Comparison of total emitted solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) and top-of-canopy (TOC) SIF in estimating photosynthesis

Many studies have shown that solar-induced fluorescence (SIF) has a good potential to predict gross primary production (GPP) of vegetation. What we measured by remote sensing or near-surface platforms is top-of-canopy (TOC) SIF (SIFtoc), which is not necessarily equal or proportional to total emitte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Remote sensing of environment 2020-12, Vol.251 (C), p.112083, Article 112083
Hauptverfasser: Lu, Xiaoliang, Liu, Zhunqiao, Zhao, Feng, Tang, Jianwu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue C
container_start_page 112083
container_title Remote sensing of environment
container_volume 251
creator Lu, Xiaoliang
Liu, Zhunqiao
Zhao, Feng
Tang, Jianwu
description Many studies have shown that solar-induced fluorescence (SIF) has a good potential to predict gross primary production (GPP) of vegetation. What we measured by remote sensing or near-surface platforms is top-of-canopy (TOC) SIF (SIFtoc), which is not necessarily equal or proportional to total emitted SIF (SIFtot) from the entire canopy due to the (re)absorption and scattering effects. However, photosynthesis, the process that plants use to fix carbon from the atmosphere, occurs at the entire vertical canopy. Here, by using the recollision theory, we calculated SIFtot at 760 nm from the measured SIFtoc, hyperspectral reflectance (R), canopy interception (i) and leaf albedo (ωl). Among them, both SIFtoc and R can be obtained from concurrent TOC spectral measurements; i and ωl in the near-infrared region can be estimated from the open access datasets with a good accuracy. Our result confirms that the measured SIFtoc only accounts for a small fraction of SIFtot: the above-the-canopy sensor can only “see” on average 22.9% of SIFtot at Harvard Forest. SIFtot has the following advantages over SIFtoc in estimating GPP: (1) SIFtot improves the diurnal estimate of canopy GPP, especially capable to capture the midday depression of photosynthesis which may cause the large discrepancies between SIFtoc and GPP on a diurnal basis, (2) SIFtot produces a stronger correlation with GPP from plants with complex canopy structure or under sky conditions with more diffuse irradiance, and (3) the SIFtot-GPP relationship shows a stronger resilience to environmental stresses. The fluorescence escape ratio (fesc), the ratio between SIFtoc multiplied by π and SIFtot, is mostly determined by the sun-canopy-sensor geometry and leaf inclination distribution. The effect of LAI and the leaf chlorophyll concentration on fesc is marginal at the 760 nm wavelength. Our results suggest that converting SIFtoc into SIFtot provides a better tool to understand and estimate GPP. [Display omitted] •Total emitted SIF (SIFtot) can be estimated from top-of-canopy SIF (SIFtoc).•The sensor only received on average 22.9% of total emitted SIF.•SIFtot improves the diurnal estimate of canopy GPP.•SIFtot produced a stronger correlation with GPP for plants with complex structure.•The SIFtot-GPP relationship shows a stronger resilience to environmental stresses.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112083
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1850972</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0034425720304569</els_id><sourcerecordid>2478110038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-d0fb6522925c392261c3b11d9520c8a47a763ece57f30133f69784f995334b213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVoIds0PyA30V6Sg7caybZseipL0wQCOTQ9C60s1Vq8GlfSBvbYf14Z95zTMMx7wzfzCLkBtgUG7ZfDNia75YyXHjjrxAXZQCf7iklWvyMbxkRd1byRl-RDSgfGoOkkbMjfHR5nHX3CQNHRjFlP1B59znagCScdKx-GkymdGSeMOI_naaJuOmG0ydhgLL39-Xh_R3UYin2u0FVGB5zP9PbleXdHy5D6QG3K_qizD7_pPGLGdA55tMmnj-S901Oy1__rFfl1__1l91A9Pf943H17qkzdQq4G5vZtw3nPGyN6zlswYg8w9A1nptO11LIV1thGOsFACNf2sqtd3zdC1HsO4op8WvdiIVHJ-GzNaDAEa7KCrmG95EX0eRXNEf-cCrM64CmGwqV4LTuA8seuqGBVmYgpRevUHMtx8ayAqSUOdVAlDrXEodY4iufr6rHlxldv44KwvG_wcSEY0L_h_gfogZFz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478110038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of total emitted solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) and top-of-canopy (TOC) SIF in estimating photosynthesis</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lu, Xiaoliang ; Liu, Zhunqiao ; Zhao, Feng ; Tang, Jianwu</creator><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xiaoliang ; Liu, Zhunqiao ; Zhao, Feng ; Tang, Jianwu ; Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Many studies have shown that solar-induced fluorescence (SIF) has a good potential to predict gross primary production (GPP) of vegetation. What we measured by remote sensing or near-surface platforms is top-of-canopy (TOC) SIF (SIFtoc), which is not necessarily equal or proportional to total emitted SIF (SIFtot) from the entire canopy due to the (re)absorption and scattering effects. However, photosynthesis, the process that plants use to fix carbon from the atmosphere, occurs at the entire vertical canopy. Here, by using the recollision theory, we calculated SIFtot at 760 nm from the measured SIFtoc, hyperspectral reflectance (R), canopy interception (i) and leaf albedo (ωl). Among them, both SIFtoc and R can be obtained from concurrent TOC spectral measurements; i and ωl in the near-infrared region can be estimated from the open access datasets with a good accuracy. Our result confirms that the measured SIFtoc only accounts for a small fraction of SIFtot: the above-the-canopy sensor can only “see” on average 22.9% of SIFtot at Harvard Forest. SIFtot has the following advantages over SIFtoc in estimating GPP: (1) SIFtot improves the diurnal estimate of canopy GPP, especially capable to capture the midday depression of photosynthesis which may cause the large discrepancies between SIFtoc and GPP on a diurnal basis, (2) SIFtot produces a stronger correlation with GPP from plants with complex canopy structure or under sky conditions with more diffuse irradiance, and (3) the SIFtot-GPP relationship shows a stronger resilience to environmental stresses. The fluorescence escape ratio (fesc), the ratio between SIFtoc multiplied by π and SIFtot, is mostly determined by the sun-canopy-sensor geometry and leaf inclination distribution. The effect of LAI and the leaf chlorophyll concentration on fesc is marginal at the 760 nm wavelength. Our results suggest that converting SIFtoc into SIFtot provides a better tool to understand and estimate GPP. [Display omitted] •Total emitted SIF (SIFtot) can be estimated from top-of-canopy SIF (SIFtoc).•The sensor only received on average 22.9% of total emitted SIF.•SIFtot improves the diurnal estimate of canopy GPP.•SIFtot produced a stronger correlation with GPP for plants with complex structure.•The SIFtot-GPP relationship shows a stronger resilience to environmental stresses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-4257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Albedo ; Canopies ; Chlorophyll ; Diurnal ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; Environmental stress ; Estimation ; Fluorescence ; Fluorescence escape ratio ; Gross primary production ; Herbivores ; Interception ; Irradiance ; Leaves ; Photosynthesis ; Primary production ; Reflectance ; Remote sensing ; Solar-induced fluorescence ; Top-of-canopy SIF ; Total emitted SIF and the recollision theory</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing of environment, 2020-12, Vol.251 (C), p.112083, Article 112083</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Dec 15, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-d0fb6522925c392261c3b11d9520c8a47a763ece57f30133f69784f995334b213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-d0fb6522925c392261c3b11d9520c8a47a763ece57f30133f69784f995334b213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112083$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1850972$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xiaoliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhunqiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jianwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of total emitted solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) and top-of-canopy (TOC) SIF in estimating photosynthesis</title><title>Remote sensing of environment</title><description>Many studies have shown that solar-induced fluorescence (SIF) has a good potential to predict gross primary production (GPP) of vegetation. What we measured by remote sensing or near-surface platforms is top-of-canopy (TOC) SIF (SIFtoc), which is not necessarily equal or proportional to total emitted SIF (SIFtot) from the entire canopy due to the (re)absorption and scattering effects. However, photosynthesis, the process that plants use to fix carbon from the atmosphere, occurs at the entire vertical canopy. Here, by using the recollision theory, we calculated SIFtot at 760 nm from the measured SIFtoc, hyperspectral reflectance (R), canopy interception (i) and leaf albedo (ωl). Among them, both SIFtoc and R can be obtained from concurrent TOC spectral measurements; i and ωl in the near-infrared region can be estimated from the open access datasets with a good accuracy. Our result confirms that the measured SIFtoc only accounts for a small fraction of SIFtot: the above-the-canopy sensor can only “see” on average 22.9% of SIFtot at Harvard Forest. SIFtot has the following advantages over SIFtoc in estimating GPP: (1) SIFtot improves the diurnal estimate of canopy GPP, especially capable to capture the midday depression of photosynthesis which may cause the large discrepancies between SIFtoc and GPP on a diurnal basis, (2) SIFtot produces a stronger correlation with GPP from plants with complex canopy structure or under sky conditions with more diffuse irradiance, and (3) the SIFtot-GPP relationship shows a stronger resilience to environmental stresses. The fluorescence escape ratio (fesc), the ratio between SIFtoc multiplied by π and SIFtot, is mostly determined by the sun-canopy-sensor geometry and leaf inclination distribution. The effect of LAI and the leaf chlorophyll concentration on fesc is marginal at the 760 nm wavelength. Our results suggest that converting SIFtoc into SIFtot provides a better tool to understand and estimate GPP. [Display omitted] •Total emitted SIF (SIFtot) can be estimated from top-of-canopy SIF (SIFtoc).•The sensor only received on average 22.9% of total emitted SIF.•SIFtot improves the diurnal estimate of canopy GPP.•SIFtot produced a stronger correlation with GPP for plants with complex structure.•The SIFtot-GPP relationship shows a stronger resilience to environmental stresses.</description><subject>Albedo</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Diurnal</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Environmental stress</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fluorescence escape ratio</subject><subject>Gross primary production</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Interception</subject><subject>Irradiance</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Reflectance</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Solar-induced fluorescence</subject><subject>Top-of-canopy SIF</subject><subject>Total emitted SIF and the recollision theory</subject><issn>0034-4257</issn><issn>1879-0704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVoIds0PyA30V6Sg7caybZseipL0wQCOTQ9C60s1Vq8GlfSBvbYf14Z95zTMMx7wzfzCLkBtgUG7ZfDNia75YyXHjjrxAXZQCf7iklWvyMbxkRd1byRl-RDSgfGoOkkbMjfHR5nHX3CQNHRjFlP1B59znagCScdKx-GkymdGSeMOI_naaJuOmG0ydhgLL39-Xh_R3UYin2u0FVGB5zP9PbleXdHy5D6QG3K_qizD7_pPGLGdA55tMmnj-S901Oy1__rFfl1__1l91A9Pf943H17qkzdQq4G5vZtw3nPGyN6zlswYg8w9A1nptO11LIV1thGOsFACNf2sqtd3zdC1HsO4op8WvdiIVHJ-GzNaDAEa7KCrmG95EX0eRXNEf-cCrM64CmGwqV4LTuA8seuqGBVmYgpRevUHMtx8ayAqSUOdVAlDrXEodY4iufr6rHlxldv44KwvG_wcSEY0L_h_gfogZFz</recordid><startdate>20201215</startdate><enddate>20201215</enddate><creator>Lu, Xiaoliang</creator><creator>Liu, Zhunqiao</creator><creator>Zhao, Feng</creator><creator>Tang, Jianwu</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201215</creationdate><title>Comparison of total emitted solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) and top-of-canopy (TOC) SIF in estimating photosynthesis</title><author>Lu, Xiaoliang ; Liu, Zhunqiao ; Zhao, Feng ; Tang, Jianwu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-d0fb6522925c392261c3b11d9520c8a47a763ece57f30133f69784f995334b213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Albedo</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Diurnal</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Environmental stress</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fluorescence escape ratio</topic><topic>Gross primary production</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Interception</topic><topic>Irradiance</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Reflectance</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Solar-induced fluorescence</topic><topic>Top-of-canopy SIF</topic><topic>Total emitted SIF and the recollision theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xiaoliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhunqiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jianwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lu, Xiaoliang</au><au>Liu, Zhunqiao</au><au>Zhao, Feng</au><au>Tang, Jianwu</au><aucorp>Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of total emitted solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) and top-of-canopy (TOC) SIF in estimating photosynthesis</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle><date>2020-12-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>251</volume><issue>C</issue><spage>112083</spage><pages>112083-</pages><artnum>112083</artnum><issn>0034-4257</issn><eissn>1879-0704</eissn><abstract>Many studies have shown that solar-induced fluorescence (SIF) has a good potential to predict gross primary production (GPP) of vegetation. What we measured by remote sensing or near-surface platforms is top-of-canopy (TOC) SIF (SIFtoc), which is not necessarily equal or proportional to total emitted SIF (SIFtot) from the entire canopy due to the (re)absorption and scattering effects. However, photosynthesis, the process that plants use to fix carbon from the atmosphere, occurs at the entire vertical canopy. Here, by using the recollision theory, we calculated SIFtot at 760 nm from the measured SIFtoc, hyperspectral reflectance (R), canopy interception (i) and leaf albedo (ωl). Among them, both SIFtoc and R can be obtained from concurrent TOC spectral measurements; i and ωl in the near-infrared region can be estimated from the open access datasets with a good accuracy. Our result confirms that the measured SIFtoc only accounts for a small fraction of SIFtot: the above-the-canopy sensor can only “see” on average 22.9% of SIFtot at Harvard Forest. SIFtot has the following advantages over SIFtoc in estimating GPP: (1) SIFtot improves the diurnal estimate of canopy GPP, especially capable to capture the midday depression of photosynthesis which may cause the large discrepancies between SIFtoc and GPP on a diurnal basis, (2) SIFtot produces a stronger correlation with GPP from plants with complex canopy structure or under sky conditions with more diffuse irradiance, and (3) the SIFtot-GPP relationship shows a stronger resilience to environmental stresses. The fluorescence escape ratio (fesc), the ratio between SIFtoc multiplied by π and SIFtot, is mostly determined by the sun-canopy-sensor geometry and leaf inclination distribution. The effect of LAI and the leaf chlorophyll concentration on fesc is marginal at the 760 nm wavelength. Our results suggest that converting SIFtoc into SIFtot provides a better tool to understand and estimate GPP. [Display omitted] •Total emitted SIF (SIFtot) can be estimated from top-of-canopy SIF (SIFtoc).•The sensor only received on average 22.9% of total emitted SIF.•SIFtot improves the diurnal estimate of canopy GPP.•SIFtot produced a stronger correlation with GPP for plants with complex structure.•The SIFtot-GPP relationship shows a stronger resilience to environmental stresses.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rse.2020.112083</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-4257
ispartof Remote sensing of environment, 2020-12, Vol.251 (C), p.112083, Article 112083
issn 0034-4257
1879-0704
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1850972
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Albedo
Canopies
Chlorophyll
Diurnal
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental stress
Estimation
Fluorescence
Fluorescence escape ratio
Gross primary production
Herbivores
Interception
Irradiance
Leaves
Photosynthesis
Primary production
Reflectance
Remote sensing
Solar-induced fluorescence
Top-of-canopy SIF
Total emitted SIF and the recollision theory
title Comparison of total emitted solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) and top-of-canopy (TOC) SIF in estimating photosynthesis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A29%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20total%20emitted%20solar-induced%20chlorophyll%20fluorescence%20(SIF)%20and%20top-of-canopy%20(TOC)%20SIF%20in%20estimating%20photosynthesis&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20of%20environment&rft.au=Lu,%20Xiaoliang&rft.aucorp=Marine%20Biological%20Laboratory,%20Woods%20Hole,%20MA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2020-12-15&rft.volume=251&rft.issue=C&rft.spage=112083&rft.pages=112083-&rft.artnum=112083&rft.issn=0034-4257&rft.eissn=1879-0704&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112083&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2478110038%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478110038&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0034425720304569&rfr_iscdi=true