Infrared measurement of the temperature at the tool–chip interface while machining Ti–6Al–4V

The challenges associated with machining titanium alloys (e.g., Ti–6Al–4V) are directly related to high cutting tool temperatures due to the low thermal conductivity of these alloys and the heat generated in the primary shear zone and at the tool–chip interface. Transparent yittrium aluminum garnet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of materials processing technology 2017-05, Vol.243 (C), p.123-130
Hauptverfasser: Heigel, J.C., Whitenton, E., Lane, B., Donmez, M.A., Madhavan, V., Moscoso-Kingsley, W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 130
container_issue C
container_start_page 123
container_title Journal of materials processing technology
container_volume 243
creator Heigel, J.C.
Whitenton, E.
Lane, B.
Donmez, M.A.
Madhavan, V.
Moscoso-Kingsley, W.
description The challenges associated with machining titanium alloys (e.g., Ti–6Al–4V) are directly related to high cutting tool temperatures due to the low thermal conductivity of these alloys and the heat generated in the primary shear zone and at the tool–chip interface. Transparent yittrium aluminum garnet (YAG) tools are used in the current study to orthogonally machine a Ti–6Al–4V disk. Although YAG tools are not industrially relevant, they permit the temperature on the tool–chip interface to be measured. These measurements are relevant because they can be used to validate cutting models, which are in-turn used by industry to improve cutting processes. An infrared camera, using a high frame rate (700Hz) and a large field of view (20mm2), observes the tool–chip interface through these tools and measures the temperature distribution and records the chip curl and breakage while cutting with a feed rate of 50μm/rev and cutting speeds between 20m/min and 100m/min. In addition to the temperature measurements, cutting forces are recorded and the chip formation is documented using a high-speed (3kHz) visible-light camera. Results show that radiant temperature increases with speed while the cutting and thrust forces show no significant trend. Analysis of the temperature distribution from one edge of the chip to the other reveals differences from 6 % to 21 %, indicating that caution must be used when performing thermographic measurements of chip temperatures from the side of the cutting zone. Finally, post process measurements are performed using a scanning white-light interferometer to investigate any correlation between the tool condition and cutting temperature. Although the qualitative analysis of some cases appears to reveal a correlation between the condition of the YAG tool and the measured temperature distribution, further work work is required to understand this relationship.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.11.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1397468</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0924013616304125</els_id><sourcerecordid>1937403646</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-e643e82510331d349eee162f77adb3ef826e514f228faa01e580601b6d6f87d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1uFDEQRi0EEkPIHSxYd-OyPbZnGSJ-IkVik2RredzljFvT9uD2gNjlDrkhJ8GtRmLJqqRPr0pfPUIosB4YqA9jP06unkqu6Hvekh6gZ1y9IBswWnRSa_mSbNiOy46BUK_Jm3keGQPNjNmQ_U0KxRUc6IRuPhecMFWaA60HpBWnExZXW0xdXaOcj7-fnv0hnmhMFUtwHunPQzwinVyLU0yP9C42Rl0tpHx4S14Fd5zx8u-8IPefP91df-1uv325ub667bzkonaopEDDt8CEgEHIHSKC4kFrN-wFBsMVbkEGzk1wjgFuDVMM9mpQwehhKy7Iu_Vunmu0s4_NyMHnlNBXC2KnpTINer9Czdj3M87VjvlcUutlYSe0ZEJJ1SizUr7keS4Y7KnEyZVfFphdtNvR_tNuF-0WwDbtbfXjuort1R8Ry9IEk8chlqXIkOP_j_wBQQiTPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1937403646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Infrared measurement of the temperature at the tool–chip interface while machining Ti–6Al–4V</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Heigel, J.C. ; Whitenton, E. ; Lane, B. ; Donmez, M.A. ; Madhavan, V. ; Moscoso-Kingsley, W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Heigel, J.C. ; Whitenton, E. ; Lane, B. ; Donmez, M.A. ; Madhavan, V. ; Moscoso-Kingsley, W.</creatorcontrib><description>The challenges associated with machining titanium alloys (e.g., Ti–6Al–4V) are directly related to high cutting tool temperatures due to the low thermal conductivity of these alloys and the heat generated in the primary shear zone and at the tool–chip interface. Transparent yittrium aluminum garnet (YAG) tools are used in the current study to orthogonally machine a Ti–6Al–4V disk. Although YAG tools are not industrially relevant, they permit the temperature on the tool–chip interface to be measured. These measurements are relevant because they can be used to validate cutting models, which are in-turn used by industry to improve cutting processes. An infrared camera, using a high frame rate (700Hz) and a large field of view (20mm2), observes the tool–chip interface through these tools and measures the temperature distribution and records the chip curl and breakage while cutting with a feed rate of 50μm/rev and cutting speeds between 20m/min and 100m/min. In addition to the temperature measurements, cutting forces are recorded and the chip formation is documented using a high-speed (3kHz) visible-light camera. Results show that radiant temperature increases with speed while the cutting and thrust forces show no significant trend. Analysis of the temperature distribution from one edge of the chip to the other reveals differences from 6 % to 21 %, indicating that caution must be used when performing thermographic measurements of chip temperatures from the side of the cutting zone. Finally, post process measurements are performed using a scanning white-light interferometer to investigate any correlation between the tool condition and cutting temperature. Although the qualitative analysis of some cases appears to reveal a correlation between the condition of the YAG tool and the measured temperature distribution, further work work is required to understand this relationship.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-0136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4774</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.11.026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Breakage ; Chip formation ; Cutting speed ; Cutting tools ; Feed rate ; Field of view ; Heat conductivity ; Heat transfer ; Infrared cameras ; Infrared temperature measurement ; Machining ; Metal cutting ; Model validation ; Qualitative analysis ; Shear zone ; Stress concentration ; Temperature distribution ; Thermal conductivity ; Thermography ; Titanium ; Titanium alloys ; Titanium base alloys ; Tool wear ; Transparent tool ; White light</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials processing technology, 2017-05, Vol.243 (C), p.123-130</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV May 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-e643e82510331d349eee162f77adb3ef826e514f228faa01e580601b6d6f87d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-e643e82510331d349eee162f77adb3ef826e514f228faa01e580601b6d6f87d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924013616304125$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1397468$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heigel, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitenton, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donmez, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madhavan, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moscoso-Kingsley, W.</creatorcontrib><title>Infrared measurement of the temperature at the tool–chip interface while machining Ti–6Al–4V</title><title>Journal of materials processing technology</title><description>The challenges associated with machining titanium alloys (e.g., Ti–6Al–4V) are directly related to high cutting tool temperatures due to the low thermal conductivity of these alloys and the heat generated in the primary shear zone and at the tool–chip interface. Transparent yittrium aluminum garnet (YAG) tools are used in the current study to orthogonally machine a Ti–6Al–4V disk. Although YAG tools are not industrially relevant, they permit the temperature on the tool–chip interface to be measured. These measurements are relevant because they can be used to validate cutting models, which are in-turn used by industry to improve cutting processes. An infrared camera, using a high frame rate (700Hz) and a large field of view (20mm2), observes the tool–chip interface through these tools and measures the temperature distribution and records the chip curl and breakage while cutting with a feed rate of 50μm/rev and cutting speeds between 20m/min and 100m/min. In addition to the temperature measurements, cutting forces are recorded and the chip formation is documented using a high-speed (3kHz) visible-light camera. Results show that radiant temperature increases with speed while the cutting and thrust forces show no significant trend. Analysis of the temperature distribution from one edge of the chip to the other reveals differences from 6 % to 21 %, indicating that caution must be used when performing thermographic measurements of chip temperatures from the side of the cutting zone. Finally, post process measurements are performed using a scanning white-light interferometer to investigate any correlation between the tool condition and cutting temperature. Although the qualitative analysis of some cases appears to reveal a correlation between the condition of the YAG tool and the measured temperature distribution, further work work is required to understand this relationship.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Breakage</subject><subject>Chip formation</subject><subject>Cutting speed</subject><subject>Cutting tools</subject><subject>Feed rate</subject><subject>Field of view</subject><subject>Heat conductivity</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Infrared cameras</subject><subject>Infrared temperature measurement</subject><subject>Machining</subject><subject>Metal cutting</subject><subject>Model validation</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Shear zone</subject><subject>Stress concentration</subject><subject>Temperature distribution</subject><subject>Thermal conductivity</subject><subject>Thermography</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Titanium alloys</subject><subject>Titanium base alloys</subject><subject>Tool wear</subject><subject>Transparent tool</subject><subject>White light</subject><issn>0924-0136</issn><issn>1873-4774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1uFDEQRi0EEkPIHSxYd-OyPbZnGSJ-IkVik2RredzljFvT9uD2gNjlDrkhJ8GtRmLJqqRPr0pfPUIosB4YqA9jP06unkqu6Hvekh6gZ1y9IBswWnRSa_mSbNiOy46BUK_Jm3keGQPNjNmQ_U0KxRUc6IRuPhecMFWaA60HpBWnExZXW0xdXaOcj7-fnv0hnmhMFUtwHunPQzwinVyLU0yP9C42Rl0tpHx4S14Fd5zx8u-8IPefP91df-1uv325ub667bzkonaopEDDt8CEgEHIHSKC4kFrN-wFBsMVbkEGzk1wjgFuDVMM9mpQwehhKy7Iu_Vunmu0s4_NyMHnlNBXC2KnpTINer9Czdj3M87VjvlcUutlYSe0ZEJJ1SizUr7keS4Y7KnEyZVfFphdtNvR_tNuF-0WwDbtbfXjuort1R8Ry9IEk8chlqXIkOP_j_wBQQiTPw</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Heigel, J.C.</creator><creator>Whitenton, E.</creator><creator>Lane, B.</creator><creator>Donmez, M.A.</creator><creator>Madhavan, V.</creator><creator>Moscoso-Kingsley, W.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Infrared measurement of the temperature at the tool–chip interface while machining Ti–6Al–4V</title><author>Heigel, J.C. ; Whitenton, E. ; Lane, B. ; Donmez, M.A. ; Madhavan, V. ; Moscoso-Kingsley, W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-e643e82510331d349eee162f77adb3ef826e514f228faa01e580601b6d6f87d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Breakage</topic><topic>Chip formation</topic><topic>Cutting speed</topic><topic>Cutting tools</topic><topic>Feed rate</topic><topic>Field of view</topic><topic>Heat conductivity</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Infrared cameras</topic><topic>Infrared temperature measurement</topic><topic>Machining</topic><topic>Metal cutting</topic><topic>Model validation</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Shear zone</topic><topic>Stress concentration</topic><topic>Temperature distribution</topic><topic>Thermal conductivity</topic><topic>Thermography</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Titanium alloys</topic><topic>Titanium base alloys</topic><topic>Tool wear</topic><topic>Transparent tool</topic><topic>White light</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heigel, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitenton, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donmez, M.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madhavan, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moscoso-Kingsley, W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials processing technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heigel, J.C.</au><au>Whitenton, E.</au><au>Lane, B.</au><au>Donmez, M.A.</au><au>Madhavan, V.</au><au>Moscoso-Kingsley, W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Infrared measurement of the temperature at the tool–chip interface while machining Ti–6Al–4V</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials processing technology</jtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>243</volume><issue>C</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>123-130</pages><issn>0924-0136</issn><eissn>1873-4774</eissn><abstract>The challenges associated with machining titanium alloys (e.g., Ti–6Al–4V) are directly related to high cutting tool temperatures due to the low thermal conductivity of these alloys and the heat generated in the primary shear zone and at the tool–chip interface. Transparent yittrium aluminum garnet (YAG) tools are used in the current study to orthogonally machine a Ti–6Al–4V disk. Although YAG tools are not industrially relevant, they permit the temperature on the tool–chip interface to be measured. These measurements are relevant because they can be used to validate cutting models, which are in-turn used by industry to improve cutting processes. An infrared camera, using a high frame rate (700Hz) and a large field of view (20mm2), observes the tool–chip interface through these tools and measures the temperature distribution and records the chip curl and breakage while cutting with a feed rate of 50μm/rev and cutting speeds between 20m/min and 100m/min. In addition to the temperature measurements, cutting forces are recorded and the chip formation is documented using a high-speed (3kHz) visible-light camera. Results show that radiant temperature increases with speed while the cutting and thrust forces show no significant trend. Analysis of the temperature distribution from one edge of the chip to the other reveals differences from 6 % to 21 %, indicating that caution must be used when performing thermographic measurements of chip temperatures from the side of the cutting zone. Finally, post process measurements are performed using a scanning white-light interferometer to investigate any correlation between the tool condition and cutting temperature. Although the qualitative analysis of some cases appears to reveal a correlation between the condition of the YAG tool and the measured temperature distribution, further work work is required to understand this relationship.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.11.026</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0924-0136
ispartof Journal of materials processing technology, 2017-05, Vol.243 (C), p.123-130
issn 0924-0136
1873-4774
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1397468
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aluminum
Breakage
Chip formation
Cutting speed
Cutting tools
Feed rate
Field of view
Heat conductivity
Heat transfer
Infrared cameras
Infrared temperature measurement
Machining
Metal cutting
Model validation
Qualitative analysis
Shear zone
Stress concentration
Temperature distribution
Thermal conductivity
Thermography
Titanium
Titanium alloys
Titanium base alloys
Tool wear
Transparent tool
White light
title Infrared measurement of the temperature at the tool–chip interface while machining Ti–6Al–4V
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T17%3A46%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Infrared%20measurement%20of%20the%20temperature%20at%20the%20tool%E2%80%93chip%20interface%20while%20machining%20Ti%E2%80%936Al%E2%80%934V&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20processing%20technology&rft.au=Heigel,%20J.C.&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=243&rft.issue=C&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=123-130&rft.issn=0924-0136&rft.eissn=1873-4774&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.11.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1937403646%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1937403646&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0924013616304125&rfr_iscdi=true