Tsunami Early Warning From Global Navigation Satellite System Data Using Convolutional Neural Networks
We investigate the potential of using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations to directly forecast full tsunami waveforms in real time. We train convolutional neural networks to use less than 9 min of GNSS data to forecast the full tsunami waveforms over 6 hr at select locations, and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geophysical research letters 2022-10, Vol.49 (20), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Geophysical research letters |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Rim, Donsub Baraldi, Robert Liu, Christopher M. LeVeque, Randall J. Terada, Kenjiro |
description | We investigate the potential of using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations to directly forecast full tsunami waveforms in real time. We train convolutional neural networks to use less than 9 min of GNSS data to forecast the full tsunami waveforms over 6 hr at select locations, and obtain accurate forecasts on a test data set. Our training and test data consists of synthetic earthquakes and associated GNSS data generated for the Cascadia Subduction Zone using the MudPy software, and corresponding tsunami waveforms in Puget Sound computed using GeoClaw. We use the same suite of synthetic earthquakes and waveforms as in earlier work where tsunami waveforms were used for forecasting, and provide a comparison. We also explore varying the number of GNSS stations, their locations, and their observation durations.
Plain Language Summary
Producing rapid real‐time forecasts for tsunamis in the first few minutes of an earthquake is a challenging problem. Accurate forecasts often rely on direct measurements of the tsunami, which are only available at sparse locations, and only after the tsunami has passed the sensors. Real‐time numerical modeling of the tsunami is also time consuming. This work attempts to bypass these difficulties by considering a model that can forecast tsunami wave heights based only on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data, which is available within minutes from an extensive network of stations. We present some initial results using this approach for hypothetical tsunamis originating from the Cascadia Subduction Zone, with forecast locations in Puget Sound. We show that this approach gives comparable results to earlier work based on observing tsunami waveforms for 30 or 60 min, but now using only a few minutes of GNSS data. We explore varying the number of GNSS stations and find that the model yields accurate forecasts when as few as 20 GNSS stations are used, and outperforms our previous model when additional stations are used. The model performs well even when only the initial 4 min of GNSS data is used.
Key Points
A deep convolutional neural network (CNN) is trained to predict tsunami waveforms, based only on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data for hypothetical earthquakes
Less than 9 min of data at GNSS stations selected from the existing dense network is used to predict 6 hr of tsunami waveforms
Results compare favorably with a previous forecast model based on 30 or 60 min of tsunami waveform data |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2022GL099511 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1893958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2729048806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3941-3f4d2e0ea6fbd5875a91a2136047ae03f6a498d4eebe88863dc186b43e0192dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1PAjEQBuDGaCKiN39Ao1fR6Qe77dEgoAnRRCAem2G3i4vLVtsuhH_vIh48eZo5PDN58xJyyeCWAdd3HDgfT0DrPmNHpMO0lD0FkB6TDoBud54mp-QshBUACBCsQ4pZaGpcl3SIvtrRN_R1WS_pyLs1HVdugRV9xk25xFi6mk4x2qoqo6XTXYh2TR8wIp2H_cnA1RtXNXu3P7KN_xlx6_xHOCcnBVbBXvzOLpmPhrPBY2_yMn4a3E96KLRkPVHInFuwmBSLvK_SPmqGnIkEZIoWRJGg1CqX1i6sUioRecZUspDCAtM8z0WXXB3-uhBLE7I2avaeubq2WTRMaaH7qkXXB_Tp3VdjQzQr1_g2dTA85RqkUpC06uagMu9C8LYwn75co98ZBmZft_lbd8v5gW_Lyu7-tWb8Okmk1kx8A7ZXgJI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2729048806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tsunami Early Warning From Global Navigation Satellite System Data Using Convolutional Neural Networks</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Rim, Donsub ; Baraldi, Robert ; Liu, Christopher M. ; LeVeque, Randall J. ; Terada, Kenjiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Rim, Donsub ; Baraldi, Robert ; Liu, Christopher M. ; LeVeque, Randall J. ; Terada, Kenjiro</creatorcontrib><description>We investigate the potential of using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations to directly forecast full tsunami waveforms in real time. We train convolutional neural networks to use less than 9 min of GNSS data to forecast the full tsunami waveforms over 6 hr at select locations, and obtain accurate forecasts on a test data set. Our training and test data consists of synthetic earthquakes and associated GNSS data generated for the Cascadia Subduction Zone using the MudPy software, and corresponding tsunami waveforms in Puget Sound computed using GeoClaw. We use the same suite of synthetic earthquakes and waveforms as in earlier work where tsunami waveforms were used for forecasting, and provide a comparison. We also explore varying the number of GNSS stations, their locations, and their observation durations.
Plain Language Summary
Producing rapid real‐time forecasts for tsunamis in the first few minutes of an earthquake is a challenging problem. Accurate forecasts often rely on direct measurements of the tsunami, which are only available at sparse locations, and only after the tsunami has passed the sensors. Real‐time numerical modeling of the tsunami is also time consuming. This work attempts to bypass these difficulties by considering a model that can forecast tsunami wave heights based only on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data, which is available within minutes from an extensive network of stations. We present some initial results using this approach for hypothetical tsunamis originating from the Cascadia Subduction Zone, with forecast locations in Puget Sound. We show that this approach gives comparable results to earlier work based on observing tsunami waveforms for 30 or 60 min, but now using only a few minutes of GNSS data. We explore varying the number of GNSS stations and find that the model yields accurate forecasts when as few as 20 GNSS stations are used, and outperforms our previous model when additional stations are used. The model performs well even when only the initial 4 min of GNSS data is used.
Key Points
A deep convolutional neural network (CNN) is trained to predict tsunami waveforms, based only on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data for hypothetical earthquakes
Less than 9 min of data at GNSS stations selected from the existing dense network is used to predict 6 hr of tsunami waveforms
Results compare favorably with a previous forecast model based on 30 or 60 min of tsunami waveform data</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2022GL099511</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Artificial neural networks ; Earthquake prediction ; Earthquakes ; Emergency warning programs ; GeoClaw software ; Global navigation satellite system ; GNSS ; Locations (working) ; machine learning ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Navigation ; Navigation satellites ; Navigation systems ; Navigational satellites ; neural network ; Neural networks ; Satellite observation ; Satellites ; Seismic activity ; Subduction ; Subduction (geology) ; Subduction zones ; synthetic ruptures ; tsunami forecasting ; Tsunamis ; Wave height ; Waveforms</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2022-10, Vol.49 (20), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3941-3f4d2e0ea6fbd5875a91a2136047ae03f6a498d4eebe88863dc186b43e0192dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3941-3f4d2e0ea6fbd5875a91a2136047ae03f6a498d4eebe88863dc186b43e0192dd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6799-2233 ; 0000-0003-1384-4504 ; 0000-0001-6044-2212 ; 0000-0002-6721-2070 ; 0000000160442212 ; 0000000313844504 ; 0000000267212070 ; 0000000167992233</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2022GL099511$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2022GL099511$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,1432,11513,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46467,46832,46891</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1893958$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rim, Donsub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baraldi, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeVeque, Randall J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terada, Kenjiro</creatorcontrib><title>Tsunami Early Warning From Global Navigation Satellite System Data Using Convolutional Neural Networks</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>We investigate the potential of using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations to directly forecast full tsunami waveforms in real time. We train convolutional neural networks to use less than 9 min of GNSS data to forecast the full tsunami waveforms over 6 hr at select locations, and obtain accurate forecasts on a test data set. Our training and test data consists of synthetic earthquakes and associated GNSS data generated for the Cascadia Subduction Zone using the MudPy software, and corresponding tsunami waveforms in Puget Sound computed using GeoClaw. We use the same suite of synthetic earthquakes and waveforms as in earlier work where tsunami waveforms were used for forecasting, and provide a comparison. We also explore varying the number of GNSS stations, their locations, and their observation durations.
Plain Language Summary
Producing rapid real‐time forecasts for tsunamis in the first few minutes of an earthquake is a challenging problem. Accurate forecasts often rely on direct measurements of the tsunami, which are only available at sparse locations, and only after the tsunami has passed the sensors. Real‐time numerical modeling of the tsunami is also time consuming. This work attempts to bypass these difficulties by considering a model that can forecast tsunami wave heights based only on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data, which is available within minutes from an extensive network of stations. We present some initial results using this approach for hypothetical tsunamis originating from the Cascadia Subduction Zone, with forecast locations in Puget Sound. We show that this approach gives comparable results to earlier work based on observing tsunami waveforms for 30 or 60 min, but now using only a few minutes of GNSS data. We explore varying the number of GNSS stations and find that the model yields accurate forecasts when as few as 20 GNSS stations are used, and outperforms our previous model when additional stations are used. The model performs well even when only the initial 4 min of GNSS data is used.
Key Points
A deep convolutional neural network (CNN) is trained to predict tsunami waveforms, based only on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data for hypothetical earthquakes
Less than 9 min of data at GNSS stations selected from the existing dense network is used to predict 6 hr of tsunami waveforms
Results compare favorably with a previous forecast model based on 30 or 60 min of tsunami waveform data</description><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Earthquake prediction</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Emergency warning programs</subject><subject>GeoClaw software</subject><subject>Global navigation satellite system</subject><subject>GNSS</subject><subject>Locations (working)</subject><subject>machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Navigation satellites</subject><subject>Navigation systems</subject><subject>Navigational satellites</subject><subject>neural network</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Satellite observation</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Subduction</subject><subject>Subduction (geology)</subject><subject>Subduction zones</subject><subject>synthetic ruptures</subject><subject>tsunami forecasting</subject><subject>Tsunamis</subject><subject>Wave height</subject><subject>Waveforms</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1PAjEQBuDGaCKiN39Ao1fR6Qe77dEgoAnRRCAem2G3i4vLVtsuhH_vIh48eZo5PDN58xJyyeCWAdd3HDgfT0DrPmNHpMO0lD0FkB6TDoBud54mp-QshBUACBCsQ4pZaGpcl3SIvtrRN_R1WS_pyLs1HVdugRV9xk25xFi6mk4x2qoqo6XTXYh2TR8wIp2H_cnA1RtXNXu3P7KN_xlx6_xHOCcnBVbBXvzOLpmPhrPBY2_yMn4a3E96KLRkPVHInFuwmBSLvK_SPmqGnIkEZIoWRJGg1CqX1i6sUioRecZUspDCAtM8z0WXXB3-uhBLE7I2avaeubq2WTRMaaH7qkXXB_Tp3VdjQzQr1_g2dTA85RqkUpC06uagMu9C8LYwn75co98ZBmZft_lbd8v5gW_Lyu7-tWb8Okmk1kx8A7ZXgJI</recordid><startdate>20221028</startdate><enddate>20221028</enddate><creator>Rim, Donsub</creator><creator>Baraldi, Robert</creator><creator>Liu, Christopher M.</creator><creator>LeVeque, Randall J.</creator><creator>Terada, Kenjiro</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>American Geophysical Union (AGU)</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6799-2233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1384-4504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6044-2212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6721-2070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000160442212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000313844504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000267212070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000167992233</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221028</creationdate><title>Tsunami Early Warning From Global Navigation Satellite System Data Using Convolutional Neural Networks</title><author>Rim, Donsub ; Baraldi, Robert ; Liu, Christopher M. ; LeVeque, Randall J. ; Terada, Kenjiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3941-3f4d2e0ea6fbd5875a91a2136047ae03f6a498d4eebe88863dc186b43e0192dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Earthquake prediction</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Emergency warning programs</topic><topic>GeoClaw software</topic><topic>Global navigation satellite system</topic><topic>GNSS</topic><topic>Locations (working)</topic><topic>machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Navigation satellites</topic><topic>Navigation systems</topic><topic>Navigational satellites</topic><topic>neural network</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Satellite observation</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Subduction</topic><topic>Subduction (geology)</topic><topic>Subduction zones</topic><topic>synthetic ruptures</topic><topic>tsunami forecasting</topic><topic>Tsunamis</topic><topic>Wave height</topic><topic>Waveforms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rim, Donsub</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baraldi, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeVeque, Randall J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terada, Kenjiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rim, Donsub</au><au>Baraldi, Robert</au><au>Liu, Christopher M.</au><au>LeVeque, Randall J.</au><au>Terada, Kenjiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tsunami Early Warning From Global Navigation Satellite System Data Using Convolutional Neural Networks</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2022-10-28</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>20</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>We investigate the potential of using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations to directly forecast full tsunami waveforms in real time. We train convolutional neural networks to use less than 9 min of GNSS data to forecast the full tsunami waveforms over 6 hr at select locations, and obtain accurate forecasts on a test data set. Our training and test data consists of synthetic earthquakes and associated GNSS data generated for the Cascadia Subduction Zone using the MudPy software, and corresponding tsunami waveforms in Puget Sound computed using GeoClaw. We use the same suite of synthetic earthquakes and waveforms as in earlier work where tsunami waveforms were used for forecasting, and provide a comparison. We also explore varying the number of GNSS stations, their locations, and their observation durations.
Plain Language Summary
Producing rapid real‐time forecasts for tsunamis in the first few minutes of an earthquake is a challenging problem. Accurate forecasts often rely on direct measurements of the tsunami, which are only available at sparse locations, and only after the tsunami has passed the sensors. Real‐time numerical modeling of the tsunami is also time consuming. This work attempts to bypass these difficulties by considering a model that can forecast tsunami wave heights based only on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data, which is available within minutes from an extensive network of stations. We present some initial results using this approach for hypothetical tsunamis originating from the Cascadia Subduction Zone, with forecast locations in Puget Sound. We show that this approach gives comparable results to earlier work based on observing tsunami waveforms for 30 or 60 min, but now using only a few minutes of GNSS data. We explore varying the number of GNSS stations and find that the model yields accurate forecasts when as few as 20 GNSS stations are used, and outperforms our previous model when additional stations are used. The model performs well even when only the initial 4 min of GNSS data is used.
Key Points
A deep convolutional neural network (CNN) is trained to predict tsunami waveforms, based only on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data for hypothetical earthquakes
Less than 9 min of data at GNSS stations selected from the existing dense network is used to predict 6 hr of tsunami waveforms
Results compare favorably with a previous forecast model based on 30 or 60 min of tsunami waveform data</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2022GL099511</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6799-2233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1384-4504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6044-2212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6721-2070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000160442212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000313844504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000267212070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000167992233</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-8276 |
ispartof | Geophysical research letters, 2022-10, Vol.49 (20), p.n/a |
issn | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1893958 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Artificial neural networks Earthquake prediction Earthquakes Emergency warning programs GeoClaw software Global navigation satellite system GNSS Locations (working) machine learning Mathematical models Modelling Navigation Navigation satellites Navigation systems Navigational satellites neural network Neural networks Satellite observation Satellites Seismic activity Subduction Subduction (geology) Subduction zones synthetic ruptures tsunami forecasting Tsunamis Wave height Waveforms |
title | Tsunami Early Warning From Global Navigation Satellite System Data Using Convolutional Neural Networks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T07%3A26%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tsunami%20Early%20Warning%20From%20Global%20Navigation%20Satellite%20System%20Data%20Using%20Convolutional%20Neural%20Networks&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Rim,%20Donsub&rft.date=2022-10-28&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=20&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2022GL099511&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2729048806%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2729048806&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |