Autoignition of methyl propanoate and its comparisons with methyl ethanoate and methyl butanoate
This work reports an experimental and computational study on the autoignition characteristics of methyl propanoate under high pressure and low-to-intermediate temperature conditions. Comparisons to its next higher and lower methyl esters are also presented. The methyl propanoate experiments have bee...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Combustion and flame 2018-02, Vol.188 (C), p.116-128 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 128 |
---|---|
container_issue | C |
container_start_page | 116 |
container_title | Combustion and flame |
container_volume | 188 |
creator | Kumar, Kamal Sung, Chih-Jen Weber, Bryan W. Bunnell, Justin A. |
description | This work reports an experimental and computational study on the autoignition characteristics of methyl propanoate under high pressure and low-to-intermediate temperature conditions. Comparisons to its next higher and lower methyl esters are also presented. The methyl propanoate experiments have been conducted using a rapid compression machine over compressed pressure and temperature ranges of 15‒45 bar and 899‒1103 K, respectively, as well as covering both stoichiometric and fuel lean conditions. In addition, the performance of four chemical kinetic models reported in the literature is assessed by comparing the experimental ignition delay times to numerical simulations. Sensitivity analysis is also performed to identify important reactions influencing the model predictions for ignition delay times. Further, we provide a comparison between the experimental ignition delay times of methyl propanoate and its next higher and lower homologs, namely methyl butanoate and methyl ethanoate, under selected conditions. An unusual trend in the autoignition response with respect to the carbon number is observed among methyl ethanoate and methyl propanoate. Methyl ethanoate is found to be more reactive than methyl propanoate in the low-temperature regime of 850‒950 K despite having a lower carbon number, with a crossover in reactivity above 950 K. Methyl butanoate is the most reactive among the three esters investigated which is consistent with the notion of increase in reactivity with increasing carbon number. This experimental and computational investigation provides insights into the homogenous autoignition chemistry associated with small unsaturated methyl ester compounds under engine relevant conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.09.027 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1538143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010218017303644</els_id><sourcerecordid>2019033614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-e9e0eec1073539175c128337e4641b94a9ab554d8eab6ddfd4395e6d1269a77c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDlE5J6zjJI65If4lJC5wNo6zoa5au9gOiLfHVYrEkYtXWn2znhlCFhQKCrS5WBXabboxxGGtNliUQHkBooCSH5AZresmL0VJD8kMgEJe0haOyUkIKwDgFWMz8nY1RmferYnG2cwN2Qbj8nudbb3bKutUxEzZPjMxZOmnrfImOBuyLxOXv2h6_5D7ZTfGaXlKjga1Dni2n3Pyenf7cv2QPz3fP15fPeW6atqYo0BA1BQ4q5mgvNa0bBnjWDUV7USlhOrquupbVF3T90NfMVFj09OyEYpzzeZkMd11IRoZtImol9pZizpKWrOWprxzcj5BKd7HiCHKlRu9Tb5kqk4AY03C5uRyorR3IXgc5NabjfLfkoLc1S5X8m_tOy2XIGSqPYlvJjGmsJ8G_c4LWo298TsrvTP_OfMDKtyTuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2019033614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Autoignition of methyl propanoate and its comparisons with methyl ethanoate and methyl butanoate</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kumar, Kamal ; Sung, Chih-Jen ; Weber, Bryan W. ; Bunnell, Justin A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Kamal ; Sung, Chih-Jen ; Weber, Bryan W. ; Bunnell, Justin A. ; Princeton Univ., NJ (United States) ; Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRC) (United States). Combustion Energy Frontier Research Center (CEFRC)</creatorcontrib><description>This work reports an experimental and computational study on the autoignition characteristics of methyl propanoate under high pressure and low-to-intermediate temperature conditions. Comparisons to its next higher and lower methyl esters are also presented. The methyl propanoate experiments have been conducted using a rapid compression machine over compressed pressure and temperature ranges of 15‒45 bar and 899‒1103 K, respectively, as well as covering both stoichiometric and fuel lean conditions. In addition, the performance of four chemical kinetic models reported in the literature is assessed by comparing the experimental ignition delay times to numerical simulations. Sensitivity analysis is also performed to identify important reactions influencing the model predictions for ignition delay times. Further, we provide a comparison between the experimental ignition delay times of methyl propanoate and its next higher and lower homologs, namely methyl butanoate and methyl ethanoate, under selected conditions. An unusual trend in the autoignition response with respect to the carbon number is observed among methyl ethanoate and methyl propanoate. Methyl ethanoate is found to be more reactive than methyl propanoate in the low-temperature regime of 850‒950 K despite having a lower carbon number, with a crossover in reactivity above 950 K. Methyl butanoate is the most reactive among the three esters investigated which is consistent with the notion of increase in reactivity with increasing carbon number. This experimental and computational investigation provides insights into the homogenous autoignition chemistry associated with small unsaturated methyl ester compounds under engine relevant conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-2180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-2921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.09.027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Autoignition ; Carbon ; Chemistry ; Computation ; Computer simulation ; Delay ; Energy & Fuels ; Engineering ; Esters ; Homology ; Ignition ; Mathematical models ; Methyl butanoate ; Methyl esters ; Methyl ethanoate ; Methyl propanoate ; Rapid compression machine ; Sensitivity analysis ; Spontaneous combustion ; Temperature ; Thermodynamics</subject><ispartof>Combustion and flame, 2018-02, Vol.188 (C), p.116-128</ispartof><rights>2017 The Combustion Institute</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-e9e0eec1073539175c128337e4641b94a9ab554d8eab6ddfd4395e6d1269a77c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-e9e0eec1073539175c128337e4641b94a9ab554d8eab6ddfd4395e6d1269a77c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3923-8740 ; 0000-0003-0815-9270 ; 0000000308159270 ; 0000000239238740</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.09.027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1538143$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Chih-Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Bryan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunnell, Justin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Princeton Univ., NJ (United States)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRC) (United States). Combustion Energy Frontier Research Center (CEFRC)</creatorcontrib><title>Autoignition of methyl propanoate and its comparisons with methyl ethanoate and methyl butanoate</title><title>Combustion and flame</title><description>This work reports an experimental and computational study on the autoignition characteristics of methyl propanoate under high pressure and low-to-intermediate temperature conditions. Comparisons to its next higher and lower methyl esters are also presented. The methyl propanoate experiments have been conducted using a rapid compression machine over compressed pressure and temperature ranges of 15‒45 bar and 899‒1103 K, respectively, as well as covering both stoichiometric and fuel lean conditions. In addition, the performance of four chemical kinetic models reported in the literature is assessed by comparing the experimental ignition delay times to numerical simulations. Sensitivity analysis is also performed to identify important reactions influencing the model predictions for ignition delay times. Further, we provide a comparison between the experimental ignition delay times of methyl propanoate and its next higher and lower homologs, namely methyl butanoate and methyl ethanoate, under selected conditions. An unusual trend in the autoignition response with respect to the carbon number is observed among methyl ethanoate and methyl propanoate. Methyl ethanoate is found to be more reactive than methyl propanoate in the low-temperature regime of 850‒950 K despite having a lower carbon number, with a crossover in reactivity above 950 K. Methyl butanoate is the most reactive among the three esters investigated which is consistent with the notion of increase in reactivity with increasing carbon number. This experimental and computational investigation provides insights into the homogenous autoignition chemistry associated with small unsaturated methyl ester compounds under engine relevant conditions.</description><subject>Autoignition</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Energy & Fuels</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Esters</subject><subject>Homology</subject><subject>Ignition</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methyl butanoate</subject><subject>Methyl esters</subject><subject>Methyl ethanoate</subject><subject>Methyl propanoate</subject><subject>Rapid compression machine</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Spontaneous combustion</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><issn>0010-2180</issn><issn>1556-2921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDlE5J6zjJI65If4lJC5wNo6zoa5au9gOiLfHVYrEkYtXWn2znhlCFhQKCrS5WBXabboxxGGtNliUQHkBooCSH5AZresmL0VJD8kMgEJe0haOyUkIKwDgFWMz8nY1RmferYnG2cwN2Qbj8nudbb3bKutUxEzZPjMxZOmnrfImOBuyLxOXv2h6_5D7ZTfGaXlKjga1Dni2n3Pyenf7cv2QPz3fP15fPeW6atqYo0BA1BQ4q5mgvNa0bBnjWDUV7USlhOrquupbVF3T90NfMVFj09OyEYpzzeZkMd11IRoZtImol9pZizpKWrOWprxzcj5BKd7HiCHKlRu9Tb5kqk4AY03C5uRyorR3IXgc5NabjfLfkoLc1S5X8m_tOy2XIGSqPYlvJjGmsJ8G_c4LWo298TsrvTP_OfMDKtyTuA</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Kumar, Kamal</creator><creator>Sung, Chih-Jen</creator><creator>Weber, Bryan W.</creator><creator>Bunnell, Justin A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3923-8740</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0815-9270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000308159270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000239238740</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Autoignition of methyl propanoate and its comparisons with methyl ethanoate and methyl butanoate</title><author>Kumar, Kamal ; Sung, Chih-Jen ; Weber, Bryan W. ; Bunnell, Justin A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-e9e0eec1073539175c128337e4641b94a9ab554d8eab6ddfd4395e6d1269a77c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Autoignition</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Energy & Fuels</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Esters</topic><topic>Homology</topic><topic>Ignition</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methyl butanoate</topic><topic>Methyl esters</topic><topic>Methyl ethanoate</topic><topic>Methyl propanoate</topic><topic>Rapid compression machine</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Spontaneous combustion</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Chih-Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Bryan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunnell, Justin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Princeton Univ., NJ (United States)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRC) (United States). Combustion Energy Frontier Research Center (CEFRC)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Combustion and flame</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, Kamal</au><au>Sung, Chih-Jen</au><au>Weber, Bryan W.</au><au>Bunnell, Justin A.</au><aucorp>Princeton Univ., NJ (United States)</aucorp><aucorp>Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRC) (United States). Combustion Energy Frontier Research Center (CEFRC)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Autoignition of methyl propanoate and its comparisons with methyl ethanoate and methyl butanoate</atitle><jtitle>Combustion and flame</jtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>188</volume><issue>C</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>116-128</pages><issn>0010-2180</issn><eissn>1556-2921</eissn><abstract>This work reports an experimental and computational study on the autoignition characteristics of methyl propanoate under high pressure and low-to-intermediate temperature conditions. Comparisons to its next higher and lower methyl esters are also presented. The methyl propanoate experiments have been conducted using a rapid compression machine over compressed pressure and temperature ranges of 15‒45 bar and 899‒1103 K, respectively, as well as covering both stoichiometric and fuel lean conditions. In addition, the performance of four chemical kinetic models reported in the literature is assessed by comparing the experimental ignition delay times to numerical simulations. Sensitivity analysis is also performed to identify important reactions influencing the model predictions for ignition delay times. Further, we provide a comparison between the experimental ignition delay times of methyl propanoate and its next higher and lower homologs, namely methyl butanoate and methyl ethanoate, under selected conditions. An unusual trend in the autoignition response with respect to the carbon number is observed among methyl ethanoate and methyl propanoate. Methyl ethanoate is found to be more reactive than methyl propanoate in the low-temperature regime of 850‒950 K despite having a lower carbon number, with a crossover in reactivity above 950 K. Methyl butanoate is the most reactive among the three esters investigated which is consistent with the notion of increase in reactivity with increasing carbon number. This experimental and computational investigation provides insights into the homogenous autoignition chemistry associated with small unsaturated methyl ester compounds under engine relevant conditions.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.09.027</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3923-8740</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0815-9270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000308159270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000239238740</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-2180 |
ispartof | Combustion and flame, 2018-02, Vol.188 (C), p.116-128 |
issn | 0010-2180 1556-2921 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1538143 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Autoignition Carbon Chemistry Computation Computer simulation Delay Energy & Fuels Engineering Esters Homology Ignition Mathematical models Methyl butanoate Methyl esters Methyl ethanoate Methyl propanoate Rapid compression machine Sensitivity analysis Spontaneous combustion Temperature Thermodynamics |
title | Autoignition of methyl propanoate and its comparisons with methyl ethanoate and methyl butanoate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A52%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Autoignition%20of%20methyl%20propanoate%20and%20its%20comparisons%20with%20methyl%20ethanoate%20and%20methyl%20butanoate&rft.jtitle=Combustion%20and%20flame&rft.au=Kumar,%20Kamal&rft.aucorp=Princeton%20Univ.,%20NJ%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=188&rft.issue=C&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=116-128&rft.issn=0010-2180&rft.eissn=1556-2921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.09.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2019033614%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2019033614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0010218017303644&rfr_iscdi=true |