Methodology for energy strategy to prescreen the feasibility of Ground Source Heat Pump systems in residential and commercial buildings in the United States

Geothermal resources have potential to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. The viability of geothermal heat pumps or ground source heat pumps (GSHPs) is significant as a potential alternative energy source with substantial savings potential. While the prospect of these systems is promising for energy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy strategy reviews 2017-12, Vol.18 (C), p.53-62
Hauptverfasser: Cho, Soolyeon, Ray, Saurabh, Im, Piljae, Honari, Hamed, Ahn, Jonghoon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 62
container_issue C
container_start_page 53
container_title Energy strategy reviews
container_volume 18
creator Cho, Soolyeon
Ray, Saurabh
Im, Piljae
Honari, Hamed
Ahn, Jonghoon
description Geothermal resources have potential to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. The viability of geothermal heat pumps or ground source heat pumps (GSHPs) is significant as a potential alternative energy source with substantial savings potential. While the prospect of these systems is promising for energy efficiency, careful feasibility analysis is required before implementation. This paper presents the results of evaluation of the application feasibility for GSHPs in buildings across seven climate zones in three United States regions. A comprehensive methodology is developed to measure the integrated feasibility of GSHPs using compiled data for energy use intensity, energy cost and design parameters. Four different feasibility metrics are utilized: ground temperature, outdoor weather condition, energy savings potential, and cost benefits. For each metric, a corresponding feasibility score system is developed. The defined integrated feasibility score classifies the locations into five different feasibility levels ranging from Fair (0–20), Moderate (21–40), Good (41–60), High (61–80), and Very High (81–100). Conclusions show the GSHP feasibility level is High for 3 sites, Good for 8 sites and Moderate for 4 sites. Through the methodology, it is possible to develop a practical energy strategy for more economic and sustainable GSHP systems at an early design stage in the various viewpoints of geometries, climate conditions, operational factors, and energy costs. •Methodology for energy strategy is developed to prescreen the feasibility of GSHP systems in buildings in the US.•Potential of GSHP systems for energy and cost savings over conventional ASHP systems is calculated.•GSHP feasibility is examined by the analysis of given and built environments for all major climate regions.•Results indicates that GSHP feasibility level is High for 3 sites, Good for 8 sites and Moderate for 4 sites.•Methodology contributes to energy strategy for more economic GSHP systems at an early design stage.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.esr.2017.09.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1399117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2211467X17300536</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2211467X17300536</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-10fa7d93ed5acc0218eccf39d143109109d06c0ff4cc219305d4909d573505f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1KAzEUhQdRUNQHcBfcd8ydn47BlRRtBUVBBXch3tzYlJmkJKnQd_FhzVgXrgyBnIRzvlw4RXEGvAQO04tVSTGUFYeu5KLkUO0VR1UFMGmm3dv-H31YnMa44nlNW-h4fVR8PVBaeu17_7FlxgdGjkKWMQWVKIvk2TpQxEDkWFoSM6Sifbe9TVvmDZsHv3GaPftNQGILUok9bYY1i9uYaIjMOpbjVpNLVvVMZS_6YaCA4_V9Y3tt3cePb6S_Opso41L-PZ4UB0b1kU5_z-Pi9fbmZbaY3D_O72bX9xNsqjZNgBvVaVGTbhUir-CSEE0tNDQ1cJG35lPkxjSIFYiat7oR-bHt6pa3pqmPi_Md18dkZcQ8Ai7RO0eYJNRCAHTZBDsTBh9jICPXwQ4qbCVwOdYgVzLXIMcaJBcy15AzV7sM5ek_LYURTg5J2zCytbf_pL8BGzuTJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methodology for energy strategy to prescreen the feasibility of Ground Source Heat Pump systems in residential and commercial buildings in the United States</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cho, Soolyeon ; Ray, Saurabh ; Im, Piljae ; Honari, Hamed ; Ahn, Jonghoon</creator><creatorcontrib>Cho, Soolyeon ; Ray, Saurabh ; Im, Piljae ; Honari, Hamed ; Ahn, Jonghoon ; Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Geothermal resources have potential to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. The viability of geothermal heat pumps or ground source heat pumps (GSHPs) is significant as a potential alternative energy source with substantial savings potential. While the prospect of these systems is promising for energy efficiency, careful feasibility analysis is required before implementation. This paper presents the results of evaluation of the application feasibility for GSHPs in buildings across seven climate zones in three United States regions. A comprehensive methodology is developed to measure the integrated feasibility of GSHPs using compiled data for energy use intensity, energy cost and design parameters. Four different feasibility metrics are utilized: ground temperature, outdoor weather condition, energy savings potential, and cost benefits. For each metric, a corresponding feasibility score system is developed. The defined integrated feasibility score classifies the locations into five different feasibility levels ranging from Fair (0–20), Moderate (21–40), Good (41–60), High (61–80), and Very High (81–100). Conclusions show the GSHP feasibility level is High for 3 sites, Good for 8 sites and Moderate for 4 sites. Through the methodology, it is possible to develop a practical energy strategy for more economic and sustainable GSHP systems at an early design stage in the various viewpoints of geometries, climate conditions, operational factors, and energy costs. •Methodology for energy strategy is developed to prescreen the feasibility of GSHP systems in buildings in the US.•Potential of GSHP systems for energy and cost savings over conventional ASHP systems is calculated.•GSHP feasibility is examined by the analysis of given and built environments for all major climate regions.•Results indicates that GSHP feasibility level is High for 3 sites, Good for 8 sites and Moderate for 4 sites.•Methodology contributes to energy strategy for more economic GSHP systems at an early design stage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2211-467X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2211-467X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2017.09.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION ; Energy Strategy ; Energy Use Intensity ; Ground Source Heat Pump ; Integrated Feasibility Score ; Residential and Commercial Buildings</subject><ispartof>Energy strategy reviews, 2017-12, Vol.18 (C), p.53-62</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-10fa7d93ed5acc0218eccf39d143109109d06c0ff4cc219305d4909d573505f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-10fa7d93ed5acc0218eccf39d143109109d06c0ff4cc219305d4909d573505f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3113-0652 ; 0000000331130652 ; 0000000295242402</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1399117$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cho, Soolyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Saurabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Im, Piljae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honari, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jonghoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Methodology for energy strategy to prescreen the feasibility of Ground Source Heat Pump systems in residential and commercial buildings in the United States</title><title>Energy strategy reviews</title><description>Geothermal resources have potential to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. The viability of geothermal heat pumps or ground source heat pumps (GSHPs) is significant as a potential alternative energy source with substantial savings potential. While the prospect of these systems is promising for energy efficiency, careful feasibility analysis is required before implementation. This paper presents the results of evaluation of the application feasibility for GSHPs in buildings across seven climate zones in three United States regions. A comprehensive methodology is developed to measure the integrated feasibility of GSHPs using compiled data for energy use intensity, energy cost and design parameters. Four different feasibility metrics are utilized: ground temperature, outdoor weather condition, energy savings potential, and cost benefits. For each metric, a corresponding feasibility score system is developed. The defined integrated feasibility score classifies the locations into five different feasibility levels ranging from Fair (0–20), Moderate (21–40), Good (41–60), High (61–80), and Very High (81–100). Conclusions show the GSHP feasibility level is High for 3 sites, Good for 8 sites and Moderate for 4 sites. Through the methodology, it is possible to develop a practical energy strategy for more economic and sustainable GSHP systems at an early design stage in the various viewpoints of geometries, climate conditions, operational factors, and energy costs. •Methodology for energy strategy is developed to prescreen the feasibility of GSHP systems in buildings in the US.•Potential of GSHP systems for energy and cost savings over conventional ASHP systems is calculated.•GSHP feasibility is examined by the analysis of given and built environments for all major climate regions.•Results indicates that GSHP feasibility level is High for 3 sites, Good for 8 sites and Moderate for 4 sites.•Methodology contributes to energy strategy for more economic GSHP systems at an early design stage.</description><subject>ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION</subject><subject>Energy Strategy</subject><subject>Energy Use Intensity</subject><subject>Ground Source Heat Pump</subject><subject>Integrated Feasibility Score</subject><subject>Residential and Commercial Buildings</subject><issn>2211-467X</issn><issn>2211-467X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1KAzEUhQdRUNQHcBfcd8ydn47BlRRtBUVBBXch3tzYlJmkJKnQd_FhzVgXrgyBnIRzvlw4RXEGvAQO04tVSTGUFYeu5KLkUO0VR1UFMGmm3dv-H31YnMa44nlNW-h4fVR8PVBaeu17_7FlxgdGjkKWMQWVKIvk2TpQxEDkWFoSM6Sifbe9TVvmDZsHv3GaPftNQGILUok9bYY1i9uYaIjMOpbjVpNLVvVMZS_6YaCA4_V9Y3tt3cePb6S_Opso41L-PZ4UB0b1kU5_z-Pi9fbmZbaY3D_O72bX9xNsqjZNgBvVaVGTbhUir-CSEE0tNDQ1cJG35lPkxjSIFYiat7oR-bHt6pa3pqmPi_Md18dkZcQ8Ai7RO0eYJNRCAHTZBDsTBh9jICPXwQ4qbCVwOdYgVzLXIMcaJBcy15AzV7sM5ek_LYURTg5J2zCytbf_pL8BGzuTJg</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Cho, Soolyeon</creator><creator>Ray, Saurabh</creator><creator>Im, Piljae</creator><creator>Honari, Hamed</creator><creator>Ahn, Jonghoon</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3113-0652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000331130652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000295242402</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Methodology for energy strategy to prescreen the feasibility of Ground Source Heat Pump systems in residential and commercial buildings in the United States</title><author>Cho, Soolyeon ; Ray, Saurabh ; Im, Piljae ; Honari, Hamed ; Ahn, Jonghoon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-10fa7d93ed5acc0218eccf39d143109109d06c0ff4cc219305d4909d573505f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION</topic><topic>Energy Strategy</topic><topic>Energy Use Intensity</topic><topic>Ground Source Heat Pump</topic><topic>Integrated Feasibility Score</topic><topic>Residential and Commercial Buildings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cho, Soolyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Saurabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Im, Piljae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honari, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jonghoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Energy strategy reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cho, Soolyeon</au><au>Ray, Saurabh</au><au>Im, Piljae</au><au>Honari, Hamed</au><au>Ahn, Jonghoon</au><aucorp>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methodology for energy strategy to prescreen the feasibility of Ground Source Heat Pump systems in residential and commercial buildings in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Energy strategy reviews</jtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>C</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>53-62</pages><issn>2211-467X</issn><eissn>2211-467X</eissn><abstract>Geothermal resources have potential to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. The viability of geothermal heat pumps or ground source heat pumps (GSHPs) is significant as a potential alternative energy source with substantial savings potential. While the prospect of these systems is promising for energy efficiency, careful feasibility analysis is required before implementation. This paper presents the results of evaluation of the application feasibility for GSHPs in buildings across seven climate zones in three United States regions. A comprehensive methodology is developed to measure the integrated feasibility of GSHPs using compiled data for energy use intensity, energy cost and design parameters. Four different feasibility metrics are utilized: ground temperature, outdoor weather condition, energy savings potential, and cost benefits. For each metric, a corresponding feasibility score system is developed. The defined integrated feasibility score classifies the locations into five different feasibility levels ranging from Fair (0–20), Moderate (21–40), Good (41–60), High (61–80), and Very High (81–100). Conclusions show the GSHP feasibility level is High for 3 sites, Good for 8 sites and Moderate for 4 sites. Through the methodology, it is possible to develop a practical energy strategy for more economic and sustainable GSHP systems at an early design stage in the various viewpoints of geometries, climate conditions, operational factors, and energy costs. •Methodology for energy strategy is developed to prescreen the feasibility of GSHP systems in buildings in the US.•Potential of GSHP systems for energy and cost savings over conventional ASHP systems is calculated.•GSHP feasibility is examined by the analysis of given and built environments for all major climate regions.•Results indicates that GSHP feasibility level is High for 3 sites, Good for 8 sites and Moderate for 4 sites.•Methodology contributes to energy strategy for more economic GSHP systems at an early design stage.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.esr.2017.09.012</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3113-0652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000331130652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000295242402</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2211-467X
ispartof Energy strategy reviews, 2017-12, Vol.18 (C), p.53-62
issn 2211-467X
2211-467X
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1399117
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION
Energy Strategy
Energy Use Intensity
Ground Source Heat Pump
Integrated Feasibility Score
Residential and Commercial Buildings
title Methodology for energy strategy to prescreen the feasibility of Ground Source Heat Pump systems in residential and commercial buildings in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T07%3A30%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methodology%20for%20energy%20strategy%20to%20prescreen%20the%20feasibility%20of%20Ground%20Source%20Heat%20Pump%20systems%20in%20residential%20and%20commercial%20buildings%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Energy%20strategy%20reviews&rft.au=Cho,%20Soolyeon&rft.aucorp=Oak%20Ridge%20National%20Lab.%20(ORNL),%20Oak%20Ridge,%20TN%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=C&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=53-62&rft.issn=2211-467X&rft.eissn=2211-467X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.esr.2017.09.012&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_osti_%3ES2211467X17300536%3C/elsevier_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S2211467X17300536&rfr_iscdi=true