Improved sampling technique to collect natural gas from hydrate-bearing pressure cores

High quality gas compositional data are an important factor in interpreting the genetic source of natural gas hosted in hydrate-bearing sediments and other subsurface systems. In order to accurately characterize the composition of gas samples degassed from hydrate-bearing pressure cores, one must us...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied geochemistry 2020-09, Vol.122 (C)
Hauptverfasser: Moore, Myles T., Phillips, Stephen C., Cook, Ann E., Darrah, Thomas H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue C
container_start_page
container_title Applied geochemistry
container_volume 122
creator Moore, Myles T.
Phillips, Stephen C.
Cook, Ann E.
Darrah, Thomas H.
description High quality gas compositional data are an important factor in interpreting the genetic source of natural gas hosted in hydrate-bearing sediments and other subsurface systems. In order to accurately characterize the composition of gas samples degassed from hydrate-bearing pressure cores, one must use a reproducible sampling technique that minimizes artifacts of the sampling process. Herein, we review sediment core degassing techniques and compare data obtained from a commonly used degassing approach, which we term the standard quantitative degassing (SQD) technique, to our newly developed modified quantitative degassing (MQD) method designed to minimize atmospheric contamination and gas-water interactions. The SQD method allows sample gas to interact with water in a bubbling chamber, which we hypothesize could alter the gas composition following mixing with water or dissolved gases in the bubbling chamber. Whereas, the MQD method allows for the collection of sample gas prior to the bubbling chamber. To compare the SQD and MQD methods, we performed a side-by-side comparison of noble (He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe), major (H2, N2, O2, and CO2), and hydrocarbon (CH4, C2H6, C3H8, i-C4H10, C4H10, i-C5H12, C5H12) gas concentrations and select isotopic compositions obtained using both sample collection techniques. Gas samples were collected from hydrate-bearing pressure cores recovered and maintained under hydrate stable conditions from the northern Gulf of Mexico during the UT-GOM2-1 Expedition. The MQD method displayed significantly lower concentrations of atmospheric gases, higher proportions of hydrocarbon gases, lower ratios of C1/C2+, and heavier stable carbon and hydrogen isotopes of methane than the SQD method. These results demonstrate that the MQD method reduced air contamination and minimized alteration of the hydrocarbon gases. Finally, we conclude this method may be important for future work that seeks to determine the composition of natural gas from pressure cores using quantitative degassing experiments, especially those seeking to measure major (e.g., N2) and noble gases.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>osti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1849136</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1849136</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_18491363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjk0OgjAUhBujifhzh8Y9SSkoZW00ujduSS0PqCkt9hUTby8kHsDVzGK-mZmRKBE5j4skzeYkYkKkMS94viQrxCdjbJ8zHpH7teu9e0NFUXa90bahAVRr9WsAGhxVzhhQgVoZBi8NbSTS2ruOtp_KywDxA6SfqN4D4uBhJEa3IYtaGoTtT9dkdz7djpfYYdAlKj2NKGft2F0mIhtfHtK_Ql8YNENY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improved sampling technique to collect natural gas from hydrate-bearing pressure cores</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Moore, Myles T. ; Phillips, Stephen C. ; Cook, Ann E. ; Darrah, Thomas H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moore, Myles T. ; Phillips, Stephen C. ; Cook, Ann E. ; Darrah, Thomas H. ; Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>High quality gas compositional data are an important factor in interpreting the genetic source of natural gas hosted in hydrate-bearing sediments and other subsurface systems. In order to accurately characterize the composition of gas samples degassed from hydrate-bearing pressure cores, one must use a reproducible sampling technique that minimizes artifacts of the sampling process. Herein, we review sediment core degassing techniques and compare data obtained from a commonly used degassing approach, which we term the standard quantitative degassing (SQD) technique, to our newly developed modified quantitative degassing (MQD) method designed to minimize atmospheric contamination and gas-water interactions. The SQD method allows sample gas to interact with water in a bubbling chamber, which we hypothesize could alter the gas composition following mixing with water or dissolved gases in the bubbling chamber. Whereas, the MQD method allows for the collection of sample gas prior to the bubbling chamber. To compare the SQD and MQD methods, we performed a side-by-side comparison of noble (He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe), major (H2, N2, O2, and CO2), and hydrocarbon (CH4, C2H6, C3H8, i-C4H10, C4H10, i-C5H12, C5H12) gas concentrations and select isotopic compositions obtained using both sample collection techniques. Gas samples were collected from hydrate-bearing pressure cores recovered and maintained under hydrate stable conditions from the northern Gulf of Mexico during the UT-GOM2-1 Expedition. The MQD method displayed significantly lower concentrations of atmospheric gases, higher proportions of hydrocarbon gases, lower ratios of C1/C2+, and heavier stable carbon and hydrogen isotopes of methane than the SQD method. These results demonstrate that the MQD method reduced air contamination and minimized alteration of the hydrocarbon gases. Finally, we conclude this method may be important for future work that seeks to determine the composition of natural gas from pressure cores using quantitative degassing experiments, especially those seeking to measure major (e.g., N2) and noble gases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-2927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9134</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Geochemistry &amp; Geophysics ; GEOSCIENCES ; Gulf of Mexico ; Hydrocarbon ; Noble gas geochemistry ; Quantitative degassing</subject><ispartof>Applied geochemistry, 2020-09, Vol.122 (C)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1849136$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moore, Myles T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Ann E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darrah, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Improved sampling technique to collect natural gas from hydrate-bearing pressure cores</title><title>Applied geochemistry</title><description>High quality gas compositional data are an important factor in interpreting the genetic source of natural gas hosted in hydrate-bearing sediments and other subsurface systems. In order to accurately characterize the composition of gas samples degassed from hydrate-bearing pressure cores, one must use a reproducible sampling technique that minimizes artifacts of the sampling process. Herein, we review sediment core degassing techniques and compare data obtained from a commonly used degassing approach, which we term the standard quantitative degassing (SQD) technique, to our newly developed modified quantitative degassing (MQD) method designed to minimize atmospheric contamination and gas-water interactions. The SQD method allows sample gas to interact with water in a bubbling chamber, which we hypothesize could alter the gas composition following mixing with water or dissolved gases in the bubbling chamber. Whereas, the MQD method allows for the collection of sample gas prior to the bubbling chamber. To compare the SQD and MQD methods, we performed a side-by-side comparison of noble (He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe), major (H2, N2, O2, and CO2), and hydrocarbon (CH4, C2H6, C3H8, i-C4H10, C4H10, i-C5H12, C5H12) gas concentrations and select isotopic compositions obtained using both sample collection techniques. Gas samples were collected from hydrate-bearing pressure cores recovered and maintained under hydrate stable conditions from the northern Gulf of Mexico during the UT-GOM2-1 Expedition. The MQD method displayed significantly lower concentrations of atmospheric gases, higher proportions of hydrocarbon gases, lower ratios of C1/C2+, and heavier stable carbon and hydrogen isotopes of methane than the SQD method. These results demonstrate that the MQD method reduced air contamination and minimized alteration of the hydrocarbon gases. Finally, we conclude this method may be important for future work that seeks to determine the composition of natural gas from pressure cores using quantitative degassing experiments, especially those seeking to measure major (e.g., N2) and noble gases.</description><subject>Geochemistry &amp; Geophysics</subject><subject>GEOSCIENCES</subject><subject>Gulf of Mexico</subject><subject>Hydrocarbon</subject><subject>Noble gas geochemistry</subject><subject>Quantitative degassing</subject><issn>0883-2927</issn><issn>1872-9134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjk0OgjAUhBujifhzh8Y9SSkoZW00ujduSS0PqCkt9hUTby8kHsDVzGK-mZmRKBE5j4skzeYkYkKkMS94viQrxCdjbJ8zHpH7teu9e0NFUXa90bahAVRr9WsAGhxVzhhQgVoZBi8NbSTS2ruOtp_KywDxA6SfqN4D4uBhJEa3IYtaGoTtT9dkdz7djpfYYdAlKj2NKGft2F0mIhtfHtK_Ql8YNENY</recordid><startdate>20200917</startdate><enddate>20200917</enddate><creator>Moore, Myles T.</creator><creator>Phillips, Stephen C.</creator><creator>Cook, Ann E.</creator><creator>Darrah, Thomas H.</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200917</creationdate><title>Improved sampling technique to collect natural gas from hydrate-bearing pressure cores</title><author>Moore, Myles T. ; Phillips, Stephen C. ; Cook, Ann E. ; Darrah, Thomas H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_18491363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Geochemistry &amp; Geophysics</topic><topic>GEOSCIENCES</topic><topic>Gulf of Mexico</topic><topic>Hydrocarbon</topic><topic>Noble gas geochemistry</topic><topic>Quantitative degassing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moore, Myles T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Ann E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darrah, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Applied geochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moore, Myles T.</au><au>Phillips, Stephen C.</au><au>Cook, Ann E.</au><au>Darrah, Thomas H.</au><aucorp>Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improved sampling technique to collect natural gas from hydrate-bearing pressure cores</atitle><jtitle>Applied geochemistry</jtitle><date>2020-09-17</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>C</issue><issn>0883-2927</issn><eissn>1872-9134</eissn><abstract>High quality gas compositional data are an important factor in interpreting the genetic source of natural gas hosted in hydrate-bearing sediments and other subsurface systems. In order to accurately characterize the composition of gas samples degassed from hydrate-bearing pressure cores, one must use a reproducible sampling technique that minimizes artifacts of the sampling process. Herein, we review sediment core degassing techniques and compare data obtained from a commonly used degassing approach, which we term the standard quantitative degassing (SQD) technique, to our newly developed modified quantitative degassing (MQD) method designed to minimize atmospheric contamination and gas-water interactions. The SQD method allows sample gas to interact with water in a bubbling chamber, which we hypothesize could alter the gas composition following mixing with water or dissolved gases in the bubbling chamber. Whereas, the MQD method allows for the collection of sample gas prior to the bubbling chamber. To compare the SQD and MQD methods, we performed a side-by-side comparison of noble (He, Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe), major (H2, N2, O2, and CO2), and hydrocarbon (CH4, C2H6, C3H8, i-C4H10, C4H10, i-C5H12, C5H12) gas concentrations and select isotopic compositions obtained using both sample collection techniques. Gas samples were collected from hydrate-bearing pressure cores recovered and maintained under hydrate stable conditions from the northern Gulf of Mexico during the UT-GOM2-1 Expedition. The MQD method displayed significantly lower concentrations of atmospheric gases, higher proportions of hydrocarbon gases, lower ratios of C1/C2+, and heavier stable carbon and hydrogen isotopes of methane than the SQD method. These results demonstrate that the MQD method reduced air contamination and minimized alteration of the hydrocarbon gases. Finally, we conclude this method may be important for future work that seeks to determine the composition of natural gas from pressure cores using quantitative degassing experiments, especially those seeking to measure major (e.g., N2) and noble gases.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-2927
ispartof Applied geochemistry, 2020-09, Vol.122 (C)
issn 0883-2927
1872-9134
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1849136
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Geochemistry & Geophysics
GEOSCIENCES
Gulf of Mexico
Hydrocarbon
Noble gas geochemistry
Quantitative degassing
title Improved sampling technique to collect natural gas from hydrate-bearing pressure cores
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A23%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-osti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improved%20sampling%20technique%20to%20collect%20natural%20gas%20from%20hydrate-bearing%20pressure%20cores&rft.jtitle=Applied%20geochemistry&rft.au=Moore,%20Myles%20T.&rft.aucorp=Univ.%20of%20Texas,%20Austin,%20TX%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2020-09-17&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=C&rft.issn=0883-2927&rft.eissn=1872-9134&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Costi%3E1849136%3C/osti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true