Long-term sinking of nuclear waste canisters in salt formations by low-stress creep at high temperature

Rock salt has a self-sealing capacity, low permeability, and high thermal conductivity, making it a potential host for heat-generating nuclear waste. The feasibility of nuclear waste disposal within salt formations has been investigated mostly for small-sized canisters. Geologic disposal of larger-s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta geotechnica 2023-07, Vol.18 (7), p.3469-3484
Hauptverfasser: Tounsi, Hafssa, Rutqvist, Jonny, Hu, Mengsu, Wolters, Ralf, Lerche, Svetlana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3484
container_issue 7
container_start_page 3469
container_title Acta geotechnica
container_volume 18
creator Tounsi, Hafssa
Rutqvist, Jonny
Hu, Mengsu
Wolters, Ralf
Lerche, Svetlana
description Rock salt has a self-sealing capacity, low permeability, and high thermal conductivity, making it a potential host for heat-generating nuclear waste. The feasibility of nuclear waste disposal within salt formations has been investigated mostly for small-sized canisters. Geologic disposal of larger-sized canisters originally designed for spent fuel storage and transportation has lately been examined as a cost-effective alternative. This raises questions about their long-term vertical movement due to their weight and high decay heat. Low-stress creep governs this movement; however, most salt constitutive models do not incorporate it. In this paper, the Norton and the WIPP creep models are compared with the Lux/Wolters/Lerche (LWL) model and a simpler model that combines linear and Norton creep laws (named combined creep model). The LWL and combined creep models consider pressure solution creep, though all incorporate dislocation creep. The models are first applied to creep tests under various stress levels. The LWL and the combined creep models results fit the experimental data well in both high and low stress ranges, whereas the Norton and WIPP models results only fit in higher-stress ranges. The different models are further applied for analyzing long-term canister movement. A sinking rate of - 4.4 × 10 - 7  mm/year was predicted using the Norton and WIPP models versus - 2.1 × 10 - 2  mm/year and - 3.1 × 10 - 2  mm/year using the LWL and the combined creep models, respectively. This comparative study confirms that creep models calibrated exclusively against high-deviatoric stress data might result in an inaccurate estimation of waste packages sinking rate in salt formations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11440-023-01900-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1970416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2831112654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ad1fee051492d9bafbcf46ea7a441ab8efc29c88c769c61567f624d28ae3171e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOIzEQRVuIkXjM_MCsLFh7cNmOu3uJEI-RIrGZWVuOU-44JHZwOYr4exoawY7VrcW5V6XTNL9B_AEh2isC0FpwIRUX0AvBD0fNKXQGOIBSx5-3nJ00Z0RrIYyS2pw2wzyngVcsW0YxPcU0sBxY2vsNusIOjioy71IcsxCLiZHbVBZy2boacyK2eGGbfOBUCxIxXxB3zFW2isOKVdzusLi6L_iz-RHchvDXR543_-9u_9088Pnj_d-b6zn3qheVuyUERDED3ctlv3Bh4YM26FqnNbhFh8HL3nedb03vDcxMG4zUS9k5VNACqvPmYtrNVKMlHyv6lc8poa8W-lZoMCN0OUG7kp_3SNWu876k8S8rOwWjJjPTIyUnypdMVDDYXYlbV14sCPtm3U7W7Wjdvlu3h7GkphKNcBqwfE1_03oF4MuG1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2831112654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term sinking of nuclear waste canisters in salt formations by low-stress creep at high temperature</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tounsi, Hafssa ; Rutqvist, Jonny ; Hu, Mengsu ; Wolters, Ralf ; Lerche, Svetlana</creator><creatorcontrib>Tounsi, Hafssa ; Rutqvist, Jonny ; Hu, Mengsu ; Wolters, Ralf ; Lerche, Svetlana ; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Rock salt has a self-sealing capacity, low permeability, and high thermal conductivity, making it a potential host for heat-generating nuclear waste. The feasibility of nuclear waste disposal within salt formations has been investigated mostly for small-sized canisters. Geologic disposal of larger-sized canisters originally designed for spent fuel storage and transportation has lately been examined as a cost-effective alternative. This raises questions about their long-term vertical movement due to their weight and high decay heat. Low-stress creep governs this movement; however, most salt constitutive models do not incorporate it. In this paper, the Norton and the WIPP creep models are compared with the Lux/Wolters/Lerche (LWL) model and a simpler model that combines linear and Norton creep laws (named combined creep model). The LWL and combined creep models consider pressure solution creep, though all incorporate dislocation creep. The models are first applied to creep tests under various stress levels. The LWL and the combined creep models results fit the experimental data well in both high and low stress ranges, whereas the Norton and WIPP models results only fit in higher-stress ranges. The different models are further applied for analyzing long-term canister movement. A sinking rate of - 4.4 × 10 - 7  mm/year was predicted using the Norton and WIPP models versus - 2.1 × 10 - 2  mm/year and - 3.1 × 10 - 2  mm/year using the LWL and the combined creep models, respectively. This comparative study confirms that creep models calibrated exclusively against high-deviatoric stress data might result in an inaccurate estimation of waste packages sinking rate in salt formations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1861-1125</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1861-1133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11440-023-01900-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Complex Fluids and Microfluidics ; Constitutive models ; Creep tests ; Engineering ; Formations ; Foundations ; Fuel storage ; Geoengineering ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; High temperature ; Hydraulics ; long-term sinking ; low-stress creep ; MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES ; Mathematical models ; nuclear waste disposal ; numerical modeling ; Permeability ; Radioactive waste disposal ; Radioactive wastes ; Research Paper ; rock salt ; Salt ; Salts ; Sinking ; Soft and Granular Matter ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Solid Mechanics ; Solifluction ; Spent nuclear fuels ; Thermal conductivity ; Vertical motion ; viscoplasticity ; Waste disposal</subject><ispartof>Acta geotechnica, 2023-07, Vol.18 (7), p.3469-3484</ispartof><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023</rights><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ad1fee051492d9bafbcf46ea7a441ab8efc29c88c769c61567f624d28ae3171e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ad1fee051492d9bafbcf46ea7a441ab8efc29c88c769c61567f624d28ae3171e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7949-9785 ; 0000000279499785</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11440-023-01900-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11440-023-01900-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1970416$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tounsi, Hafssa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutqvist, Jonny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Mengsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolters, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerche, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term sinking of nuclear waste canisters in salt formations by low-stress creep at high temperature</title><title>Acta geotechnica</title><addtitle>Acta Geotech</addtitle><description>Rock salt has a self-sealing capacity, low permeability, and high thermal conductivity, making it a potential host for heat-generating nuclear waste. The feasibility of nuclear waste disposal within salt formations has been investigated mostly for small-sized canisters. Geologic disposal of larger-sized canisters originally designed for spent fuel storage and transportation has lately been examined as a cost-effective alternative. This raises questions about their long-term vertical movement due to their weight and high decay heat. Low-stress creep governs this movement; however, most salt constitutive models do not incorporate it. In this paper, the Norton and the WIPP creep models are compared with the Lux/Wolters/Lerche (LWL) model and a simpler model that combines linear and Norton creep laws (named combined creep model). The LWL and combined creep models consider pressure solution creep, though all incorporate dislocation creep. The models are first applied to creep tests under various stress levels. The LWL and the combined creep models results fit the experimental data well in both high and low stress ranges, whereas the Norton and WIPP models results only fit in higher-stress ranges. The different models are further applied for analyzing long-term canister movement. A sinking rate of - 4.4 × 10 - 7  mm/year was predicted using the Norton and WIPP models versus - 2.1 × 10 - 2  mm/year and - 3.1 × 10 - 2  mm/year using the LWL and the combined creep models, respectively. This comparative study confirms that creep models calibrated exclusively against high-deviatoric stress data might result in an inaccurate estimation of waste packages sinking rate in salt formations.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Complex Fluids and Microfluidics</subject><subject>Constitutive models</subject><subject>Creep tests</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Formations</subject><subject>Foundations</subject><subject>Fuel storage</subject><subject>Geoengineering</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>long-term sinking</subject><subject>low-stress creep</subject><subject>MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>nuclear waste disposal</subject><subject>numerical modeling</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Radioactive waste disposal</subject><subject>Radioactive wastes</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>rock salt</subject><subject>Salt</subject><subject>Salts</subject><subject>Sinking</subject><subject>Soft and Granular Matter</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Solid Mechanics</subject><subject>Solifluction</subject><subject>Spent nuclear fuels</subject><subject>Thermal conductivity</subject><subject>Vertical motion</subject><subject>viscoplasticity</subject><subject>Waste disposal</subject><issn>1861-1125</issn><issn>1861-1133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOIzEQRVuIkXjM_MCsLFh7cNmOu3uJEI-RIrGZWVuOU-44JHZwOYr4exoawY7VrcW5V6XTNL9B_AEh2isC0FpwIRUX0AvBD0fNKXQGOIBSx5-3nJ00Z0RrIYyS2pw2wzyngVcsW0YxPcU0sBxY2vsNusIOjioy71IcsxCLiZHbVBZy2boacyK2eGGbfOBUCxIxXxB3zFW2isOKVdzusLi6L_iz-RHchvDXR543_-9u_9088Pnj_d-b6zn3qheVuyUERDED3ctlv3Bh4YM26FqnNbhFh8HL3nedb03vDcxMG4zUS9k5VNACqvPmYtrNVKMlHyv6lc8poa8W-lZoMCN0OUG7kp_3SNWu876k8S8rOwWjJjPTIyUnypdMVDDYXYlbV14sCPtm3U7W7Wjdvlu3h7GkphKNcBqwfE1_03oF4MuG1Q</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Tounsi, Hafssa</creator><creator>Rutqvist, Jonny</creator><creator>Hu, Mengsu</creator><creator>Wolters, Ralf</creator><creator>Lerche, Svetlana</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7949-9785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000279499785</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Long-term sinking of nuclear waste canisters in salt formations by low-stress creep at high temperature</title><author>Tounsi, Hafssa ; Rutqvist, Jonny ; Hu, Mengsu ; Wolters, Ralf ; Lerche, Svetlana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ad1fee051492d9bafbcf46ea7a441ab8efc29c88c769c61567f624d28ae3171e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Complex Fluids and Microfluidics</topic><topic>Constitutive models</topic><topic>Creep tests</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Formations</topic><topic>Foundations</topic><topic>Fuel storage</topic><topic>Geoengineering</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>long-term sinking</topic><topic>low-stress creep</topic><topic>MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>nuclear waste disposal</topic><topic>numerical modeling</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Radioactive waste disposal</topic><topic>Radioactive wastes</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>rock salt</topic><topic>Salt</topic><topic>Salts</topic><topic>Sinking</topic><topic>Soft and Granular Matter</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Solid Mechanics</topic><topic>Solifluction</topic><topic>Spent nuclear fuels</topic><topic>Thermal conductivity</topic><topic>Vertical motion</topic><topic>viscoplasticity</topic><topic>Waste disposal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tounsi, Hafssa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutqvist, Jonny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Mengsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolters, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerche, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Acta geotechnica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tounsi, Hafssa</au><au>Rutqvist, Jonny</au><au>Hu, Mengsu</au><au>Wolters, Ralf</au><au>Lerche, Svetlana</au><aucorp>Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term sinking of nuclear waste canisters in salt formations by low-stress creep at high temperature</atitle><jtitle>Acta geotechnica</jtitle><stitle>Acta Geotech</stitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3469</spage><epage>3484</epage><pages>3469-3484</pages><issn>1861-1125</issn><eissn>1861-1133</eissn><abstract>Rock salt has a self-sealing capacity, low permeability, and high thermal conductivity, making it a potential host for heat-generating nuclear waste. The feasibility of nuclear waste disposal within salt formations has been investigated mostly for small-sized canisters. Geologic disposal of larger-sized canisters originally designed for spent fuel storage and transportation has lately been examined as a cost-effective alternative. This raises questions about their long-term vertical movement due to their weight and high decay heat. Low-stress creep governs this movement; however, most salt constitutive models do not incorporate it. In this paper, the Norton and the WIPP creep models are compared with the Lux/Wolters/Lerche (LWL) model and a simpler model that combines linear and Norton creep laws (named combined creep model). The LWL and combined creep models consider pressure solution creep, though all incorporate dislocation creep. The models are first applied to creep tests under various stress levels. The LWL and the combined creep models results fit the experimental data well in both high and low stress ranges, whereas the Norton and WIPP models results only fit in higher-stress ranges. The different models are further applied for analyzing long-term canister movement. A sinking rate of - 4.4 × 10 - 7  mm/year was predicted using the Norton and WIPP models versus - 2.1 × 10 - 2  mm/year and - 3.1 × 10 - 2  mm/year using the LWL and the combined creep models, respectively. This comparative study confirms that creep models calibrated exclusively against high-deviatoric stress data might result in an inaccurate estimation of waste packages sinking rate in salt formations.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11440-023-01900-w</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7949-9785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000279499785</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1861-1125
ispartof Acta geotechnica, 2023-07, Vol.18 (7), p.3469-3484
issn 1861-1125
1861-1133
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1970416
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Comparative analysis
Comparative studies
Complex Fluids and Microfluidics
Constitutive models
Creep tests
Engineering
Formations
Foundations
Fuel storage
Geoengineering
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
High temperature
Hydraulics
long-term sinking
low-stress creep
MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES
Mathematical models
nuclear waste disposal
numerical modeling
Permeability
Radioactive waste disposal
Radioactive wastes
Research Paper
rock salt
Salt
Salts
Sinking
Soft and Granular Matter
Soil Science & Conservation
Solid Mechanics
Solifluction
Spent nuclear fuels
Thermal conductivity
Vertical motion
viscoplasticity
Waste disposal
title Long-term sinking of nuclear waste canisters in salt formations by low-stress creep at high temperature
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A21%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20sinking%20of%20nuclear%20waste%20canisters%20in%20salt%20formations%20by%20low-stress%20creep%20at%20high%20temperature&rft.jtitle=Acta%20geotechnica&rft.au=Tounsi,%20Hafssa&rft.aucorp=Lawrence%20Berkeley%20National%20Laboratory%20(LBNL),%20Berkeley,%20CA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3469&rft.epage=3484&rft.pages=3469-3484&rft.issn=1861-1125&rft.eissn=1861-1133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11440-023-01900-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2831112654%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2831112654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true