A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere

We describe a process for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere in an industrial plant. The design captures ∼1 Mt-CO2/year in a continuous process using an aqueous KOH sorbent coupled to a calcium caustic recovery loop. We describe the design rationale, summarize performance of the major unit operations...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Joule 2018-08, Vol.2 (8), p.1573-1594
Hauptverfasser: Keith, David W., Holmes, Geoffrey, St. Angelo, David, Heidel, Kenton
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1594
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1573
container_title Joule
container_volume 2
creator Keith, David W.
Holmes, Geoffrey
St. Angelo, David
Heidel, Kenton
description We describe a process for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere in an industrial plant. The design captures ∼1 Mt-CO2/year in a continuous process using an aqueous KOH sorbent coupled to a calcium caustic recovery loop. We describe the design rationale, summarize performance of the major unit operations, and provide a capital cost breakdown developed with an independent consulting engineering firm. We report results from a pilot plant that provides data on performance of the major unit operations. We summarize the energy and material balance computed using an Aspen process simulation. When CO2 is delivered at 15 MPa, the design requires either 8.81 GJ of natural gas, or 5.25 GJ of gas and 366 kWhr of electricity, per ton of CO2 captured. Depending on financial assumptions, energy costs, and the specific choice of inputs and outputs, the levelized cost per ton CO2 captured from the atmosphere ranges from 94 to 232 $/t-CO2. [Display omitted] •Detailed engineering and cost analysis for a 1 Mt-CO2/year direct air capture plant•Levelized costs of $94 to $232 per ton CO2 from the atmosphere•First DAC paper with commercial engineering cost breakdown•Full mass and energy balance with pilot plant data for each unit operation An industrial process for large-scale capture of atmospheric CO2 (DAC) serves two roles. First, as a source of CO2 for making carbon-neutral hydrocarbon fuels, enabling carbon-free energy to be converted into high-energy-density fuels. Solar fuels, for example, may be produced at high-insolation low-cost locations from DAC-CO2 and electrolytic hydrogen using gas-to-liquids technology enabling decarbonization of difficult-to-electrify sectors such as aviation. And second, DAC with CO2 sequestration allows carbon removal. The feasibility of DAC has been disputed, in part, because publications have not provided sufficient engineering detail to allow independent evaluation of costs. We provide an engineering cost basis for a commercial DAC system for which all major components are either drawn from well-established commercial heritage or described in sufficient detail to allow assessment by third parties. This design reflects roughly 100 person-years of development by Carbon Engineering. First direct air capture paper for which all major components are either drawn from well-established commercial heritage or described in sufficient detail to allow assessment by third parties. Includes energy and materials balances, commercial engineering cost breakdow
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1441045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2542435118302253</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2542435118302253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-2d1f8f8f896df266a6d395add4a0e20fdb083a10672b0a99d77e7409b9a9a6a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1rwzAQhkVpoSHNL-giuts5yZJsDR2C6RcE0qGdhSKdG5vECpJT6L-v3XToVG64G97n5XgIuWWQM2Bq2eVdOO0x58CqHGQOoC7IjEvBM1FIdvnnviaLlDoAYJpXXBUzslzR1xgcpkSbEGltj8Mptv0HrTecNjEc6LBDuhoOIR13GPGGXDV2n3Dxu-fk_fHhrX7O1punl3q1zpzgcsi4Z001jVa-4UpZ5QstrffCAnJo_BaqwjJQJd-C1dqXJZYC9FZbbZWtijm5O_eGNLQmuXZAt3Oh79ENhgnBQMgxVJxDLoaUIjbmGNuDjV-GgZncmM78uDGTGwPSjG5G6v5M4fj_Z4txqsfeoW_j1O5D-y__Dccda_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Keith, David W. ; Holmes, Geoffrey ; St. Angelo, David ; Heidel, Kenton</creator><creatorcontrib>Keith, David W. ; Holmes, Geoffrey ; St. Angelo, David ; Heidel, Kenton ; Carbon Engineering Ltd., Squamish, BC (Canada)</creatorcontrib><description>We describe a process for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere in an industrial plant. The design captures ∼1 Mt-CO2/year in a continuous process using an aqueous KOH sorbent coupled to a calcium caustic recovery loop. We describe the design rationale, summarize performance of the major unit operations, and provide a capital cost breakdown developed with an independent consulting engineering firm. We report results from a pilot plant that provides data on performance of the major unit operations. We summarize the energy and material balance computed using an Aspen process simulation. When CO2 is delivered at 15 MPa, the design requires either 8.81 GJ of natural gas, or 5.25 GJ of gas and 366 kWhr of electricity, per ton of CO2 captured. Depending on financial assumptions, energy costs, and the specific choice of inputs and outputs, the levelized cost per ton CO2 captured from the atmosphere ranges from 94 to 232 $/t-CO2. [Display omitted] •Detailed engineering and cost analysis for a 1 Mt-CO2/year direct air capture plant•Levelized costs of $94 to $232 per ton CO2 from the atmosphere•First DAC paper with commercial engineering cost breakdown•Full mass and energy balance with pilot plant data for each unit operation An industrial process for large-scale capture of atmospheric CO2 (DAC) serves two roles. First, as a source of CO2 for making carbon-neutral hydrocarbon fuels, enabling carbon-free energy to be converted into high-energy-density fuels. Solar fuels, for example, may be produced at high-insolation low-cost locations from DAC-CO2 and electrolytic hydrogen using gas-to-liquids technology enabling decarbonization of difficult-to-electrify sectors such as aviation. And second, DAC with CO2 sequestration allows carbon removal. The feasibility of DAC has been disputed, in part, because publications have not provided sufficient engineering detail to allow independent evaluation of costs. We provide an engineering cost basis for a commercial DAC system for which all major components are either drawn from well-established commercial heritage or described in sufficient detail to allow assessment by third parties. This design reflects roughly 100 person-years of development by Carbon Engineering. First direct air capture paper for which all major components are either drawn from well-established commercial heritage or described in sufficient detail to allow assessment by third parties. Includes energy and materials balances, commercial engineering cost breakdown, and pilot plant data. When CO2 is delivered at 15 MPa, the design requires either 8.81 GJ of natural gas, or 5.25 GJ of gas and 366 kWhr of electricity, per ton of CO2 captured. Levelized cost per t-CO2 from atmosphere ranges from 94 to 232 $/t-CO2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2542-4351</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2542-4351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Air capture ; carbon storage ; CCS ; climate policy ; cost assessment ; DCA, carbon removal ; direct air capture ; ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION ; ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY ; negative emissions ; pilot plant data ; process design ; solar fuels</subject><ispartof>Joule, 2018-08, Vol.2 (8), p.1573-1594</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-2d1f8f8f896df266a6d395add4a0e20fdb083a10672b0a99d77e7409b9a9a6a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-2d1f8f8f896df266a6d395add4a0e20fdb083a10672b0a99d77e7409b9a9a6a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8224-3780 ; 0000000282243780</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1441045$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keith, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Angelo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidel, Kenton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbon Engineering Ltd., Squamish, BC (Canada)</creatorcontrib><title>A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere</title><title>Joule</title><description>We describe a process for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere in an industrial plant. The design captures ∼1 Mt-CO2/year in a continuous process using an aqueous KOH sorbent coupled to a calcium caustic recovery loop. We describe the design rationale, summarize performance of the major unit operations, and provide a capital cost breakdown developed with an independent consulting engineering firm. We report results from a pilot plant that provides data on performance of the major unit operations. We summarize the energy and material balance computed using an Aspen process simulation. When CO2 is delivered at 15 MPa, the design requires either 8.81 GJ of natural gas, or 5.25 GJ of gas and 366 kWhr of electricity, per ton of CO2 captured. Depending on financial assumptions, energy costs, and the specific choice of inputs and outputs, the levelized cost per ton CO2 captured from the atmosphere ranges from 94 to 232 $/t-CO2. [Display omitted] •Detailed engineering and cost analysis for a 1 Mt-CO2/year direct air capture plant•Levelized costs of $94 to $232 per ton CO2 from the atmosphere•First DAC paper with commercial engineering cost breakdown•Full mass and energy balance with pilot plant data for each unit operation An industrial process for large-scale capture of atmospheric CO2 (DAC) serves two roles. First, as a source of CO2 for making carbon-neutral hydrocarbon fuels, enabling carbon-free energy to be converted into high-energy-density fuels. Solar fuels, for example, may be produced at high-insolation low-cost locations from DAC-CO2 and electrolytic hydrogen using gas-to-liquids technology enabling decarbonization of difficult-to-electrify sectors such as aviation. And second, DAC with CO2 sequestration allows carbon removal. The feasibility of DAC has been disputed, in part, because publications have not provided sufficient engineering detail to allow independent evaluation of costs. We provide an engineering cost basis for a commercial DAC system for which all major components are either drawn from well-established commercial heritage or described in sufficient detail to allow assessment by third parties. This design reflects roughly 100 person-years of development by Carbon Engineering. First direct air capture paper for which all major components are either drawn from well-established commercial heritage or described in sufficient detail to allow assessment by third parties. Includes energy and materials balances, commercial engineering cost breakdown, and pilot plant data. When CO2 is delivered at 15 MPa, the design requires either 8.81 GJ of natural gas, or 5.25 GJ of gas and 366 kWhr of electricity, per ton of CO2 captured. Levelized cost per t-CO2 from atmosphere ranges from 94 to 232 $/t-CO2.</description><subject>Air capture</subject><subject>carbon storage</subject><subject>CCS</subject><subject>climate policy</subject><subject>cost assessment</subject><subject>DCA, carbon removal</subject><subject>direct air capture</subject><subject>ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION</subject><subject>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY</subject><subject>negative emissions</subject><subject>pilot plant data</subject><subject>process design</subject><subject>solar fuels</subject><issn>2542-4351</issn><issn>2542-4351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1rwzAQhkVpoSHNL-giuts5yZJsDR2C6RcE0qGdhSKdG5vECpJT6L-v3XToVG64G97n5XgIuWWQM2Bq2eVdOO0x58CqHGQOoC7IjEvBM1FIdvnnviaLlDoAYJpXXBUzslzR1xgcpkSbEGltj8Mptv0HrTecNjEc6LBDuhoOIR13GPGGXDV2n3Dxu-fk_fHhrX7O1punl3q1zpzgcsi4Z001jVa-4UpZ5QstrffCAnJo_BaqwjJQJd-C1dqXJZYC9FZbbZWtijm5O_eGNLQmuXZAt3Oh79ENhgnBQMgxVJxDLoaUIjbmGNuDjV-GgZncmM78uDGTGwPSjG5G6v5M4fj_Z4txqsfeoW_j1O5D-y__Dccda_g</recordid><startdate>20180815</startdate><enddate>20180815</enddate><creator>Keith, David W.</creator><creator>Holmes, Geoffrey</creator><creator>St. Angelo, David</creator><creator>Heidel, Kenton</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8224-3780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000282243780</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180815</creationdate><title>A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere</title><author>Keith, David W. ; Holmes, Geoffrey ; St. Angelo, David ; Heidel, Kenton</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-2d1f8f8f896df266a6d395add4a0e20fdb083a10672b0a99d77e7409b9a9a6a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Air capture</topic><topic>carbon storage</topic><topic>CCS</topic><topic>climate policy</topic><topic>cost assessment</topic><topic>DCA, carbon removal</topic><topic>direct air capture</topic><topic>ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION</topic><topic>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY</topic><topic>negative emissions</topic><topic>pilot plant data</topic><topic>process design</topic><topic>solar fuels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keith, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Angelo, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidel, Kenton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbon Engineering Ltd., Squamish, BC (Canada)</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Joule</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keith, David W.</au><au>Holmes, Geoffrey</au><au>St. Angelo, David</au><au>Heidel, Kenton</au><aucorp>Carbon Engineering Ltd., Squamish, BC (Canada)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere</atitle><jtitle>Joule</jtitle><date>2018-08-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1573</spage><epage>1594</epage><pages>1573-1594</pages><issn>2542-4351</issn><eissn>2542-4351</eissn><abstract>We describe a process for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere in an industrial plant. The design captures ∼1 Mt-CO2/year in a continuous process using an aqueous KOH sorbent coupled to a calcium caustic recovery loop. We describe the design rationale, summarize performance of the major unit operations, and provide a capital cost breakdown developed with an independent consulting engineering firm. We report results from a pilot plant that provides data on performance of the major unit operations. We summarize the energy and material balance computed using an Aspen process simulation. When CO2 is delivered at 15 MPa, the design requires either 8.81 GJ of natural gas, or 5.25 GJ of gas and 366 kWhr of electricity, per ton of CO2 captured. Depending on financial assumptions, energy costs, and the specific choice of inputs and outputs, the levelized cost per ton CO2 captured from the atmosphere ranges from 94 to 232 $/t-CO2. [Display omitted] •Detailed engineering and cost analysis for a 1 Mt-CO2/year direct air capture plant•Levelized costs of $94 to $232 per ton CO2 from the atmosphere•First DAC paper with commercial engineering cost breakdown•Full mass and energy balance with pilot plant data for each unit operation An industrial process for large-scale capture of atmospheric CO2 (DAC) serves two roles. First, as a source of CO2 for making carbon-neutral hydrocarbon fuels, enabling carbon-free energy to be converted into high-energy-density fuels. Solar fuels, for example, may be produced at high-insolation low-cost locations from DAC-CO2 and electrolytic hydrogen using gas-to-liquids technology enabling decarbonization of difficult-to-electrify sectors such as aviation. And second, DAC with CO2 sequestration allows carbon removal. The feasibility of DAC has been disputed, in part, because publications have not provided sufficient engineering detail to allow independent evaluation of costs. We provide an engineering cost basis for a commercial DAC system for which all major components are either drawn from well-established commercial heritage or described in sufficient detail to allow assessment by third parties. This design reflects roughly 100 person-years of development by Carbon Engineering. First direct air capture paper for which all major components are either drawn from well-established commercial heritage or described in sufficient detail to allow assessment by third parties. Includes energy and materials balances, commercial engineering cost breakdown, and pilot plant data. When CO2 is delivered at 15 MPa, the design requires either 8.81 GJ of natural gas, or 5.25 GJ of gas and 366 kWhr of electricity, per ton of CO2 captured. Levelized cost per t-CO2 from atmosphere ranges from 94 to 232 $/t-CO2.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8224-3780</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000282243780</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2542-4351
ispartof Joule, 2018-08, Vol.2 (8), p.1573-1594
issn 2542-4351
2542-4351
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1441045
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Air capture
carbon storage
CCS
climate policy
cost assessment
DCA, carbon removal
direct air capture
ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION
ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY
negative emissions
pilot plant data
process design
solar fuels
title A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T14%3A32%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Process%20for%20Capturing%20CO2%20from%20the%20Atmosphere&rft.jtitle=Joule&rft.au=Keith,%20David%20W.&rft.aucorp=Carbon%20Engineering%20Ltd.,%20Squamish,%20BC%20(Canada)&rft.date=2018-08-15&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1573&rft.epage=1594&rft.pages=1573-1594&rft.issn=2542-4351&rft.eissn=2542-4351&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_osti_%3ES2542435118302253%3C/elsevier_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S2542435118302253&rfr_iscdi=true