nonlocal form.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Dirichlet problem</subject><subject>Ducts</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Finite difference method</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Interpolation</subject><subject>lattice Boltzmann method</subject><subject>Linear algebra</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Microchannels</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Momentum</subject><subject>rarefied gases</subject><subject>slip boundary conditions</subject><subject>Slip flow</subject><subject>Slip velocity</subject><subject>Transcription</subject><subject>two‐relaxation‐time</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Viscous flow</subject><subject>Wall slip</subject><issn>0271-2091</issn><issn>1097-0363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10cFqGzEQBmARWqibFvoIork0h01npNWudEyTJikYemhy6UXIWilWkFfOSk5wnr5yN_TW08DwMczPT8gnhDMEYF99HM4EcnlEFgiqb4B3_A1ZAOuxYaDwHXmf8wMAKCb5gvz-FcOWPrmYbCh7ukq7cTDTnto0DqGENGbq00TL2tFoSgnW0W8plpeNGUe6SYOLYbynydNNsFOy67p2kfqYnvMH8tabmN3H13lM7q6-317cNMuf1z8uzpeN5VLKRhkvBlRyJYF1gwAOvcBVJ5FZL4TxSrUdt62UXnrnmbTGtgMzzA9u1VsF_Jh8nu-mXILONYez6_r_6GzRqFQHrajodEZrE_V2CpsaUicT9M35Uh920AJKRHzCak9mu53S487loh_SbhprBs16jr0Qveyr-jKrmjvnyfl_ZxH0oQpdq9CHKiptZvocotv_1-mr5eVf_wdoc4ll</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Silva, Goncalo</creator><creator>Ginzburg, Irina</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2660-350X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5719-799X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000015719799X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000022660350X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Slip velocity boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann modeling of microchannel flows</title><author>Silva, Goncalo ; Ginzburg, Irina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-9af5d198b8026d5030751b6812cf55af99463c488f8fef28cac4d2a2fdeb7c903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Dirichlet problem</topic><topic>Ducts</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Finite difference method</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Interpolation</topic><topic>lattice Boltzmann method</topic><topic>Linear algebra</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Microchannels</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Momentum</topic><topic>rarefied gases</topic><topic>slip boundary conditions</topic><topic>Slip flow</topic><topic>Slip velocity</topic><topic>Transcription</topic><topic>two‐relaxation‐time</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Viscous flow</topic><topic>Wall slip</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, Goncalo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginzburg, Irina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in fluids</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, Goncalo</au><au>Ginzburg, Irina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Slip velocity boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann modeling of microchannel flows</atitle><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in fluids</jtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2104</spage><epage>2136</epage><pages>2104-2136</pages><issn>0271-2091</issn><eissn>1097-0363</eissn><abstract>Slip flows in ducts are important in numerous engineering applications, most notably in microchannel flows. Compared to the standard no‐slip Dirichlet condition, the case of slip formulates as a Robin‐type condition for the fluid tangential velocity. Such an increase in mathematical complexity is accompanied by a more challenging numerical transcription. The present work concerns with this topic, addressing the modeling of the slip velocity boundary condition in the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) applied to steady slow viscous flows inside ducts of nontrivial shapes. As novelty, we extend the newly revised local second‐order boundary (LSOB) Dirichlet fluid flow method [Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 378, 20190404 (2020)] to implement the slip velocity condition within the two‐relaxation‐time (TRT) framework. The LSOB follows an in‐node philosophy where its operation principle seeks to explicitly reconstruct the unknown boundary populations in the form of a third‐order accurate Chapman–Enskog expansion, where the wall slip condition is built‐in as a normal Taylor‐type condition. The key point of this approach is that the required first‐ and second‐order momentum derivatives, rather than computed through nonlocal finite difference approximations, are locally determined through a simple local linear algebra procedure, whose formulation is particularly aided by the TRT symmetry argument. To express the obtained derivatives, two approaches are considered, called Lnode$$ \mathrm{Lnode} $$ and Lwall$$ \mathrm{Lwall} $$, which operate with node and wall variables, respectively. These two formulations are developed to prescribe the physical slip condition over plane and curved walls, including the corners. Their consistency and accuracy characteristics are examined against alternative linkwise strategies to impose the wall slip velocity, such as the kinetic‐based diffusive bounce‐back scheme, the central linear interpolation slip scheme, and the multireflection slip scheme. The several slip schemes are tested over different 3D microchannel configurations, with walls not conforming with the LBM uniform mesh. Numerical tests confirm the advanced accuracy characteristics of the proposed LSOB slip boundary scheme, revealing the added challenge of the wall slip modeling, and that parabolic accuracy is a necessary requirement to reach second‐order accuracy within this problem class.
Slip flows in ducts are important in numerous engineering applications, most notably in microchannel flows.
The present work proposes a local and highly accurate approach to model the slip velocity boundary condition in the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) applied to the simulation of steady slow viscous flows inside ducts of nontrivial shapes.
The work focuses on the recently revived local second‐order boundary (LSOB) approach, extending it from no‐slip to slip walls of arbitrary shape.
Based on numerical tests performed in several microchannel discretizations, it is shown that the numerical accuracy of the LSOB‐slip scheme here proposed competes (or even supersedes) against the numerical accuracy of state‐of‐the‐art LBM slip schemes either implemented in local or nonlocal form.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/fld.5138</doi><tpages>33</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2660-350X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5719-799X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000015719799X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000022660350X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0271-2091 |
ispartof | International journal for numerical methods in fluids, 2022-12, Vol.94 (12), p.2104-2136 |
issn | 0271-2091 1097-0363 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1996045 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Boundary conditions Dirichlet problem Ducts Environmental Sciences Finite difference method Finite element method Fluid dynamics Fluid flow Interpolation lattice Boltzmann method Linear algebra Mathematical models Microchannels Modelling Momentum rarefied gases slip boundary conditions Slip flow Slip velocity Transcription two‐relaxation‐time Velocity Viscous flow Wall slip |
title | Slip velocity boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann modeling of microchannel flows |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T17%3A27%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Slip%20velocity%20boundary%20conditions%20for%20the%20lattice%20Boltzmann%20modeling%20of%20microchannel%20flows&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20for%20numerical%20methods%20in%20fluids&rft.au=Silva,%20Goncalo&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2104&rft.epage=2136&rft.pages=2104-2136&rft.issn=0271-2091&rft.eissn=1097-0363&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/fld.5138&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2731755787%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2731755787&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |