Deep Learning Emulation of Subgrid‐Scale Processes in Turbulent Shear Flows

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are developed from a data set obtained from the dynamic Smagorinsky model to emulate the subgrid‐scale (SGS) viscosity (νsgs) and diffusivity (κsgs) for turbulent stratified shear flows encountered in the oceans and the atmosphere. These DNNs predict νsgs and κsgs from ve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical research letters 2020-06, Vol.47 (12), p.n/a
1. Verfasser: Pal, Anikesh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 12
container_start_page
container_title Geophysical research letters
container_volume 47
creator Pal, Anikesh
description Deep neural networks (DNNs) are developed from a data set obtained from the dynamic Smagorinsky model to emulate the subgrid‐scale (SGS) viscosity (νsgs) and diffusivity (κsgs) for turbulent stratified shear flows encountered in the oceans and the atmosphere. These DNNs predict νsgs and κsgs from velocities, strain rates, and density gradients such that the evolution of the kinetic energy budget and density variance budget terms is similar to the corresponding values obtained from the original dynamic Smagorinsky model. These DNNs also compute νsgs and κsgs ∼2–4 times quicker than the dynamic Smagorinsky model resulting in a ∼2–2.5 times acceleration of the entire simulation. This study demonstrates the feasibility of deep learning in emulating the subgrid‐scale (SGS) phenomenon in geophysical flows accurately in a cost‐effective manner. In a broader perspective, deep learning‐based surrogate models can present a promising alternative to the traditional parameterizations of the subgrid‐scale processes in climate models. Plain Language Summary Large eddy simulations (LES) are commonly used to simulate various oceanic and atmospheric flows. In LES, the large eddies are resolved, whereas the small‐scale turbulent features, which are the primary sources of mixing, are parameterized using physical models. A deep learning‐based surrogate LES model is developed from the data set obtained from such a physical model, the dynamic Smagorinsky model, at moderate Reynolds number and resolution. When this surrogate LES model is deployed for 10 times higher Reynolds number at a relatively higher and lower resolution, it was able to capture all the qualitative and quantitative features of the flow accurately at a cheaper computational cost. The effectiveness of deep learning‐based surrogate models to emulate the small‐scale processes is a promising area of research and can potentially be extended for various subgrid‐scale parameterizations in climate and earth science models. Key Points DNNs are built to emulate the SGS eddy viscosity and diffusivity for turbulent stratified shear flows These DNNs compute the SGS eddy viscosity and diffusivity 2–4 times faster than the dynamic Smagorinsky model These DNNs emulate the SGS processes accurately such that the energy and variance budgets match with the dynamic Smagorinsky model
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2020GL087005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1633497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2417104135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-47e90666aeedab71b5b9e1f236ec1146473878785292c88adfa255a7c2a1a803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90LFOwzAQBmALgUQpbDyABSuBs53YyYhKW5CCQLS75biXNlUaFztR1Y1H4Bl5EoLKwIRuuBu-O51-Qi4Z3DLg2R0HDtMcUgWQHJEBy-I4SgHUMRkAZP3MlTwlZyGsAUCAYAPy_IC4pTka31TNko43XW3ayjXUlXTWFUtfLb4-PmfW1EhfvbMYAgZaNXTe-aKrsWnpbNVv00ntduGcnJSmDnjx24dkPhnPR49R_jJ9Gt3nkRWKiShWmIGU0iAuTKFYkRQZspILiZaxWMZKpKqvhGfcpqlZlIYniVGWG2ZSEENydTjrQlvpYKsW7cq6pkHbaiaFiDPVo-sD2nr33mFo9dp1vunf0jxmikHMRNKrm4Oy3oXgsdRbX22M32sG-idU_TfUnvMD31U17v-1evqWS0i4EN_sTHbB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2417104135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deep Learning Emulation of Subgrid‐Scale Processes in Turbulent Shear Flows</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Pal, Anikesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Pal, Anikesh</creatorcontrib><description>Deep neural networks (DNNs) are developed from a data set obtained from the dynamic Smagorinsky model to emulate the subgrid‐scale (SGS) viscosity (νsgs) and diffusivity (κsgs) for turbulent stratified shear flows encountered in the oceans and the atmosphere. These DNNs predict νsgs and κsgs from velocities, strain rates, and density gradients such that the evolution of the kinetic energy budget and density variance budget terms is similar to the corresponding values obtained from the original dynamic Smagorinsky model. These DNNs also compute νsgs and κsgs ∼2–4 times quicker than the dynamic Smagorinsky model resulting in a ∼2–2.5 times acceleration of the entire simulation. This study demonstrates the feasibility of deep learning in emulating the subgrid‐scale (SGS) phenomenon in geophysical flows accurately in a cost‐effective manner. In a broader perspective, deep learning‐based surrogate models can present a promising alternative to the traditional parameterizations of the subgrid‐scale processes in climate models. Plain Language Summary Large eddy simulations (LES) are commonly used to simulate various oceanic and atmospheric flows. In LES, the large eddies are resolved, whereas the small‐scale turbulent features, which are the primary sources of mixing, are parameterized using physical models. A deep learning‐based surrogate LES model is developed from the data set obtained from such a physical model, the dynamic Smagorinsky model, at moderate Reynolds number and resolution. When this surrogate LES model is deployed for 10 times higher Reynolds number at a relatively higher and lower resolution, it was able to capture all the qualitative and quantitative features of the flow accurately at a cheaper computational cost. The effectiveness of deep learning‐based surrogate models to emulate the small‐scale processes is a promising area of research and can potentially be extended for various subgrid‐scale parameterizations in climate and earth science models. Key Points DNNs are built to emulate the SGS eddy viscosity and diffusivity for turbulent stratified shear flows These DNNs compute the SGS eddy viscosity and diffusivity 2–4 times faster than the dynamic Smagorinsky model These DNNs emulate the SGS processes accurately such that the energy and variance budgets match with the dynamic Smagorinsky model</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2020GL087005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Artificial neural networks ; Atmospheric flows ; Atmospheric models ; Climate ; Climate models ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer applications ; Computer simulation ; Computing costs ; Datasets ; Deep learning ; Density gradients ; Eddies ; Energy budget ; Feasibility studies ; Fluid flow ; Kinetic energy ; Large eddy simulation ; Large eddy simulations ; Machine learning ; Neural networks ; Oceans ; Resolution ; Reynolds number ; Shear ; Shear flow ; shear layers ; turbulence ; Viscosity</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2020-06, Vol.47 (12), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-47e90666aeedab71b5b9e1f236ec1146473878785292c88adfa255a7c2a1a803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-47e90666aeedab71b5b9e1f236ec1146473878785292c88adfa255a7c2a1a803</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2085-7231 ; 0000000320857231</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2020GL087005$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2020GL087005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1633497$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pal, Anikesh</creatorcontrib><title>Deep Learning Emulation of Subgrid‐Scale Processes in Turbulent Shear Flows</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>Deep neural networks (DNNs) are developed from a data set obtained from the dynamic Smagorinsky model to emulate the subgrid‐scale (SGS) viscosity (νsgs) and diffusivity (κsgs) for turbulent stratified shear flows encountered in the oceans and the atmosphere. These DNNs predict νsgs and κsgs from velocities, strain rates, and density gradients such that the evolution of the kinetic energy budget and density variance budget terms is similar to the corresponding values obtained from the original dynamic Smagorinsky model. These DNNs also compute νsgs and κsgs ∼2–4 times quicker than the dynamic Smagorinsky model resulting in a ∼2–2.5 times acceleration of the entire simulation. This study demonstrates the feasibility of deep learning in emulating the subgrid‐scale (SGS) phenomenon in geophysical flows accurately in a cost‐effective manner. In a broader perspective, deep learning‐based surrogate models can present a promising alternative to the traditional parameterizations of the subgrid‐scale processes in climate models. Plain Language Summary Large eddy simulations (LES) are commonly used to simulate various oceanic and atmospheric flows. In LES, the large eddies are resolved, whereas the small‐scale turbulent features, which are the primary sources of mixing, are parameterized using physical models. A deep learning‐based surrogate LES model is developed from the data set obtained from such a physical model, the dynamic Smagorinsky model, at moderate Reynolds number and resolution. When this surrogate LES model is deployed for 10 times higher Reynolds number at a relatively higher and lower resolution, it was able to capture all the qualitative and quantitative features of the flow accurately at a cheaper computational cost. The effectiveness of deep learning‐based surrogate models to emulate the small‐scale processes is a promising area of research and can potentially be extended for various subgrid‐scale parameterizations in climate and earth science models. Key Points DNNs are built to emulate the SGS eddy viscosity and diffusivity for turbulent stratified shear flows These DNNs compute the SGS eddy viscosity and diffusivity 2–4 times faster than the dynamic Smagorinsky model These DNNs emulate the SGS processes accurately such that the energy and variance budgets match with the dynamic Smagorinsky model</description><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Atmospheric flows</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Computing costs</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Density gradients</subject><subject>Eddies</subject><subject>Energy budget</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Kinetic energy</subject><subject>Large eddy simulation</subject><subject>Large eddy simulations</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><subject>Shear</subject><subject>Shear flow</subject><subject>shear layers</subject><subject>turbulence</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90LFOwzAQBmALgUQpbDyABSuBs53YyYhKW5CCQLS75biXNlUaFztR1Y1H4Bl5EoLKwIRuuBu-O51-Qi4Z3DLg2R0HDtMcUgWQHJEBy-I4SgHUMRkAZP3MlTwlZyGsAUCAYAPy_IC4pTka31TNko43XW3ayjXUlXTWFUtfLb4-PmfW1EhfvbMYAgZaNXTe-aKrsWnpbNVv00ntduGcnJSmDnjx24dkPhnPR49R_jJ9Gt3nkRWKiShWmIGU0iAuTKFYkRQZspILiZaxWMZKpKqvhGfcpqlZlIYniVGWG2ZSEENydTjrQlvpYKsW7cq6pkHbaiaFiDPVo-sD2nr33mFo9dp1vunf0jxmikHMRNKrm4Oy3oXgsdRbX22M32sG-idU_TfUnvMD31U17v-1evqWS0i4EN_sTHbB</recordid><startdate>20200628</startdate><enddate>20200628</enddate><creator>Pal, Anikesh</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>American Geophysical Union (AGU)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2085-7231</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000320857231</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200628</creationdate><title>Deep Learning Emulation of Subgrid‐Scale Processes in Turbulent Shear Flows</title><author>Pal, Anikesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3713-47e90666aeedab71b5b9e1f236ec1146473878785292c88adfa255a7c2a1a803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Atmospheric flows</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Computing costs</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Density gradients</topic><topic>Eddies</topic><topic>Energy budget</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Kinetic energy</topic><topic>Large eddy simulation</topic><topic>Large eddy simulations</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><topic>Shear</topic><topic>Shear flow</topic><topic>shear layers</topic><topic>turbulence</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pal, Anikesh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pal, Anikesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deep Learning Emulation of Subgrid‐Scale Processes in Turbulent Shear Flows</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2020-06-28</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>12</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>Deep neural networks (DNNs) are developed from a data set obtained from the dynamic Smagorinsky model to emulate the subgrid‐scale (SGS) viscosity (νsgs) and diffusivity (κsgs) for turbulent stratified shear flows encountered in the oceans and the atmosphere. These DNNs predict νsgs and κsgs from velocities, strain rates, and density gradients such that the evolution of the kinetic energy budget and density variance budget terms is similar to the corresponding values obtained from the original dynamic Smagorinsky model. These DNNs also compute νsgs and κsgs ∼2–4 times quicker than the dynamic Smagorinsky model resulting in a ∼2–2.5 times acceleration of the entire simulation. This study demonstrates the feasibility of deep learning in emulating the subgrid‐scale (SGS) phenomenon in geophysical flows accurately in a cost‐effective manner. In a broader perspective, deep learning‐based surrogate models can present a promising alternative to the traditional parameterizations of the subgrid‐scale processes in climate models. Plain Language Summary Large eddy simulations (LES) are commonly used to simulate various oceanic and atmospheric flows. In LES, the large eddies are resolved, whereas the small‐scale turbulent features, which are the primary sources of mixing, are parameterized using physical models. A deep learning‐based surrogate LES model is developed from the data set obtained from such a physical model, the dynamic Smagorinsky model, at moderate Reynolds number and resolution. When this surrogate LES model is deployed for 10 times higher Reynolds number at a relatively higher and lower resolution, it was able to capture all the qualitative and quantitative features of the flow accurately at a cheaper computational cost. The effectiveness of deep learning‐based surrogate models to emulate the small‐scale processes is a promising area of research and can potentially be extended for various subgrid‐scale parameterizations in climate and earth science models. Key Points DNNs are built to emulate the SGS eddy viscosity and diffusivity for turbulent stratified shear flows These DNNs compute the SGS eddy viscosity and diffusivity 2–4 times faster than the dynamic Smagorinsky model These DNNs emulate the SGS processes accurately such that the energy and variance budgets match with the dynamic Smagorinsky model</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2020GL087005</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2085-7231</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000320857231</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8276
ispartof Geophysical research letters, 2020-06, Vol.47 (12), p.n/a
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1633497
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Artificial neural networks
Atmospheric flows
Atmospheric models
Climate
Climate models
Computational fluid dynamics
Computer applications
Computer simulation
Computing costs
Datasets
Deep learning
Density gradients
Eddies
Energy budget
Feasibility studies
Fluid flow
Kinetic energy
Large eddy simulation
Large eddy simulations
Machine learning
Neural networks
Oceans
Resolution
Reynolds number
Shear
Shear flow
shear layers
turbulence
Viscosity
title Deep Learning Emulation of Subgrid‐Scale Processes in Turbulent Shear Flows
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T01%3A50%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep%20Learning%20Emulation%20of%20Subgrid%E2%80%90Scale%20Processes%20in%20Turbulent%20Shear%20Flows&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Pal,%20Anikesh&rft.date=2020-06-28&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=12&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2020GL087005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2417104135%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2417104135&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true