Evaluating the feasibility of geothermal deep direct-use in the United States

•Deep direct-use projects were evaluated for heating, cooling and thermal storage.•Performance was compared with non-geothermal systems and other countries.•Subsurface, surface and financial conditions significantly impact feasibility.•Attractive levelized costs of energy found for heating, cooling...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy conversion and management 2021-09, Vol.243, p.114335, Article 114335
Hauptverfasser: Beckers, Koenraad F., Kolker, Amanda, Pauling, Hannah, McTigue, Joshua D, Kesseli, Devon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 114335
container_title Energy conversion and management
container_volume 243
creator Beckers, Koenraad F.
Kolker, Amanda
Pauling, Hannah
McTigue, Joshua D
Kesseli, Devon
description •Deep direct-use projects were evaluated for heating, cooling and thermal storage.•Performance was compared with non-geothermal systems and other countries.•Subsurface, surface and financial conditions significantly impact feasibility.•Attractive levelized costs of energy found for heating, cooling and thermal storage. This paper investigates the techno-economic feasibility of geothermal deep direct-use for heating, cooling, and thermal energy storage in the United States. The six 2017–2019 deep direct-use projects funded by the U.S. Department of Energy are reviewed and evaluated using the simulation tool GEOPHIRES, and results are compared with prior studies, existing geothermal district heating systems in Europe and the United States, as well as non-geothermal centralized and non-centralized heating, cooling, and thermal energy storage systems. Analysis indicates that deep direct-use feasibility varies widely, depending on subsurface characteristics, system design, and financial conditions. Project base case levelized cost of heat values ranged between $13 and $350/MWh; key drivers lowering the levelized cost of heat include higher reservoir temperatures, shallower reservoir depths, higher well flow rates, higher utilization rates, lower drilling costs, and lower discount rates. Incentives such as grants and an investment tax credit resulted in small improvements in project economics. Base case levelized cost of heat values for four projects fell within the range of levelized cost values for existing systems in Europe and the United States, and were comparable to values found in previous studies, including the 2019 GeoVision study. The lowest-cost projects for district heating had comparable levelized cost of heat values to existing fossil-fuel-driven district heating systems, and lower values than decentralized heating with natural gas boilers or heat pumps. Chilled water production with absorption chillers driven by a high-quality geothermal resource obtained attractive levelized cost of cooling values, in line with values from typical centralized cooling production facilities and lower than domestic decentralized cooling with air-conditioning units. Also, thermal energy storage is a potential deep direct-use application, where levelized cost of storage values can be obtained that are comparable to those of other thermal storage techniques such as borehole thermal energy storage and hot water storage tanks. Other aspects of deep direct-use, which are
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114335
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1798719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196890421005112</els_id><sourcerecordid>2568306852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-c05e547a87bfff9ea22b99fe67f2630a1c67fa99f28325ada3601fbefd1235203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwC8iCdYIfsZPsQBUvqYgFdG05ybh1lCbFdir173EJrFnZGp07unMQuqYkpYTKuzaFvh76re5TRhhNKc04FydoRou8TBhj-SmaEVrKpChJdo4uvG8JIVwQOUNvj3vdjTrYfo3DBrAB7W1lOxsOeDB4DUOcuq3ucAOww411UIdk9IBt_xNY9TZAgz-CDuAv0ZnRnYer33eOVk-Pn4uXZPn-_Lp4WCZ1RkVIaiJAZLku8soYU4JmrCpLAzI3THKiaR1_Ok5YwZnQjeaSUFOBaSjjghE-RzfT3sEHq3wdK9Sb6KCP5RTNyyKnZYRuJ2jnhq8RfFDtMLo-9lJMyIITWQgWKTlRtRu8d2DUztmtdgdFiTr6Va3686uOftXkNwbvpyDEQ_cW3LFHJGFypJrB_rfiG3zmhpo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2568306852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the feasibility of geothermal deep direct-use in the United States</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Beckers, Koenraad F. ; Kolker, Amanda ; Pauling, Hannah ; McTigue, Joshua D ; Kesseli, Devon</creator><creatorcontrib>Beckers, Koenraad F. ; Kolker, Amanda ; Pauling, Hannah ; McTigue, Joshua D ; Kesseli, Devon ; National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>•Deep direct-use projects were evaluated for heating, cooling and thermal storage.•Performance was compared with non-geothermal systems and other countries.•Subsurface, surface and financial conditions significantly impact feasibility.•Attractive levelized costs of energy found for heating, cooling and thermal storage. This paper investigates the techno-economic feasibility of geothermal deep direct-use for heating, cooling, and thermal energy storage in the United States. The six 2017–2019 deep direct-use projects funded by the U.S. Department of Energy are reviewed and evaluated using the simulation tool GEOPHIRES, and results are compared with prior studies, existing geothermal district heating systems in Europe and the United States, as well as non-geothermal centralized and non-centralized heating, cooling, and thermal energy storage systems. Analysis indicates that deep direct-use feasibility varies widely, depending on subsurface characteristics, system design, and financial conditions. Project base case levelized cost of heat values ranged between $13 and $350/MWh; key drivers lowering the levelized cost of heat include higher reservoir temperatures, shallower reservoir depths, higher well flow rates, higher utilization rates, lower drilling costs, and lower discount rates. Incentives such as grants and an investment tax credit resulted in small improvements in project economics. Base case levelized cost of heat values for four projects fell within the range of levelized cost values for existing systems in Europe and the United States, and were comparable to values found in previous studies, including the 2019 GeoVision study. The lowest-cost projects for district heating had comparable levelized cost of heat values to existing fossil-fuel-driven district heating systems, and lower values than decentralized heating with natural gas boilers or heat pumps. Chilled water production with absorption chillers driven by a high-quality geothermal resource obtained attractive levelized cost of cooling values, in line with values from typical centralized cooling production facilities and lower than domestic decentralized cooling with air-conditioning units. Also, thermal energy storage is a potential deep direct-use application, where levelized cost of storage values can be obtained that are comparable to those of other thermal storage techniques such as borehole thermal energy storage and hot water storage tanks. Other aspects of deep direct-use, which are not captured in a standard levelized cost of energy metric, include the ability to decarbonize the heating and cooling supply, and provide reliability and resiliency to the energy infrastructure. These attributes are gaining increased attention and improve overall project feasibility. Finally, this paper identifies technical, market, policy, and social barriers for deep direct-use development in the United States, and provides potential approaches for reducing these barriers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8904</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air conditioning ; Air conditioning equipment ; Boilers ; Boreholes ; Cooling ; direct use ; district energy ; District heating ; Drilling ; Energy storage ; Feasibility studies ; Federal agencies ; Flow rates ; Flow velocity ; Fossil fuels ; Geothermal deep direct-use ; Geothermal district heating ; GEOTHERMAL ENERGY ; Geothermal resources ; Heat exchangers ; Heat pumps ; Heating ; Heating systems ; Incentives ; Natural gas ; Project feasibility ; Reliability engineering ; Reservoir thermal energy storage ; Reservoirs ; Storage systems ; Storage tanks ; Systems design ; Taxation ; Thermal energy ; Thermal storage ; Water storage ; Water tanks</subject><ispartof>Energy conversion and management, 2021-09, Vol.243, p.114335, Article 114335</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 1, 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-c05e547a87bfff9ea22b99fe67f2630a1c67fa99f28325ada3601fbefd1235203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-c05e547a87bfff9ea22b99fe67f2630a1c67fa99f28325ada3601fbefd1235203</cites><orcidid>0000000193113036 ; 0000000337362788</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114335$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1798719$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beckers, Koenraad F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolker, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauling, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McTigue, Joshua D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesseli, Devon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the feasibility of geothermal deep direct-use in the United States</title><title>Energy conversion and management</title><description>•Deep direct-use projects were evaluated for heating, cooling and thermal storage.•Performance was compared with non-geothermal systems and other countries.•Subsurface, surface and financial conditions significantly impact feasibility.•Attractive levelized costs of energy found for heating, cooling and thermal storage. This paper investigates the techno-economic feasibility of geothermal deep direct-use for heating, cooling, and thermal energy storage in the United States. The six 2017–2019 deep direct-use projects funded by the U.S. Department of Energy are reviewed and evaluated using the simulation tool GEOPHIRES, and results are compared with prior studies, existing geothermal district heating systems in Europe and the United States, as well as non-geothermal centralized and non-centralized heating, cooling, and thermal energy storage systems. Analysis indicates that deep direct-use feasibility varies widely, depending on subsurface characteristics, system design, and financial conditions. Project base case levelized cost of heat values ranged between $13 and $350/MWh; key drivers lowering the levelized cost of heat include higher reservoir temperatures, shallower reservoir depths, higher well flow rates, higher utilization rates, lower drilling costs, and lower discount rates. Incentives such as grants and an investment tax credit resulted in small improvements in project economics. Base case levelized cost of heat values for four projects fell within the range of levelized cost values for existing systems in Europe and the United States, and were comparable to values found in previous studies, including the 2019 GeoVision study. The lowest-cost projects for district heating had comparable levelized cost of heat values to existing fossil-fuel-driven district heating systems, and lower values than decentralized heating with natural gas boilers or heat pumps. Chilled water production with absorption chillers driven by a high-quality geothermal resource obtained attractive levelized cost of cooling values, in line with values from typical centralized cooling production facilities and lower than domestic decentralized cooling with air-conditioning units. Also, thermal energy storage is a potential deep direct-use application, where levelized cost of storage values can be obtained that are comparable to those of other thermal storage techniques such as borehole thermal energy storage and hot water storage tanks. Other aspects of deep direct-use, which are not captured in a standard levelized cost of energy metric, include the ability to decarbonize the heating and cooling supply, and provide reliability and resiliency to the energy infrastructure. These attributes are gaining increased attention and improve overall project feasibility. Finally, this paper identifies technical, market, policy, and social barriers for deep direct-use development in the United States, and provides potential approaches for reducing these barriers.</description><subject>Air conditioning</subject><subject>Air conditioning equipment</subject><subject>Boilers</subject><subject>Boreholes</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>direct use</subject><subject>district energy</subject><subject>District heating</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Federal agencies</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Geothermal deep direct-use</subject><subject>Geothermal district heating</subject><subject>GEOTHERMAL ENERGY</subject><subject>Geothermal resources</subject><subject>Heat exchangers</subject><subject>Heat pumps</subject><subject>Heating</subject><subject>Heating systems</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Project feasibility</subject><subject>Reliability engineering</subject><subject>Reservoir thermal energy storage</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Storage systems</subject><subject>Storage tanks</subject><subject>Systems design</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Thermal energy</subject><subject>Thermal storage</subject><subject>Water storage</subject><subject>Water tanks</subject><issn>0196-8904</issn><issn>1879-2227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwC8iCdYIfsZPsQBUvqYgFdG05ybh1lCbFdir173EJrFnZGp07unMQuqYkpYTKuzaFvh76re5TRhhNKc04FydoRou8TBhj-SmaEVrKpChJdo4uvG8JIVwQOUNvj3vdjTrYfo3DBrAB7W1lOxsOeDB4DUOcuq3ucAOww411UIdk9IBt_xNY9TZAgz-CDuAv0ZnRnYer33eOVk-Pn4uXZPn-_Lp4WCZ1RkVIaiJAZLku8soYU4JmrCpLAzI3THKiaR1_Ok5YwZnQjeaSUFOBaSjjghE-RzfT3sEHq3wdK9Sb6KCP5RTNyyKnZYRuJ2jnhq8RfFDtMLo-9lJMyIITWQgWKTlRtRu8d2DUztmtdgdFiTr6Va3686uOftXkNwbvpyDEQ_cW3LFHJGFypJrB_rfiG3zmhpo</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Beckers, Koenraad F.</creator><creator>Kolker, Amanda</creator><creator>Pauling, Hannah</creator><creator>McTigue, Joshua D</creator><creator>Kesseli, Devon</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000193113036</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000337362788</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Evaluating the feasibility of geothermal deep direct-use in the United States</title><author>Beckers, Koenraad F. ; Kolker, Amanda ; Pauling, Hannah ; McTigue, Joshua D ; Kesseli, Devon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-c05e547a87bfff9ea22b99fe67f2630a1c67fa99f28325ada3601fbefd1235203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Air conditioning</topic><topic>Air conditioning equipment</topic><topic>Boilers</topic><topic>Boreholes</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>direct use</topic><topic>district energy</topic><topic>District heating</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Federal agencies</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Geothermal deep direct-use</topic><topic>Geothermal district heating</topic><topic>GEOTHERMAL ENERGY</topic><topic>Geothermal resources</topic><topic>Heat exchangers</topic><topic>Heat pumps</topic><topic>Heating</topic><topic>Heating systems</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Project feasibility</topic><topic>Reliability engineering</topic><topic>Reservoir thermal energy storage</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Storage systems</topic><topic>Storage tanks</topic><topic>Systems design</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Thermal energy</topic><topic>Thermal storage</topic><topic>Water storage</topic><topic>Water tanks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beckers, Koenraad F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolker, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauling, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McTigue, Joshua D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesseli, Devon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beckers, Koenraad F.</au><au>Kolker, Amanda</au><au>Pauling, Hannah</au><au>McTigue, Joshua D</au><au>Kesseli, Devon</au><aucorp>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the feasibility of geothermal deep direct-use in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>243</volume><spage>114335</spage><pages>114335-</pages><artnum>114335</artnum><issn>0196-8904</issn><eissn>1879-2227</eissn><abstract>•Deep direct-use projects were evaluated for heating, cooling and thermal storage.•Performance was compared with non-geothermal systems and other countries.•Subsurface, surface and financial conditions significantly impact feasibility.•Attractive levelized costs of energy found for heating, cooling and thermal storage. This paper investigates the techno-economic feasibility of geothermal deep direct-use for heating, cooling, and thermal energy storage in the United States. The six 2017–2019 deep direct-use projects funded by the U.S. Department of Energy are reviewed and evaluated using the simulation tool GEOPHIRES, and results are compared with prior studies, existing geothermal district heating systems in Europe and the United States, as well as non-geothermal centralized and non-centralized heating, cooling, and thermal energy storage systems. Analysis indicates that deep direct-use feasibility varies widely, depending on subsurface characteristics, system design, and financial conditions. Project base case levelized cost of heat values ranged between $13 and $350/MWh; key drivers lowering the levelized cost of heat include higher reservoir temperatures, shallower reservoir depths, higher well flow rates, higher utilization rates, lower drilling costs, and lower discount rates. Incentives such as grants and an investment tax credit resulted in small improvements in project economics. Base case levelized cost of heat values for four projects fell within the range of levelized cost values for existing systems in Europe and the United States, and were comparable to values found in previous studies, including the 2019 GeoVision study. The lowest-cost projects for district heating had comparable levelized cost of heat values to existing fossil-fuel-driven district heating systems, and lower values than decentralized heating with natural gas boilers or heat pumps. Chilled water production with absorption chillers driven by a high-quality geothermal resource obtained attractive levelized cost of cooling values, in line with values from typical centralized cooling production facilities and lower than domestic decentralized cooling with air-conditioning units. Also, thermal energy storage is a potential deep direct-use application, where levelized cost of storage values can be obtained that are comparable to those of other thermal storage techniques such as borehole thermal energy storage and hot water storage tanks. Other aspects of deep direct-use, which are not captured in a standard levelized cost of energy metric, include the ability to decarbonize the heating and cooling supply, and provide reliability and resiliency to the energy infrastructure. These attributes are gaining increased attention and improve overall project feasibility. Finally, this paper identifies technical, market, policy, and social barriers for deep direct-use development in the United States, and provides potential approaches for reducing these barriers.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114335</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000193113036</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000337362788</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-8904
ispartof Energy conversion and management, 2021-09, Vol.243, p.114335, Article 114335
issn 0196-8904
1879-2227
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1798719
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Air conditioning
Air conditioning equipment
Boilers
Boreholes
Cooling
direct use
district energy
District heating
Drilling
Energy storage
Feasibility studies
Federal agencies
Flow rates
Flow velocity
Fossil fuels
Geothermal deep direct-use
Geothermal district heating
GEOTHERMAL ENERGY
Geothermal resources
Heat exchangers
Heat pumps
Heating
Heating systems
Incentives
Natural gas
Project feasibility
Reliability engineering
Reservoir thermal energy storage
Reservoirs
Storage systems
Storage tanks
Systems design
Taxation
Thermal energy
Thermal storage
Water storage
Water tanks
title Evaluating the feasibility of geothermal deep direct-use in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T08%3A08%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20feasibility%20of%20geothermal%20deep%20direct-use%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Energy%20conversion%20and%20management&rft.au=Beckers,%20Koenraad%20F.&rft.aucorp=National%20Renewable%20Energy%20Lab.%20(NREL),%20Golden,%20CO%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=243&rft.spage=114335&rft.pages=114335-&rft.artnum=114335&rft.issn=0196-8904&rft.eissn=1879-2227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114335&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2568306852%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2568306852&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0196890421005112&rfr_iscdi=true