Selective Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Coal Fly Ash Leachates Using Liquid Membrane Processes

Coal combustion residues and other geological waste materials have been proposed as a resource for rare earth elements (REEs, herein defined as the 14 stable lanthanides, yttrium, and scandium). The extraction of REEs from residues often generate acidified leachates that require highly selective sep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2019-04, Vol.53 (8), p.4490-4499
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Ryan C, Taggart, Ross K, Hower, James C, Wiesner, Mark R, Hsu-Kim, Heileen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4499
container_issue 8
container_start_page 4490
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 53
creator Smith, Ryan C
Taggart, Ross K
Hower, James C
Wiesner, Mark R
Hsu-Kim, Heileen
description Coal combustion residues and other geological waste materials have been proposed as a resource for rare earth elements (REEs, herein defined as the 14 stable lanthanides, yttrium, and scandium). The extraction of REEs from residues often generate acidified leachates that require highly selective separation methods to recover the REEs from other major soluble ions in the leachates. Here, we studied two liquid membrane processes (liquid emulsion membranes, LEM, and supported liquid membranes, SLM) and compared them to standard solvent extraction techniques for selective recovery and concentration of REEs from a leachate of coal fly ash. All separation methods involved an organic solution of di­(2-ethylhexyl)­phosphoric acid dissolved in kerosene or mineral oil and an acid strippant solution of 5 M nitric acid for the liquid-based separations. The LEM configuration, which separated REEs by immersing an acid-in-oil emulsion in the ash leachate, resulted in similar recovery percentages of individual REEs as the conventional solvent extraction approach. The recovery of REEs in the SLM configuration, which involved the impregnation of the solvent in a hydrophobic membrane, was slower than the LEM process. However, the SLM process was notably more selective for the heavy (and higher value) REEs, while the conventional extraction and LEM processes were more selective for the light REEs. A flux-based model of the extraction processes suggested that recovery rates were limited by REE affinity for the solvent chelator in the SLM, while the rates of REEs separation via LEM were limited by diffusive mass transfer across the liquid membrane. Altogether, these results help to identify specific steps in the recovery process that future work should target in the development of scalable liquid membrane separations for REE recovery.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.est.9b00539
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1526007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2197327217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-b917f054cb9bd4ce728b19495285feb6d7f51a9d90d6b9cd6d333a02dfd7f5383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxS0EokvhzA1Z9IKEsh3bcRwfq9UWkBaBCpW4WY49YVMlcWsnlfa_x9EuPSBxmsP83puPR8hbBmsGnF1al9aYprVuAKTQz8iKSQ6FrCV7TlYATBRaVL_OyKuU7gCAC6hfkjMBGpSs1YrgD-zRTd0j0ht04RHjgYaW3tiIdGvjtKfbHgccp0TbGAa6Cban1_2BXqU93aF1ezthorepG3_TXfcwd55-xaGJdkT6PQaHKWF6TV60tk_45lTPye319ufmc7H79unL5mpX2LKqpqLRTLUgS9foxpcOFa8bpksteS1bbCqvWsms9hp81WjnKy-EsMB9u3RELc7J-6NvSFNnkusmdHsXxjGfaPJnKgCVoQ9H6D6Ghzl_zwxdctj3eeUwJ8OZVoIrzhb04h_0LsxxzCcYzlnNVQm1ztTlkXIxpBSxNfexG2w8GAZmicnkmMyiPsWUFe9OvnMzoH_i_-aSgY9HYFE-zfyf3R8sUZx9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2218274089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selective Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Coal Fly Ash Leachates Using Liquid Membrane Processes</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Smith, Ryan C ; Taggart, Ross K ; Hower, James C ; Wiesner, Mark R ; Hsu-Kim, Heileen</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Ryan C ; Taggart, Ross K ; Hower, James C ; Wiesner, Mark R ; Hsu-Kim, Heileen ; Duke Univ., Durham, NC (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Coal combustion residues and other geological waste materials have been proposed as a resource for rare earth elements (REEs, herein defined as the 14 stable lanthanides, yttrium, and scandium). The extraction of REEs from residues often generate acidified leachates that require highly selective separation methods to recover the REEs from other major soluble ions in the leachates. Here, we studied two liquid membrane processes (liquid emulsion membranes, LEM, and supported liquid membranes, SLM) and compared them to standard solvent extraction techniques for selective recovery and concentration of REEs from a leachate of coal fly ash. All separation methods involved an organic solution of di­(2-ethylhexyl)­phosphoric acid dissolved in kerosene or mineral oil and an acid strippant solution of 5 M nitric acid for the liquid-based separations. The LEM configuration, which separated REEs by immersing an acid-in-oil emulsion in the ash leachate, resulted in similar recovery percentages of individual REEs as the conventional solvent extraction approach. The recovery of REEs in the SLM configuration, which involved the impregnation of the solvent in a hydrophobic membrane, was slower than the LEM process. However, the SLM process was notably more selective for the heavy (and higher value) REEs, while the conventional extraction and LEM processes were more selective for the light REEs. A flux-based model of the extraction processes suggested that recovery rates were limited by REE affinity for the solvent chelator in the SLM, while the rates of REEs separation via LEM were limited by diffusive mass transfer across the liquid membrane. Altogether, these results help to identify specific steps in the recovery process that future work should target in the development of scalable liquid membrane separations for REE recovery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00539</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30907587</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Acidification ; Acids ; Coal ; Configurations ; Diethylhexylphosphoric acid ; ENGINEERING ; Fly ash ; Hydrophobicity ; Kerosene ; Lanthanides ; Leachates ; Liquid membranes ; Mass transfer ; Membrane processes ; Membranes ; Mineral oils ; Nitric acid ; Phosphoric acid ; Rare earth elements ; Recovery ; Residues ; Scandium ; Separation ; Solvent extraction ; Solvent extraction processes ; Solvents ; Trace elements ; Waste materials ; Yttrium</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2019-04, Vol.53 (8), p.4490-4499</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Apr 16, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-b917f054cb9bd4ce728b19495285feb6d7f51a9d90d6b9cd6d333a02dfd7f5383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-b917f054cb9bd4ce728b19495285feb6d7f51a9d90d6b9cd6d333a02dfd7f5383</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2591-416X ; 0000-0001-7152-7852 ; 0000-0003-4694-2776 ; 0000-0003-0675-4308 ; 0000000346942776 ; 0000000171527852 ; 0000000306754308 ; 000000032591416X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.9b00539$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b00539$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30907587$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1526007$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Ryan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taggart, Ross K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hower, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiesner, Mark R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu-Kim, Heileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duke Univ., Durham, NC (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Selective Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Coal Fly Ash Leachates Using Liquid Membrane Processes</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Coal combustion residues and other geological waste materials have been proposed as a resource for rare earth elements (REEs, herein defined as the 14 stable lanthanides, yttrium, and scandium). The extraction of REEs from residues often generate acidified leachates that require highly selective separation methods to recover the REEs from other major soluble ions in the leachates. Here, we studied two liquid membrane processes (liquid emulsion membranes, LEM, and supported liquid membranes, SLM) and compared them to standard solvent extraction techniques for selective recovery and concentration of REEs from a leachate of coal fly ash. All separation methods involved an organic solution of di­(2-ethylhexyl)­phosphoric acid dissolved in kerosene or mineral oil and an acid strippant solution of 5 M nitric acid for the liquid-based separations. The LEM configuration, which separated REEs by immersing an acid-in-oil emulsion in the ash leachate, resulted in similar recovery percentages of individual REEs as the conventional solvent extraction approach. The recovery of REEs in the SLM configuration, which involved the impregnation of the solvent in a hydrophobic membrane, was slower than the LEM process. However, the SLM process was notably more selective for the heavy (and higher value) REEs, while the conventional extraction and LEM processes were more selective for the light REEs. A flux-based model of the extraction processes suggested that recovery rates were limited by REE affinity for the solvent chelator in the SLM, while the rates of REEs separation via LEM were limited by diffusive mass transfer across the liquid membrane. Altogether, these results help to identify specific steps in the recovery process that future work should target in the development of scalable liquid membrane separations for REE recovery.</description><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Diethylhexylphosphoric acid</subject><subject>ENGINEERING</subject><subject>Fly ash</subject><subject>Hydrophobicity</subject><subject>Kerosene</subject><subject>Lanthanides</subject><subject>Leachates</subject><subject>Liquid membranes</subject><subject>Mass transfer</subject><subject>Membrane processes</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Mineral oils</subject><subject>Nitric acid</subject><subject>Phosphoric acid</subject><subject>Rare earth elements</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Scandium</subject><subject>Separation</subject><subject>Solvent extraction</subject><subject>Solvent extraction processes</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Trace elements</subject><subject>Waste materials</subject><subject>Yttrium</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1v1DAQxS0EokvhzA1Z9IKEsh3bcRwfq9UWkBaBCpW4WY49YVMlcWsnlfa_x9EuPSBxmsP83puPR8hbBmsGnF1al9aYprVuAKTQz8iKSQ6FrCV7TlYATBRaVL_OyKuU7gCAC6hfkjMBGpSs1YrgD-zRTd0j0ht04RHjgYaW3tiIdGvjtKfbHgccp0TbGAa6Cban1_2BXqU93aF1ezthorepG3_TXfcwd55-xaGJdkT6PQaHKWF6TV60tk_45lTPye319ufmc7H79unL5mpX2LKqpqLRTLUgS9foxpcOFa8bpksteS1bbCqvWsms9hp81WjnKy-EsMB9u3RELc7J-6NvSFNnkusmdHsXxjGfaPJnKgCVoQ9H6D6Ghzl_zwxdctj3eeUwJ8OZVoIrzhb04h_0LsxxzCcYzlnNVQm1ztTlkXIxpBSxNfexG2w8GAZmicnkmMyiPsWUFe9OvnMzoH_i_-aSgY9HYFE-zfyf3R8sUZx9</recordid><startdate>20190416</startdate><enddate>20190416</enddate><creator>Smith, Ryan C</creator><creator>Taggart, Ross K</creator><creator>Hower, James C</creator><creator>Wiesner, Mark R</creator><creator>Hsu-Kim, Heileen</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><general>American Chemical Society (ACS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2591-416X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7152-7852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4694-2776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0675-4308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000346942776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000171527852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000306754308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000032591416X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190416</creationdate><title>Selective Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Coal Fly Ash Leachates Using Liquid Membrane Processes</title><author>Smith, Ryan C ; Taggart, Ross K ; Hower, James C ; Wiesner, Mark R ; Hsu-Kim, Heileen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a466t-b917f054cb9bd4ce728b19495285feb6d7f51a9d90d6b9cd6d333a02dfd7f5383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Diethylhexylphosphoric acid</topic><topic>ENGINEERING</topic><topic>Fly ash</topic><topic>Hydrophobicity</topic><topic>Kerosene</topic><topic>Lanthanides</topic><topic>Leachates</topic><topic>Liquid membranes</topic><topic>Mass transfer</topic><topic>Membrane processes</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Mineral oils</topic><topic>Nitric acid</topic><topic>Phosphoric acid</topic><topic>Rare earth elements</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Scandium</topic><topic>Separation</topic><topic>Solvent extraction</topic><topic>Solvent extraction processes</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Trace elements</topic><topic>Waste materials</topic><topic>Yttrium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Ryan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taggart, Ross K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hower, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiesner, Mark R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu-Kim, Heileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duke Univ., Durham, NC (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Ryan C</au><au>Taggart, Ross K</au><au>Hower, James C</au><au>Wiesner, Mark R</au><au>Hsu-Kim, Heileen</au><aucorp>Duke Univ., Durham, NC (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selective Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Coal Fly Ash Leachates Using Liquid Membrane Processes</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2019-04-16</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>4490</spage><epage>4499</epage><pages>4490-4499</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><abstract>Coal combustion residues and other geological waste materials have been proposed as a resource for rare earth elements (REEs, herein defined as the 14 stable lanthanides, yttrium, and scandium). The extraction of REEs from residues often generate acidified leachates that require highly selective separation methods to recover the REEs from other major soluble ions in the leachates. Here, we studied two liquid membrane processes (liquid emulsion membranes, LEM, and supported liquid membranes, SLM) and compared them to standard solvent extraction techniques for selective recovery and concentration of REEs from a leachate of coal fly ash. All separation methods involved an organic solution of di­(2-ethylhexyl)­phosphoric acid dissolved in kerosene or mineral oil and an acid strippant solution of 5 M nitric acid for the liquid-based separations. The LEM configuration, which separated REEs by immersing an acid-in-oil emulsion in the ash leachate, resulted in similar recovery percentages of individual REEs as the conventional solvent extraction approach. The recovery of REEs in the SLM configuration, which involved the impregnation of the solvent in a hydrophobic membrane, was slower than the LEM process. However, the SLM process was notably more selective for the heavy (and higher value) REEs, while the conventional extraction and LEM processes were more selective for the light REEs. A flux-based model of the extraction processes suggested that recovery rates were limited by REE affinity for the solvent chelator in the SLM, while the rates of REEs separation via LEM were limited by diffusive mass transfer across the liquid membrane. Altogether, these results help to identify specific steps in the recovery process that future work should target in the development of scalable liquid membrane separations for REE recovery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>30907587</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.9b00539</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2591-416X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7152-7852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4694-2776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0675-4308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000346942776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000171527852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000306754308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000032591416X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2019-04, Vol.53 (8), p.4490-4499
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1526007
source ACS Publications
subjects Acidification
Acids
Coal
Configurations
Diethylhexylphosphoric acid
ENGINEERING
Fly ash
Hydrophobicity
Kerosene
Lanthanides
Leachates
Liquid membranes
Mass transfer
Membrane processes
Membranes
Mineral oils
Nitric acid
Phosphoric acid
Rare earth elements
Recovery
Residues
Scandium
Separation
Solvent extraction
Solvent extraction processes
Solvents
Trace elements
Waste materials
Yttrium
title Selective Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Coal Fly Ash Leachates Using Liquid Membrane Processes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A08%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selective%20Recovery%20of%20Rare%20Earth%20Elements%20from%20Coal%20Fly%20Ash%20Leachates%20Using%20Liquid%20Membrane%20Processes&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Smith,%20Ryan%20C&rft.aucorp=Duke%20Univ.,%20Durham,%20NC%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2019-04-16&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=4490&rft.epage=4499&rft.pages=4490-4499&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b00539&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2197327217%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2218274089&rft_id=info:pmid/30907587&rfr_iscdi=true