Investigating the Impacts of Daytime Boundary Layer Clouds on Surface Energy Fluxes and Boundary Layer Structure During CHEESEHEAD19

Studies of land‐atmosphere interactions under a clear sky and low cumulus cloud conditions are common from long‐term observatories like at the southern great plains. How well the relationships and responses of surface radiative and turbulent heat fluxes determined from these investigations hold for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2022-03, Vol.127 (5), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Sedlar, J., Riihimaki, L. D., Turner, D. D., Duncan, J., Adler, B., Bianco, L., Lantz, K., Wilczak, J., Hall, E., Herrera, C., Hodges, Gary B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 5
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres
container_volume 127
creator Sedlar, J.
Riihimaki, L. D.
Turner, D. D.
Duncan, J.
Adler, B.
Bianco, L.
Lantz, K.
Wilczak, J.
Hall, E.
Herrera, C.
Hodges, Gary B.
description Studies of land‐atmosphere interactions under a clear sky and low cumulus cloud conditions are common from long‐term observatories like at the southern great plains. How well the relationships and responses of surface radiative and turbulent heat fluxes determined from these investigations hold for more heterogeneous surfaces in other climate regimes, however, is uncertain. In this study, detailed observations of the surface energy budget and daytime boundary layer properties are analyzed using measurements from the Chequamegon Heterogenous Ecosystem Energy‐Balance Study Enabled by a High‐Density Extensive Array of Detectors 2019 (CHEESEHEAD19) field campaign, July‐October 2019, across a heterogeneous forested landscape of northern Wisconsin. A cloud regime framework is employed to classify consecutive periods of clear skies from lower atmosphere stratiform and cumulus clouds. A seasonal transition from low cumulus to low stratiform periods occurred, together with a diurnal pattern in cloudy or clear sky period dominance. Radiative forcing was highly dependent on sky conditions, leading to changes in the redistribution efficiency of radiative energy by the surface turbulent heat fluxes. During CHEESEHEAD19, small Bowen ratios dominated with daytime latent heat fluxes three times as large as sensible heat fluxes for all sky conditions studied; the forested region, therefore, falls within an energy‐limited regime. The depth of the daytime mixed layer depended upon the sky condition and thermodynamic setting; deeper mixed layers occurred during periods of low cumulus and not clear skies. Profiles of vertical velocity were found to have enhanced variance under low cumulus compared to clear sky periods, suggesting potential for cloud feedbacks on boundary layer structure and surface energy fluxes. Plain Language Summary This study investigates how different cloud regimes influence the exchange of energy at Earth's surface over a highly heterogeneous forested landscape in northern Wisconsin. Clouds directly modify the solar and infrared radiation reaching the surface. In turn, the modifications to radiation affect how turbulence near the surface is generated and its magnitude. The net result of these energy fluxes determines the warming and cooling processes at the surface, with direct implications on the development of local weather systems. From the observations in northern Wisconsin, an apparent partition in energy fluxes between two commonly observed lower a
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2021JD036060
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1860631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2639051084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3728-ca217157173137d9be2cdc2e3438a55a215313fab56968de291a937c850557163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLAzEQx4MoKNWbHyDo1WoeTTY5ane1lYJgFbyFmM3WlTZb81D37gc3UhHx4FxmYH7_eQJwiNEpRkSeEUTwdYkoRxxtgT2CuRwKKfn2T1w87IKDEJ5RNoHoiI32wMfUvdoQ24WOrVvA-GThdLXWJgbYNbDUfWxXFl50ydXa93Cme-vheNmlOgMOzpNvtLGwctYveni5TO82QO3qv5J59MnE5C0sk__qNJ5U1byaVOcllvtgp9HLYA--_QDcX1Z348lwdnM1HZ_PhoYWRAyNJrjArMAFxbSo5aMlpjbE0hEVmrGcZTnR6EfGJRe1JRJrSQsjGGJZxekAHG3qdnljFUwbrXkynXPWRIVFvlzWD8DxBlr77iXl26jnLnmX51KEU4kYRmKUqZMNZXwXgreNWvt2lfdVGKmvf6jf_8g43eBv7dL2_7Lq-uq2ZAXngn4CKe2Jbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2639051084</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating the Impacts of Daytime Boundary Layer Clouds on Surface Energy Fluxes and Boundary Layer Structure During CHEESEHEAD19</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sedlar, J. ; Riihimaki, L. D. ; Turner, D. D. ; Duncan, J. ; Adler, B. ; Bianco, L. ; Lantz, K. ; Wilczak, J. ; Hall, E. ; Herrera, C. ; Hodges, Gary B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sedlar, J. ; Riihimaki, L. D. ; Turner, D. D. ; Duncan, J. ; Adler, B. ; Bianco, L. ; Lantz, K. ; Wilczak, J. ; Hall, E. ; Herrera, C. ; Hodges, Gary B. ; Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Data Center</creatorcontrib><description>Studies of land‐atmosphere interactions under a clear sky and low cumulus cloud conditions are common from long‐term observatories like at the southern great plains. How well the relationships and responses of surface radiative and turbulent heat fluxes determined from these investigations hold for more heterogeneous surfaces in other climate regimes, however, is uncertain. In this study, detailed observations of the surface energy budget and daytime boundary layer properties are analyzed using measurements from the Chequamegon Heterogenous Ecosystem Energy‐Balance Study Enabled by a High‐Density Extensive Array of Detectors 2019 (CHEESEHEAD19) field campaign, July‐October 2019, across a heterogeneous forested landscape of northern Wisconsin. A cloud regime framework is employed to classify consecutive periods of clear skies from lower atmosphere stratiform and cumulus clouds. A seasonal transition from low cumulus to low stratiform periods occurred, together with a diurnal pattern in cloudy or clear sky period dominance. Radiative forcing was highly dependent on sky conditions, leading to changes in the redistribution efficiency of radiative energy by the surface turbulent heat fluxes. During CHEESEHEAD19, small Bowen ratios dominated with daytime latent heat fluxes three times as large as sensible heat fluxes for all sky conditions studied; the forested region, therefore, falls within an energy‐limited regime. The depth of the daytime mixed layer depended upon the sky condition and thermodynamic setting; deeper mixed layers occurred during periods of low cumulus and not clear skies. Profiles of vertical velocity were found to have enhanced variance under low cumulus compared to clear sky periods, suggesting potential for cloud feedbacks on boundary layer structure and surface energy fluxes. Plain Language Summary This study investigates how different cloud regimes influence the exchange of energy at Earth's surface over a highly heterogeneous forested landscape in northern Wisconsin. Clouds directly modify the solar and infrared radiation reaching the surface. In turn, the modifications to radiation affect how turbulence near the surface is generated and its magnitude. The net result of these energy fluxes determines the warming and cooling processes at the surface, with direct implications on the development of local weather systems. From the observations in northern Wisconsin, an apparent partition in energy fluxes between two commonly observed lower atmosphere cloud types is found. A seasonal pattern in the occurrence of these cloud types was observed. Because of these cloud‐specific preferences, turbulence generated near the surface was larger during the first half of the 3‐month field campaign. Enhanced surface fluxes supported a deeper boundary layer for the shallow cumulus cloud conditions compared to overcast conditions. These fluxes were even larger than periods when skies were clear; however clear sky conditions were most frequent during the morning when surface energy fluxes were generally increasing with time during this development stage of the convective mixed layer. Turbulent fluxes associated with evaporation at the surface dominated over dry fluxes, regardless of the overhead sky conditions. These findings represent important differences to heavily study climatological regions where grasslands make up the primary surface characteristics. Key Points Detailed surface energy fluxes and boundary layer structure responses to three boundary layer sky conditions are examined: low stratiform, low cumulus, clear Turbulent and radiative flux relationships were separable by cloud regime; latent fluxes dominated over sensible fluxes by a factor of 3 (low Bowen ratios dominated) Boundary layers were deeper during low cumulus compared to clear sky periods; surface‐atmosphere interactions are complex over the heterogenous forest landscape</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021JD036060</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Atmosphere ; Boundary layer ; Boundary layer structure ; Boundary layers ; Bowen ratio ; Clear sky ; Cloud types ; Clouds ; Cumulus clouds ; Daytime ; Detectors ; Earth surface ; Energy ; Energy budget ; Enthalpy ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; Evaporation ; Geophysics ; Grasslands ; Heat ; Heat flux ; Heat transfer ; Heterogeneous surface ; I.R. radiation ; Infrared radiation ; Land-atmosphere ; Landscape ; Latent heat ; Lower atmosphere ; Mixed layer ; Observatories ; Radiation ; Radiative forcing ; Seasonal variations ; Sensible heat ; Sky ; Surface energy ; Surface energy budget ; Surface fluxes ; Surface properties ; Turbulence ; Turbulent fluxes ; Vertical velocities</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2022-03, Vol.127 (5), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022. The Authors.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3728-ca217157173137d9be2cdc2e3438a55a215313fab56968de291a937c850557163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3728-ca217157173137d9be2cdc2e3438a55a215313fab56968de291a937c850557163</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1794-3860 ; 0000-0002-0384-7456 ; 0000-0001-9515-160X ; 0000-0002-4022-7854 ; 0000-0002-9912-6396 ; 0000-0003-3101-9401 ; 0000-0003-1097-897X ; 0000-0003-2194-592X ; 0000-0002-8882-5693 ; 0000000331019401 ; 000000031097897X ; 0000000217943860 ; 0000000203847456 ; 0000000288825693 ; 0000000299126396 ; 000000019515160X ; 000000032194592X ; 0000000240227854</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021JD036060$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021JD036060$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46811</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1860631$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sedlar, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riihimaki, L. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, D. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianco, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lantz, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilczak, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Gary B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Data Center</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating the Impacts of Daytime Boundary Layer Clouds on Surface Energy Fluxes and Boundary Layer Structure During CHEESEHEAD19</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>Studies of land‐atmosphere interactions under a clear sky and low cumulus cloud conditions are common from long‐term observatories like at the southern great plains. How well the relationships and responses of surface radiative and turbulent heat fluxes determined from these investigations hold for more heterogeneous surfaces in other climate regimes, however, is uncertain. In this study, detailed observations of the surface energy budget and daytime boundary layer properties are analyzed using measurements from the Chequamegon Heterogenous Ecosystem Energy‐Balance Study Enabled by a High‐Density Extensive Array of Detectors 2019 (CHEESEHEAD19) field campaign, July‐October 2019, across a heterogeneous forested landscape of northern Wisconsin. A cloud regime framework is employed to classify consecutive periods of clear skies from lower atmosphere stratiform and cumulus clouds. A seasonal transition from low cumulus to low stratiform periods occurred, together with a diurnal pattern in cloudy or clear sky period dominance. Radiative forcing was highly dependent on sky conditions, leading to changes in the redistribution efficiency of radiative energy by the surface turbulent heat fluxes. During CHEESEHEAD19, small Bowen ratios dominated with daytime latent heat fluxes three times as large as sensible heat fluxes for all sky conditions studied; the forested region, therefore, falls within an energy‐limited regime. The depth of the daytime mixed layer depended upon the sky condition and thermodynamic setting; deeper mixed layers occurred during periods of low cumulus and not clear skies. Profiles of vertical velocity were found to have enhanced variance under low cumulus compared to clear sky periods, suggesting potential for cloud feedbacks on boundary layer structure and surface energy fluxes. Plain Language Summary This study investigates how different cloud regimes influence the exchange of energy at Earth's surface over a highly heterogeneous forested landscape in northern Wisconsin. Clouds directly modify the solar and infrared radiation reaching the surface. In turn, the modifications to radiation affect how turbulence near the surface is generated and its magnitude. The net result of these energy fluxes determines the warming and cooling processes at the surface, with direct implications on the development of local weather systems. From the observations in northern Wisconsin, an apparent partition in energy fluxes between two commonly observed lower atmosphere cloud types is found. A seasonal pattern in the occurrence of these cloud types was observed. Because of these cloud‐specific preferences, turbulence generated near the surface was larger during the first half of the 3‐month field campaign. Enhanced surface fluxes supported a deeper boundary layer for the shallow cumulus cloud conditions compared to overcast conditions. These fluxes were even larger than periods when skies were clear; however clear sky conditions were most frequent during the morning when surface energy fluxes were generally increasing with time during this development stage of the convective mixed layer. Turbulent fluxes associated with evaporation at the surface dominated over dry fluxes, regardless of the overhead sky conditions. These findings represent important differences to heavily study climatological regions where grasslands make up the primary surface characteristics. Key Points Detailed surface energy fluxes and boundary layer structure responses to three boundary layer sky conditions are examined: low stratiform, low cumulus, clear Turbulent and radiative flux relationships were separable by cloud regime; latent fluxes dominated over sensible fluxes by a factor of 3 (low Bowen ratios dominated) Boundary layers were deeper during low cumulus compared to clear sky periods; surface‐atmosphere interactions are complex over the heterogenous forest landscape</description><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Boundary layer</subject><subject>Boundary layer structure</subject><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>Bowen ratio</subject><subject>Clear sky</subject><subject>Cloud types</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Cumulus clouds</subject><subject>Daytime</subject><subject>Detectors</subject><subject>Earth surface</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy budget</subject><subject>Enthalpy</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Heat flux</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Heterogeneous surface</subject><subject>I.R. radiation</subject><subject>Infrared radiation</subject><subject>Land-atmosphere</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Latent heat</subject><subject>Lower atmosphere</subject><subject>Mixed layer</subject><subject>Observatories</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiative forcing</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Sensible heat</subject><subject>Sky</subject><subject>Surface energy</subject><subject>Surface energy budget</subject><subject>Surface fluxes</subject><subject>Surface properties</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Turbulent fluxes</subject><subject>Vertical velocities</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtLAzEQx4MoKNWbHyDo1WoeTTY5ane1lYJgFbyFmM3WlTZb81D37gc3UhHx4FxmYH7_eQJwiNEpRkSeEUTwdYkoRxxtgT2CuRwKKfn2T1w87IKDEJ5RNoHoiI32wMfUvdoQ24WOrVvA-GThdLXWJgbYNbDUfWxXFl50ydXa93Cme-vheNmlOgMOzpNvtLGwctYveni5TO82QO3qv5J59MnE5C0sk__qNJ5U1byaVOcllvtgp9HLYA--_QDcX1Z348lwdnM1HZ_PhoYWRAyNJrjArMAFxbSo5aMlpjbE0hEVmrGcZTnR6EfGJRe1JRJrSQsjGGJZxekAHG3qdnljFUwbrXkynXPWRIVFvlzWD8DxBlr77iXl26jnLnmX51KEU4kYRmKUqZMNZXwXgreNWvt2lfdVGKmvf6jf_8g43eBv7dL2_7Lq-uq2ZAXngn4CKe2Jbw</recordid><startdate>20220316</startdate><enddate>20220316</enddate><creator>Sedlar, J.</creator><creator>Riihimaki, L. D.</creator><creator>Turner, D. D.</creator><creator>Duncan, J.</creator><creator>Adler, B.</creator><creator>Bianco, L.</creator><creator>Lantz, K.</creator><creator>Wilczak, J.</creator><creator>Hall, E.</creator><creator>Herrera, C.</creator><creator>Hodges, Gary B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-3860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0384-7456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9515-160X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4022-7854</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9912-6396</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3101-9401</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-897X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2194-592X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8882-5693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000331019401</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000031097897X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000217943860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000203847456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000288825693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000299126396</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000019515160X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000032194592X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000240227854</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220316</creationdate><title>Investigating the Impacts of Daytime Boundary Layer Clouds on Surface Energy Fluxes and Boundary Layer Structure During CHEESEHEAD19</title><author>Sedlar, J. ; Riihimaki, L. D. ; Turner, D. D. ; Duncan, J. ; Adler, B. ; Bianco, L. ; Lantz, K. ; Wilczak, J. ; Hall, E. ; Herrera, C. ; Hodges, Gary B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3728-ca217157173137d9be2cdc2e3438a55a215313fab56968de291a937c850557163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Boundary layer</topic><topic>Boundary layer structure</topic><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>Bowen ratio</topic><topic>Clear sky</topic><topic>Cloud types</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Cumulus clouds</topic><topic>Daytime</topic><topic>Detectors</topic><topic>Earth surface</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy budget</topic><topic>Enthalpy</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Heat flux</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Heterogeneous surface</topic><topic>I.R. radiation</topic><topic>Infrared radiation</topic><topic>Land-atmosphere</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Latent heat</topic><topic>Lower atmosphere</topic><topic>Mixed layer</topic><topic>Observatories</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiative forcing</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Sensible heat</topic><topic>Sky</topic><topic>Surface energy</topic><topic>Surface energy budget</topic><topic>Surface fluxes</topic><topic>Surface properties</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Turbulent fluxes</topic><topic>Vertical velocities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sedlar, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riihimaki, L. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, D. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adler, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianco, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lantz, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilczak, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Gary B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Data Center</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sedlar, J.</au><au>Riihimaki, L. D.</au><au>Turner, D. D.</au><au>Duncan, J.</au><au>Adler, B.</au><au>Bianco, L.</au><au>Lantz, K.</au><au>Wilczak, J.</au><au>Hall, E.</au><au>Herrera, C.</au><au>Hodges, Gary B.</au><aucorp>Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Data Center</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating the Impacts of Daytime Boundary Layer Clouds on Surface Energy Fluxes and Boundary Layer Structure During CHEESEHEAD19</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2022-03-16</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>5</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>Studies of land‐atmosphere interactions under a clear sky and low cumulus cloud conditions are common from long‐term observatories like at the southern great plains. How well the relationships and responses of surface radiative and turbulent heat fluxes determined from these investigations hold for more heterogeneous surfaces in other climate regimes, however, is uncertain. In this study, detailed observations of the surface energy budget and daytime boundary layer properties are analyzed using measurements from the Chequamegon Heterogenous Ecosystem Energy‐Balance Study Enabled by a High‐Density Extensive Array of Detectors 2019 (CHEESEHEAD19) field campaign, July‐October 2019, across a heterogeneous forested landscape of northern Wisconsin. A cloud regime framework is employed to classify consecutive periods of clear skies from lower atmosphere stratiform and cumulus clouds. A seasonal transition from low cumulus to low stratiform periods occurred, together with a diurnal pattern in cloudy or clear sky period dominance. Radiative forcing was highly dependent on sky conditions, leading to changes in the redistribution efficiency of radiative energy by the surface turbulent heat fluxes. During CHEESEHEAD19, small Bowen ratios dominated with daytime latent heat fluxes three times as large as sensible heat fluxes for all sky conditions studied; the forested region, therefore, falls within an energy‐limited regime. The depth of the daytime mixed layer depended upon the sky condition and thermodynamic setting; deeper mixed layers occurred during periods of low cumulus and not clear skies. Profiles of vertical velocity were found to have enhanced variance under low cumulus compared to clear sky periods, suggesting potential for cloud feedbacks on boundary layer structure and surface energy fluxes. Plain Language Summary This study investigates how different cloud regimes influence the exchange of energy at Earth's surface over a highly heterogeneous forested landscape in northern Wisconsin. Clouds directly modify the solar and infrared radiation reaching the surface. In turn, the modifications to radiation affect how turbulence near the surface is generated and its magnitude. The net result of these energy fluxes determines the warming and cooling processes at the surface, with direct implications on the development of local weather systems. From the observations in northern Wisconsin, an apparent partition in energy fluxes between two commonly observed lower atmosphere cloud types is found. A seasonal pattern in the occurrence of these cloud types was observed. Because of these cloud‐specific preferences, turbulence generated near the surface was larger during the first half of the 3‐month field campaign. Enhanced surface fluxes supported a deeper boundary layer for the shallow cumulus cloud conditions compared to overcast conditions. These fluxes were even larger than periods when skies were clear; however clear sky conditions were most frequent during the morning when surface energy fluxes were generally increasing with time during this development stage of the convective mixed layer. Turbulent fluxes associated with evaporation at the surface dominated over dry fluxes, regardless of the overhead sky conditions. These findings represent important differences to heavily study climatological regions where grasslands make up the primary surface characteristics. Key Points Detailed surface energy fluxes and boundary layer structure responses to three boundary layer sky conditions are examined: low stratiform, low cumulus, clear Turbulent and radiative flux relationships were separable by cloud regime; latent fluxes dominated over sensible fluxes by a factor of 3 (low Bowen ratios dominated) Boundary layers were deeper during low cumulus compared to clear sky periods; surface‐atmosphere interactions are complex over the heterogenous forest landscape</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2021JD036060</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-3860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0384-7456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9515-160X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4022-7854</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9912-6396</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3101-9401</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-897X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2194-592X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8882-5693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000331019401</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000031097897X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000217943860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000203847456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000288825693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000299126396</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000019515160X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000032194592X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000240227854</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-897X
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2022-03, Vol.127 (5), p.n/a
issn 2169-897X
2169-8996
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1860631
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Atmosphere
Boundary layer
Boundary layer structure
Boundary layers
Bowen ratio
Clear sky
Cloud types
Clouds
Cumulus clouds
Daytime
Detectors
Earth surface
Energy
Energy budget
Enthalpy
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Evaporation
Geophysics
Grasslands
Heat
Heat flux
Heat transfer
Heterogeneous surface
I.R. radiation
Infrared radiation
Land-atmosphere
Landscape
Latent heat
Lower atmosphere
Mixed layer
Observatories
Radiation
Radiative forcing
Seasonal variations
Sensible heat
Sky
Surface energy
Surface energy budget
Surface fluxes
Surface properties
Turbulence
Turbulent fluxes
Vertical velocities
title Investigating the Impacts of Daytime Boundary Layer Clouds on Surface Energy Fluxes and Boundary Layer Structure During CHEESEHEAD19
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T22%3A11%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20the%20Impacts%20of%20Daytime%20Boundary%20Layer%20Clouds%20on%20Surface%20Energy%20Fluxes%20and%20Boundary%20Layer%20Structure%20During%20CHEESEHEAD19&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Sedlar,%20J.&rft.aucorp=Oak%20Ridge%20National%20Laboratory%20(ORNL),%20Oak%20Ridge,%20TN%20(United%20States).%20Atmospheric%20Radiation%20Measurement%20(ARM)%20Data%20Center&rft.date=2022-03-16&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=5&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021JD036060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2639051084%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2639051084&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true