Overbuilding & curtailment: The cost-effective enablers of firm PV generation
Current thinking considers that PV output curtailment is a last resort measure to be avoided. In this article, we argue that supply-shaping, achieved through proactive curtailment associated with PV oversupply, is actually critical to achieving intermittency mitigation and delivering firm PV generat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Solar energy 2019-01, Vol.180 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Solar energy |
container_volume | 180 |
creator | Perez, Marc Perez, Richard Rábago, Karl R. Putnam, Morgan |
description | Current thinking considers that PV output curtailment is a last resort measure to be avoided. In this article, we argue that supply-shaping, achieved through proactive curtailment associated with PV oversupply, is actually critical to achieving intermittency mitigation and delivering firm PV generation at the lowest cost. We investigate the premium to transform a low-cost, but intermittent solar kWh into a firm, effectively dispatchable kWh. We show that a fundamental ingredient of minimizing this premium is to optimally overbuild and, as necessary and appropriate, curtail PV generation. Drawing on a case study in the State of Minnesota, we show that firm, high-penetration-ready PV generation could be achieved at a production cost at or below current conventional generation, especially when optimally coupled with wind generation. Here, we conclude with a recommendation that in order to achieve this lowest cost firm generation potential, proactive curtailment strategies should inform future transactional PV remuneration systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.12.074 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>osti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1864801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1864801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g661-181bc64b4d7affd1c95b21b0959b58e4ad4350e74010c43351cc47601d7b89103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzs9LwzAYxvEgCtbpnyAED95a37dNm9SbDH_BZB6KeBtJ-qbL6FJosv39TvT03L7Ph7FbhAIBm4ddEaeRAs1FCagKLAuQ4oxlKCTmWNbynGUAlcqhLb8v2VWMOwCUqGTGPtZHms3Bj70PA7_n9jAn7cc9hfTIuy1xO8WUk3Nkkz8Sp6DNSHPkk-POz3v--cWH32-d_BSu2YXTY6Sb_12w7uW5W77lq_Xr-_JplQ9NcyIpNLYRRvRSO9ejbWtTooG2bk2tSOheVDWQFIBgRVXVaK2QDWAvjWoRqgW7-8uebH4TrU9kt3YK4YTcoGqEAqx-AGKgUSU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Overbuilding & curtailment: The cost-effective enablers of firm PV generation</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Perez, Marc ; Perez, Richard ; Rábago, Karl R. ; Putnam, Morgan</creator><creatorcontrib>Perez, Marc ; Perez, Richard ; Rábago, Karl R. ; Putnam, Morgan ; MN Department of Commerce, Saint Paul, MN (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Current thinking considers that PV output curtailment is a last resort measure to be avoided. In this article, we argue that supply-shaping, achieved through proactive curtailment associated with PV oversupply, is actually critical to achieving intermittency mitigation and delivering firm PV generation at the lowest cost. We investigate the premium to transform a low-cost, but intermittent solar kWh into a firm, effectively dispatchable kWh. We show that a fundamental ingredient of minimizing this premium is to optimally overbuild and, as necessary and appropriate, curtail PV generation. Drawing on a case study in the State of Minnesota, we show that firm, high-penetration-ready PV generation could be achieved at a production cost at or below current conventional generation, especially when optimally coupled with wind generation. Here, we conclude with a recommendation that in order to achieve this lowest cost firm generation potential, proactive curtailment strategies should inform future transactional PV remuneration systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-092X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-1257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.12.074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier</publisher><subject>curtailment ; energy storage ; firm power generation ; high PV penetration ; implicit storage ; overbuilding ; photovoltaics ; renewable intermittency mitigation ; solar ; SOLAR ENERGY ; wind</subject><ispartof>Solar energy, 2019-01, Vol.180</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1864801$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perez, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rábago, Karl R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Putnam, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MN Department of Commerce, Saint Paul, MN (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Overbuilding & curtailment: The cost-effective enablers of firm PV generation</title><title>Solar energy</title><description>Current thinking considers that PV output curtailment is a last resort measure to be avoided. In this article, we argue that supply-shaping, achieved through proactive curtailment associated with PV oversupply, is actually critical to achieving intermittency mitigation and delivering firm PV generation at the lowest cost. We investigate the premium to transform a low-cost, but intermittent solar kWh into a firm, effectively dispatchable kWh. We show that a fundamental ingredient of minimizing this premium is to optimally overbuild and, as necessary and appropriate, curtail PV generation. Drawing on a case study in the State of Minnesota, we show that firm, high-penetration-ready PV generation could be achieved at a production cost at or below current conventional generation, especially when optimally coupled with wind generation. Here, we conclude with a recommendation that in order to achieve this lowest cost firm generation potential, proactive curtailment strategies should inform future transactional PV remuneration systems.</description><subject>curtailment</subject><subject>energy storage</subject><subject>firm power generation</subject><subject>high PV penetration</subject><subject>implicit storage</subject><subject>overbuilding</subject><subject>photovoltaics</subject><subject>renewable intermittency mitigation</subject><subject>solar</subject><subject>SOLAR ENERGY</subject><subject>wind</subject><issn>0038-092X</issn><issn>1471-1257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotzs9LwzAYxvEgCtbpnyAED95a37dNm9SbDH_BZB6KeBtJ-qbL6FJosv39TvT03L7Ph7FbhAIBm4ddEaeRAs1FCagKLAuQ4oxlKCTmWNbynGUAlcqhLb8v2VWMOwCUqGTGPtZHms3Bj70PA7_n9jAn7cc9hfTIuy1xO8WUk3Nkkz8Sp6DNSHPkk-POz3v--cWH32-d_BSu2YXTY6Sb_12w7uW5W77lq_Xr-_JplQ9NcyIpNLYRRvRSO9ejbWtTooG2bk2tSOheVDWQFIBgRVXVaK2QDWAvjWoRqgW7-8uebH4TrU9kt3YK4YTcoGqEAqx-AGKgUSU</recordid><startdate>20190122</startdate><enddate>20190122</enddate><creator>Perez, Marc</creator><creator>Perez, Richard</creator><creator>Rábago, Karl R.</creator><creator>Putnam, Morgan</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190122</creationdate><title>Overbuilding & curtailment: The cost-effective enablers of firm PV generation</title><author>Perez, Marc ; Perez, Richard ; Rábago, Karl R. ; Putnam, Morgan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g661-181bc64b4d7affd1c95b21b0959b58e4ad4350e74010c43351cc47601d7b89103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>curtailment</topic><topic>energy storage</topic><topic>firm power generation</topic><topic>high PV penetration</topic><topic>implicit storage</topic><topic>overbuilding</topic><topic>photovoltaics</topic><topic>renewable intermittency mitigation</topic><topic>solar</topic><topic>SOLAR ENERGY</topic><topic>wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perez, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rábago, Karl R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Putnam, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MN Department of Commerce, Saint Paul, MN (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perez, Marc</au><au>Perez, Richard</au><au>Rábago, Karl R.</au><au>Putnam, Morgan</au><aucorp>MN Department of Commerce, Saint Paul, MN (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Overbuilding & curtailment: The cost-effective enablers of firm PV generation</atitle><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle><date>2019-01-22</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>180</volume><issn>0038-092X</issn><eissn>1471-1257</eissn><abstract>Current thinking considers that PV output curtailment is a last resort measure to be avoided. In this article, we argue that supply-shaping, achieved through proactive curtailment associated with PV oversupply, is actually critical to achieving intermittency mitigation and delivering firm PV generation at the lowest cost. We investigate the premium to transform a low-cost, but intermittent solar kWh into a firm, effectively dispatchable kWh. We show that a fundamental ingredient of minimizing this premium is to optimally overbuild and, as necessary and appropriate, curtail PV generation. Drawing on a case study in the State of Minnesota, we show that firm, high-penetration-ready PV generation could be achieved at a production cost at or below current conventional generation, especially when optimally coupled with wind generation. Here, we conclude with a recommendation that in order to achieve this lowest cost firm generation potential, proactive curtailment strategies should inform future transactional PV remuneration systems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><doi>10.1016/j.solener.2018.12.074</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-092X |
ispartof | Solar energy, 2019-01, Vol.180 |
issn | 0038-092X 1471-1257 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1864801 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | curtailment energy storage firm power generation high PV penetration implicit storage overbuilding photovoltaics renewable intermittency mitigation solar SOLAR ENERGY wind |
title | Overbuilding & curtailment: The cost-effective enablers of firm PV generation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T06%3A32%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-osti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Overbuilding%20&%20curtailment:%20The%20cost-effective%20enablers%20of%20firm%20PV%20generation&rft.jtitle=Solar%20energy&rft.au=Perez,%20Marc&rft.aucorp=MN%20Department%20of%20Commerce,%20Saint%20Paul,%20MN%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2019-01-22&rft.volume=180&rft.issn=0038-092X&rft.eissn=1471-1257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.solener.2018.12.074&rft_dat=%3Costi%3E1864801%3C/osti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |