Is there a geomorphic expression of interbasin groundwater flow in watersheds? Interactions between interbasin groundwater flow, springs, streams, and geomorphology
Interbasin groundwater flow (IGF) can play a significant role in the generation and geochemical evolution of streamflow. However, it is exceedingly difficult to identify IGF and to determine the location and quantity of water that is exchanged between watersheds. How does IGF affect landscape/waters...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geophysical research letters 2016-02, Vol.43 (3), p.1158-1165 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1165 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1158 |
container_title | Geophysical research letters |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Frisbee, Marty D. Tysor, Elizabeth H. Stewart‐Maddox, Noah S. Tsinnajinnie, Lani M. Wilson, John L. Granger, Darryl E. Newman, Brent D. |
description | Interbasin groundwater flow (IGF) can play a significant role in the generation and geochemical evolution of streamflow. However, it is exceedingly difficult to identify IGF and to determine the location and quantity of water that is exchanged between watersheds. How does IGF affect landscape/watershed geomorphic evolution? Can geomorphic metrics be used to identify the presence of IGF? We examine these questions in two adjacent sedimentary watersheds in northern New Mexico using a combination of geomorphic/landscape metrics, springflow residence times, and spatial geochemical patterns. IGF is expressed geomorphically in the landscape placement of springs and flow direction and shape of stream channels. Springs emerge preferentially on one side of stream valleys where landscape incision has intercepted IGF flow paths. Stream channels grow toward the IGF source and show little bifurcation. In addition, radiocarbon residence times of springs decrease and the geochemical composition of springs changes as the connection to IGF is lost.
Key Points
Exchanges of IGF in complex geology can affect landscape/watershed geomorphic evolution
IGF is expressed as preferred orientations of springs and flow directions of channels
IGF is expressed by unique spatial trends in radiocarbon residence times |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2015GL067082 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1338763</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2370691035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5355-9a92dccefdde3635f60a4a77c995f0bc7908044432193759ecc8a2da6ecf799b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0k-rEzEQAPBFFKxPb36AoBcPrzr5vzmJPHy1UBBEzyHNzrb72CY1s6X2-_hBzXsVEQ_1lEnymyEZpmlecnjLAcQ7AVwvVmAstOJRM-NOqXkLYB83MwBXY2HN0-YZ0R0ASJB81vxcEpu2WJAFtsG8y2W_HSLDH_uCRENOLPdsSBOWdaAhsU3Jh9QdQz1g_ZiP9Y497GiLHb1ny3sa4lQzia1xOiKmS_nXjPZlSBuqwVQw7GoQUvfnLXnMm9Pz5kkfRsIXv9er5tvtx683n-arz4vlzYfVPGqp9dwFJ7oYse86lEbq3kBQwdronO5hHa2DFpRSUnAnrXYYYxtEFwzG3jq3llfNq3PdTNPgKQ4Txm3MKWGcPJeytUZW9OaM9iV_PyBNfjdQxHEMCfOBPK8dV63RTv2fWmuMUVbwSl__Q-_yoaT6Wy-kBeM4SH1JcWta3WqrTFXXZxVLJirY-9riXSgnz8HfD4r_e1AqF2d-HEY8XbR-8WWlpRNa_gL9fsCt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768585746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is there a geomorphic expression of interbasin groundwater flow in watersheds? Interactions between interbasin groundwater flow, springs, streams, and geomorphology</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Frisbee, Marty D. ; Tysor, Elizabeth H. ; Stewart‐Maddox, Noah S. ; Tsinnajinnie, Lani M. ; Wilson, John L. ; Granger, Darryl E. ; Newman, Brent D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Frisbee, Marty D. ; Tysor, Elizabeth H. ; Stewart‐Maddox, Noah S. ; Tsinnajinnie, Lani M. ; Wilson, John L. ; Granger, Darryl E. ; Newman, Brent D. ; Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Interbasin groundwater flow (IGF) can play a significant role in the generation and geochemical evolution of streamflow. However, it is exceedingly difficult to identify IGF and to determine the location and quantity of water that is exchanged between watersheds. How does IGF affect landscape/watershed geomorphic evolution? Can geomorphic metrics be used to identify the presence of IGF? We examine these questions in two adjacent sedimentary watersheds in northern New Mexico using a combination of geomorphic/landscape metrics, springflow residence times, and spatial geochemical patterns. IGF is expressed geomorphically in the landscape placement of springs and flow direction and shape of stream channels. Springs emerge preferentially on one side of stream valleys where landscape incision has intercepted IGF flow paths. Stream channels grow toward the IGF source and show little bifurcation. In addition, radiocarbon residence times of springs decrease and the geochemical composition of springs changes as the connection to IGF is lost.
Key Points
Exchanges of IGF in complex geology can affect landscape/watershed geomorphic evolution
IGF is expressed as preferred orientations of springs and flow directions of channels
IGF is expressed by unique spatial trends in radiocarbon residence times</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2015GL067082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bifurcations ; Channels ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; environmental tracers ; Evolution ; Flow paths ; Freshwater ; Geochemistry ; Geomorphology ; Ground-water flow ; Groundwater ; Groundwater flow ; Insulin-like growth factors ; interbasin groundwater flow ; Landscapes ; Radiocarbon dating ; residence time ; River valleys ; Rivers ; Springs ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Streams ; Water springs ; watershed hydrology ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2016-02, Vol.43 (3), p.1158-1165</ispartof><rights>2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5355-9a92dccefdde3635f60a4a77c995f0bc7908044432193759ecc8a2da6ecf799b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5355-9a92dccefdde3635f60a4a77c995f0bc7908044432193759ecc8a2da6ecf799b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2015GL067082$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2015GL067082$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1338763$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frisbee, Marty D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tysor, Elizabeth H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart‐Maddox, Noah S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsinnajinnie, Lani M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granger, Darryl E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Brent D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Is there a geomorphic expression of interbasin groundwater flow in watersheds? Interactions between interbasin groundwater flow, springs, streams, and geomorphology</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>Interbasin groundwater flow (IGF) can play a significant role in the generation and geochemical evolution of streamflow. However, it is exceedingly difficult to identify IGF and to determine the location and quantity of water that is exchanged between watersheds. How does IGF affect landscape/watershed geomorphic evolution? Can geomorphic metrics be used to identify the presence of IGF? We examine these questions in two adjacent sedimentary watersheds in northern New Mexico using a combination of geomorphic/landscape metrics, springflow residence times, and spatial geochemical patterns. IGF is expressed geomorphically in the landscape placement of springs and flow direction and shape of stream channels. Springs emerge preferentially on one side of stream valleys where landscape incision has intercepted IGF flow paths. Stream channels grow toward the IGF source and show little bifurcation. In addition, radiocarbon residence times of springs decrease and the geochemical composition of springs changes as the connection to IGF is lost.
Key Points
Exchanges of IGF in complex geology can affect landscape/watershed geomorphic evolution
IGF is expressed as preferred orientations of springs and flow directions of channels
IGF is expressed by unique spatial trends in radiocarbon residence times</description><subject>Bifurcations</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>environmental tracers</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Flow paths</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Ground-water flow</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater flow</subject><subject>Insulin-like growth factors</subject><subject>interbasin groundwater flow</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>Radiocarbon dating</subject><subject>residence time</subject><subject>River valleys</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Springs</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Water springs</subject><subject>watershed hydrology</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0k-rEzEQAPBFFKxPb36AoBcPrzr5vzmJPHy1UBBEzyHNzrb72CY1s6X2-_hBzXsVEQ_1lEnymyEZpmlecnjLAcQ7AVwvVmAstOJRM-NOqXkLYB83MwBXY2HN0-YZ0R0ASJB81vxcEpu2WJAFtsG8y2W_HSLDH_uCRENOLPdsSBOWdaAhsU3Jh9QdQz1g_ZiP9Y497GiLHb1ny3sa4lQzia1xOiKmS_nXjPZlSBuqwVQw7GoQUvfnLXnMm9Pz5kkfRsIXv9er5tvtx683n-arz4vlzYfVPGqp9dwFJ7oYse86lEbq3kBQwdronO5hHa2DFpRSUnAnrXYYYxtEFwzG3jq3llfNq3PdTNPgKQ4Txm3MKWGcPJeytUZW9OaM9iV_PyBNfjdQxHEMCfOBPK8dV63RTv2fWmuMUVbwSl__Q-_yoaT6Wy-kBeM4SH1JcWta3WqrTFXXZxVLJirY-9riXSgnz8HfD4r_e1AqF2d-HEY8XbR-8WWlpRNa_gL9fsCt</recordid><startdate>20160216</startdate><enddate>20160216</enddate><creator>Frisbee, Marty D.</creator><creator>Tysor, Elizabeth H.</creator><creator>Stewart‐Maddox, Noah S.</creator><creator>Tsinnajinnie, Lani M.</creator><creator>Wilson, John L.</creator><creator>Granger, Darryl E.</creator><creator>Newman, Brent D.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160216</creationdate><title>Is there a geomorphic expression of interbasin groundwater flow in watersheds? Interactions between interbasin groundwater flow, springs, streams, and geomorphology</title><author>Frisbee, Marty D. ; Tysor, Elizabeth H. ; Stewart‐Maddox, Noah S. ; Tsinnajinnie, Lani M. ; Wilson, John L. ; Granger, Darryl E. ; Newman, Brent D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5355-9a92dccefdde3635f60a4a77c995f0bc7908044432193759ecc8a2da6ecf799b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bifurcations</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>environmental tracers</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Flow paths</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Ground-water flow</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater flow</topic><topic>Insulin-like growth factors</topic><topic>interbasin groundwater flow</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>Radiocarbon dating</topic><topic>residence time</topic><topic>River valleys</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Springs</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Water springs</topic><topic>watershed hydrology</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frisbee, Marty D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tysor, Elizabeth H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart‐Maddox, Noah S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsinnajinnie, Lani M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granger, Darryl E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newman, Brent D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frisbee, Marty D.</au><au>Tysor, Elizabeth H.</au><au>Stewart‐Maddox, Noah S.</au><au>Tsinnajinnie, Lani M.</au><au>Wilson, John L.</au><au>Granger, Darryl E.</au><au>Newman, Brent D.</au><aucorp>Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is there a geomorphic expression of interbasin groundwater flow in watersheds? Interactions between interbasin groundwater flow, springs, streams, and geomorphology</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2016-02-16</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1158</spage><epage>1165</epage><pages>1158-1165</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>Interbasin groundwater flow (IGF) can play a significant role in the generation and geochemical evolution of streamflow. However, it is exceedingly difficult to identify IGF and to determine the location and quantity of water that is exchanged between watersheds. How does IGF affect landscape/watershed geomorphic evolution? Can geomorphic metrics be used to identify the presence of IGF? We examine these questions in two adjacent sedimentary watersheds in northern New Mexico using a combination of geomorphic/landscape metrics, springflow residence times, and spatial geochemical patterns. IGF is expressed geomorphically in the landscape placement of springs and flow direction and shape of stream channels. Springs emerge preferentially on one side of stream valleys where landscape incision has intercepted IGF flow paths. Stream channels grow toward the IGF source and show little bifurcation. In addition, radiocarbon residence times of springs decrease and the geochemical composition of springs changes as the connection to IGF is lost.
Key Points
Exchanges of IGF in complex geology can affect landscape/watershed geomorphic evolution
IGF is expressed as preferred orientations of springs and flow directions of channels
IGF is expressed by unique spatial trends in radiocarbon residence times</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/2015GL067082</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-8276 |
ispartof | Geophysical research letters, 2016-02, Vol.43 (3), p.1158-1165 |
issn | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1338763 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Bifurcations Channels ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES environmental tracers Evolution Flow paths Freshwater Geochemistry Geomorphology Ground-water flow Groundwater Groundwater flow Insulin-like growth factors interbasin groundwater flow Landscapes Radiocarbon dating residence time River valleys Rivers Springs Stream discharge Stream flow Streams Water springs watershed hydrology Watersheds |
title | Is there a geomorphic expression of interbasin groundwater flow in watersheds? Interactions between interbasin groundwater flow, springs, streams, and geomorphology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T03%3A56%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20there%20a%20geomorphic%20expression%20of%20interbasin%20groundwater%20flow%20in%20watersheds?%20Interactions%20between%20interbasin%20groundwater%20flow,%20springs,%20streams,%20and%20geomorphology&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Frisbee,%20Marty%20D.&rft.aucorp=Los%20Alamos%20National%20Lab.%20(LANL),%20Los%20Alamos,%20NM%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2016-02-16&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1158&rft.epage=1165&rft.pages=1158-1165&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2015GL067082&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2370691035%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768585746&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |