Monte Carlo reference data sets for imaging research: Executive summary of the report of AAPM Research Committee Task Group 195

The use of Monte Carlo simulations in diagnostic medical imaging research is widespread due to its flexibility and ability to estimate quantities that are challenging to measure empirically. However, any new Monte Carlo simulation code needs to be validated before it can be used reliably. The type a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2015-10, Vol.42 (10), p.5679-5691
Hauptverfasser: Sechopoulos, Ioannis, Ali, Elsayed S. M., Badal, Andreu, Badano, Aldo, Boone, John M., Kyprianou, Iacovos S., Mainegra‐Hing, Ernesto, McMillan, Kyle L., McNitt‐Gray, Michael F., Rogers, D. W. O., Samei, Ehsan, Turner, Adam C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5691
container_issue 10
container_start_page 5679
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 42
creator Sechopoulos, Ioannis
Ali, Elsayed S. M.
Badal, Andreu
Badano, Aldo
Boone, John M.
Kyprianou, Iacovos S.
Mainegra‐Hing, Ernesto
McMillan, Kyle L.
McNitt‐Gray, Michael F.
Rogers, D. W. O.
Samei, Ehsan
Turner, Adam C.
description The use of Monte Carlo simulations in diagnostic medical imaging research is widespread due to its flexibility and ability to estimate quantities that are challenging to measure empirically. However, any new Monte Carlo simulation code needs to be validated before it can be used reliably. The type and degree of validation required depends on the goals of the research project, but, typically, such validation involves either comparison of simulation results to physical measurements or to previously published results obtained with established Monte Carlo codes. The former is complicated due to nuances of experimental conditions and uncertainty, while the latter is challenging due to typical graphical presentation and lack of simulation details in previous publications. In addition, entering the field of Monte Carlo simulations in general involves a steep learning curve. It is not a simple task to learn how to program and interpret a Monte Carlo simulation, even when using one of the publicly available code packages. This Task Group report provides a common reference for benchmarking Monte Carlo simulations across a range of Monte Carlo codes and simulation scenarios. In the report, all simulation conditions are provided for six different Monte Carlo simulation cases that involve common x‐ray based imaging research areas. The results obtained for the six cases using four publicly available Monte Carlo software packages are included in tabular form. In addition to a full description of all simulation conditions and results, a discussion and comparison of results among the Monte Carlo packages and the lessons learned during the compilation of these results are included. This abridged version of the report includes only an introductory description of the six cases and a brief example of the results of one of the cases. This work provides an investigator the necessary information to benchmark his/her Monte Carlo simulation software against the reference cases included here before performing his/her own novel research. In addition, an investigator entering the field of Monte Carlo simulations can use these descriptions and results as a self‐teaching tool to ensure that he/she is able to perform a specific simulation correctly. Finally, educators can assign these cases as learning projects as part of course objectives or training programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4928676
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1401394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1718910067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3856-8772d88745c20c9f22508017f6a553223745ce694a1756d302bf611cb332da4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1PGzEQhi3UqqTQA3-gsnpqDwv-9rq3KKIUiQiE4Gw53lnisrsOtrctp_71bprQG6fRaJ55Du-L0Aklp5TS-oyeCsNqpdUBmjGheSUYMW_QjBAjKiaIPETvc_5BCFFcknfokCnBDBNshv4s41AAL1zqIk7QQoLBA25ccThDybiNCYfePYThYbpncMmvv-Lz3-DHEn4CzmPfu_SMY4vLGiZkE1PZbvP5zRLf7j_wIvZ9KAUA37n8iC9SHDeYGnmM3rauy_BhP4_Q_bfzu8X36ur64nIxv6o8r6Wqaq1ZU9daSM-INy1jktSE6lY5KTljfHsBZYSjWqqGE7ZqFaV-xTlrnPD8CH3aeWMuwWYfCvi1j8MAvlgqCOVGTNDnHbRJ8WmEXGwfsoeucwPEMVuqaW3olKKe0C871KeY8xSc3aSwDcJSYrelWGr3pUzsx712XPXQ_CdfWpiAagf8Ch08v26yy5t_wr9_R5G3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1718910067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monte Carlo reference data sets for imaging research: Executive summary of the report of AAPM Research Committee Task Group 195</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sechopoulos, Ioannis ; Ali, Elsayed S. M. ; Badal, Andreu ; Badano, Aldo ; Boone, John M. ; Kyprianou, Iacovos S. ; Mainegra‐Hing, Ernesto ; McMillan, Kyle L. ; McNitt‐Gray, Michael F. ; Rogers, D. W. O. ; Samei, Ehsan ; Turner, Adam C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sechopoulos, Ioannis ; Ali, Elsayed S. M. ; Badal, Andreu ; Badano, Aldo ; Boone, John M. ; Kyprianou, Iacovos S. ; Mainegra‐Hing, Ernesto ; McMillan, Kyle L. ; McNitt‐Gray, Michael F. ; Rogers, D. W. O. ; Samei, Ehsan ; Turner, Adam C.</creatorcontrib><description>The use of Monte Carlo simulations in diagnostic medical imaging research is widespread due to its flexibility and ability to estimate quantities that are challenging to measure empirically. However, any new Monte Carlo simulation code needs to be validated before it can be used reliably. The type and degree of validation required depends on the goals of the research project, but, typically, such validation involves either comparison of simulation results to physical measurements or to previously published results obtained with established Monte Carlo codes. The former is complicated due to nuances of experimental conditions and uncertainty, while the latter is challenging due to typical graphical presentation and lack of simulation details in previous publications. In addition, entering the field of Monte Carlo simulations in general involves a steep learning curve. It is not a simple task to learn how to program and interpret a Monte Carlo simulation, even when using one of the publicly available code packages. This Task Group report provides a common reference for benchmarking Monte Carlo simulations across a range of Monte Carlo codes and simulation scenarios. In the report, all simulation conditions are provided for six different Monte Carlo simulation cases that involve common x‐ray based imaging research areas. The results obtained for the six cases using four publicly available Monte Carlo software packages are included in tabular form. In addition to a full description of all simulation conditions and results, a discussion and comparison of results among the Monte Carlo packages and the lessons learned during the compilation of these results are included. This abridged version of the report includes only an introductory description of the six cases and a brief example of the results of one of the cases. This work provides an investigator the necessary information to benchmark his/her Monte Carlo simulation software against the reference cases included here before performing his/her own novel research. In addition, an investigator entering the field of Monte Carlo simulations can use these descriptions and results as a self‐teaching tool to ensure that he/she is able to perform a specific simulation correctly. Finally, educators can assign these cases as learning projects as part of course objectives or training programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4928676</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26429242</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers ; Breast ; Computed tomography ; Computerised tomographs ; computerised tomography ; diagnostic imaging ; diagnostic radiography ; Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications ; Digital tomosynthesis mammography ; EGSnrc ; geant4 ; Humans ; mammography ; mcnp ; medical computing ; Medical X‐ray imaging ; Monte Carlo Method ; Monte Carlo methods ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Monte Carlo simulations ; penelope ; Photons ; Radiography ; Reference Standards ; Research Report ; test cases ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; X‐ray imaging ; X‐ray scattering ; X‐ray spectra ; x‐rays</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2015-10, Vol.42 (10), p.5679-5691</ispartof><rights>2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3856-8772d88745c20c9f22508017f6a553223745ce694a1756d302bf611cb332da4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3856-8772d88745c20c9f22508017f6a553223745ce694a1756d302bf611cb332da4c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3712-6670 ; 0000000337126670</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.4928676$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4928676$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26429242$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1401394$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sechopoulos, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Elsayed S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badal, Andreu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badano, Aldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boone, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyprianou, Iacovos S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainegra‐Hing, Ernesto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMillan, Kyle L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNitt‐Gray, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, D. W. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samei, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Adam C.</creatorcontrib><title>Monte Carlo reference data sets for imaging research: Executive summary of the report of AAPM Research Committee Task Group 195</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>The use of Monte Carlo simulations in diagnostic medical imaging research is widespread due to its flexibility and ability to estimate quantities that are challenging to measure empirically. However, any new Monte Carlo simulation code needs to be validated before it can be used reliably. The type and degree of validation required depends on the goals of the research project, but, typically, such validation involves either comparison of simulation results to physical measurements or to previously published results obtained with established Monte Carlo codes. The former is complicated due to nuances of experimental conditions and uncertainty, while the latter is challenging due to typical graphical presentation and lack of simulation details in previous publications. In addition, entering the field of Monte Carlo simulations in general involves a steep learning curve. It is not a simple task to learn how to program and interpret a Monte Carlo simulation, even when using one of the publicly available code packages. This Task Group report provides a common reference for benchmarking Monte Carlo simulations across a range of Monte Carlo codes and simulation scenarios. In the report, all simulation conditions are provided for six different Monte Carlo simulation cases that involve common x‐ray based imaging research areas. The results obtained for the six cases using four publicly available Monte Carlo software packages are included in tabular form. In addition to a full description of all simulation conditions and results, a discussion and comparison of results among the Monte Carlo packages and the lessons learned during the compilation of these results are included. This abridged version of the report includes only an introductory description of the six cases and a brief example of the results of one of the cases. This work provides an investigator the necessary information to benchmark his/her Monte Carlo simulation software against the reference cases included here before performing his/her own novel research. In addition, an investigator entering the field of Monte Carlo simulations can use these descriptions and results as a self‐teaching tool to ensure that he/she is able to perform a specific simulation correctly. Finally, educators can assign these cases as learning projects as part of course objectives or training programs.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computerised tomographs</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>diagnostic radiography</subject><subject>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</subject><subject>Digital tomosynthesis mammography</subject><subject>EGSnrc</subject><subject>geant4</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>mammography</subject><subject>mcnp</subject><subject>medical computing</subject><subject>Medical X‐ray imaging</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Monte Carlo methods</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulations</subject><subject>penelope</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Research Report</subject><subject>test cases</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>X‐ray imaging</subject><subject>X‐ray scattering</subject><subject>X‐ray spectra</subject><subject>x‐rays</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1PGzEQhi3UqqTQA3-gsnpqDwv-9rq3KKIUiQiE4Gw53lnisrsOtrctp_71bprQG6fRaJ55Du-L0Aklp5TS-oyeCsNqpdUBmjGheSUYMW_QjBAjKiaIPETvc_5BCFFcknfokCnBDBNshv4s41AAL1zqIk7QQoLBA25ccThDybiNCYfePYThYbpncMmvv-Lz3-DHEn4CzmPfu_SMY4vLGiZkE1PZbvP5zRLf7j_wIvZ9KAUA37n8iC9SHDeYGnmM3rauy_BhP4_Q_bfzu8X36ur64nIxv6o8r6Wqaq1ZU9daSM-INy1jktSE6lY5KTljfHsBZYSjWqqGE7ZqFaV-xTlrnPD8CH3aeWMuwWYfCvi1j8MAvlgqCOVGTNDnHbRJ8WmEXGwfsoeucwPEMVuqaW3olKKe0C871KeY8xSc3aSwDcJSYrelWGr3pUzsx712XPXQ_CdfWpiAagf8Ch08v26yy5t_wr9_R5G3</recordid><startdate>201510</startdate><enddate>201510</enddate><creator>Sechopoulos, Ioannis</creator><creator>Ali, Elsayed S. M.</creator><creator>Badal, Andreu</creator><creator>Badano, Aldo</creator><creator>Boone, John M.</creator><creator>Kyprianou, Iacovos S.</creator><creator>Mainegra‐Hing, Ernesto</creator><creator>McMillan, Kyle L.</creator><creator>McNitt‐Gray, Michael F.</creator><creator>Rogers, D. W. O.</creator><creator>Samei, Ehsan</creator><creator>Turner, Adam C.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><general>Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley &amp; Sons)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3712-6670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000337126670</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201510</creationdate><title>Monte Carlo reference data sets for imaging research: Executive summary of the report of AAPM Research Committee Task Group 195</title><author>Sechopoulos, Ioannis ; Ali, Elsayed S. M. ; Badal, Andreu ; Badano, Aldo ; Boone, John M. ; Kyprianou, Iacovos S. ; Mainegra‐Hing, Ernesto ; McMillan, Kyle L. ; McNitt‐Gray, Michael F. ; Rogers, D. W. O. ; Samei, Ehsan ; Turner, Adam C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3856-8772d88745c20c9f22508017f6a553223745ce694a1756d302bf611cb332da4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computerised tomographs</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>diagnostic radiography</topic><topic>Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications</topic><topic>Digital tomosynthesis mammography</topic><topic>EGSnrc</topic><topic>geant4</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>mammography</topic><topic>mcnp</topic><topic>medical computing</topic><topic>Medical X‐ray imaging</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Monte Carlo methods</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulations</topic><topic>penelope</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Research Report</topic><topic>test cases</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>X‐ray imaging</topic><topic>X‐ray scattering</topic><topic>X‐ray spectra</topic><topic>x‐rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sechopoulos, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Elsayed S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badal, Andreu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badano, Aldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boone, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyprianou, Iacovos S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mainegra‐Hing, Ernesto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMillan, Kyle L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNitt‐Gray, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, D. W. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samei, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Adam C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sechopoulos, Ioannis</au><au>Ali, Elsayed S. M.</au><au>Badal, Andreu</au><au>Badano, Aldo</au><au>Boone, John M.</au><au>Kyprianou, Iacovos S.</au><au>Mainegra‐Hing, Ernesto</au><au>McMillan, Kyle L.</au><au>McNitt‐Gray, Michael F.</au><au>Rogers, D. W. O.</au><au>Samei, Ehsan</au><au>Turner, Adam C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monte Carlo reference data sets for imaging research: Executive summary of the report of AAPM Research Committee Task Group 195</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2015-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>5679</spage><epage>5691</epage><pages>5679-5691</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>The use of Monte Carlo simulations in diagnostic medical imaging research is widespread due to its flexibility and ability to estimate quantities that are challenging to measure empirically. However, any new Monte Carlo simulation code needs to be validated before it can be used reliably. The type and degree of validation required depends on the goals of the research project, but, typically, such validation involves either comparison of simulation results to physical measurements or to previously published results obtained with established Monte Carlo codes. The former is complicated due to nuances of experimental conditions and uncertainty, while the latter is challenging due to typical graphical presentation and lack of simulation details in previous publications. In addition, entering the field of Monte Carlo simulations in general involves a steep learning curve. It is not a simple task to learn how to program and interpret a Monte Carlo simulation, even when using one of the publicly available code packages. This Task Group report provides a common reference for benchmarking Monte Carlo simulations across a range of Monte Carlo codes and simulation scenarios. In the report, all simulation conditions are provided for six different Monte Carlo simulation cases that involve common x‐ray based imaging research areas. The results obtained for the six cases using four publicly available Monte Carlo software packages are included in tabular form. In addition to a full description of all simulation conditions and results, a discussion and comparison of results among the Monte Carlo packages and the lessons learned during the compilation of these results are included. This abridged version of the report includes only an introductory description of the six cases and a brief example of the results of one of the cases. This work provides an investigator the necessary information to benchmark his/her Monte Carlo simulation software against the reference cases included here before performing his/her own novel research. In addition, an investigator entering the field of Monte Carlo simulations can use these descriptions and results as a self‐teaching tool to ensure that he/she is able to perform a specific simulation correctly. Finally, educators can assign these cases as learning projects as part of course objectives or training programs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>26429242</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4928676</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3712-6670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000337126670</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2015-10, Vol.42 (10), p.5679-5691
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1401394
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Benchmarking
Biological material, e.g. blood, urine
Haemocytometers
Breast
Computed tomography
Computerised tomographs
computerised tomography
diagnostic imaging
diagnostic radiography
Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
Digital tomosynthesis mammography
EGSnrc
geant4
Humans
mammography
mcnp
medical computing
Medical X‐ray imaging
Monte Carlo Method
Monte Carlo methods
Monte Carlo simulation
Monte Carlo simulations
penelope
Photons
Radiography
Reference Standards
Research Report
test cases
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
X‐ray imaging
X‐ray scattering
X‐ray spectra
x‐rays
title Monte Carlo reference data sets for imaging research: Executive summary of the report of AAPM Research Committee Task Group 195
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T00%3A14%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monte%20Carlo%20reference%20data%20sets%20for%20imaging%20research:%20Executive%20summary%20of%20the%20report%20of%20AAPM%20Research%20Committee%20Task%20Group%20195&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Sechopoulos,%20Ioannis&rft.date=2015-10&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=5679&rft.epage=5691&rft.pages=5679-5691&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4928676&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1718910067%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1718910067&rft_id=info:pmid/26429242&rfr_iscdi=true