A lightweight method for evaluating in situ workflow efficiency

Performance evaluation is crucial to understanding the behavior of scientific workflows. In this study, we target an emerging type of workflow, called in situ workflows. These workflows tightly couple components such as simulation and analysis to improve overall workflow performance. To understand t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of computational science 2020-12, Vol.48
Hauptverfasser: Do, Tu Mai Anh, Pottier, Loïc, Caíno-Lores, Silvina, Ferreira da Silva, Rafael, Cuendet, Michel A., Weinstein, Harel, Estrada, Trilce, Taufer, Michela, Deelman, Ewa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Journal of computational science
container_volume 48
creator Do, Tu Mai Anh
Pottier, Loïc
Caíno-Lores, Silvina
Ferreira da Silva, Rafael
Cuendet, Michel A.
Weinstein, Harel
Estrada, Trilce
Taufer, Michela
Deelman, Ewa
description Performance evaluation is crucial to understanding the behavior of scientific workflows. In this study, we target an emerging type of workflow, called in situ workflows. These workflows tightly couple components such as simulation and analysis to improve overall workflow performance. To understand the tradeoffs of various configurable parameters for coupling these heterogeneous tasks, namely simulation stride, and component placement, separately monitoring each component is insufficient to gain insights into the entire workflow behavior. Through an analysis of the state-of-the-art research, we propose a lightweight metric, derived from a defined in situ step, for assessing resource usage efficiency of an in situ workflow execution. By applying this metric to a synthetic workflow, which is parameterized to emulate behaviors of a molecular dynamics simulation, we explore two possible scenarios (Idle Simulation and Idle Analyzer) for the characterization of in situ workflow execution. In addition to preliminary results from a recently published study [11], we further exploit the proposed metric to evaluate a practical in situ workflow with a real molecular dynamics application, i.e., GROMACS. Here, experimental results show that the in transit placement (analytics on dedicated nodes) sustains a higher frequency for performing in situ analysis compared to the helper-core configuration (analytics co-allocated with simulation).
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>osti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1787006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1787006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_17870063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNikEKwjAQRYMoWLR3GNwXEoImrkRE8QDupcRJOxoTaKYWb6-CuPYv3nuLPxKFssZUZqnU-NdST0WZ81W-p61dK12IzRYCNS0P-CHckdt0AZ86wEcd-popNkARMnEPQ-puPqQB0HtyhNE952Li65Cx_HomFof9aXesUmY6Z0eMrnUpRnR8VsYaKVf6r9MLKQY7BQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A lightweight method for evaluating in situ workflow efficiency</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Do, Tu Mai Anh ; Pottier, Loïc ; Caíno-Lores, Silvina ; Ferreira da Silva, Rafael ; Cuendet, Michel A. ; Weinstein, Harel ; Estrada, Trilce ; Taufer, Michela ; Deelman, Ewa</creator><creatorcontrib>Do, Tu Mai Anh ; Pottier, Loïc ; Caíno-Lores, Silvina ; Ferreira da Silva, Rafael ; Cuendet, Michel A. ; Weinstein, Harel ; Estrada, Trilce ; Taufer, Michela ; Deelman, Ewa ; Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Performance evaluation is crucial to understanding the behavior of scientific workflows. In this study, we target an emerging type of workflow, called in situ workflows. These workflows tightly couple components such as simulation and analysis to improve overall workflow performance. To understand the tradeoffs of various configurable parameters for coupling these heterogeneous tasks, namely simulation stride, and component placement, separately monitoring each component is insufficient to gain insights into the entire workflow behavior. Through an analysis of the state-of-the-art research, we propose a lightweight metric, derived from a defined in situ step, for assessing resource usage efficiency of an in situ workflow execution. By applying this metric to a synthetic workflow, which is parameterized to emulate behaviors of a molecular dynamics simulation, we explore two possible scenarios (Idle Simulation and Idle Analyzer) for the characterization of in situ workflow execution. In addition to preliminary results from a recently published study [11], we further exploit the proposed metric to evaluate a practical in situ workflow with a real molecular dynamics application, i.e., GROMACS. Here, experimental results show that the in transit placement (analytics on dedicated nodes) sustains a higher frequency for performing in situ analysis compared to the helper-core configuration (analytics co-allocated with simulation).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-7503</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-7511</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier</publisher><subject>High-performance computing ; In situ model ; MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING ; Molecular dynamics ; Scientific workflow</subject><ispartof>Journal of computational science, 2020-12, Vol.48</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000000217200928 ; 0000000207543425 ; 0000000224192305</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1787006$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Do, Tu Mai Anh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pottier, Loïc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caíno-Lores, Silvina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira da Silva, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuendet, Michel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Harel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estrada, Trilce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taufer, Michela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deelman, Ewa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>A lightweight method for evaluating in situ workflow efficiency</title><title>Journal of computational science</title><description>Performance evaluation is crucial to understanding the behavior of scientific workflows. In this study, we target an emerging type of workflow, called in situ workflows. These workflows tightly couple components such as simulation and analysis to improve overall workflow performance. To understand the tradeoffs of various configurable parameters for coupling these heterogeneous tasks, namely simulation stride, and component placement, separately monitoring each component is insufficient to gain insights into the entire workflow behavior. Through an analysis of the state-of-the-art research, we propose a lightweight metric, derived from a defined in situ step, for assessing resource usage efficiency of an in situ workflow execution. By applying this metric to a synthetic workflow, which is parameterized to emulate behaviors of a molecular dynamics simulation, we explore two possible scenarios (Idle Simulation and Idle Analyzer) for the characterization of in situ workflow execution. In addition to preliminary results from a recently published study [11], we further exploit the proposed metric to evaluate a practical in situ workflow with a real molecular dynamics application, i.e., GROMACS. Here, experimental results show that the in transit placement (analytics on dedicated nodes) sustains a higher frequency for performing in situ analysis compared to the helper-core configuration (analytics co-allocated with simulation).</description><subject>High-performance computing</subject><subject>In situ model</subject><subject>MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING</subject><subject>Molecular dynamics</subject><subject>Scientific workflow</subject><issn>1877-7503</issn><issn>1877-7511</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNikEKwjAQRYMoWLR3GNwXEoImrkRE8QDupcRJOxoTaKYWb6-CuPYv3nuLPxKFssZUZqnU-NdST0WZ81W-p61dK12IzRYCNS0P-CHckdt0AZ86wEcd-popNkARMnEPQ-puPqQB0HtyhNE952Li65Cx_HomFof9aXesUmY6Z0eMrnUpRnR8VsYaKVf6r9MLKQY7BQ</recordid><startdate>20201203</startdate><enddate>20201203</enddate><creator>Do, Tu Mai Anh</creator><creator>Pottier, Loïc</creator><creator>Caíno-Lores, Silvina</creator><creator>Ferreira da Silva, Rafael</creator><creator>Cuendet, Michel A.</creator><creator>Weinstein, Harel</creator><creator>Estrada, Trilce</creator><creator>Taufer, Michela</creator><creator>Deelman, Ewa</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000217200928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000207543425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000224192305</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201203</creationdate><title>A lightweight method for evaluating in situ workflow efficiency</title><author>Do, Tu Mai Anh ; Pottier, Loïc ; Caíno-Lores, Silvina ; Ferreira da Silva, Rafael ; Cuendet, Michel A. ; Weinstein, Harel ; Estrada, Trilce ; Taufer, Michela ; Deelman, Ewa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_17870063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>High-performance computing</topic><topic>In situ model</topic><topic>MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING</topic><topic>Molecular dynamics</topic><topic>Scientific workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Do, Tu Mai Anh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pottier, Loïc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caíno-Lores, Silvina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira da Silva, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuendet, Michel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Harel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estrada, Trilce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taufer, Michela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deelman, Ewa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Journal of computational science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Do, Tu Mai Anh</au><au>Pottier, Loïc</au><au>Caíno-Lores, Silvina</au><au>Ferreira da Silva, Rafael</au><au>Cuendet, Michel A.</au><au>Weinstein, Harel</au><au>Estrada, Trilce</au><au>Taufer, Michela</au><au>Deelman, Ewa</au><aucorp>Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A lightweight method for evaluating in situ workflow efficiency</atitle><jtitle>Journal of computational science</jtitle><date>2020-12-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>48</volume><issn>1877-7503</issn><eissn>1877-7511</eissn><abstract>Performance evaluation is crucial to understanding the behavior of scientific workflows. In this study, we target an emerging type of workflow, called in situ workflows. These workflows tightly couple components such as simulation and analysis to improve overall workflow performance. To understand the tradeoffs of various configurable parameters for coupling these heterogeneous tasks, namely simulation stride, and component placement, separately monitoring each component is insufficient to gain insights into the entire workflow behavior. Through an analysis of the state-of-the-art research, we propose a lightweight metric, derived from a defined in situ step, for assessing resource usage efficiency of an in situ workflow execution. By applying this metric to a synthetic workflow, which is parameterized to emulate behaviors of a molecular dynamics simulation, we explore two possible scenarios (Idle Simulation and Idle Analyzer) for the characterization of in situ workflow execution. In addition to preliminary results from a recently published study [11], we further exploit the proposed metric to evaluate a practical in situ workflow with a real molecular dynamics application, i.e., GROMACS. Here, experimental results show that the in transit placement (analytics on dedicated nodes) sustains a higher frequency for performing in situ analysis compared to the helper-core configuration (analytics co-allocated with simulation).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000217200928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000207543425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000224192305</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1877-7503
ispartof Journal of computational science, 2020-12, Vol.48
issn 1877-7503
1877-7511
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1787006
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects High-performance computing
In situ model
MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING
Molecular dynamics
Scientific workflow
title A lightweight method for evaluating in situ workflow efficiency
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T05%3A21%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-osti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20lightweight%20method%20for%20evaluating%20in%20situ%20workflow%20efficiency&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20computational%20science&rft.au=Do,%20Tu%20Mai%20Anh&rft.aucorp=Univ.%20of%20Southern%20California,%20Los%20Angeles,%20CA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2020-12-03&rft.volume=48&rft.issn=1877-7503&rft.eissn=1877-7511&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Costi%3E1787006%3C/osti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true