Autoignition of methyl propanoate and its comparisons with methyl ethanoate and methyl butanoate

This work reports an experimental and computational study on the autoignition characteristics of methyl propanoate under high pressure and low-to-intermediate temperature conditions. Comparisons to its next higher and lower methyl esters are also presented. The methyl propanoate experiments have bee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Combustion and flame 2018-02, Vol.188 (C), p.116-128
Hauptverfasser: Kumar, Kamal, Sung, Chih-Jen, Weber, Bryan W., Bunnell, Justin A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 128
container_issue C
container_start_page 116
container_title Combustion and flame
container_volume 188
creator Kumar, Kamal
Sung, Chih-Jen
Weber, Bryan W.
Bunnell, Justin A.
description This work reports an experimental and computational study on the autoignition characteristics of methyl propanoate under high pressure and low-to-intermediate temperature conditions. Comparisons to its next higher and lower methyl esters are also presented. The methyl propanoate experiments have been conducted using a rapid compression machine over compressed pressure and temperature ranges of 15‒45 bar and 899‒1103 K, respectively, as well as covering both stoichiometric and fuel lean conditions. In addition, the performance of four chemical kinetic models reported in the literature is assessed by comparing the experimental ignition delay times to numerical simulations. Sensitivity analysis is also performed to identify important reactions influencing the model predictions for ignition delay times. Further, we provide a comparison between the experimental ignition delay times of methyl propanoate and its next higher and lower homologs, namely methyl butanoate and methyl ethanoate, under selected conditions. An unusual trend in the autoignition response with respect to the carbon number is observed among methyl ethanoate and methyl propanoate. Methyl ethanoate is found to be more reactive than methyl propanoate in the low-temperature regime of 850‒950 K despite having a lower carbon number, with a crossover in reactivity above 950 K. Methyl butanoate is the most reactive among the three esters investigated which is consistent with the notion of increase in reactivity with increasing carbon number. This experimental and computational investigation provides insights into the homogenous autoignition chemistry associated with small unsaturated methyl ester compounds under engine relevant conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.09.027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1538143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010218017303644</els_id><sourcerecordid>2019033614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-e9e0eec1073539175c128337e4641b94a9ab554d8eab6ddfd4395e6d1269a77c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDlE5J6zjJI65If4lJC5wNo6zoa5au9gOiLfHVYrEkYtXWn2znhlCFhQKCrS5WBXabboxxGGtNliUQHkBooCSH5AZresmL0VJD8kMgEJe0haOyUkIKwDgFWMz8nY1RmferYnG2cwN2Qbj8nudbb3bKutUxEzZPjMxZOmnrfImOBuyLxOXv2h6_5D7ZTfGaXlKjga1Dni2n3Pyenf7cv2QPz3fP15fPeW6atqYo0BA1BQ4q5mgvNa0bBnjWDUV7USlhOrquupbVF3T90NfMVFj09OyEYpzzeZkMd11IRoZtImol9pZizpKWrOWprxzcj5BKd7HiCHKlRu9Tb5kqk4AY03C5uRyorR3IXgc5NabjfLfkoLc1S5X8m_tOy2XIGSqPYlvJjGmsJ8G_c4LWo298TsrvTP_OfMDKtyTuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2019033614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Autoignition of methyl propanoate and its comparisons with methyl ethanoate and methyl butanoate</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kumar, Kamal ; Sung, Chih-Jen ; Weber, Bryan W. ; Bunnell, Justin A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Kamal ; Sung, Chih-Jen ; Weber, Bryan W. ; Bunnell, Justin A. ; Princeton Univ., NJ (United States) ; Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRC) (United States). Combustion Energy Frontier Research Center (CEFRC)</creatorcontrib><description>This work reports an experimental and computational study on the autoignition characteristics of methyl propanoate under high pressure and low-to-intermediate temperature conditions. Comparisons to its next higher and lower methyl esters are also presented. The methyl propanoate experiments have been conducted using a rapid compression machine over compressed pressure and temperature ranges of 15‒45 bar and 899‒1103 K, respectively, as well as covering both stoichiometric and fuel lean conditions. In addition, the performance of four chemical kinetic models reported in the literature is assessed by comparing the experimental ignition delay times to numerical simulations. Sensitivity analysis is also performed to identify important reactions influencing the model predictions for ignition delay times. Further, we provide a comparison between the experimental ignition delay times of methyl propanoate and its next higher and lower homologs, namely methyl butanoate and methyl ethanoate, under selected conditions. An unusual trend in the autoignition response with respect to the carbon number is observed among methyl ethanoate and methyl propanoate. Methyl ethanoate is found to be more reactive than methyl propanoate in the low-temperature regime of 850‒950 K despite having a lower carbon number, with a crossover in reactivity above 950 K. Methyl butanoate is the most reactive among the three esters investigated which is consistent with the notion of increase in reactivity with increasing carbon number. This experimental and computational investigation provides insights into the homogenous autoignition chemistry associated with small unsaturated methyl ester compounds under engine relevant conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-2180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-2921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.09.027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Autoignition ; Carbon ; Chemistry ; Computation ; Computer simulation ; Delay ; Energy &amp; Fuels ; Engineering ; Esters ; Homology ; Ignition ; Mathematical models ; Methyl butanoate ; Methyl esters ; Methyl ethanoate ; Methyl propanoate ; Rapid compression machine ; Sensitivity analysis ; Spontaneous combustion ; Temperature ; Thermodynamics</subject><ispartof>Combustion and flame, 2018-02, Vol.188 (C), p.116-128</ispartof><rights>2017 The Combustion Institute</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-e9e0eec1073539175c128337e4641b94a9ab554d8eab6ddfd4395e6d1269a77c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-e9e0eec1073539175c128337e4641b94a9ab554d8eab6ddfd4395e6d1269a77c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3923-8740 ; 0000-0003-0815-9270 ; 0000000308159270 ; 0000000239238740</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.09.027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1538143$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Chih-Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Bryan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunnell, Justin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Princeton Univ., NJ (United States)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRC) (United States). Combustion Energy Frontier Research Center (CEFRC)</creatorcontrib><title>Autoignition of methyl propanoate and its comparisons with methyl ethanoate and methyl butanoate</title><title>Combustion and flame</title><description>This work reports an experimental and computational study on the autoignition characteristics of methyl propanoate under high pressure and low-to-intermediate temperature conditions. Comparisons to its next higher and lower methyl esters are also presented. The methyl propanoate experiments have been conducted using a rapid compression machine over compressed pressure and temperature ranges of 15‒45 bar and 899‒1103 K, respectively, as well as covering both stoichiometric and fuel lean conditions. In addition, the performance of four chemical kinetic models reported in the literature is assessed by comparing the experimental ignition delay times to numerical simulations. Sensitivity analysis is also performed to identify important reactions influencing the model predictions for ignition delay times. Further, we provide a comparison between the experimental ignition delay times of methyl propanoate and its next higher and lower homologs, namely methyl butanoate and methyl ethanoate, under selected conditions. An unusual trend in the autoignition response with respect to the carbon number is observed among methyl ethanoate and methyl propanoate. Methyl ethanoate is found to be more reactive than methyl propanoate in the low-temperature regime of 850‒950 K despite having a lower carbon number, with a crossover in reactivity above 950 K. Methyl butanoate is the most reactive among the three esters investigated which is consistent with the notion of increase in reactivity with increasing carbon number. This experimental and computational investigation provides insights into the homogenous autoignition chemistry associated with small unsaturated methyl ester compounds under engine relevant conditions.</description><subject>Autoignition</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Energy &amp; Fuels</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Esters</subject><subject>Homology</subject><subject>Ignition</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methyl butanoate</subject><subject>Methyl esters</subject><subject>Methyl ethanoate</subject><subject>Methyl propanoate</subject><subject>Rapid compression machine</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Spontaneous combustion</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><issn>0010-2180</issn><issn>1556-2921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDlE5J6zjJI65If4lJC5wNo6zoa5au9gOiLfHVYrEkYtXWn2znhlCFhQKCrS5WBXabboxxGGtNliUQHkBooCSH5AZresmL0VJD8kMgEJe0haOyUkIKwDgFWMz8nY1RmferYnG2cwN2Qbj8nudbb3bKutUxEzZPjMxZOmnrfImOBuyLxOXv2h6_5D7ZTfGaXlKjga1Dni2n3Pyenf7cv2QPz3fP15fPeW6atqYo0BA1BQ4q5mgvNa0bBnjWDUV7USlhOrquupbVF3T90NfMVFj09OyEYpzzeZkMd11IRoZtImol9pZizpKWrOWprxzcj5BKd7HiCHKlRu9Tb5kqk4AY03C5uRyorR3IXgc5NabjfLfkoLc1S5X8m_tOy2XIGSqPYlvJjGmsJ8G_c4LWo298TsrvTP_OfMDKtyTuA</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Kumar, Kamal</creator><creator>Sung, Chih-Jen</creator><creator>Weber, Bryan W.</creator><creator>Bunnell, Justin A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3923-8740</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0815-9270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000308159270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000239238740</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Autoignition of methyl propanoate and its comparisons with methyl ethanoate and methyl butanoate</title><author>Kumar, Kamal ; Sung, Chih-Jen ; Weber, Bryan W. ; Bunnell, Justin A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-e9e0eec1073539175c128337e4641b94a9ab554d8eab6ddfd4395e6d1269a77c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Autoignition</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Energy &amp; Fuels</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Esters</topic><topic>Homology</topic><topic>Ignition</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methyl butanoate</topic><topic>Methyl esters</topic><topic>Methyl ethanoate</topic><topic>Methyl propanoate</topic><topic>Rapid compression machine</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Spontaneous combustion</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Chih-Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Bryan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunnell, Justin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Princeton Univ., NJ (United States)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRC) (United States). Combustion Energy Frontier Research Center (CEFRC)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Combustion and flame</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, Kamal</au><au>Sung, Chih-Jen</au><au>Weber, Bryan W.</au><au>Bunnell, Justin A.</au><aucorp>Princeton Univ., NJ (United States)</aucorp><aucorp>Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRC) (United States). Combustion Energy Frontier Research Center (CEFRC)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Autoignition of methyl propanoate and its comparisons with methyl ethanoate and methyl butanoate</atitle><jtitle>Combustion and flame</jtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>188</volume><issue>C</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>116-128</pages><issn>0010-2180</issn><eissn>1556-2921</eissn><abstract>This work reports an experimental and computational study on the autoignition characteristics of methyl propanoate under high pressure and low-to-intermediate temperature conditions. Comparisons to its next higher and lower methyl esters are also presented. The methyl propanoate experiments have been conducted using a rapid compression machine over compressed pressure and temperature ranges of 15‒45 bar and 899‒1103 K, respectively, as well as covering both stoichiometric and fuel lean conditions. In addition, the performance of four chemical kinetic models reported in the literature is assessed by comparing the experimental ignition delay times to numerical simulations. Sensitivity analysis is also performed to identify important reactions influencing the model predictions for ignition delay times. Further, we provide a comparison between the experimental ignition delay times of methyl propanoate and its next higher and lower homologs, namely methyl butanoate and methyl ethanoate, under selected conditions. An unusual trend in the autoignition response with respect to the carbon number is observed among methyl ethanoate and methyl propanoate. Methyl ethanoate is found to be more reactive than methyl propanoate in the low-temperature regime of 850‒950 K despite having a lower carbon number, with a crossover in reactivity above 950 K. Methyl butanoate is the most reactive among the three esters investigated which is consistent with the notion of increase in reactivity with increasing carbon number. This experimental and computational investigation provides insights into the homogenous autoignition chemistry associated with small unsaturated methyl ester compounds under engine relevant conditions.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.09.027</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3923-8740</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0815-9270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000308159270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000239238740</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-2180
ispartof Combustion and flame, 2018-02, Vol.188 (C), p.116-128
issn 0010-2180
1556-2921
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1538143
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings
subjects Autoignition
Carbon
Chemistry
Computation
Computer simulation
Delay
Energy & Fuels
Engineering
Esters
Homology
Ignition
Mathematical models
Methyl butanoate
Methyl esters
Methyl ethanoate
Methyl propanoate
Rapid compression machine
Sensitivity analysis
Spontaneous combustion
Temperature
Thermodynamics
title Autoignition of methyl propanoate and its comparisons with methyl ethanoate and methyl butanoate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A52%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Autoignition%20of%20methyl%20propanoate%20and%20its%20comparisons%20with%20methyl%20ethanoate%20and%20methyl%20butanoate&rft.jtitle=Combustion%20and%20flame&rft.au=Kumar,%20Kamal&rft.aucorp=Princeton%20Univ.,%20NJ%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=188&rft.issue=C&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=116-128&rft.issn=0010-2180&rft.eissn=1556-2921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.09.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2019033614%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2019033614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0010218017303644&rfr_iscdi=true