The soil health assessment protocol and evaluation applied to soil organic carbon
The concept of soil health has evolved over the past several decades, recognizing that dynamic soil property response to management and land use is highly dependent on site‐specific factors that must be considered when interpreting soil health measurements. Initially, the Soil Management Assessment...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Soil Science Society of America journal 2021-07, Vol.85 (4), p.1196-1213 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1213 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1196 |
container_title | Soil Science Society of America journal |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Nunes, Márcio R. Veum, Kristen S. Parker, Paul A. Holan, Scott H. Karlen, Douglas L. Amsili, Joseph P. Es, Harold M. Wills, Skye A. Seybold, Cathy A. Moorman, Thomas B. |
description | The concept of soil health has evolved over the past several decades, recognizing that dynamic soil property response to management and land use is highly dependent on site‐specific factors that must be considered when interpreting soil health measurements. Initially, the Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) and Comprehensive Assessment of Soil Health (CASH) were developed and used globally for scoring soil health indicators. However, both SMAF and CASH frameworks were developed using a relatively small dataset and their interpretation curves were not validated at the nationwide scale. Expanding upon these concepts, we propose the Soil Health Assessment Protocol and Evaluation (SHAPE) tool. The SHAPE was developed using 14,680 soil organic C (SOC) observations from across the United States, and accounts for edaphic and climate factors at the continental scale. Data were compiled from the literature, the Cornell Soil Health Laboratory, and the Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory. In this approach, scoring curves are Bayesian model‐based estimates of the conditional cumulative distribution function (CDF) for defined soil peer groups reflecting five soil texture and five soil suborder classes adjusted for mean annual temperature and precipitation. Specifically, SHAPE produces scores between 0 and 1 (0–100%) for measured SOC values that reflect the quantile or position within the conditional CDF along with measures of uncertainty. Herein, we focus on development of the SHAPE scoring curve for SOC with our case studies. SHAPE is a flexible, quantitative tool that provides a regionally relevant interpretation of this key soil health indicator.
Core Ideas
Response of soil health (SH) indicators to land use and management is site‐specific.
Soil Health Assessment Protocol and Evaluation (SHAPE) is proposed as a flexible tool.
The SHAPE builds upon conceptual frameworks established by the SMAF and CASH protocols.
The SHAPE provides SH interpretation for soil peer groups based on edaphic and climatic factors.
This tool provides knowledge about the status of soils in response to agronomic practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/saj2.20244 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1853979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>SAJ220244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3364-2e1d4bdebc4635247dc068308e2d939795640820e567c7aaca7364c339a572693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAURi0EEuWx8AssRqSU62fisap4qhJClNlynVviKo2r2ID670kJM9O3nPMNh5ArBlMGwG-T2_ApBy7lEZkwKVQBWrNjMgGhWaGMUafkLKUNAFMGYEJelw3SFENLG3RtbqhLCVPaYpfpro85-thS19UUv1z76XKIHXW7XRuwpjmOZuw_XBc89a5fxe6CnKxdm_Dyb8_J-_3dcv5YLF4enuazReGF0LLgyGq5qnHlpRaKy7L2oCsBFfLaCFMapSVUHFDp0pfOeVcO2uAap0qujTgn1-NvTDnY5ENG3_jYdeizZZU6fAzQzQj5PqbU49ru-rB1_d4ysIdi9lDM_hYbYDbC36HF_T-kfZs989H5Abj6bMU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The soil health assessment protocol and evaluation applied to soil organic carbon</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Nunes, Márcio R. ; Veum, Kristen S. ; Parker, Paul A. ; Holan, Scott H. ; Karlen, Douglas L. ; Amsili, Joseph P. ; Es, Harold M. ; Wills, Skye A. ; Seybold, Cathy A. ; Moorman, Thomas B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Márcio R. ; Veum, Kristen S. ; Parker, Paul A. ; Holan, Scott H. ; Karlen, Douglas L. ; Amsili, Joseph P. ; Es, Harold M. ; Wills, Skye A. ; Seybold, Cathy A. ; Moorman, Thomas B. ; Antares Group, Inc., Lanham, MD (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>The concept of soil health has evolved over the past several decades, recognizing that dynamic soil property response to management and land use is highly dependent on site‐specific factors that must be considered when interpreting soil health measurements. Initially, the Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) and Comprehensive Assessment of Soil Health (CASH) were developed and used globally for scoring soil health indicators. However, both SMAF and CASH frameworks were developed using a relatively small dataset and their interpretation curves were not validated at the nationwide scale. Expanding upon these concepts, we propose the Soil Health Assessment Protocol and Evaluation (SHAPE) tool. The SHAPE was developed using 14,680 soil organic C (SOC) observations from across the United States, and accounts for edaphic and climate factors at the continental scale. Data were compiled from the literature, the Cornell Soil Health Laboratory, and the Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory. In this approach, scoring curves are Bayesian model‐based estimates of the conditional cumulative distribution function (CDF) for defined soil peer groups reflecting five soil texture and five soil suborder classes adjusted for mean annual temperature and precipitation. Specifically, SHAPE produces scores between 0 and 1 (0–100%) for measured SOC values that reflect the quantile or position within the conditional CDF along with measures of uncertainty. Herein, we focus on development of the SHAPE scoring curve for SOC with our case studies. SHAPE is a flexible, quantitative tool that provides a regionally relevant interpretation of this key soil health indicator.
Core Ideas
Response of soil health (SH) indicators to land use and management is site‐specific.
Soil Health Assessment Protocol and Evaluation (SHAPE) is proposed as a flexible tool.
The SHAPE builds upon conceptual frameworks established by the SMAF and CASH protocols.
The SHAPE provides SH interpretation for soil peer groups based on edaphic and climatic factors.
This tool provides knowledge about the status of soils in response to agronomic practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-5995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20244</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Alliance of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Science Societies</publisher><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><ispartof>Soil Science Society of America journal, 2021-07, Vol.85 (4), p.1196-1213</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Soil Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3364-2e1d4bdebc4635247dc068308e2d939795640820e567c7aaca7364c339a572693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3364-2e1d4bdebc4635247dc068308e2d939795640820e567c7aaca7364c339a572693</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6492-913X ; 0000-0002-3674-279X ; 0000-0001-9822-9476 ; 0000-0002-8293-5824 ; 0000000282935824 ; 000000026492913X ; 000000023674279X ; 0000000198229476</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsaj2.20244$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsaj2.20244$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1853979$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Márcio R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veum, Kristen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holan, Scott H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlen, Douglas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amsili, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Es, Harold M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wills, Skye A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seybold, Cathy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorman, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antares Group, Inc., Lanham, MD (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>The soil health assessment protocol and evaluation applied to soil organic carbon</title><title>Soil Science Society of America journal</title><description>The concept of soil health has evolved over the past several decades, recognizing that dynamic soil property response to management and land use is highly dependent on site‐specific factors that must be considered when interpreting soil health measurements. Initially, the Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) and Comprehensive Assessment of Soil Health (CASH) were developed and used globally for scoring soil health indicators. However, both SMAF and CASH frameworks were developed using a relatively small dataset and their interpretation curves were not validated at the nationwide scale. Expanding upon these concepts, we propose the Soil Health Assessment Protocol and Evaluation (SHAPE) tool. The SHAPE was developed using 14,680 soil organic C (SOC) observations from across the United States, and accounts for edaphic and climate factors at the continental scale. Data were compiled from the literature, the Cornell Soil Health Laboratory, and the Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory. In this approach, scoring curves are Bayesian model‐based estimates of the conditional cumulative distribution function (CDF) for defined soil peer groups reflecting five soil texture and five soil suborder classes adjusted for mean annual temperature and precipitation. Specifically, SHAPE produces scores between 0 and 1 (0–100%) for measured SOC values that reflect the quantile or position within the conditional CDF along with measures of uncertainty. Herein, we focus on development of the SHAPE scoring curve for SOC with our case studies. SHAPE is a flexible, quantitative tool that provides a regionally relevant interpretation of this key soil health indicator.
Core Ideas
Response of soil health (SH) indicators to land use and management is site‐specific.
Soil Health Assessment Protocol and Evaluation (SHAPE) is proposed as a flexible tool.
The SHAPE builds upon conceptual frameworks established by the SMAF and CASH protocols.
The SHAPE provides SH interpretation for soil peer groups based on edaphic and climatic factors.
This tool provides knowledge about the status of soils in response to agronomic practices.</description><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><issn>0361-5995</issn><issn>1435-0661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAURi0EEuWx8AssRqSU62fisap4qhJClNlynVviKo2r2ID670kJM9O3nPMNh5ArBlMGwG-T2_ApBy7lEZkwKVQBWrNjMgGhWaGMUafkLKUNAFMGYEJelw3SFENLG3RtbqhLCVPaYpfpro85-thS19UUv1z76XKIHXW7XRuwpjmOZuw_XBc89a5fxe6CnKxdm_Dyb8_J-_3dcv5YLF4enuazReGF0LLgyGq5qnHlpRaKy7L2oCsBFfLaCFMapSVUHFDp0pfOeVcO2uAap0qujTgn1-NvTDnY5ENG3_jYdeizZZU6fAzQzQj5PqbU49ru-rB1_d4ysIdi9lDM_hYbYDbC36HF_T-kfZs989H5Abj6bMU</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Nunes, Márcio R.</creator><creator>Veum, Kristen S.</creator><creator>Parker, Paul A.</creator><creator>Holan, Scott H.</creator><creator>Karlen, Douglas L.</creator><creator>Amsili, Joseph P.</creator><creator>Es, Harold M.</creator><creator>Wills, Skye A.</creator><creator>Seybold, Cathy A.</creator><creator>Moorman, Thomas B.</creator><general>Alliance of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Science Societies</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6492-913X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3674-279X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9822-9476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8293-5824</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000282935824</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000026492913X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000023674279X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000198229476</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>The soil health assessment protocol and evaluation applied to soil organic carbon</title><author>Nunes, Márcio R. ; Veum, Kristen S. ; Parker, Paul A. ; Holan, Scott H. ; Karlen, Douglas L. ; Amsili, Joseph P. ; Es, Harold M. ; Wills, Skye A. ; Seybold, Cathy A. ; Moorman, Thomas B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3364-2e1d4bdebc4635247dc068308e2d939795640820e567c7aaca7364c339a572693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Márcio R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veum, Kristen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holan, Scott H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlen, Douglas L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amsili, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Es, Harold M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wills, Skye A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seybold, Cathy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorman, Thomas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antares Group, Inc., Lanham, MD (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nunes, Márcio R.</au><au>Veum, Kristen S.</au><au>Parker, Paul A.</au><au>Holan, Scott H.</au><au>Karlen, Douglas L.</au><au>Amsili, Joseph P.</au><au>Es, Harold M.</au><au>Wills, Skye A.</au><au>Seybold, Cathy A.</au><au>Moorman, Thomas B.</au><aucorp>Antares Group, Inc., Lanham, MD (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The soil health assessment protocol and evaluation applied to soil organic carbon</atitle><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1196</spage><epage>1213</epage><pages>1196-1213</pages><issn>0361-5995</issn><eissn>1435-0661</eissn><abstract>The concept of soil health has evolved over the past several decades, recognizing that dynamic soil property response to management and land use is highly dependent on site‐specific factors that must be considered when interpreting soil health measurements. Initially, the Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) and Comprehensive Assessment of Soil Health (CASH) were developed and used globally for scoring soil health indicators. However, both SMAF and CASH frameworks were developed using a relatively small dataset and their interpretation curves were not validated at the nationwide scale. Expanding upon these concepts, we propose the Soil Health Assessment Protocol and Evaluation (SHAPE) tool. The SHAPE was developed using 14,680 soil organic C (SOC) observations from across the United States, and accounts for edaphic and climate factors at the continental scale. Data were compiled from the literature, the Cornell Soil Health Laboratory, and the Kellogg Soil Survey Laboratory. In this approach, scoring curves are Bayesian model‐based estimates of the conditional cumulative distribution function (CDF) for defined soil peer groups reflecting five soil texture and five soil suborder classes adjusted for mean annual temperature and precipitation. Specifically, SHAPE produces scores between 0 and 1 (0–100%) for measured SOC values that reflect the quantile or position within the conditional CDF along with measures of uncertainty. Herein, we focus on development of the SHAPE scoring curve for SOC with our case studies. SHAPE is a flexible, quantitative tool that provides a regionally relevant interpretation of this key soil health indicator.
Core Ideas
Response of soil health (SH) indicators to land use and management is site‐specific.
Soil Health Assessment Protocol and Evaluation (SHAPE) is proposed as a flexible tool.
The SHAPE builds upon conceptual frameworks established by the SMAF and CASH protocols.
The SHAPE provides SH interpretation for soil peer groups based on edaphic and climatic factors.
This tool provides knowledge about the status of soils in response to agronomic practices.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Alliance of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Science Societies</pub><doi>10.1002/saj2.20244</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6492-913X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3674-279X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9822-9476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8293-5824</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000282935824</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000026492913X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000023674279X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000198229476</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-5995 |
ispartof | Soil Science Society of America journal, 2021-07, Vol.85 (4), p.1196-1213 |
issn | 0361-5995 1435-0661 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1853979 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES |
title | The soil health assessment protocol and evaluation applied to soil organic carbon |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A33%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20soil%20health%20assessment%20protocol%20and%20evaluation%20applied%20to%20soil%20organic%20carbon&rft.jtitle=Soil%20Science%20Society%20of%20America%20journal&rft.au=Nunes,%20M%C3%A1rcio%20R.&rft.aucorp=Antares%20Group,%20Inc.,%20Lanham,%20MD%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1196&rft.epage=1213&rft.pages=1196-1213&rft.issn=0361-5995&rft.eissn=1435-0661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/saj2.20244&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_osti_%3ESAJ220244%3C/wiley_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |