A comparison of the power potential for surface- and seabed-deployed tidal turbines in the San Juan Archipelago, Salish Sea, WA

The San Juan archipelago lies along the axis of tidal movement between Straits of Juan de Fuca and Strait of Georgia in the Salish Sea. The amplitude of the tidal exchange produces significant tidal currents between the islands, as well as in Rosario Strait to the east and Haro Strait to the west. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Renewable energy 2023-09, Vol.214, p.168-184
Hauptverfasser: Calandra, Gemma, Wang, Taiping, Miller, Calum, Yang, Zhaoqing, Polagye, Brian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 184
container_issue
container_start_page 168
container_title Renewable energy
container_volume 214
creator Calandra, Gemma
Wang, Taiping
Miller, Calum
Yang, Zhaoqing
Polagye, Brian
description The San Juan archipelago lies along the axis of tidal movement between Straits of Juan de Fuca and Strait of Georgia in the Salish Sea. The amplitude of the tidal exchange produces significant tidal currents between the islands, as well as in Rosario Strait to the east and Haro Strait to the west. These currents are of interest as a future source of electrical power generation, given the archipelago’s dependence on electricity supply by a subsea cable from the United States mainland. Here, we evaluate the tidal current energy potential in this region through a re-analysis of measurements collected by the National Ocean Service (NOS) and a high-resolution numerical model. Given the considerable variations in water depth and vertical velocity profiles across candidate tidal energy sites, we consider the trade-offs between tidal turbines deployed from a floating platform and those anchored to the seabed. Measurement re-analysis indicates several locations that could support tidal current power generation by MW-scale turbines with an acceptable balance between turbine size, rated power, and capacity factor. Even for relatively large (30 m) turbine diameters, surface-deployed turbines would be expected to produce up to 30 % more electricity than the same turbine deployed near the seabed due to vertical shear, with this difference increasing for smaller diameter turbines. As anticipated for sparse measurements, the regional simulation identifies several locations with power generation potential more than twice as high as locations in the measurement re-analysis. These sites were either not surveyed or excluded due to data quality issues. A benchmark comparison at the measurement locations with the highest power generation potential shows relatively good model fidelity, though time-average power density disagreements of ± 50 % persist throughout the water column. In addition to the case study, we also treat three general considerations for measurement data: (1) the accuracy of energy generation estimates from hub height speed relative to rotor-averaged power density, (2) the feasibility of extrapolating profiles towards the surface and seabed, and (3) trends in energy generation with rotor size and position in the water column. Overall, these results demonstrate that models and measurements can be used in a complementary manner for tidal energy site assessment and that tidal currents could be an important source of electricity generation in the San Juan archipela
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.099
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1989172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960148123007322</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0960148123007322</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2439-98e8ab02dc9dacb36129c5d0a393c6faea29d25081eeef68f0c0e96924f54f093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LJDEQxYO44Oj6DTwEz3ZbSf-Z5CIMoqsieJhd9hgyScXJ0JM0SY_iab_6ZhzPUvAKivd-UI-QCwY1A9Zfb-qEoUzNgTc1dDVIeURmTMxlBb3gx2QGsoeKtYKdkNOcNwCsE_N2Rv4tqInbUSefY6DR0WmNdIzvmIpOGCavB-pionmXnDZYUR0szahXaCuL4xA_0NLJ22KbdmnlA2bqwydmqQN92hVZJLP2Iw76NV6V6-Dzmi5RX9G_i5_kh9NDxvOvfUb-3N_9vn2onl9-Pd4univD20ZWUqDQK-DWSKvNqukZl6azoBvZmN5p1Fxa3oFgiOh64cAAyl7y1nWtA9mckcsDN-bJq2z8hGZtYghoJsWkkGzOi6k9mEyKOSd0akx-q9OHYqD2TauNOjSt9k0r6FRpusRuDjEsD7x5THs-BoPWpz3eRv894D-slonU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of the power potential for surface- and seabed-deployed tidal turbines in the San Juan Archipelago, Salish Sea, WA</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Calandra, Gemma ; Wang, Taiping ; Miller, Calum ; Yang, Zhaoqing ; Polagye, Brian</creator><creatorcontrib>Calandra, Gemma ; Wang, Taiping ; Miller, Calum ; Yang, Zhaoqing ; Polagye, Brian ; Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>The San Juan archipelago lies along the axis of tidal movement between Straits of Juan de Fuca and Strait of Georgia in the Salish Sea. The amplitude of the tidal exchange produces significant tidal currents between the islands, as well as in Rosario Strait to the east and Haro Strait to the west. These currents are of interest as a future source of electrical power generation, given the archipelago’s dependence on electricity supply by a subsea cable from the United States mainland. Here, we evaluate the tidal current energy potential in this region through a re-analysis of measurements collected by the National Ocean Service (NOS) and a high-resolution numerical model. Given the considerable variations in water depth and vertical velocity profiles across candidate tidal energy sites, we consider the trade-offs between tidal turbines deployed from a floating platform and those anchored to the seabed. Measurement re-analysis indicates several locations that could support tidal current power generation by MW-scale turbines with an acceptable balance between turbine size, rated power, and capacity factor. Even for relatively large (30 m) turbine diameters, surface-deployed turbines would be expected to produce up to 30 % more electricity than the same turbine deployed near the seabed due to vertical shear, with this difference increasing for smaller diameter turbines. As anticipated for sparse measurements, the regional simulation identifies several locations with power generation potential more than twice as high as locations in the measurement re-analysis. These sites were either not surveyed or excluded due to data quality issues. A benchmark comparison at the measurement locations with the highest power generation potential shows relatively good model fidelity, though time-average power density disagreements of ± 50 % persist throughout the water column. In addition to the case study, we also treat three general considerations for measurement data: (1) the accuracy of energy generation estimates from hub height speed relative to rotor-averaged power density, (2) the feasibility of extrapolating profiles towards the surface and seabed, and (3) trends in energy generation with rotor size and position in the water column. Overall, these results demonstrate that models and measurements can be used in a complementary manner for tidal energy site assessment and that tidal currents could be an important source of electricity generation in the San Juan archipelago. •Locations in the San Juan archipelago could support tidal current power generation.•Turbines near the surface produce 30 % more power than those near the seabed.•Simulations indicate sites with more than 2x generation of those with measurements.•Hub-height speed is a good approximation for rotor-averaged kinetic power density.•Tangent or power law fits can be used to extrapolate measurements, when needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-1481</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Marine energy ; Resource characterization ; Salish Sea ; TIDAL AND WAVE POWER ; Tidal currents ; Tidal energy</subject><ispartof>Renewable energy, 2023-09, Vol.214, p.168-184</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2439-98e8ab02dc9dacb36129c5d0a393c6faea29d25081eeef68f0c0e96924f54f093</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5156-5007 ; 0000000251565007 ; 0000000192570796</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.099$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1989172$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calandra, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Taiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Calum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhaoqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polagye, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of the power potential for surface- and seabed-deployed tidal turbines in the San Juan Archipelago, Salish Sea, WA</title><title>Renewable energy</title><description>The San Juan archipelago lies along the axis of tidal movement between Straits of Juan de Fuca and Strait of Georgia in the Salish Sea. The amplitude of the tidal exchange produces significant tidal currents between the islands, as well as in Rosario Strait to the east and Haro Strait to the west. These currents are of interest as a future source of electrical power generation, given the archipelago’s dependence on electricity supply by a subsea cable from the United States mainland. Here, we evaluate the tidal current energy potential in this region through a re-analysis of measurements collected by the National Ocean Service (NOS) and a high-resolution numerical model. Given the considerable variations in water depth and vertical velocity profiles across candidate tidal energy sites, we consider the trade-offs between tidal turbines deployed from a floating platform and those anchored to the seabed. Measurement re-analysis indicates several locations that could support tidal current power generation by MW-scale turbines with an acceptable balance between turbine size, rated power, and capacity factor. Even for relatively large (30 m) turbine diameters, surface-deployed turbines would be expected to produce up to 30 % more electricity than the same turbine deployed near the seabed due to vertical shear, with this difference increasing for smaller diameter turbines. As anticipated for sparse measurements, the regional simulation identifies several locations with power generation potential more than twice as high as locations in the measurement re-analysis. These sites were either not surveyed or excluded due to data quality issues. A benchmark comparison at the measurement locations with the highest power generation potential shows relatively good model fidelity, though time-average power density disagreements of ± 50 % persist throughout the water column. In addition to the case study, we also treat three general considerations for measurement data: (1) the accuracy of energy generation estimates from hub height speed relative to rotor-averaged power density, (2) the feasibility of extrapolating profiles towards the surface and seabed, and (3) trends in energy generation with rotor size and position in the water column. Overall, these results demonstrate that models and measurements can be used in a complementary manner for tidal energy site assessment and that tidal currents could be an important source of electricity generation in the San Juan archipelago. •Locations in the San Juan archipelago could support tidal current power generation.•Turbines near the surface produce 30 % more power than those near the seabed.•Simulations indicate sites with more than 2x generation of those with measurements.•Hub-height speed is a good approximation for rotor-averaged kinetic power density.•Tangent or power law fits can be used to extrapolate measurements, when needed.</description><subject>Marine energy</subject><subject>Resource characterization</subject><subject>Salish Sea</subject><subject>TIDAL AND WAVE POWER</subject><subject>Tidal currents</subject><subject>Tidal energy</subject><issn>0960-1481</issn><issn>1879-0682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LJDEQxYO44Oj6DTwEz3ZbSf-Z5CIMoqsieJhd9hgyScXJ0JM0SY_iab_6ZhzPUvAKivd-UI-QCwY1A9Zfb-qEoUzNgTc1dDVIeURmTMxlBb3gx2QGsoeKtYKdkNOcNwCsE_N2Rv4tqInbUSefY6DR0WmNdIzvmIpOGCavB-pionmXnDZYUR0szahXaCuL4xA_0NLJ22KbdmnlA2bqwydmqQN92hVZJLP2Iw76NV6V6-Dzmi5RX9G_i5_kh9NDxvOvfUb-3N_9vn2onl9-Pd4univD20ZWUqDQK-DWSKvNqukZl6azoBvZmN5p1Fxa3oFgiOh64cAAyl7y1nWtA9mckcsDN-bJq2z8hGZtYghoJsWkkGzOi6k9mEyKOSd0akx-q9OHYqD2TauNOjSt9k0r6FRpusRuDjEsD7x5THs-BoPWpz3eRv894D-slonU</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Calandra, Gemma</creator><creator>Wang, Taiping</creator><creator>Miller, Calum</creator><creator>Yang, Zhaoqing</creator><creator>Polagye, Brian</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5156-5007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000251565007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000192570796</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>A comparison of the power potential for surface- and seabed-deployed tidal turbines in the San Juan Archipelago, Salish Sea, WA</title><author>Calandra, Gemma ; Wang, Taiping ; Miller, Calum ; Yang, Zhaoqing ; Polagye, Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2439-98e8ab02dc9dacb36129c5d0a393c6faea29d25081eeef68f0c0e96924f54f093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Marine energy</topic><topic>Resource characterization</topic><topic>Salish Sea</topic><topic>TIDAL AND WAVE POWER</topic><topic>Tidal currents</topic><topic>Tidal energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calandra, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Taiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Calum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhaoqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polagye, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Renewable energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calandra, Gemma</au><au>Wang, Taiping</au><au>Miller, Calum</au><au>Yang, Zhaoqing</au><au>Polagye, Brian</au><aucorp>Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of the power potential for surface- and seabed-deployed tidal turbines in the San Juan Archipelago, Salish Sea, WA</atitle><jtitle>Renewable energy</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>214</volume><spage>168</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>168-184</pages><issn>0960-1481</issn><eissn>1879-0682</eissn><abstract>The San Juan archipelago lies along the axis of tidal movement between Straits of Juan de Fuca and Strait of Georgia in the Salish Sea. The amplitude of the tidal exchange produces significant tidal currents between the islands, as well as in Rosario Strait to the east and Haro Strait to the west. These currents are of interest as a future source of electrical power generation, given the archipelago’s dependence on electricity supply by a subsea cable from the United States mainland. Here, we evaluate the tidal current energy potential in this region through a re-analysis of measurements collected by the National Ocean Service (NOS) and a high-resolution numerical model. Given the considerable variations in water depth and vertical velocity profiles across candidate tidal energy sites, we consider the trade-offs between tidal turbines deployed from a floating platform and those anchored to the seabed. Measurement re-analysis indicates several locations that could support tidal current power generation by MW-scale turbines with an acceptable balance between turbine size, rated power, and capacity factor. Even for relatively large (30 m) turbine diameters, surface-deployed turbines would be expected to produce up to 30 % more electricity than the same turbine deployed near the seabed due to vertical shear, with this difference increasing for smaller diameter turbines. As anticipated for sparse measurements, the regional simulation identifies several locations with power generation potential more than twice as high as locations in the measurement re-analysis. These sites were either not surveyed or excluded due to data quality issues. A benchmark comparison at the measurement locations with the highest power generation potential shows relatively good model fidelity, though time-average power density disagreements of ± 50 % persist throughout the water column. In addition to the case study, we also treat three general considerations for measurement data: (1) the accuracy of energy generation estimates from hub height speed relative to rotor-averaged power density, (2) the feasibility of extrapolating profiles towards the surface and seabed, and (3) trends in energy generation with rotor size and position in the water column. Overall, these results demonstrate that models and measurements can be used in a complementary manner for tidal energy site assessment and that tidal currents could be an important source of electricity generation in the San Juan archipelago. •Locations in the San Juan archipelago could support tidal current power generation.•Turbines near the surface produce 30 % more power than those near the seabed.•Simulations indicate sites with more than 2x generation of those with measurements.•Hub-height speed is a good approximation for rotor-averaged kinetic power density.•Tangent or power law fits can be used to extrapolate measurements, when needed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.099</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5156-5007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000251565007</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000192570796</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-1481
ispartof Renewable energy, 2023-09, Vol.214, p.168-184
issn 0960-1481
1879-0682
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1989172
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Marine energy
Resource characterization
Salish Sea
TIDAL AND WAVE POWER
Tidal currents
Tidal energy
title A comparison of the power potential for surface- and seabed-deployed tidal turbines in the San Juan Archipelago, Salish Sea, WA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T02%3A07%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20the%20power%20potential%20for%20surface-%20and%20seabed-deployed%20tidal%20turbines%20in%20the%20San%20Juan%20Archipelago,%20Salish%20Sea,%20WA&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20energy&rft.au=Calandra,%20Gemma&rft.aucorp=Pacific%20Northwest%20National%20Laboratory%20(PNNL),%20Richland,%20WA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=214&rft.spage=168&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=168-184&rft.issn=0960-1481&rft.eissn=1879-0682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.099&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_osti_%3ES0960148123007322%3C/elsevier_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0960148123007322&rfr_iscdi=true