Assessing non-CO2 climate-forcing emissions and mitigation in sub-Saharan Africa

•An African Green Revolution would increase N inputs by an order of magnitude.•Data gaps constrain current and future estimates of emissions from Africa.•Livestock, fires, and soils represent the major African sources of climate forcing.•Mitigation innovations must focus on alleviating food insecuri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current opinion in environmental sustainability 2014-11, Vol.9-10 (C), p.65-72
Hauptverfasser: Hickman, Jonathan E, Scholes, Robert J, Rosenstock, Todd S, Pérez García-Pando, C., Nyamangara, Justice
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 72
container_issue C
container_start_page 65
container_title Current opinion in environmental sustainability
container_volume 9-10
creator Hickman, Jonathan E
Scholes, Robert J
Rosenstock, Todd S
Pérez García-Pando, C.
Nyamangara, Justice
description •An African Green Revolution would increase N inputs by an order of magnitude.•Data gaps constrain current and future estimates of emissions from Africa.•Livestock, fires, and soils represent the major African sources of climate forcing.•Mitigation innovations must focus on alleviating food insecurity and poverty first. There are few direct measurements of anthropogenic climate-forcing emissions in Africa, making it difficult to accurately assess current emissions and to anticipate changes in future emissions. Emissions databases suggest that sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), home to less than 15% of the world's population, is responsible for 11% of anthropogenic methane (CH4) and 18% of anthropogenic nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions globally, though this includes substantial emissions from biomass burning that would occur in the absence of contemporary anthropogenic activity, and which may be over-estimated. SSA is also an important source of precursors to the greenhouse gas tropospheric ozone, and of mineral dust, which has a range of impacts on climate. Eliminating food insecurity and poverty is likely to take priority over greenhouse gas mitigation in the region, so innovations in mitigation must focus on ways to reduce emissions as an ancillary benefit of improving livelihoods.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1556767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1877343514000438</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1877343514000438</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-78b378cf88ede5b51ed47ac2dd8918c4ac5b0bb15eed0d372e5e96166a0ecab83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1Lw0AQDaJgrf6DHoL3xNkk-9GLUIpfICio52WzO2m3tBvZ2Qr-exMiHj3Nx3tvhveybMGgZMDEza60PR0plRWwpgRZAoOTbMaUlEXdNPXpX1_z8-yCaAcgAUQ1y15XREjkwyYPfSjWL1Vu9_5gEhZdH-24x4MfCH2g3ASXH3zyG5OGOfchp2NbvJmtiSbkqy56ay6zs87sCa9-6zz7uL97Xz8Wzy8PT-vVc2EbIVIhVVtLZTul0CFvOUPXSGMr59SSKdsYy1toW8YRHbhaVshxKZgQBtCaVtXz7Hq621PymqxPaLe2DwFt0oxzIYUcSM1EsrEnitjpzziYi9-agR6j0zs9RafH6DRIPUQ3yBaTLBgyOqRIIywAgNWsGuDbCcbB35fHOL7HYNH5OH53vf___g8tvoLm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing non-CO2 climate-forcing emissions and mitigation in sub-Saharan Africa</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>NASA Technical Reports Server</source><creator>Hickman, Jonathan E ; Scholes, Robert J ; Rosenstock, Todd S ; Pérez García-Pando, C. ; Nyamangara, Justice</creator><creatorcontrib>Hickman, Jonathan E ; Scholes, Robert J ; Rosenstock, Todd S ; Pérez García-Pando, C. ; Nyamangara, Justice</creatorcontrib><description>•An African Green Revolution would increase N inputs by an order of magnitude.•Data gaps constrain current and future estimates of emissions from Africa.•Livestock, fires, and soils represent the major African sources of climate forcing.•Mitigation innovations must focus on alleviating food insecurity and poverty first. There are few direct measurements of anthropogenic climate-forcing emissions in Africa, making it difficult to accurately assess current emissions and to anticipate changes in future emissions. Emissions databases suggest that sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), home to less than 15% of the world's population, is responsible for 11% of anthropogenic methane (CH4) and 18% of anthropogenic nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions globally, though this includes substantial emissions from biomass burning that would occur in the absence of contemporary anthropogenic activity, and which may be over-estimated. SSA is also an important source of precursors to the greenhouse gas tropospheric ozone, and of mineral dust, which has a range of impacts on climate. Eliminating food insecurity and poverty is likely to take priority over greenhouse gas mitigation in the region, so innovations in mitigation must focus on ways to reduce emissions as an ancillary benefit of improving livelihoods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-3435</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-3443</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Goddard Space Flight Center: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Environment Pollution</subject><ispartof>Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 2014-11, Vol.9-10 (C), p.65-72</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Determination: MAY_INCLUDE_COPYRIGHT_MATERIAL -- Approver Comments: Distribution of STI Program archival copy not authorized</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-78b378cf88ede5b51ed47ac2dd8918c4ac5b0bb15eed0d372e5e96166a0ecab83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-78b378cf88ede5b51ed47ac2dd8918c4ac5b0bb15eed0d372e5e96166a0ecab83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1556767$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hickman, Jonathan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholes, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstock, Todd S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez García-Pando, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyamangara, Justice</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing non-CO2 climate-forcing emissions and mitigation in sub-Saharan Africa</title><title>Current opinion in environmental sustainability</title><description>•An African Green Revolution would increase N inputs by an order of magnitude.•Data gaps constrain current and future estimates of emissions from Africa.•Livestock, fires, and soils represent the major African sources of climate forcing.•Mitigation innovations must focus on alleviating food insecurity and poverty first. There are few direct measurements of anthropogenic climate-forcing emissions in Africa, making it difficult to accurately assess current emissions and to anticipate changes in future emissions. Emissions databases suggest that sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), home to less than 15% of the world's population, is responsible for 11% of anthropogenic methane (CH4) and 18% of anthropogenic nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions globally, though this includes substantial emissions from biomass burning that would occur in the absence of contemporary anthropogenic activity, and which may be over-estimated. SSA is also an important source of precursors to the greenhouse gas tropospheric ozone, and of mineral dust, which has a range of impacts on climate. Eliminating food insecurity and poverty is likely to take priority over greenhouse gas mitigation in the region, so innovations in mitigation must focus on ways to reduce emissions as an ancillary benefit of improving livelihoods.</description><subject>Environment Pollution</subject><issn>1877-3435</issn><issn>1877-3443</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>CYI</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1Lw0AQDaJgrf6DHoL3xNkk-9GLUIpfICio52WzO2m3tBvZ2Qr-exMiHj3Nx3tvhveybMGgZMDEza60PR0plRWwpgRZAoOTbMaUlEXdNPXpX1_z8-yCaAcgAUQ1y15XREjkwyYPfSjWL1Vu9_5gEhZdH-24x4MfCH2g3ASXH3zyG5OGOfchp2NbvJmtiSbkqy56ay6zs87sCa9-6zz7uL97Xz8Wzy8PT-vVc2EbIVIhVVtLZTul0CFvOUPXSGMr59SSKdsYy1toW8YRHbhaVshxKZgQBtCaVtXz7Hq621PymqxPaLe2DwFt0oxzIYUcSM1EsrEnitjpzziYi9-agR6j0zs9RafH6DRIPUQ3yBaTLBgyOqRIIywAgNWsGuDbCcbB35fHOL7HYNH5OH53vf___g8tvoLm</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Hickman, Jonathan E</creator><creator>Scholes, Robert J</creator><creator>Rosenstock, Todd S</creator><creator>Pérez García-Pando, C.</creator><creator>Nyamangara, Justice</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CYE</scope><scope>CYI</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>Assessing non-CO2 climate-forcing emissions and mitigation in sub-Saharan Africa</title><author>Hickman, Jonathan E ; Scholes, Robert J ; Rosenstock, Todd S ; Pérez García-Pando, C. ; Nyamangara, Justice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-78b378cf88ede5b51ed47ac2dd8918c4ac5b0bb15eed0d372e5e96166a0ecab83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Environment Pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hickman, Jonathan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholes, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenstock, Todd S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez García-Pando, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyamangara, Justice</creatorcontrib><collection>NASA Scientific and Technical Information</collection><collection>NASA Technical Reports Server</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Current opinion in environmental sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hickman, Jonathan E</au><au>Scholes, Robert J</au><au>Rosenstock, Todd S</au><au>Pérez García-Pando, C.</au><au>Nyamangara, Justice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing non-CO2 climate-forcing emissions and mitigation in sub-Saharan Africa</atitle><jtitle>Current opinion in environmental sustainability</jtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>9-10</volume><issue>C</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>65-72</pages><issn>1877-3435</issn><eissn>1877-3443</eissn><abstract>•An African Green Revolution would increase N inputs by an order of magnitude.•Data gaps constrain current and future estimates of emissions from Africa.•Livestock, fires, and soils represent the major African sources of climate forcing.•Mitigation innovations must focus on alleviating food insecurity and poverty first. There are few direct measurements of anthropogenic climate-forcing emissions in Africa, making it difficult to accurately assess current emissions and to anticipate changes in future emissions. Emissions databases suggest that sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), home to less than 15% of the world's population, is responsible for 11% of anthropogenic methane (CH4) and 18% of anthropogenic nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions globally, though this includes substantial emissions from biomass burning that would occur in the absence of contemporary anthropogenic activity, and which may be over-estimated. SSA is also an important source of precursors to the greenhouse gas tropospheric ozone, and of mineral dust, which has a range of impacts on climate. Eliminating food insecurity and poverty is likely to take priority over greenhouse gas mitigation in the region, so innovations in mitigation must focus on ways to reduce emissions as an ancillary benefit of improving livelihoods.</abstract><cop>Goddard Space Flight Center</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.010</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1877-3435
ispartof Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 2014-11, Vol.9-10 (C), p.65-72
issn 1877-3435
1877-3443
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1556767
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; NASA Technical Reports Server
subjects Environment Pollution
title Assessing non-CO2 climate-forcing emissions and mitigation in sub-Saharan Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T17%3A51%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20non-CO2%20climate-forcing%20emissions%20and%20mitigation%20in%20sub-Saharan%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Current%20opinion%20in%20environmental%20sustainability&rft.au=Hickman,%20Jonathan%20E&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=9-10&rft.issue=C&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=65-72&rft.issn=1877-3435&rft.eissn=1877-3443&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.010&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_osti_%3ES1877343514000438%3C/elsevier_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1877343514000438&rfr_iscdi=true