Influence of Charge Motion and Compression Ratio on the Performance of a Combustion Concept Employing In-Cylinder Gasoline and Natural Gas Blending

The present paper represents a small piece of an extensive experimental effort investigating the dual-fuel operation of a light-duty spark ignited engine. Natural gas (NG) was directly injected into the cylinder and gasoline was injected into the intake-port. Direct injection (DI) of NG was used in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of engineering for gas turbines and power 2018-12, Vol.140 (12)
Hauptverfasser: Sevik, James, Pamminger, Michael, Wallner, Thomas, Scarcelli, Riccardo, Wooldridge, Steven, Boyer, Brad, Miers, Scott, Hall, Carrie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page
container_title Journal of engineering for gas turbines and power
container_volume 140
creator Sevik, James
Pamminger, Michael
Wallner, Thomas
Scarcelli, Riccardo
Wooldridge, Steven
Boyer, Brad
Miers, Scott
Hall, Carrie
description The present paper represents a small piece of an extensive experimental effort investigating the dual-fuel operation of a light-duty spark ignited engine. Natural gas (NG) was directly injected into the cylinder and gasoline was injected into the intake-port. Direct injection (DI) of NG was used in order to overcome the power density loss usually experienced with NG port-fuel injection (PFI) as it allows an injection after intake valve closing. Having two separate fuel systems allows for a continuum of in-cylinder blend levels from pure gasoline to pure NG operation. The huge benefit of gasoline is its availability and energy density, whereas NG allows efficient operation at high load due to improved combustion phasing enabled by its higher knock resistance. Furthermore, using NG allowed a reduction of carbon dioxide emissions across the entire engine map due to the higher hydrogen-to-carbon ratio. Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) was used to (a) increase efficiency at low and part-load operation and (b) reduce the propensity of knock at higher compression ratios (CRs) thereby enabling blend levels with greater amount of gasoline across a wider operating range. Two integral engine parameters, CR and in-cylinder turbulence levels, were varied in order to study their influence on efficiency, emissions, and performance over a specific speed and load range. Increasing the CR from 10.5 to 14.5 allowed an absolute increase in indicated thermal efficiency of more than 3% for 75% NG (25% gasoline) operation at 8 bar net indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) and 2500 rpm. However, as anticipated, the achievable peak load at CR 14.5 with 100% gasoline was greatly reduced due to its lower knock resistance. The in-cylinder turbulence level was varied by means of tumble plates (TPs) as well as an insert for the NG injector that guides the injection “spray” to augment the tumble motion. The usage of TPs showed a significant increase in EGR dilution tolerance for pure gasoline operation, however, no such impact was found for blended operation of gasoline and NG.
doi_str_mv 10.1115/1.4040090
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>asme_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1463678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>366413</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a350t-6fb45e1b7a9426f423647604861ca03886246f4f5a62a8c66c7524d355abbb0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw4MzF4sYhxY4fSY4QlVKpPITgbG1cu02V2JWdHvo7-MO4tKfdHX0zWg1Ct5RMKKXikU444YRU5AyNqMjLrKxodY5GpOB5xotKXKKrGDeEUMZ4MUK_c2e7nXHaYG9xvYawMvjND613GNwS177fBhPj4f6CJOO0DGuDP02wPvRwcsKBbHbx31j7pG4HPO23nd-3boXnLqv3XeuWJuAZRJ9W85__DsMuQHcQ8XNn3DLR1-jCQhfNzWmO0c_L9Lt-zRYfs3n9tMiACTJk0jZcGNoUUPFcWp4zyQtJeCmpBsLKUuY8yVaAzKHUUupC5HzJhICmaYhlY3R_zPXpbRV1Oxi91t45owdFuWSyKBP0cIR08DEGY9U2tD2EvaJEHSpXVJ0qT-zdkYXYG7Xxu-DS_4pJyVPdf-SZfIY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Charge Motion and Compression Ratio on the Performance of a Combustion Concept Employing In-Cylinder Gasoline and Natural Gas Blending</title><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sevik, James ; Pamminger, Michael ; Wallner, Thomas ; Scarcelli, Riccardo ; Wooldridge, Steven ; Boyer, Brad ; Miers, Scott ; Hall, Carrie</creator><creatorcontrib>Sevik, James ; Pamminger, Michael ; Wallner, Thomas ; Scarcelli, Riccardo ; Wooldridge, Steven ; Boyer, Brad ; Miers, Scott ; Hall, Carrie ; Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>The present paper represents a small piece of an extensive experimental effort investigating the dual-fuel operation of a light-duty spark ignited engine. Natural gas (NG) was directly injected into the cylinder and gasoline was injected into the intake-port. Direct injection (DI) of NG was used in order to overcome the power density loss usually experienced with NG port-fuel injection (PFI) as it allows an injection after intake valve closing. Having two separate fuel systems allows for a continuum of in-cylinder blend levels from pure gasoline to pure NG operation. The huge benefit of gasoline is its availability and energy density, whereas NG allows efficient operation at high load due to improved combustion phasing enabled by its higher knock resistance. Furthermore, using NG allowed a reduction of carbon dioxide emissions across the entire engine map due to the higher hydrogen-to-carbon ratio. Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) was used to (a) increase efficiency at low and part-load operation and (b) reduce the propensity of knock at higher compression ratios (CRs) thereby enabling blend levels with greater amount of gasoline across a wider operating range. Two integral engine parameters, CR and in-cylinder turbulence levels, were varied in order to study their influence on efficiency, emissions, and performance over a specific speed and load range. Increasing the CR from 10.5 to 14.5 allowed an absolute increase in indicated thermal efficiency of more than 3% for 75% NG (25% gasoline) operation at 8 bar net indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) and 2500 rpm. However, as anticipated, the achievable peak load at CR 14.5 with 100% gasoline was greatly reduced due to its lower knock resistance. The in-cylinder turbulence level was varied by means of tumble plates (TPs) as well as an insert for the NG injector that guides the injection “spray” to augment the tumble motion. The usage of TPs showed a significant increase in EGR dilution tolerance for pure gasoline operation, however, no such impact was found for blended operation of gasoline and NG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-4795</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-8919</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.4040090</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: ASME</publisher><subject>ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS ; Combustion ; Compression ; Cylinders ; Engines ; Exhaust gas recirculation ; Fuels ; Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions ; Gasoline ; Natural gas ; Plates (structures) ; Stress</subject><ispartof>Journal of engineering for gas turbines and power, 2018-12, Vol.140 (12)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a350t-6fb45e1b7a9426f423647604861ca03886246f4f5a62a8c66c7524d355abbb0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a350t-6fb45e1b7a9426f423647604861ca03886246f4f5a62a8c66c7524d355abbb0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,38520</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1463678$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sevik, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamminger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallner, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarcelli, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wooldridge, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miers, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Charge Motion and Compression Ratio on the Performance of a Combustion Concept Employing In-Cylinder Gasoline and Natural Gas Blending</title><title>Journal of engineering for gas turbines and power</title><addtitle>J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power</addtitle><description>The present paper represents a small piece of an extensive experimental effort investigating the dual-fuel operation of a light-duty spark ignited engine. Natural gas (NG) was directly injected into the cylinder and gasoline was injected into the intake-port. Direct injection (DI) of NG was used in order to overcome the power density loss usually experienced with NG port-fuel injection (PFI) as it allows an injection after intake valve closing. Having two separate fuel systems allows for a continuum of in-cylinder blend levels from pure gasoline to pure NG operation. The huge benefit of gasoline is its availability and energy density, whereas NG allows efficient operation at high load due to improved combustion phasing enabled by its higher knock resistance. Furthermore, using NG allowed a reduction of carbon dioxide emissions across the entire engine map due to the higher hydrogen-to-carbon ratio. Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) was used to (a) increase efficiency at low and part-load operation and (b) reduce the propensity of knock at higher compression ratios (CRs) thereby enabling blend levels with greater amount of gasoline across a wider operating range. Two integral engine parameters, CR and in-cylinder turbulence levels, were varied in order to study their influence on efficiency, emissions, and performance over a specific speed and load range. Increasing the CR from 10.5 to 14.5 allowed an absolute increase in indicated thermal efficiency of more than 3% for 75% NG (25% gasoline) operation at 8 bar net indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) and 2500 rpm. However, as anticipated, the achievable peak load at CR 14.5 with 100% gasoline was greatly reduced due to its lower knock resistance. The in-cylinder turbulence level was varied by means of tumble plates (TPs) as well as an insert for the NG injector that guides the injection “spray” to augment the tumble motion. The usage of TPs showed a significant increase in EGR dilution tolerance for pure gasoline operation, however, no such impact was found for blended operation of gasoline and NG.</description><subject>ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Cylinders</subject><subject>Engines</subject><subject>Exhaust gas recirculation</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Plates (structures)</subject><subject>Stress</subject><issn>0742-4795</issn><issn>1528-8919</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw4MzF4sYhxY4fSY4QlVKpPITgbG1cu02V2JWdHvo7-MO4tKfdHX0zWg1Ct5RMKKXikU444YRU5AyNqMjLrKxodY5GpOB5xotKXKKrGDeEUMZ4MUK_c2e7nXHaYG9xvYawMvjND613GNwS177fBhPj4f6CJOO0DGuDP02wPvRwcsKBbHbx31j7pG4HPO23nd-3boXnLqv3XeuWJuAZRJ9W85__DsMuQHcQ8XNn3DLR1-jCQhfNzWmO0c_L9Lt-zRYfs3n9tMiACTJk0jZcGNoUUPFcWp4zyQtJeCmpBsLKUuY8yVaAzKHUUupC5HzJhICmaYhlY3R_zPXpbRV1Oxi91t45owdFuWSyKBP0cIR08DEGY9U2tD2EvaJEHSpXVJ0qT-zdkYXYG7Xxu-DS_4pJyVPdf-SZfIY</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Sevik, James</creator><creator>Pamminger, Michael</creator><creator>Wallner, Thomas</creator><creator>Scarcelli, Riccardo</creator><creator>Wooldridge, Steven</creator><creator>Boyer, Brad</creator><creator>Miers, Scott</creator><creator>Hall, Carrie</creator><general>ASME</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Influence of Charge Motion and Compression Ratio on the Performance of a Combustion Concept Employing In-Cylinder Gasoline and Natural Gas Blending</title><author>Sevik, James ; Pamminger, Michael ; Wallner, Thomas ; Scarcelli, Riccardo ; Wooldridge, Steven ; Boyer, Brad ; Miers, Scott ; Hall, Carrie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a350t-6fb45e1b7a9426f423647604861ca03886246f4f5a62a8c66c7524d355abbb0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Cylinders</topic><topic>Engines</topic><topic>Exhaust gas recirculation</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Plates (structures)</topic><topic>Stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sevik, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamminger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallner, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarcelli, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wooldridge, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyer, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miers, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Journal of engineering for gas turbines and power</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sevik, James</au><au>Pamminger, Michael</au><au>Wallner, Thomas</au><au>Scarcelli, Riccardo</au><au>Wooldridge, Steven</au><au>Boyer, Brad</au><au>Miers, Scott</au><au>Hall, Carrie</au><aucorp>Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Charge Motion and Compression Ratio on the Performance of a Combustion Concept Employing In-Cylinder Gasoline and Natural Gas Blending</atitle><jtitle>Journal of engineering for gas turbines and power</jtitle><stitle>J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power</stitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>140</volume><issue>12</issue><issn>0742-4795</issn><eissn>1528-8919</eissn><abstract>The present paper represents a small piece of an extensive experimental effort investigating the dual-fuel operation of a light-duty spark ignited engine. Natural gas (NG) was directly injected into the cylinder and gasoline was injected into the intake-port. Direct injection (DI) of NG was used in order to overcome the power density loss usually experienced with NG port-fuel injection (PFI) as it allows an injection after intake valve closing. Having two separate fuel systems allows for a continuum of in-cylinder blend levels from pure gasoline to pure NG operation. The huge benefit of gasoline is its availability and energy density, whereas NG allows efficient operation at high load due to improved combustion phasing enabled by its higher knock resistance. Furthermore, using NG allowed a reduction of carbon dioxide emissions across the entire engine map due to the higher hydrogen-to-carbon ratio. Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) was used to (a) increase efficiency at low and part-load operation and (b) reduce the propensity of knock at higher compression ratios (CRs) thereby enabling blend levels with greater amount of gasoline across a wider operating range. Two integral engine parameters, CR and in-cylinder turbulence levels, were varied in order to study their influence on efficiency, emissions, and performance over a specific speed and load range. Increasing the CR from 10.5 to 14.5 allowed an absolute increase in indicated thermal efficiency of more than 3% for 75% NG (25% gasoline) operation at 8 bar net indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) and 2500 rpm. However, as anticipated, the achievable peak load at CR 14.5 with 100% gasoline was greatly reduced due to its lower knock resistance. The in-cylinder turbulence level was varied by means of tumble plates (TPs) as well as an insert for the NG injector that guides the injection “spray” to augment the tumble motion. The usage of TPs showed a significant increase in EGR dilution tolerance for pure gasoline operation, however, no such impact was found for blended operation of gasoline and NG.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>ASME</pub><doi>10.1115/1.4040090</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0742-4795
ispartof Journal of engineering for gas turbines and power, 2018-12, Vol.140 (12)
issn 0742-4795
1528-8919
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1463678
source ASME Transactions Journals (Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS
Combustion
Compression
Cylinders
Engines
Exhaust gas recirculation
Fuels
Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions
Gasoline
Natural gas
Plates (structures)
Stress
title Influence of Charge Motion and Compression Ratio on the Performance of a Combustion Concept Employing In-Cylinder Gasoline and Natural Gas Blending
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T02%3A40%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-asme_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Charge%20Motion%20and%20Compression%20Ratio%20on%20the%20Performance%20of%20a%20Combustion%20Concept%20Employing%20In-Cylinder%20Gasoline%20and%20Natural%20Gas%20Blending&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20engineering%20for%20gas%20turbines%20and%20power&rft.au=Sevik,%20James&rft.aucorp=Argonne%20National%20Lab.%20(ANL),%20Argonne,%20IL%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=140&rft.issue=12&rft.issn=0742-4795&rft.eissn=1528-8919&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.4040090&rft_dat=%3Casme_osti_%3E366413%3C/asme_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true