Annual Differences in Female Reproductive Success Affect Spatial and Cohort-Specific Genotypic Heterogeneity in Painted Turtles

Long-term ecological data were used to evaluate the relative importance of movements, breeding structure, and reproductive ecological factors to the degree of spatial and age-specific variation in genetic characteristics of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) on the E. S. George Reserve in southeaster...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evolution 1993-10, Vol.47 (5), p.1360-1373
Hauptverfasser: Scribner, Kim T., Congdon, Justin D., Chesser, Ronald K., Smith, Michael H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1373
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1360
container_title Evolution
container_volume 47
creator Scribner, Kim T.
Congdon, Justin D.
Chesser, Ronald K.
Smith, Michael H.
description Long-term ecological data were used to evaluate the relative importance of movements, breeding structure, and reproductive ecological factors to the degree of spatial and age-specific variation in genetic characteristics of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) on the E. S. George Reserve in southeastern Michigan. Estimates of the degree of spatial genetic structuring were based on the proportion of total genotypic variance partitioned within and between subpopulations (inferred from hierarchical F-statistics based on variation at 18 protein loci), and in terms of gene correlations (co-ancestry among individuals derived from reproductive data on full-sib families of females nesting at specific nesting areas). Little variation in allele frequency was observed among turtles from different marshes (Fmt = 0.003), though significant variation was observed among turtles from different nesting areas associated with each marsh (Fnm = 0.046). Gene correlations among individuals within nesting areas varied greatly over years (0.032-0.171; mean = 0.069) and were negatively correlated to the proportion of females that successfully nested during each year. General concordance between independent estimates of genotypic correlations (i.e., Fnm derived from protein electrophoretic variation vs. mean co-ancestry) suggests that allozyme data, when collected over spatial scales consistent with species behavioral characteristics and reproductive ecology, may accurately reflect the apportionment of gene diversity within and among subpopulations. The magnitude and patterning of allelic variation among nesting areas and individuals appears to be primarily a function of gametic correlations among members of full-sib families, irrespective of the degree of gene flow or female nesting-site fidelity. Comparisons of genetic characteristics among 11 cohorts (1974-1984) revealed that heterozygosity (H) and inbreeding coefficients (F) varied greatly. Cohort estimates of H and F were correlated to female nesting success and to estimates of co-ancestry for the same years. Results clearly reflect the concomitant importance of ecological factors (principally the proportion of the female population that successfully produce offspring during each year) in determining the magnitude and patterning of gene correlations within and among groups, and to the genotypic composition of offspring born during each year.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02160.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1401318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A16044546</galeid><jstor_id>2410153</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A16044546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5920-f331ad90f304a29439f72539149fea1c0b09fe587cd931a1fe30d1e763dd33b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkl1vFCEUhidGY2v1L5hJY4wXzsoBZnbolZvaD5MmNbZ6S1jm0LKZhRUY7V7512XcdetFYyKQcALP-YK3KA6BTCCPd4sJ1HVb1Q1vJiAEm6Q5odCQyd2jYn939bjYJwR4xVpK9opnMS4IIaIG8bTYo20mWtHuFz9nzg2qLz9YYzCg0xhL68pTXKoey8-4Cr4bdLLfsbwadL6N5SyTOpVXK5Vs9lSuK4_9rQ-pulqhtsbq8gydT-tVts4xYfA36NCm9Rj5k7IuYVdeDyH1GJ8XT4zqI77Y7gfFl9OT6-Pz6uLy7OPx7KLStaCkMoyB6gQxjHBFBWfCTGnNBHBhUIEmc5KNup3qTmQSDDLSAU4b1nWMzQk7KA43cX1MVkZtE-pb7Z3LrUjgBBi0GXqzgXLX3waMSS5t1Nj3yqEfogRBeF6U8oy-_jfaiAbqlt8n3oELPwSXe5WUTsd4zQi93UA3-dWldcanoPT4akH13qGx-XiWv5jzmjcZrx7A8-xwafVD_NGG18HHGNDIVbBLFdYSiBwlJRdy1I0cdSNHScmtpORddn65bWCYL7Hbuf7RUAZebQEVtepNUE7buOM4gGgbyNj7DfYjF7f-jwrkydfL3-Z9pkVMPvwdgjIylZQDgZqxX_V38sk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>227049064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Annual Differences in Female Reproductive Success Affect Spatial and Cohort-Specific Genotypic Heterogeneity in Painted Turtles</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Scribner, Kim T. ; Congdon, Justin D. ; Chesser, Ronald K. ; Smith, Michael H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Scribner, Kim T. ; Congdon, Justin D. ; Chesser, Ronald K. ; Smith, Michael H.</creatorcontrib><description>Long-term ecological data were used to evaluate the relative importance of movements, breeding structure, and reproductive ecological factors to the degree of spatial and age-specific variation in genetic characteristics of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) on the E. S. George Reserve in southeastern Michigan. Estimates of the degree of spatial genetic structuring were based on the proportion of total genotypic variance partitioned within and between subpopulations (inferred from hierarchical F-statistics based on variation at 18 protein loci), and in terms of gene correlations (co-ancestry among individuals derived from reproductive data on full-sib families of females nesting at specific nesting areas). Little variation in allele frequency was observed among turtles from different marshes (Fmt = 0.003), though significant variation was observed among turtles from different nesting areas associated with each marsh (Fnm = 0.046). Gene correlations among individuals within nesting areas varied greatly over years (0.032-0.171; mean = 0.069) and were negatively correlated to the proportion of females that successfully nested during each year. General concordance between independent estimates of genotypic correlations (i.e., Fnm derived from protein electrophoretic variation vs. mean co-ancestry) suggests that allozyme data, when collected over spatial scales consistent with species behavioral characteristics and reproductive ecology, may accurately reflect the apportionment of gene diversity within and among subpopulations. The magnitude and patterning of allelic variation among nesting areas and individuals appears to be primarily a function of gametic correlations among members of full-sib families, irrespective of the degree of gene flow or female nesting-site fidelity. Comparisons of genetic characteristics among 11 cohorts (1974-1984) revealed that heterozygosity (H) and inbreeding coefficients (F) varied greatly. Cohort estimates of H and F were correlated to female nesting success and to estimates of co-ancestry for the same years. Results clearly reflect the concomitant importance of ecological factors (principally the proportion of the female population that successfully produce offspring during each year) in determining the magnitude and patterning of gene correlations within and among groups, and to the genotypic composition of offspring born during each year.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-3820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02160.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28564898</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, MA: Society for the Study of Evolution</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animal reproduction ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breeding ; breeding structure ; Chrysemys ; Chrysemys picta ; Ecological genetics ; Evolutionary genetics ; Female animals ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gene correlations ; Genetic aspects ; genetic variance ; Genetic variation ; Genetics ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution ; heterozygosity ; Nesting tables ; Population ecology ; Population genetics ; Population genetics, reproduction patterns ; recruitment ; Reproductive success ; Reptiles &amp; amphibians ; Sexual behavior in animals ; Spatial behavior in animals ; Turtles ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Evolution, 1993-10, Vol.47 (5), p.1360-1373</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1993 The Society for the Study of Evolution</rights><rights>1993 The Society for the Study of Evolution</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>1993 The Society for the Study of Evolution.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1993 Society for the Study of Evolution</rights><rights>Copyright Society for the Study of Evolution Oct 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5920-f331ad90f304a29439f72539149fea1c0b09fe587cd931a1fe30d1e763dd33b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5920-f331ad90f304a29439f72539149fea1c0b09fe587cd931a1fe30d1e763dd33b03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2410153$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2410153$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4119861$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28564898$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1401318$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scribner, Kim T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Justin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesser, Ronald K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Michael H.</creatorcontrib><title>Annual Differences in Female Reproductive Success Affect Spatial and Cohort-Specific Genotypic Heterogeneity in Painted Turtles</title><title>Evolution</title><addtitle>Evolution</addtitle><description>Long-term ecological data were used to evaluate the relative importance of movements, breeding structure, and reproductive ecological factors to the degree of spatial and age-specific variation in genetic characteristics of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) on the E. S. George Reserve in southeastern Michigan. Estimates of the degree of spatial genetic structuring were based on the proportion of total genotypic variance partitioned within and between subpopulations (inferred from hierarchical F-statistics based on variation at 18 protein loci), and in terms of gene correlations (co-ancestry among individuals derived from reproductive data on full-sib families of females nesting at specific nesting areas). Little variation in allele frequency was observed among turtles from different marshes (Fmt = 0.003), though significant variation was observed among turtles from different nesting areas associated with each marsh (Fnm = 0.046). Gene correlations among individuals within nesting areas varied greatly over years (0.032-0.171; mean = 0.069) and were negatively correlated to the proportion of females that successfully nested during each year. General concordance between independent estimates of genotypic correlations (i.e., Fnm derived from protein electrophoretic variation vs. mean co-ancestry) suggests that allozyme data, when collected over spatial scales consistent with species behavioral characteristics and reproductive ecology, may accurately reflect the apportionment of gene diversity within and among subpopulations. The magnitude and patterning of allelic variation among nesting areas and individuals appears to be primarily a function of gametic correlations among members of full-sib families, irrespective of the degree of gene flow or female nesting-site fidelity. Comparisons of genetic characteristics among 11 cohorts (1974-1984) revealed that heterozygosity (H) and inbreeding coefficients (F) varied greatly. Cohort estimates of H and F were correlated to female nesting success and to estimates of co-ancestry for the same years. Results clearly reflect the concomitant importance of ecological factors (principally the proportion of the female population that successfully produce offspring during each year) in determining the magnitude and patterning of gene correlations within and among groups, and to the genotypic composition of offspring born during each year.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>breeding structure</subject><subject>Chrysemys</subject><subject>Chrysemys picta</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gene correlations</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>genetic variance</subject><subject>Genetic variation</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><subject>heterozygosity</subject><subject>Nesting tables</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Population genetics, reproduction patterns</subject><subject>recruitment</subject><subject>Reproductive success</subject><subject>Reptiles &amp; amphibians</subject><subject>Sexual behavior in animals</subject><subject>Spatial behavior in animals</subject><subject>Turtles</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0014-3820</issn><issn>1558-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkl1vFCEUhidGY2v1L5hJY4wXzsoBZnbolZvaD5MmNbZ6S1jm0LKZhRUY7V7512XcdetFYyKQcALP-YK3KA6BTCCPd4sJ1HVb1Q1vJiAEm6Q5odCQyd2jYn939bjYJwR4xVpK9opnMS4IIaIG8bTYo20mWtHuFz9nzg2qLz9YYzCg0xhL68pTXKoey8-4Cr4bdLLfsbwadL6N5SyTOpVXK5Vs9lSuK4_9rQ-pulqhtsbq8gydT-tVts4xYfA36NCm9Rj5k7IuYVdeDyH1GJ8XT4zqI77Y7gfFl9OT6-Pz6uLy7OPx7KLStaCkMoyB6gQxjHBFBWfCTGnNBHBhUIEmc5KNup3qTmQSDDLSAU4b1nWMzQk7KA43cX1MVkZtE-pb7Z3LrUjgBBi0GXqzgXLX3waMSS5t1Nj3yqEfogRBeF6U8oy-_jfaiAbqlt8n3oELPwSXe5WUTsd4zQi93UA3-dWldcanoPT4akH13qGx-XiWv5jzmjcZrx7A8-xwafVD_NGG18HHGNDIVbBLFdYSiBwlJRdy1I0cdSNHScmtpORddn65bWCYL7Hbuf7RUAZebQEVtepNUE7buOM4gGgbyNj7DfYjF7f-jwrkydfL3-Z9pkVMPvwdgjIylZQDgZqxX_V38sk</recordid><startdate>199310</startdate><enddate>199310</enddate><creator>Scribner, Kim T.</creator><creator>Congdon, Justin D.</creator><creator>Chesser, Ronald K.</creator><creator>Smith, Michael H.</creator><general>Society for the Study of Evolution</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199310</creationdate><title>Annual Differences in Female Reproductive Success Affect Spatial and Cohort-Specific Genotypic Heterogeneity in Painted Turtles</title><author>Scribner, Kim T. ; Congdon, Justin D. ; Chesser, Ronald K. ; Smith, Michael H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5920-f331ad90f304a29439f72539149fea1c0b09fe587cd931a1fe30d1e763dd33b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>breeding structure</topic><topic>Chrysemys</topic><topic>Chrysemys picta</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gene correlations</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>genetic variance</topic><topic>Genetic variation</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><topic>heterozygosity</topic><topic>Nesting tables</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Population genetics, reproduction patterns</topic><topic>recruitment</topic><topic>Reproductive success</topic><topic>Reptiles &amp; amphibians</topic><topic>Sexual behavior in animals</topic><topic>Spatial behavior in animals</topic><topic>Turtles</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scribner, Kim T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Justin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chesser, Ronald K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Michael H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scribner, Kim T.</au><au>Congdon, Justin D.</au><au>Chesser, Ronald K.</au><au>Smith, Michael H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Annual Differences in Female Reproductive Success Affect Spatial and Cohort-Specific Genotypic Heterogeneity in Painted Turtles</atitle><jtitle>Evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Evolution</addtitle><date>1993-10</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1360</spage><epage>1373</epage><pages>1360-1373</pages><issn>0014-3820</issn><eissn>1558-5646</eissn><abstract>Long-term ecological data were used to evaluate the relative importance of movements, breeding structure, and reproductive ecological factors to the degree of spatial and age-specific variation in genetic characteristics of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) on the E. S. George Reserve in southeastern Michigan. Estimates of the degree of spatial genetic structuring were based on the proportion of total genotypic variance partitioned within and between subpopulations (inferred from hierarchical F-statistics based on variation at 18 protein loci), and in terms of gene correlations (co-ancestry among individuals derived from reproductive data on full-sib families of females nesting at specific nesting areas). Little variation in allele frequency was observed among turtles from different marshes (Fmt = 0.003), though significant variation was observed among turtles from different nesting areas associated with each marsh (Fnm = 0.046). Gene correlations among individuals within nesting areas varied greatly over years (0.032-0.171; mean = 0.069) and were negatively correlated to the proportion of females that successfully nested during each year. General concordance between independent estimates of genotypic correlations (i.e., Fnm derived from protein electrophoretic variation vs. mean co-ancestry) suggests that allozyme data, when collected over spatial scales consistent with species behavioral characteristics and reproductive ecology, may accurately reflect the apportionment of gene diversity within and among subpopulations. The magnitude and patterning of allelic variation among nesting areas and individuals appears to be primarily a function of gametic correlations among members of full-sib families, irrespective of the degree of gene flow or female nesting-site fidelity. Comparisons of genetic characteristics among 11 cohorts (1974-1984) revealed that heterozygosity (H) and inbreeding coefficients (F) varied greatly. Cohort estimates of H and F were correlated to female nesting success and to estimates of co-ancestry for the same years. Results clearly reflect the concomitant importance of ecological factors (principally the proportion of the female population that successfully produce offspring during each year) in determining the magnitude and patterning of gene correlations within and among groups, and to the genotypic composition of offspring born during each year.</abstract><cop>Malden, MA</cop><pub>Society for the Study of Evolution</pub><pmid>28564898</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02160.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-3820
ispartof Evolution, 1993-10, Vol.47 (5), p.1360-1373
issn 0014-3820
1558-5646
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1401318
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis
Animal reproduction
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Breeding
breeding structure
Chrysemys
Chrysemys picta
Ecological genetics
Evolutionary genetics
Female animals
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
gene correlations
Genetic aspects
genetic variance
Genetic variation
Genetics
Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution
heterozygosity
Nesting tables
Population ecology
Population genetics
Population genetics, reproduction patterns
recruitment
Reproductive success
Reptiles & amphibians
Sexual behavior in animals
Spatial behavior in animals
Turtles
Vertebrata
title Annual Differences in Female Reproductive Success Affect Spatial and Cohort-Specific Genotypic Heterogeneity in Painted Turtles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A25%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Annual%20Differences%20in%20Female%20Reproductive%20Success%20Affect%20Spatial%20and%20Cohort-Specific%20Genotypic%20Heterogeneity%20in%20Painted%20Turtles&rft.jtitle=Evolution&rft.au=Scribner,%20Kim%20T.&rft.date=1993-10&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1360&rft.epage=1373&rft.pages=1360-1373&rft.issn=0014-3820&rft.eissn=1558-5646&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02160.x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_osti_%3EA16044546%3C/gale_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227049064&rft_id=info:pmid/28564898&rft_galeid=A16044546&rft_jstor_id=2410153&rfr_iscdi=true