Global intercomparison and regional evaluation of GPM IMERG Version-03, Version-04 and its latest Version-05 precipitation products: Similarity, difference and improvements

•IMERG V03/V04/V05 are intercompared at multiple spatiotemporal resolutions.•GPCP V2.3 and MSWEP V2.1 are used as benchmarks in global comparison.•IMERG V04/V05 precipitation is much higher than V03 over global ocean.•More than 30,000 gauges are used as ground truth in regional evaluation over China...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 2018-09, Vol.564 (C), p.342-356
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Cunguang, Tang, Guoqiang, Han, Zhongying, Guo, Xiaolin, Hong, Yang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 356
container_issue C
container_start_page 342
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 564
creator Wang, Cunguang
Tang, Guoqiang
Han, Zhongying
Guo, Xiaolin
Hong, Yang
description •IMERG V03/V04/V05 are intercompared at multiple spatiotemporal resolutions.•GPCP V2.3 and MSWEP V2.1 are used as benchmarks in global comparison.•IMERG V04/V05 precipitation is much higher than V03 over global ocean.•More than 30,000 gauges are used as ground truth in regional evaluation over China.•IMERG V05 shows better performance than V03/V04 over Mainland China. The overarching goal of this study is to intercompare the newly released Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) Version 05 (V05) products with its former Version 04 (V04) and Version 03 (V03) products and also assess any differences and improvements, with cross-evaluation against the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Version 2.3, Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP) Version 2.1 and the dense gauge networks in China. Firstly, the gauge-adjusted products (Final run) of V03, V04 and V05 are compared over the globe. Then, the near-real-time products without gauge adjustments (Early and Late run) and Final run products of all versions are evaluated against ground-based observations comprised of more than 30,000 gauges over Mainland China at 0.1° × 0.1° grid and hourly and daily temporal scales. The primary conclusions are: (1) globally, both V04 and V05 Final run show significant differences and improvements from V03. Particularly, the overall mean oceanic precipitation of V04 and V05 increases by +31.36% and +28.81% respectively from that of V03 and much closer to GPCP and MSWEP; (2) over Mainland China, the Early and Late run products of the same version (V03 or V04) generally have similar performance, while V04 Early and Late run have better performance in most regions than the corresponding run of V03 except in the arid Xinjiang Province and the mountainous Tibetan Plateau; and (3) V04 and V03 Final run show comparable performance, while V05 Final run generally improves upon both V04 and V03 and has the best performance among the seven standard IMERG products. The improvement of V05 Final run is particularly evident in southeastern and western China. At a timely matter, the study provides first-hand global and regional assessment feedback to IMERG algorithm developers and also sheds insights for GPM precipitation product users across the world.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.064
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1548081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022169418304864</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0022169418304864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-f036db9043957bc69ededddc0f0054579e38b69e2a22b8710c6410f9cc5070ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUV1LHTEQDVLBW_UnCKHP7nWyyX71RUT0VlAsre1ryCazmsvuZknihfuf-iObdQUfHQYmmTnnDMMh5IzBmgErL7br7cveeNevc2D1GsqU4oCsWF01WV5B9YWsAPI8Y2UjjsjXELaQgnOxIv82vWtVT-0Y0Ws3TMrb4EaqRkM9Pls3piHuVP-qYvpQ19HNzwd693Dza0P_og-pmQE__3iLN66NgfYqYogfk4JOHrWdbFy0Ju_Mq47hO_1tB9unzXF_To3tOvQ4alyEhgTb4YBjDCfksFN9wNP3ekz-3N48Xf_I7h83d9dX95nmNY9ZB7w0bQOCN0XV6rJBg8YYDR1AIYqqQV63qZurPG_rioEuBYOu0bqAChD5Mfm26LoQrQzaRtQv2o0j6ihZIWqoWQIVC0h7F4LHTk7eDsrvJQM5-yK38t0XOfsioUwpEu9y4WG6YGfRzwvmc431s75x9hOF_-rjnAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global intercomparison and regional evaluation of GPM IMERG Version-03, Version-04 and its latest Version-05 precipitation products: Similarity, difference and improvements</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Wang, Cunguang ; Tang, Guoqiang ; Han, Zhongying ; Guo, Xiaolin ; Hong, Yang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cunguang ; Tang, Guoqiang ; Han, Zhongying ; Guo, Xiaolin ; Hong, Yang</creatorcontrib><description>•IMERG V03/V04/V05 are intercompared at multiple spatiotemporal resolutions.•GPCP V2.3 and MSWEP V2.1 are used as benchmarks in global comparison.•IMERG V04/V05 precipitation is much higher than V03 over global ocean.•More than 30,000 gauges are used as ground truth in regional evaluation over China.•IMERG V05 shows better performance than V03/V04 over Mainland China. The overarching goal of this study is to intercompare the newly released Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) Version 05 (V05) products with its former Version 04 (V04) and Version 03 (V03) products and also assess any differences and improvements, with cross-evaluation against the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Version 2.3, Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP) Version 2.1 and the dense gauge networks in China. Firstly, the gauge-adjusted products (Final run) of V03, V04 and V05 are compared over the globe. Then, the near-real-time products without gauge adjustments (Early and Late run) and Final run products of all versions are evaluated against ground-based observations comprised of more than 30,000 gauges over Mainland China at 0.1° × 0.1° grid and hourly and daily temporal scales. The primary conclusions are: (1) globally, both V04 and V05 Final run show significant differences and improvements from V03. Particularly, the overall mean oceanic precipitation of V04 and V05 increases by +31.36% and +28.81% respectively from that of V03 and much closer to GPCP and MSWEP; (2) over Mainland China, the Early and Late run products of the same version (V03 or V04) generally have similar performance, while V04 Early and Late run have better performance in most regions than the corresponding run of V03 except in the arid Xinjiang Province and the mountainous Tibetan Plateau; and (3) V04 and V03 Final run show comparable performance, while V05 Final run generally improves upon both V04 and V03 and has the best performance among the seven standard IMERG products. The improvement of V05 Final run is particularly evident in southeastern and western China. At a timely matter, the study provides first-hand global and regional assessment feedback to IMERG algorithm developers and also sheds insights for GPM precipitation product users across the world.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.064</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>GPM ; IMERG ; Precipitation ; Satellite</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2018-09, Vol.564 (C), p.342-356</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-f036db9043957bc69ededddc0f0054579e38b69e2a22b8710c6410f9cc5070ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-f036db9043957bc69ededddc0f0054579e38b69e2a22b8710c6410f9cc5070ee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7428-0269 ; 0000000174280269</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.064$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1548081$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cunguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Guoqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Zhongying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xiaolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Yang</creatorcontrib><title>Global intercomparison and regional evaluation of GPM IMERG Version-03, Version-04 and its latest Version-05 precipitation products: Similarity, difference and improvements</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>•IMERG V03/V04/V05 are intercompared at multiple spatiotemporal resolutions.•GPCP V2.3 and MSWEP V2.1 are used as benchmarks in global comparison.•IMERG V04/V05 precipitation is much higher than V03 over global ocean.•More than 30,000 gauges are used as ground truth in regional evaluation over China.•IMERG V05 shows better performance than V03/V04 over Mainland China. The overarching goal of this study is to intercompare the newly released Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) Version 05 (V05) products with its former Version 04 (V04) and Version 03 (V03) products and also assess any differences and improvements, with cross-evaluation against the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Version 2.3, Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP) Version 2.1 and the dense gauge networks in China. Firstly, the gauge-adjusted products (Final run) of V03, V04 and V05 are compared over the globe. Then, the near-real-time products without gauge adjustments (Early and Late run) and Final run products of all versions are evaluated against ground-based observations comprised of more than 30,000 gauges over Mainland China at 0.1° × 0.1° grid and hourly and daily temporal scales. The primary conclusions are: (1) globally, both V04 and V05 Final run show significant differences and improvements from V03. Particularly, the overall mean oceanic precipitation of V04 and V05 increases by +31.36% and +28.81% respectively from that of V03 and much closer to GPCP and MSWEP; (2) over Mainland China, the Early and Late run products of the same version (V03 or V04) generally have similar performance, while V04 Early and Late run have better performance in most regions than the corresponding run of V03 except in the arid Xinjiang Province and the mountainous Tibetan Plateau; and (3) V04 and V03 Final run show comparable performance, while V05 Final run generally improves upon both V04 and V03 and has the best performance among the seven standard IMERG products. The improvement of V05 Final run is particularly evident in southeastern and western China. At a timely matter, the study provides first-hand global and regional assessment feedback to IMERG algorithm developers and also sheds insights for GPM precipitation product users across the world.</description><subject>GPM</subject><subject>IMERG</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Satellite</subject><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUV1LHTEQDVLBW_UnCKHP7nWyyX71RUT0VlAsre1ryCazmsvuZknihfuf-iObdQUfHQYmmTnnDMMh5IzBmgErL7br7cveeNevc2D1GsqU4oCsWF01WV5B9YWsAPI8Y2UjjsjXELaQgnOxIv82vWtVT-0Y0Ws3TMrb4EaqRkM9Pls3piHuVP-qYvpQ19HNzwd693Dza0P_og-pmQE__3iLN66NgfYqYogfk4JOHrWdbFy0Ju_Mq47hO_1tB9unzXF_To3tOvQ4alyEhgTb4YBjDCfksFN9wNP3ekz-3N48Xf_I7h83d9dX95nmNY9ZB7w0bQOCN0XV6rJBg8YYDR1AIYqqQV63qZurPG_rioEuBYOu0bqAChD5Mfm26LoQrQzaRtQv2o0j6ihZIWqoWQIVC0h7F4LHTk7eDsrvJQM5-yK38t0XOfsioUwpEu9y4WG6YGfRzwvmc431s75x9hOF_-rjnAg</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Wang, Cunguang</creator><creator>Tang, Guoqiang</creator><creator>Han, Zhongying</creator><creator>Guo, Xiaolin</creator><creator>Hong, Yang</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7428-0269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000174280269</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>Global intercomparison and regional evaluation of GPM IMERG Version-03, Version-04 and its latest Version-05 precipitation products: Similarity, difference and improvements</title><author>Wang, Cunguang ; Tang, Guoqiang ; Han, Zhongying ; Guo, Xiaolin ; Hong, Yang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-f036db9043957bc69ededddc0f0054579e38b69e2a22b8710c6410f9cc5070ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>GPM</topic><topic>IMERG</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Satellite</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Cunguang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Guoqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Zhongying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xiaolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Yang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Cunguang</au><au>Tang, Guoqiang</au><au>Han, Zhongying</au><au>Guo, Xiaolin</au><au>Hong, Yang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global intercomparison and regional evaluation of GPM IMERG Version-03, Version-04 and its latest Version-05 precipitation products: Similarity, difference and improvements</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>564</volume><issue>C</issue><spage>342</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>342-356</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><abstract>•IMERG V03/V04/V05 are intercompared at multiple spatiotemporal resolutions.•GPCP V2.3 and MSWEP V2.1 are used as benchmarks in global comparison.•IMERG V04/V05 precipitation is much higher than V03 over global ocean.•More than 30,000 gauges are used as ground truth in regional evaluation over China.•IMERG V05 shows better performance than V03/V04 over Mainland China. The overarching goal of this study is to intercompare the newly released Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) Version 05 (V05) products with its former Version 04 (V04) and Version 03 (V03) products and also assess any differences and improvements, with cross-evaluation against the Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Version 2.3, Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP) Version 2.1 and the dense gauge networks in China. Firstly, the gauge-adjusted products (Final run) of V03, V04 and V05 are compared over the globe. Then, the near-real-time products without gauge adjustments (Early and Late run) and Final run products of all versions are evaluated against ground-based observations comprised of more than 30,000 gauges over Mainland China at 0.1° × 0.1° grid and hourly and daily temporal scales. The primary conclusions are: (1) globally, both V04 and V05 Final run show significant differences and improvements from V03. Particularly, the overall mean oceanic precipitation of V04 and V05 increases by +31.36% and +28.81% respectively from that of V03 and much closer to GPCP and MSWEP; (2) over Mainland China, the Early and Late run products of the same version (V03 or V04) generally have similar performance, while V04 Early and Late run have better performance in most regions than the corresponding run of V03 except in the arid Xinjiang Province and the mountainous Tibetan Plateau; and (3) V04 and V03 Final run show comparable performance, while V05 Final run generally improves upon both V04 and V03 and has the best performance among the seven standard IMERG products. The improvement of V05 Final run is particularly evident in southeastern and western China. At a timely matter, the study provides first-hand global and regional assessment feedback to IMERG algorithm developers and also sheds insights for GPM precipitation product users across the world.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.064</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7428-0269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000174280269</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 2018-09, Vol.564 (C), p.342-356
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1548081
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects GPM
IMERG
Precipitation
Satellite
title Global intercomparison and regional evaluation of GPM IMERG Version-03, Version-04 and its latest Version-05 precipitation products: Similarity, difference and improvements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T01%3A18%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20intercomparison%20and%20regional%20evaluation%20of%20GPM%20IMERG%20Version-03,%20Version-04%20and%20its%20latest%20Version-05%20precipitation%20products:%20Similarity,%20difference%20and%20improvements&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Wang,%20Cunguang&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=564&rft.issue=C&rft.spage=342&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=342-356&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.064&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_osti_%3ES0022169418304864%3C/elsevier_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0022169418304864&rfr_iscdi=true