Undefined cellulase formulations hinder scientific reproducibility

In the shadow of a burgeoning biomass-to-fuels industry, biological conversion of lignocellulose to fermentable sugars in a cost-effective manner is key to the success of second-generation and advanced biofuel production. For the effective comparison of one cellulase preparation to another, cellulas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biotechnology for biofuels 2017-11, Vol.10 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Himmel, Michael E., Abbas, Charles A., Baker, John O., Bayer, Edward A., Bomble, Yannick J., Brunecky, Roman, Chen, Xiaowen, Felby, Claus, Jeoh, Tina, Kumar, Rajeev, McCleary, Barry V., Pletschke, Brett I., Tucker, Melvin P., Wyman, Charles E., Decker, Stephen R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Biotechnology for biofuels
container_volume 10
creator Himmel, Michael E.
Abbas, Charles A.
Baker, John O.
Bayer, Edward A.
Bomble, Yannick J.
Brunecky, Roman
Chen, Xiaowen
Felby, Claus
Jeoh, Tina
Kumar, Rajeev
McCleary, Barry V.
Pletschke, Brett I.
Tucker, Melvin P.
Wyman, Charles E.
Decker, Stephen R.
description In the shadow of a burgeoning biomass-to-fuels industry, biological conversion of lignocellulose to fermentable sugars in a cost-effective manner is key to the success of second-generation and advanced biofuel production. For the effective comparison of one cellulase preparation to another, cellulase assays are typically carried out with one or more engineered cellulase formulations or natural exoproteomes of known performance serving as positive controls. When these formulations have unknown composition, as is the case with several widely used commercial products, it becomes impossible to compare or reproduce work done today to work done in the future, where, for example, such preparations may not be available. Therefore, being a critical tenet of science publishing, experimental reproducibility is endangered by the continued use of these undisclosed products. We propose the introduction of standard procedures and materials to produce specific and reproducible cellulase formulations. These formulations are to serve as yardsticks to measure improvements and performance of new cellulase formulations.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13068-017-0974-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>osti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1618705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1618705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_16187053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi7sOgjAUQBujifj4ALfGvdoboMVVo_EDdCZYLuGa2hpaBv5eBgdHp3OGcxjbgNwBFGofIJWqEBK0kAediWHCEtB5JlSRZtMfn7NFCE8pFWipE3a8uxobclhzg9b2tgrIG9-9RovkXeAtjUXHgyF0kRoyvMN35-ve0IMsxWHFZk1lA66_XLLt5Xw7XYUPkcrxi2ha451DE0tQUGiZp39FH2isQfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Undefined cellulase formulations hinder scientific reproducibility</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Himmel, Michael E. ; Abbas, Charles A. ; Baker, John O. ; Bayer, Edward A. ; Bomble, Yannick J. ; Brunecky, Roman ; Chen, Xiaowen ; Felby, Claus ; Jeoh, Tina ; Kumar, Rajeev ; McCleary, Barry V. ; Pletschke, Brett I. ; Tucker, Melvin P. ; Wyman, Charles E. ; Decker, Stephen R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Himmel, Michael E. ; Abbas, Charles A. ; Baker, John O. ; Bayer, Edward A. ; Bomble, Yannick J. ; Brunecky, Roman ; Chen, Xiaowen ; Felby, Claus ; Jeoh, Tina ; Kumar, Rajeev ; McCleary, Barry V. ; Pletschke, Brett I. ; Tucker, Melvin P. ; Wyman, Charles E. ; Decker, Stephen R. ; National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>In the shadow of a burgeoning biomass-to-fuels industry, biological conversion of lignocellulose to fermentable sugars in a cost-effective manner is key to the success of second-generation and advanced biofuel production. For the effective comparison of one cellulase preparation to another, cellulase assays are typically carried out with one or more engineered cellulase formulations or natural exoproteomes of known performance serving as positive controls. When these formulations have unknown composition, as is the case with several widely used commercial products, it becomes impossible to compare or reproduce work done today to work done in the future, where, for example, such preparations may not be available. Therefore, being a critical tenet of science publishing, experimental reproducibility is endangered by the continued use of these undisclosed products. We propose the introduction of standard procedures and materials to produce specific and reproducible cellulase formulations. These formulations are to serve as yardsticks to measure improvements and performance of new cellulase formulations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-6834</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-6834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-0974-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>09 BIOMASS FUELS ; assays ; biofuels ; cellulase ; cellulose ; commercial cellulase formulations</subject><ispartof>Biotechnology for biofuels, 2017-11, Vol.10 (1)</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1618705$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Himmel, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Charles A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, John O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayer, Edward A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bomble, Yannick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunecky, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaowen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felby, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeoh, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCleary, Barry V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pletschke, Brett I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Melvin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyman, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decker, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Undefined cellulase formulations hinder scientific reproducibility</title><title>Biotechnology for biofuels</title><description>In the shadow of a burgeoning biomass-to-fuels industry, biological conversion of lignocellulose to fermentable sugars in a cost-effective manner is key to the success of second-generation and advanced biofuel production. For the effective comparison of one cellulase preparation to another, cellulase assays are typically carried out with one or more engineered cellulase formulations or natural exoproteomes of known performance serving as positive controls. When these formulations have unknown composition, as is the case with several widely used commercial products, it becomes impossible to compare or reproduce work done today to work done in the future, where, for example, such preparations may not be available. Therefore, being a critical tenet of science publishing, experimental reproducibility is endangered by the continued use of these undisclosed products. We propose the introduction of standard procedures and materials to produce specific and reproducible cellulase formulations. These formulations are to serve as yardsticks to measure improvements and performance of new cellulase formulations.</description><subject>09 BIOMASS FUELS</subject><subject>assays</subject><subject>biofuels</subject><subject>cellulase</subject><subject>cellulose</subject><subject>commercial cellulase formulations</subject><issn>1754-6834</issn><issn>1754-6834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNi7sOgjAUQBujifj4ALfGvdoboMVVo_EDdCZYLuGa2hpaBv5eBgdHp3OGcxjbgNwBFGofIJWqEBK0kAediWHCEtB5JlSRZtMfn7NFCE8pFWipE3a8uxobclhzg9b2tgrIG9-9RovkXeAtjUXHgyF0kRoyvMN35-ve0IMsxWHFZk1lA66_XLLt5Xw7XYUPkcrxi2ha451DE0tQUGiZp39FH2isQfA</recordid><startdate>20171128</startdate><enddate>20171128</enddate><creator>Himmel, Michael E.</creator><creator>Abbas, Charles A.</creator><creator>Baker, John O.</creator><creator>Bayer, Edward A.</creator><creator>Bomble, Yannick J.</creator><creator>Brunecky, Roman</creator><creator>Chen, Xiaowen</creator><creator>Felby, Claus</creator><creator>Jeoh, Tina</creator><creator>Kumar, Rajeev</creator><creator>McCleary, Barry V.</creator><creator>Pletschke, Brett I.</creator><creator>Tucker, Melvin P.</creator><creator>Wyman, Charles E.</creator><creator>Decker, Stephen R.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171128</creationdate><title>Undefined cellulase formulations hinder scientific reproducibility</title><author>Himmel, Michael E. ; Abbas, Charles A. ; Baker, John O. ; Bayer, Edward A. ; Bomble, Yannick J. ; Brunecky, Roman ; Chen, Xiaowen ; Felby, Claus ; Jeoh, Tina ; Kumar, Rajeev ; McCleary, Barry V. ; Pletschke, Brett I. ; Tucker, Melvin P. ; Wyman, Charles E. ; Decker, Stephen R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_16187053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>09 BIOMASS FUELS</topic><topic>assays</topic><topic>biofuels</topic><topic>cellulase</topic><topic>cellulose</topic><topic>commercial cellulase formulations</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Himmel, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Charles A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, John O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayer, Edward A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bomble, Yannick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunecky, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaowen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felby, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeoh, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCleary, Barry V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pletschke, Brett I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Melvin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyman, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decker, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Biotechnology for biofuels</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Himmel, Michael E.</au><au>Abbas, Charles A.</au><au>Baker, John O.</au><au>Bayer, Edward A.</au><au>Bomble, Yannick J.</au><au>Brunecky, Roman</au><au>Chen, Xiaowen</au><au>Felby, Claus</au><au>Jeoh, Tina</au><au>Kumar, Rajeev</au><au>McCleary, Barry V.</au><au>Pletschke, Brett I.</au><au>Tucker, Melvin P.</au><au>Wyman, Charles E.</au><au>Decker, Stephen R.</au><aucorp>National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Undefined cellulase formulations hinder scientific reproducibility</atitle><jtitle>Biotechnology for biofuels</jtitle><date>2017-11-28</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1754-6834</issn><eissn>1754-6834</eissn><abstract>In the shadow of a burgeoning biomass-to-fuels industry, biological conversion of lignocellulose to fermentable sugars in a cost-effective manner is key to the success of second-generation and advanced biofuel production. For the effective comparison of one cellulase preparation to another, cellulase assays are typically carried out with one or more engineered cellulase formulations or natural exoproteomes of known performance serving as positive controls. When these formulations have unknown composition, as is the case with several widely used commercial products, it becomes impossible to compare or reproduce work done today to work done in the future, where, for example, such preparations may not be available. Therefore, being a critical tenet of science publishing, experimental reproducibility is endangered by the continued use of these undisclosed products. We propose the introduction of standard procedures and materials to produce specific and reproducible cellulase formulations. These formulations are to serve as yardsticks to measure improvements and performance of new cellulase formulations.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1186/s13068-017-0974-y</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1754-6834
ispartof Biotechnology for biofuels, 2017-11, Vol.10 (1)
issn 1754-6834
1754-6834
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1618705
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects 09 BIOMASS FUELS
assays
biofuels
cellulase
cellulose
commercial cellulase formulations
title Undefined cellulase formulations hinder scientific reproducibility
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T08%3A32%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-osti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Undefined%20cellulase%20formulations%20hinder%20scientific%20reproducibility&rft.jtitle=Biotechnology%20for%20biofuels&rft.au=Himmel,%20Michael%20E.&rft.aucorp=National%20Renewable%20Energy%20Lab.%20(NREL),%20Golden,%20CO%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2017-11-28&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1754-6834&rft.eissn=1754-6834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13068-017-0974-y&rft_dat=%3Costi%3E1618705%3C/osti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true