Numerical Simulation of M9 Megathrust Earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction Zone
We estimate ground motions in the Pacific Northwest urban areas during M9 subduction scenario earthquakes on the Cascadia megathrust by simulating wave propagation from an ensemble of kinematic source descriptions. Velocities and densities in our computational mesh are defined by integrating the reg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pure and Applied Geophysics 2020-05, Vol.177 (5), p.2125-2141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2141 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2125 |
container_title | Pure and Applied Geophysics |
container_volume | 177 |
creator | Roten, D. Olsen, K. B. Takedatsu, R. |
description | We estimate ground motions in the Pacific Northwest urban areas during M9 subduction scenario earthquakes on the Cascadia megathrust by simulating wave propagation from an ensemble of kinematic source descriptions. Velocities and densities in our computational mesh are defined by integrating the regional Cascadia Community Velocity Model (CVM) v1.6 (Stephenson et al. P-and S-wave velocity models incorporating the Cascadia subduction zone for 3D earthquake ground motion simulations—update for open-file report 2007–1348, US Geological Survey,
2017
) including the ocean water layer with a local velocity model of the Georgia basin (Molnar, Predicting earthquake ground shaking due to 1D soil layering and 3D basin structure in SW British Columbia, Canada,
2011
), including additional near-surface velocity information. We generate six source realizations, each consisting of a background slip distribution with correlation lengths, rise times and rupture velocities consistent with data from previous megathrust earthquakes (e.g., 2011 M 9 Tohoku or 2010 M 8.8 Maule). We then superimpose
M
~ 8 subevents, characterized by short rise times and high stress drops on the background slip model to mimic high-frequency strong ground motion generation areas in the deeper portion of the rupture (Frankel, Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(1):372–386,
2017
). The wave propagation is simulated using the discontinuous mesh (DM) version of the AWP finite difference code. We simulate frequencies up to 1.25 Hz, using a spatial discretization of 100 m in the fine grid, resulting in surface grid dimensions of 6540 × 10,728 mesh points. At depths below 8 km, the grid step increases to 300 m. We obtain stable and accurate results for the DM method throughout the simulation time of 7.5 min as verified against a solution obtained with a uniform 100 m grid spacing. Peak ground velocities (PGVs) range between 0.57 and 1.0 m/s in downtown Seattle and between 0.25 and 0.54 m/s in downtown Vancouver, while spectral accelerations at 2 s range between 1.7 and 3.6 m/s
2
and 1.0 and 1.3 m/s
2
, respectively. These long-period ground motions are not significantly reduced if plastic Drucker-Prager yielding in shallow cohesionless sediments is taken into account. Effects of rupture directivity are significant at periods of ~ 10 s, but almost absent at shorter periods. We find that increasing the depth extent of the subducting slab from the truncation at 60 km in the Cascadia CVM version 1.6 to ~ 100 km increas |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00024-018-2085-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1567536</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2165963702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a366t-2192d24206a3a934b20df962f2854df682e4a0e6cddcd7ed094965bdabc689b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPwzAURi0EEqXwA9gsmAPXduzEI6rKQ2pBqLCwWI7ttClt0vox8O9JCRIT013O-XR1ELokcEMAitsAADTPgJQZhZJn_AiNSE4hk4SJYzQCYCzLOWen6CyENQApCi5H6PU5bZ1vjN7gRbNNGx2brsVdjecSz91Sx5VPIeKp9nG1T_rTBdy0OK4cnuhgtG00XqTKJvPjfXStO0cntd4Ed_F7x-j9fvo2ecxmLw9Pk7tZppkQMaNEUkv7D4VmWrK8omBrKWhNS57bWpTU5RqcMNYaWzgLMpeCV1ZXRpSyKtgYXQ27XYiNCqaJzqxM17bOREW4KDgTPXQ9QDvf7ZMLUa275Nv-L0WJ4FKwAmhPkYEyvgvBu1rtfLPV_ksRUIe8asir-rzqkFfx3qGDE3q2XTr_t_y_9A1OVXwB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2165963702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Numerical Simulation of M9 Megathrust Earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction Zone</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Roten, D. ; Olsen, K. B. ; Takedatsu, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roten, D. ; Olsen, K. B. ; Takedatsu, R. ; Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF)</creatorcontrib><description>We estimate ground motions in the Pacific Northwest urban areas during M9 subduction scenario earthquakes on the Cascadia megathrust by simulating wave propagation from an ensemble of kinematic source descriptions. Velocities and densities in our computational mesh are defined by integrating the regional Cascadia Community Velocity Model (CVM) v1.6 (Stephenson et al. P-and S-wave velocity models incorporating the Cascadia subduction zone for 3D earthquake ground motion simulations—update for open-file report 2007–1348, US Geological Survey,
2017
) including the ocean water layer with a local velocity model of the Georgia basin (Molnar, Predicting earthquake ground shaking due to 1D soil layering and 3D basin structure in SW British Columbia, Canada,
2011
), including additional near-surface velocity information. We generate six source realizations, each consisting of a background slip distribution with correlation lengths, rise times and rupture velocities consistent with data from previous megathrust earthquakes (e.g., 2011 M 9 Tohoku or 2010 M 8.8 Maule). We then superimpose
M
~ 8 subevents, characterized by short rise times and high stress drops on the background slip model to mimic high-frequency strong ground motion generation areas in the deeper portion of the rupture (Frankel, Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(1):372–386,
2017
). The wave propagation is simulated using the discontinuous mesh (DM) version of the AWP finite difference code. We simulate frequencies up to 1.25 Hz, using a spatial discretization of 100 m in the fine grid, resulting in surface grid dimensions of 6540 × 10,728 mesh points. At depths below 8 km, the grid step increases to 300 m. We obtain stable and accurate results for the DM method throughout the simulation time of 7.5 min as verified against a solution obtained with a uniform 100 m grid spacing. Peak ground velocities (PGVs) range between 0.57 and 1.0 m/s in downtown Seattle and between 0.25 and 0.54 m/s in downtown Vancouver, while spectral accelerations at 2 s range between 1.7 and 3.6 m/s
2
and 1.0 and 1.3 m/s
2
, respectively. These long-period ground motions are not significantly reduced if plastic Drucker-Prager yielding in shallow cohesionless sediments is taken into account. Effects of rupture directivity are significant at periods of ~ 10 s, but almost absent at shorter periods. We find that increasing the depth extent of the subducting slab from the truncation at 60 km in the Cascadia CVM version 1.6 to ~ 100 km increases the PGVs by 15% in Seattle and by 40% in Vancouver.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-4553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9136</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00024-018-2085-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Central business districts ; Cohesionless sediments ; Computational grids ; Computer applications ; Computer simulation ; Dimensions ; Directivity ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake prediction ; Earthquakes ; Finite difference method ; Finite element method ; Geological surveys ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Ground motion ; Long-period ground motion ; Mathematical models ; megathrust earthquake ; Numerical simulations ; Propagation ; Rupture ; Rupturing ; Sediments ; Seismic activity ; Seismic velocities ; Shaking ; Simulation ; Slip ; Soil ; Soil layers ; Subduction ; Subduction (geology) ; Subduction zones ; Surface velocity ; Surveying ; Three dimensional motion ; Urban areas ; Velocity ; Wave propagation ; wave propagation simulation ; Wave velocity</subject><ispartof>Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2020-05, Vol.177 (5), p.2125-2141</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019</rights><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a366t-2192d24206a3a934b20df962f2854df682e4a0e6cddcd7ed094965bdabc689b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a366t-2192d24206a3a934b20df962f2854df682e4a0e6cddcd7ed094965bdabc689b73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2706-0658 ; 0000000227060658</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00024-018-2085-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00024-018-2085-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,307,314,780,784,787,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1567536$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roten, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, K. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takedatsu, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF)</creatorcontrib><title>Numerical Simulation of M9 Megathrust Earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction Zone</title><title>Pure and Applied Geophysics</title><addtitle>Pure Appl. Geophys</addtitle><description>We estimate ground motions in the Pacific Northwest urban areas during M9 subduction scenario earthquakes on the Cascadia megathrust by simulating wave propagation from an ensemble of kinematic source descriptions. Velocities and densities in our computational mesh are defined by integrating the regional Cascadia Community Velocity Model (CVM) v1.6 (Stephenson et al. P-and S-wave velocity models incorporating the Cascadia subduction zone for 3D earthquake ground motion simulations—update for open-file report 2007–1348, US Geological Survey,
2017
) including the ocean water layer with a local velocity model of the Georgia basin (Molnar, Predicting earthquake ground shaking due to 1D soil layering and 3D basin structure in SW British Columbia, Canada,
2011
), including additional near-surface velocity information. We generate six source realizations, each consisting of a background slip distribution with correlation lengths, rise times and rupture velocities consistent with data from previous megathrust earthquakes (e.g., 2011 M 9 Tohoku or 2010 M 8.8 Maule). We then superimpose
M
~ 8 subevents, characterized by short rise times and high stress drops on the background slip model to mimic high-frequency strong ground motion generation areas in the deeper portion of the rupture (Frankel, Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(1):372–386,
2017
). The wave propagation is simulated using the discontinuous mesh (DM) version of the AWP finite difference code. We simulate frequencies up to 1.25 Hz, using a spatial discretization of 100 m in the fine grid, resulting in surface grid dimensions of 6540 × 10,728 mesh points. At depths below 8 km, the grid step increases to 300 m. We obtain stable and accurate results for the DM method throughout the simulation time of 7.5 min as verified against a solution obtained with a uniform 100 m grid spacing. Peak ground velocities (PGVs) range between 0.57 and 1.0 m/s in downtown Seattle and between 0.25 and 0.54 m/s in downtown Vancouver, while spectral accelerations at 2 s range between 1.7 and 3.6 m/s
2
and 1.0 and 1.3 m/s
2
, respectively. These long-period ground motions are not significantly reduced if plastic Drucker-Prager yielding in shallow cohesionless sediments is taken into account. Effects of rupture directivity are significant at periods of ~ 10 s, but almost absent at shorter periods. We find that increasing the depth extent of the subducting slab from the truncation at 60 km in the Cascadia CVM version 1.6 to ~ 100 km increases the PGVs by 15% in Seattle and by 40% in Vancouver.</description><subject>Central business districts</subject><subject>Cohesionless sediments</subject><subject>Computational grids</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Dimensions</subject><subject>Directivity</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake prediction</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Finite difference method</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Geological surveys</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Long-period ground motion</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>megathrust earthquake</subject><subject>Numerical simulations</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>Rupture</subject><subject>Rupturing</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic velocities</subject><subject>Shaking</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Slip</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil layers</subject><subject>Subduction</subject><subject>Subduction (geology)</subject><subject>Subduction zones</subject><subject>Surface velocity</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Three dimensional motion</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Wave propagation</subject><subject>wave propagation simulation</subject><subject>Wave velocity</subject><issn>0033-4553</issn><issn>1420-9136</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDtPwzAURi0EEqXwA9gsmAPXduzEI6rKQ2pBqLCwWI7ttClt0vox8O9JCRIT013O-XR1ELokcEMAitsAADTPgJQZhZJn_AiNSE4hk4SJYzQCYCzLOWen6CyENQApCi5H6PU5bZ1vjN7gRbNNGx2brsVdjecSz91Sx5VPIeKp9nG1T_rTBdy0OK4cnuhgtG00XqTKJvPjfXStO0cntd4Ed_F7x-j9fvo2ecxmLw9Pk7tZppkQMaNEUkv7D4VmWrK8omBrKWhNS57bWpTU5RqcMNYaWzgLMpeCV1ZXRpSyKtgYXQ27XYiNCqaJzqxM17bOREW4KDgTPXQ9QDvf7ZMLUa275Nv-L0WJ4FKwAmhPkYEyvgvBu1rtfLPV_ksRUIe8asir-rzqkFfx3qGDE3q2XTr_t_y_9A1OVXwB</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Roten, D.</creator><creator>Olsen, K. B.</creator><creator>Takedatsu, R.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2706-0658</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000227060658</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Numerical Simulation of M9 Megathrust Earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction Zone</title><author>Roten, D. ; Olsen, K. B. ; Takedatsu, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a366t-2192d24206a3a934b20df962f2854df682e4a0e6cddcd7ed094965bdabc689b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Central business districts</topic><topic>Cohesionless sediments</topic><topic>Computational grids</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Dimensions</topic><topic>Directivity</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake prediction</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Finite difference method</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Geological surveys</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Long-period ground motion</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>megathrust earthquake</topic><topic>Numerical simulations</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>Rupture</topic><topic>Rupturing</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic velocities</topic><topic>Shaking</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Slip</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil layers</topic><topic>Subduction</topic><topic>Subduction (geology)</topic><topic>Subduction zones</topic><topic>Surface velocity</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Three dimensional motion</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Wave propagation</topic><topic>wave propagation simulation</topic><topic>Wave velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roten, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, K. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takedatsu, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Pure and Applied Geophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roten, D.</au><au>Olsen, K. B.</au><au>Takedatsu, R.</au><aucorp>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Numerical Simulation of M9 Megathrust Earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction Zone</atitle><jtitle>Pure and Applied Geophysics</jtitle><stitle>Pure Appl. Geophys</stitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>177</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2125</spage><epage>2141</epage><pages>2125-2141</pages><issn>0033-4553</issn><eissn>1420-9136</eissn><abstract>We estimate ground motions in the Pacific Northwest urban areas during M9 subduction scenario earthquakes on the Cascadia megathrust by simulating wave propagation from an ensemble of kinematic source descriptions. Velocities and densities in our computational mesh are defined by integrating the regional Cascadia Community Velocity Model (CVM) v1.6 (Stephenson et al. P-and S-wave velocity models incorporating the Cascadia subduction zone for 3D earthquake ground motion simulations—update for open-file report 2007–1348, US Geological Survey,
2017
) including the ocean water layer with a local velocity model of the Georgia basin (Molnar, Predicting earthquake ground shaking due to 1D soil layering and 3D basin structure in SW British Columbia, Canada,
2011
), including additional near-surface velocity information. We generate six source realizations, each consisting of a background slip distribution with correlation lengths, rise times and rupture velocities consistent with data from previous megathrust earthquakes (e.g., 2011 M 9 Tohoku or 2010 M 8.8 Maule). We then superimpose
M
~ 8 subevents, characterized by short rise times and high stress drops on the background slip model to mimic high-frequency strong ground motion generation areas in the deeper portion of the rupture (Frankel, Bull Seismol Soc Am 107(1):372–386,
2017
). The wave propagation is simulated using the discontinuous mesh (DM) version of the AWP finite difference code. We simulate frequencies up to 1.25 Hz, using a spatial discretization of 100 m in the fine grid, resulting in surface grid dimensions of 6540 × 10,728 mesh points. At depths below 8 km, the grid step increases to 300 m. We obtain stable and accurate results for the DM method throughout the simulation time of 7.5 min as verified against a solution obtained with a uniform 100 m grid spacing. Peak ground velocities (PGVs) range between 0.57 and 1.0 m/s in downtown Seattle and between 0.25 and 0.54 m/s in downtown Vancouver, while spectral accelerations at 2 s range between 1.7 and 3.6 m/s
2
and 1.0 and 1.3 m/s
2
, respectively. These long-period ground motions are not significantly reduced if plastic Drucker-Prager yielding in shallow cohesionless sediments is taken into account. Effects of rupture directivity are significant at periods of ~ 10 s, but almost absent at shorter periods. We find that increasing the depth extent of the subducting slab from the truncation at 60 km in the Cascadia CVM version 1.6 to ~ 100 km increases the PGVs by 15% in Seattle and by 40% in Vancouver.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s00024-018-2085-5</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2706-0658</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000227060658</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-4553 |
ispartof | Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2020-05, Vol.177 (5), p.2125-2141 |
issn | 0033-4553 1420-9136 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1567536 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Central business districts Cohesionless sediments Computational grids Computer applications Computer simulation Dimensions Directivity Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earthquake prediction Earthquakes Finite difference method Finite element method Geological surveys Geophysics/Geodesy Ground motion Long-period ground motion Mathematical models megathrust earthquake Numerical simulations Propagation Rupture Rupturing Sediments Seismic activity Seismic velocities Shaking Simulation Slip Soil Soil layers Subduction Subduction (geology) Subduction zones Surface velocity Surveying Three dimensional motion Urban areas Velocity Wave propagation wave propagation simulation Wave velocity |
title | Numerical Simulation of M9 Megathrust Earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction Zone |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T19%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Numerical%20Simulation%20of%20M9%20Megathrust%20Earthquakes%20in%20the%20Cascadia%20Subduction%20Zone&rft.jtitle=Pure%20and%20Applied%20Geophysics&rft.au=Roten,%20D.&rft.aucorp=Oak%20Ridge%20National%20Lab.%20(ORNL),%20Oak%20Ridge,%20TN%20(United%20States).%20Oak%20Ridge%20Leadership%20Computing%20Facility%20(OLCF)&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=177&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2125&rft.epage=2141&rft.pages=2125-2141&rft.issn=0033-4553&rft.eissn=1420-9136&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00024-018-2085-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2165963702%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2165963702&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |