Stabilization of X–Au–X Complexes on the Au(111) Surface: A Theoretical Investigation and Comparison of X = S, Cl, CH3S, and SiH3S

Stabilities of linear X–Au–X complexes on the Au(111) surface, with different ligands X = S, Cl, CH3S, and SiH3S, are studied using density functional theory (DFT). For X = CH3S and SiH3S, AuX2 complexes are more stable compared with the configuration where X are individually chemisorbed and Au is i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of physical chemistry. C 2017-02, Vol.121 (7), p.3870-3879
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Jiyoung, Boschen, Jeffery S, Windus, Theresa L, Thiel, Patricia A, Liu, Da-Jiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3879
container_issue 7
container_start_page 3870
container_title Journal of physical chemistry. C
container_volume 121
creator Lee, Jiyoung
Boschen, Jeffery S
Windus, Theresa L
Thiel, Patricia A
Liu, Da-Jiang
description Stabilities of linear X–Au–X complexes on the Au(111) surface, with different ligands X = S, Cl, CH3S, and SiH3S, are studied using density functional theory (DFT). For X = CH3S and SiH3S, AuX2 complexes are more stable compared with the configuration where X are individually chemisorbed and Au is incorporated into the bulk. AuS2 complexes, however, are less stable than chemisorbed S. The relative stability of AuCl2 complexes depends on the functionals used. Bond strengths of the X–Au–X complexes in the gas phase are calculated by using DFT and the coupled cluster method and found to be similar. This implies that the stabilities of adsorbed complexes are controlled by the bond strength of the ligand to the surface. These results explain why complexes with X = CH3S and sometimes Cl are observed on Au(111), whereas complexes with X = S are not.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11120
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1349895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>h51787639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a1760-5630cb9aad104ae2b5ee5cce72ba7deb16d084ab386165e11c2d9a2e209caf443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHhdPCk3dj2zSCB5CUFsoeEiF3sJkM7FbYlKyiYgnT_4B_6G_xO0HHmbmZeblYXgJueRszJngt6DteL3RehzknHPBjsiAR1J4oa_U8b_2w1NyZu2aMSUZlwPynXaQm8p8QmeamjYlXf5-_cS9a0uaNG-bCj_QUnfqVkjj_trBb2jatyVovKMxXaywabEzGio6q9_RduZ1z4K62BGgNfaApvc0HdGkcjWVTm0tqXHynJyUUFm8OMwheXl8WCRTb_78NEviuQc8DJinAsl0HgEUnPmAIleISmsMRQ5hgTkPCjbxIZeTgAcKOdeiiECgYJGG0vflkFztuY37M7PadKhXuqlr1F3GpR9NIuVMo73JZZqtm76t3UsZZ9k26Gy3dEFnh6DlHzQTclA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stabilization of X–Au–X Complexes on the Au(111) Surface: A Theoretical Investigation and Comparison of X = S, Cl, CH3S, and SiH3S</title><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Lee, Jiyoung ; Boschen, Jeffery S ; Windus, Theresa L ; Thiel, Patricia A ; Liu, Da-Jiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jiyoung ; Boschen, Jeffery S ; Windus, Theresa L ; Thiel, Patricia A ; Liu, Da-Jiang ; Ames Lab., Ames, IA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Stabilities of linear X–Au–X complexes on the Au(111) surface, with different ligands X = S, Cl, CH3S, and SiH3S, are studied using density functional theory (DFT). For X = CH3S and SiH3S, AuX2 complexes are more stable compared with the configuration where X are individually chemisorbed and Au is incorporated into the bulk. AuS2 complexes, however, are less stable than chemisorbed S. The relative stability of AuCl2 complexes depends on the functionals used. Bond strengths of the X–Au–X complexes in the gas phase are calculated by using DFT and the coupled cluster method and found to be similar. This implies that the stabilities of adsorbed complexes are controlled by the bond strength of the ligand to the surface. These results explain why complexes with X = CH3S and sometimes Cl are observed on Au(111), whereas complexes with X = S are not.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-7447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-7455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY ; MATERIALS SCIENCE</subject><ispartof>Journal of physical chemistry. C, 2017-02, Vol.121 (7), p.3870-3879</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-6065-3167 ; 0000-0002-3019-9247 ; 0000000160653167 ; 0000000230199247</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11120$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11120$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27057,27905,27906,56719,56769</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1349895$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jiyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boschen, Jeffery S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windus, Theresa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiel, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Da-Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ames Lab., Ames, IA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Stabilization of X–Au–X Complexes on the Au(111) Surface: A Theoretical Investigation and Comparison of X = S, Cl, CH3S, and SiH3S</title><title>Journal of physical chemistry. C</title><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. C</addtitle><description>Stabilities of linear X–Au–X complexes on the Au(111) surface, with different ligands X = S, Cl, CH3S, and SiH3S, are studied using density functional theory (DFT). For X = CH3S and SiH3S, AuX2 complexes are more stable compared with the configuration where X are individually chemisorbed and Au is incorporated into the bulk. AuS2 complexes, however, are less stable than chemisorbed S. The relative stability of AuCl2 complexes depends on the functionals used. Bond strengths of the X–Au–X complexes in the gas phase are calculated by using DFT and the coupled cluster method and found to be similar. This implies that the stabilities of adsorbed complexes are controlled by the bond strength of the ligand to the surface. These results explain why complexes with X = CH3S and sometimes Cl are observed on Au(111), whereas complexes with X = S are not.</description><subject>INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY</subject><subject>MATERIALS SCIENCE</subject><issn>1932-7447</issn><issn>1932-7455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHhdPCk3dj2zSCB5CUFsoeEiF3sJkM7FbYlKyiYgnT_4B_6G_xO0HHmbmZeblYXgJueRszJngt6DteL3RehzknHPBjsiAR1J4oa_U8b_2w1NyZu2aMSUZlwPynXaQm8p8QmeamjYlXf5-_cS9a0uaNG-bCj_QUnfqVkjj_trBb2jatyVovKMxXaywabEzGio6q9_RduZ1z4K62BGgNfaApvc0HdGkcjWVTm0tqXHynJyUUFm8OMwheXl8WCRTb_78NEviuQc8DJinAsl0HgEUnPmAIleISmsMRQ5hgTkPCjbxIZeTgAcKOdeiiECgYJGG0vflkFztuY37M7PadKhXuqlr1F3GpR9NIuVMo73JZZqtm76t3UsZZ9k26Gy3dEFnh6DlHzQTclA</recordid><startdate>20170223</startdate><enddate>20170223</enddate><creator>Lee, Jiyoung</creator><creator>Boschen, Jeffery S</creator><creator>Windus, Theresa L</creator><creator>Thiel, Patricia A</creator><creator>Liu, Da-Jiang</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-3167</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3019-9247</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000160653167</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000230199247</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170223</creationdate><title>Stabilization of X–Au–X Complexes on the Au(111) Surface: A Theoretical Investigation and Comparison of X = S, Cl, CH3S, and SiH3S</title><author>Lee, Jiyoung ; Boschen, Jeffery S ; Windus, Theresa L ; Thiel, Patricia A ; Liu, Da-Jiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a1760-5630cb9aad104ae2b5ee5cce72ba7deb16d084ab386165e11c2d9a2e209caf443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY</topic><topic>MATERIALS SCIENCE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jiyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boschen, Jeffery S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windus, Theresa L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiel, Patricia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Da-Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ames Lab., Ames, IA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Journal of physical chemistry. C</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Jiyoung</au><au>Boschen, Jeffery S</au><au>Windus, Theresa L</au><au>Thiel, Patricia A</au><au>Liu, Da-Jiang</au><aucorp>Ames Lab., Ames, IA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stabilization of X–Au–X Complexes on the Au(111) Surface: A Theoretical Investigation and Comparison of X = S, Cl, CH3S, and SiH3S</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physical chemistry. C</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. C</addtitle><date>2017-02-23</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3870</spage><epage>3879</epage><pages>3870-3879</pages><issn>1932-7447</issn><eissn>1932-7455</eissn><abstract>Stabilities of linear X–Au–X complexes on the Au(111) surface, with different ligands X = S, Cl, CH3S, and SiH3S, are studied using density functional theory (DFT). For X = CH3S and SiH3S, AuX2 complexes are more stable compared with the configuration where X are individually chemisorbed and Au is incorporated into the bulk. AuS2 complexes, however, are less stable than chemisorbed S. The relative stability of AuCl2 complexes depends on the functionals used. Bond strengths of the X–Au–X complexes in the gas phase are calculated by using DFT and the coupled cluster method and found to be similar. This implies that the stabilities of adsorbed complexes are controlled by the bond strength of the ligand to the surface. These results explain why complexes with X = CH3S and sometimes Cl are observed on Au(111), whereas complexes with X = S are not.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11120</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-3167</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3019-9247</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000160653167</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000230199247</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-7447
ispartof Journal of physical chemistry. C, 2017-02, Vol.121 (7), p.3870-3879
issn 1932-7447
1932-7455
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1349895
source American Chemical Society Journals
subjects INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
MATERIALS SCIENCE
title Stabilization of X–Au–X Complexes on the Au(111) Surface: A Theoretical Investigation and Comparison of X = S, Cl, CH3S, and SiH3S
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A30%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stabilization%20of%20X%E2%80%93Au%E2%80%93X%20Complexes%20on%20the%20Au(111)%20Surface:%20A%20Theoretical%20Investigation%20and%20Comparison%20of%20X%20=%20S,%20Cl,%20CH3S,%20and%20SiH3S&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physical%20chemistry.%20C&rft.au=Lee,%20Jiyoung&rft.aucorp=Ames%20Lab.,%20Ames,%20IA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2017-02-23&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3870&rft.epage=3879&rft.pages=3870-3879&rft.issn=1932-7447&rft.eissn=1932-7455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11120&rft_dat=%3Cacs_osti_%3Eh51787639%3C/acs_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true