Quantitative analysis of degradation mechanisms in 30-year-old PV modules

Quantitative analysis of two 30-year-old PV modules is performed by a combination of the equivalent-circuit model and optoelectronic characterization methods. The two modules under analysis were manufactured in 1984 with the nameplate power of 41.0 W, but degraded under two different conditions; one...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Solar energy materials and solar cells 2019-09, Vol.200 (C), p.110019, Article 110019
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Zhe, Castillo, Mariela Lizet, Youssef, Amanda, Serdy, James G., Watts, Alliston, Schmid, Cordula, Kurtz, Sarah, Peters, Ian Marius, Buonassisi, Tonio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue C
container_start_page 110019
container_title Solar energy materials and solar cells
container_volume 200
creator Liu, Zhe
Castillo, Mariela Lizet
Youssef, Amanda
Serdy, James G.
Watts, Alliston
Schmid, Cordula
Kurtz, Sarah
Peters, Ian Marius
Buonassisi, Tonio
description Quantitative analysis of two 30-year-old PV modules is performed by a combination of the equivalent-circuit model and optoelectronic characterization methods. The two modules under analysis were manufactured in 1984 with the nameplate power of 41.0 W, but degraded under two different conditions; one was operated in the field in Northern California for about 30 years, and the other was stored in a warehouse for the same period. The power outputs of the two modules measured in 2016 are as 28.4W for the field-exposed one and 35.9 W for the warehoused one. We further break down this power difference of 7.5 W ± 0.3 W to specific physical mechanisms. Through the encapsulant transmittance measurements and the circuit modeling of module I–V curves, the power degradation due to encapsulant discoloration is found as 59% ± 4% of the total difference. With the bias-dependent electroluminescence imaging and the dark I–V measurement of solar cells (via the additionally-attached probe wires), the series-resistance increase is attributed to 33% ± 1%, with the split of 13% ± 4% due to interconnection resistance and 20% ± 4% due to cell resistance. In addition, the synergistic effect of all the physical mechanisms makes up the remaining 8% ± 4%. This case study presents an example of analyzing multiple degradation mechanisms of the PV modules. With more characterization data being collected for today's modules, the same analysis framework can be broadly applied, yield great insights module power degradation attributed to multiple loss mechanisms. [Display omitted] •Quantitative comparison between power losses of two 30-year-old PV modules: a case study of field-operated vs warehoused.•Encapsulant discoloration is found as the primary degradation mechanism in the investigated field-exposed module.•Resistance increase is the second most significant degradation mechanism in the investigated field-exposed module.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1530469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0927024819303484</els_id><sourcerecordid>2287981902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-143a9f18e9c1ed35dc6a370728ef6e850cbcc3e623a45cece8be1cb9d3268f313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AxdF16159JFsBBEfAwMqqNuQSW41pW3GJDMw_96UunZ14HLO4dwPoUuCC4JJfdMVwfWDigXFRBSE4CRHaEF4I3LGBD9GCyxok2Na8lN0FkKHMaY1Kxdo9bZTY7RRRbuHTI2qPwQbMtdmBr68MunuxmwA_a1GG4aQ2TFjOD-A8rnrTfb6mQ3O7HoI5-ikVX2Aiz9doo_Hh_f753z98rS6v1vnuizrmJOSKdESDkITMKwyulaswQ3l0NbAK6w3WjOoKVNlpUED3wDRG2EYrXnLCFuiq7nXhWhl0DamcdqNI-goScVwWYtkup5NW-9-dhCi7NzOp--CpDRh4URgmlzl7NLeheChlVtvB-UPkmA5kZWdnMnKiaycyabY7RyD9Obegp9WwKjBWD-NMM7-X_ALwt2DDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287981902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative analysis of degradation mechanisms in 30-year-old PV modules</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liu, Zhe ; Castillo, Mariela Lizet ; Youssef, Amanda ; Serdy, James G. ; Watts, Alliston ; Schmid, Cordula ; Kurtz, Sarah ; Peters, Ian Marius ; Buonassisi, Tonio</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhe ; Castillo, Mariela Lizet ; Youssef, Amanda ; Serdy, James G. ; Watts, Alliston ; Schmid, Cordula ; Kurtz, Sarah ; Peters, Ian Marius ; Buonassisi, Tonio</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative analysis of two 30-year-old PV modules is performed by a combination of the equivalent-circuit model and optoelectronic characterization methods. The two modules under analysis were manufactured in 1984 with the nameplate power of 41.0 W, but degraded under two different conditions; one was operated in the field in Northern California for about 30 years, and the other was stored in a warehouse for the same period. The power outputs of the two modules measured in 2016 are as 28.4W for the field-exposed one and 35.9 W for the warehoused one. We further break down this power difference of 7.5 W ± 0.3 W to specific physical mechanisms. Through the encapsulant transmittance measurements and the circuit modeling of module I–V curves, the power degradation due to encapsulant discoloration is found as 59% ± 4% of the total difference. With the bias-dependent electroluminescence imaging and the dark I–V measurement of solar cells (via the additionally-attached probe wires), the series-resistance increase is attributed to 33% ± 1%, with the split of 13% ± 4% due to interconnection resistance and 20% ± 4% due to cell resistance. In addition, the synergistic effect of all the physical mechanisms makes up the remaining 8% ± 4%. This case study presents an example of analyzing multiple degradation mechanisms of the PV modules. With more characterization data being collected for today's modules, the same analysis framework can be broadly applied, yield great insights module power degradation attributed to multiple loss mechanisms. [Display omitted] •Quantitative comparison between power losses of two 30-year-old PV modules: a case study of field-operated vs warehoused.•Encapsulant discoloration is found as the primary degradation mechanism in the investigated field-exposed module.•Resistance increase is the second most significant degradation mechanism in the investigated field-exposed module.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0927-0248</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3398</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Circuits ; Degradation ; Device characterization ; Device modeling ; Discoloration ; Electroluminescence ; Encapsulation ; Modules ; Optoelectronics ; Photovoltaic cells ; Power loss analysis ; PV module degradation ; PV reliability ; Quantitative analysis ; Solar cells ; Synergistic effect ; Warehouses</subject><ispartof>Solar energy materials and solar cells, 2019-09, Vol.200 (C), p.110019, Article 110019</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Sep 15, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-143a9f18e9c1ed35dc6a370728ef6e850cbcc3e623a45cece8be1cb9d3268f313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-143a9f18e9c1ed35dc6a370728ef6e850cbcc3e623a45cece8be1cb9d3268f313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927024819303484$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1530469$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo, Mariela Lizet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serdy, James G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watts, Alliston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Cordula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurtz, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Ian Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buonassisi, Tonio</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative analysis of degradation mechanisms in 30-year-old PV modules</title><title>Solar energy materials and solar cells</title><description>Quantitative analysis of two 30-year-old PV modules is performed by a combination of the equivalent-circuit model and optoelectronic characterization methods. The two modules under analysis were manufactured in 1984 with the nameplate power of 41.0 W, but degraded under two different conditions; one was operated in the field in Northern California for about 30 years, and the other was stored in a warehouse for the same period. The power outputs of the two modules measured in 2016 are as 28.4W for the field-exposed one and 35.9 W for the warehoused one. We further break down this power difference of 7.5 W ± 0.3 W to specific physical mechanisms. Through the encapsulant transmittance measurements and the circuit modeling of module I–V curves, the power degradation due to encapsulant discoloration is found as 59% ± 4% of the total difference. With the bias-dependent electroluminescence imaging and the dark I–V measurement of solar cells (via the additionally-attached probe wires), the series-resistance increase is attributed to 33% ± 1%, with the split of 13% ± 4% due to interconnection resistance and 20% ± 4% due to cell resistance. In addition, the synergistic effect of all the physical mechanisms makes up the remaining 8% ± 4%. This case study presents an example of analyzing multiple degradation mechanisms of the PV modules. With more characterization data being collected for today's modules, the same analysis framework can be broadly applied, yield great insights module power degradation attributed to multiple loss mechanisms. [Display omitted] •Quantitative comparison between power losses of two 30-year-old PV modules: a case study of field-operated vs warehoused.•Encapsulant discoloration is found as the primary degradation mechanism in the investigated field-exposed module.•Resistance increase is the second most significant degradation mechanism in the investigated field-exposed module.</description><subject>Circuits</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Device characterization</subject><subject>Device modeling</subject><subject>Discoloration</subject><subject>Electroluminescence</subject><subject>Encapsulation</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>Optoelectronics</subject><subject>Photovoltaic cells</subject><subject>Power loss analysis</subject><subject>PV module degradation</subject><subject>PV reliability</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Solar cells</subject><subject>Synergistic effect</subject><subject>Warehouses</subject><issn>0927-0248</issn><issn>1879-3398</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AxdF16159JFsBBEfAwMqqNuQSW41pW3GJDMw_96UunZ14HLO4dwPoUuCC4JJfdMVwfWDigXFRBSE4CRHaEF4I3LGBD9GCyxok2Na8lN0FkKHMaY1Kxdo9bZTY7RRRbuHTI2qPwQbMtdmBr68MunuxmwA_a1GG4aQ2TFjOD-A8rnrTfb6mQ3O7HoI5-ikVX2Aiz9doo_Hh_f753z98rS6v1vnuizrmJOSKdESDkITMKwyulaswQ3l0NbAK6w3WjOoKVNlpUED3wDRG2EYrXnLCFuiq7nXhWhl0DamcdqNI-goScVwWYtkup5NW-9-dhCi7NzOp--CpDRh4URgmlzl7NLeheChlVtvB-UPkmA5kZWdnMnKiaycyabY7RyD9Obegp9WwKjBWD-NMM7-X_ALwt2DDw</recordid><startdate>20190915</startdate><enddate>20190915</enddate><creator>Liu, Zhe</creator><creator>Castillo, Mariela Lizet</creator><creator>Youssef, Amanda</creator><creator>Serdy, James G.</creator><creator>Watts, Alliston</creator><creator>Schmid, Cordula</creator><creator>Kurtz, Sarah</creator><creator>Peters, Ian Marius</creator><creator>Buonassisi, Tonio</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190915</creationdate><title>Quantitative analysis of degradation mechanisms in 30-year-old PV modules</title><author>Liu, Zhe ; Castillo, Mariela Lizet ; Youssef, Amanda ; Serdy, James G. ; Watts, Alliston ; Schmid, Cordula ; Kurtz, Sarah ; Peters, Ian Marius ; Buonassisi, Tonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-143a9f18e9c1ed35dc6a370728ef6e850cbcc3e623a45cece8be1cb9d3268f313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Circuits</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Device characterization</topic><topic>Device modeling</topic><topic>Discoloration</topic><topic>Electroluminescence</topic><topic>Encapsulation</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>Optoelectronics</topic><topic>Photovoltaic cells</topic><topic>Power loss analysis</topic><topic>PV module degradation</topic><topic>PV reliability</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Solar cells</topic><topic>Synergistic effect</topic><topic>Warehouses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo, Mariela Lizet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serdy, James G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watts, Alliston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Cordula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurtz, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Ian Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buonassisi, Tonio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Solar energy materials and solar cells</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Zhe</au><au>Castillo, Mariela Lizet</au><au>Youssef, Amanda</au><au>Serdy, James G.</au><au>Watts, Alliston</au><au>Schmid, Cordula</au><au>Kurtz, Sarah</au><au>Peters, Ian Marius</au><au>Buonassisi, Tonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative analysis of degradation mechanisms in 30-year-old PV modules</atitle><jtitle>Solar energy materials and solar cells</jtitle><date>2019-09-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>200</volume><issue>C</issue><spage>110019</spage><pages>110019-</pages><artnum>110019</artnum><issn>0927-0248</issn><eissn>1879-3398</eissn><abstract>Quantitative analysis of two 30-year-old PV modules is performed by a combination of the equivalent-circuit model and optoelectronic characterization methods. The two modules under analysis were manufactured in 1984 with the nameplate power of 41.0 W, but degraded under two different conditions; one was operated in the field in Northern California for about 30 years, and the other was stored in a warehouse for the same period. The power outputs of the two modules measured in 2016 are as 28.4W for the field-exposed one and 35.9 W for the warehoused one. We further break down this power difference of 7.5 W ± 0.3 W to specific physical mechanisms. Through the encapsulant transmittance measurements and the circuit modeling of module I–V curves, the power degradation due to encapsulant discoloration is found as 59% ± 4% of the total difference. With the bias-dependent electroluminescence imaging and the dark I–V measurement of solar cells (via the additionally-attached probe wires), the series-resistance increase is attributed to 33% ± 1%, with the split of 13% ± 4% due to interconnection resistance and 20% ± 4% due to cell resistance. In addition, the synergistic effect of all the physical mechanisms makes up the remaining 8% ± 4%. This case study presents an example of analyzing multiple degradation mechanisms of the PV modules. With more characterization data being collected for today's modules, the same analysis framework can be broadly applied, yield great insights module power degradation attributed to multiple loss mechanisms. [Display omitted] •Quantitative comparison between power losses of two 30-year-old PV modules: a case study of field-operated vs warehoused.•Encapsulant discoloration is found as the primary degradation mechanism in the investigated field-exposed module.•Resistance increase is the second most significant degradation mechanism in the investigated field-exposed module.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110019</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0927-0248
ispartof Solar energy materials and solar cells, 2019-09, Vol.200 (C), p.110019, Article 110019
issn 0927-0248
1879-3398
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1530469
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Circuits
Degradation
Device characterization
Device modeling
Discoloration
Electroluminescence
Encapsulation
Modules
Optoelectronics
Photovoltaic cells
Power loss analysis
PV module degradation
PV reliability
Quantitative analysis
Solar cells
Synergistic effect
Warehouses
title Quantitative analysis of degradation mechanisms in 30-year-old PV modules
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T12%3A35%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20analysis%20of%20degradation%20mechanisms%20in%2030-year-old%20PV%20modules&rft.jtitle=Solar%20energy%20materials%20and%20solar%20cells&rft.au=Liu,%20Zhe&rft.date=2019-09-15&rft.volume=200&rft.issue=C&rft.spage=110019&rft.pages=110019-&rft.artnum=110019&rft.issn=0927-0248&rft.eissn=1879-3398&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2287981902%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287981902&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0927024819303484&rfr_iscdi=true