COMPARISON OF MONOENERGETIC PHOTON ORGAN DOSE RATE COEFFICIENTS FOR STYLIZED AND VOXEL PHANTOMS SUBMERGED IN AIR
As part of a broader effort to calculate effective dose rate coefficients for external exposure to photons and electrons emitted by radionuclides distributed in air, soil or water, age-specific stylized phantoms have been employed to determine dose coefficients relating dose rate to organs and tissu...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Radiation protection dosimetry 2016-12, Vol.172 (4), p.367-374 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 374 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 367 |
| container_title | Radiation protection dosimetry |
| container_volume | 172 |
| creator | Bellamy, M B Hiller, M M Dewji, S A Veinot, K G Leggett, R W Eckerman, K F Easterly, C E Hertel, N E |
| description | As part of a broader effort to calculate effective dose rate coefficients for external exposure to photons and electrons emitted by radionuclides distributed in air, soil or water, age-specific stylized phantoms have been employed to determine dose coefficients relating dose rate to organs and tissues in the body. In this article, dose rate coefficients computed using the International Commission on Radiological Protection reference adult male voxel phantom are compared with values computed using the Oak Ridge National Laboratory adult male stylized phantom in an air submersion exposure geometry. Monte Carlo calculations for both phantoms were performed for monoenergetic source photons in the range of 30 keV to 5 MeV. These calculations largely result in differences under 10 % for photon energies above 50 keV, and it can be expected that both models show comparable results for the environmental sources of radionuclides. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/rpd/ncv548 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1338489</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826659080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-b542d4cd9e5813f25a6c33ed03894866654efc541c728bcdb4703ec3ef1531e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkdFq2zAUhkVZabO2N3uAInY1Bl4lHdmRL11HTgyJFWynbLsRiSzTlCTOLKfQt59D0l736sDh-38O50PoGyW_KAnhod1XDzvz6nNxgQZ0yJkHnARf0IBQzj3BGblGX517IYQNQ59foWsWCBAkCAZoH6vZPMrTQmVYJXimMiUzmY9lmcZ4PlHlcZ-PowyPVCFxHpUSx0omSRqnMisLnKgcF-WfafpXjnCUjfCT-i2nfTTKSjUrcLF4nB37RjjNcJTmt-iyXm6cvTvPG7RIZBlPvKkap3E09QwI6LyVz1nFTRVaX1Comb8MDICtCIiQiyAIfG5r43NqhkysTLXiQwLWgK2pD9QyuEHfT72N69bamXVnzbNpdjtrOk0BBBdhD_04Qfu2-XewrtPbtTN2s1nubHNwmor-UUAYkE-grD8qJOKI_jyhpm2ca22t9-16u2zfNCX6aEz3xvTJWA_fn3sPq62tPtB3RfAfwr-HVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826659080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>COMPARISON OF MONOENERGETIC PHOTON ORGAN DOSE RATE COEFFICIENTS FOR STYLIZED AND VOXEL PHANTOMS SUBMERGED IN AIR</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bellamy, M B ; Hiller, M M ; Dewji, S A ; Veinot, K G ; Leggett, R W ; Eckerman, K F ; Easterly, C E ; Hertel, N E</creator><creatorcontrib>Bellamy, M B ; Hiller, M M ; Dewji, S A ; Veinot, K G ; Leggett, R W ; Eckerman, K F ; Easterly, C E ; Hertel, N E ; Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>As part of a broader effort to calculate effective dose rate coefficients for external exposure to photons and electrons emitted by radionuclides distributed in air, soil or water, age-specific stylized phantoms have been employed to determine dose coefficients relating dose rate to organs and tissues in the body. In this article, dose rate coefficients computed using the International Commission on Radiological Protection reference adult male voxel phantom are compared with values computed using the Oak Ridge National Laboratory adult male stylized phantom in an air submersion exposure geometry. Monte Carlo calculations for both phantoms were performed for monoenergetic source photons in the range of 30 keV to 5 MeV. These calculations largely result in differences under 10 % for photon energies above 50 keV, and it can be expected that both models show comparable results for the environmental sources of radionuclides.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv548</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26838066</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Air ; Algorithms ; Body Burden ; Electrons ; Humans ; Male ; Models, Theoretical ; Monte Carlo Method ; Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Organs at Risk ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Photons ; RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY ; Radiation Protection ; Radiometry - methods ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2016-12, Vol.172 (4), p.367-374</ispartof><rights>The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-b542d4cd9e5813f25a6c33ed03894866654efc541c728bcdb4703ec3ef1531e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-b542d4cd9e5813f25a6c33ed03894866654efc541c728bcdb4703ec3ef1531e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26838066$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1338489$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bellamy, M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiller, M M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewji, S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veinot, K G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leggett, R W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckerman, K F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easterly, C E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hertel, N E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>COMPARISON OF MONOENERGETIC PHOTON ORGAN DOSE RATE COEFFICIENTS FOR STYLIZED AND VOXEL PHANTOMS SUBMERGED IN AIR</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>As part of a broader effort to calculate effective dose rate coefficients for external exposure to photons and electrons emitted by radionuclides distributed in air, soil or water, age-specific stylized phantoms have been employed to determine dose coefficients relating dose rate to organs and tissues in the body. In this article, dose rate coefficients computed using the International Commission on Radiological Protection reference adult male voxel phantom are compared with values computed using the Oak Ridge National Laboratory adult male stylized phantom in an air submersion exposure geometry. Monte Carlo calculations for both phantoms were performed for monoenergetic source photons in the range of 30 keV to 5 MeV. These calculations largely result in differences under 10 % for photon energies above 50 keV, and it can be expected that both models show comparable results for the environmental sources of radionuclides.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Air</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Body Burden</subject><subject>Electrons</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Organs at Risk</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY</subject><subject>Radiation Protection</subject><subject>Radiometry - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkdFq2zAUhkVZabO2N3uAInY1Bl4lHdmRL11HTgyJFWynbLsRiSzTlCTOLKfQt59D0l736sDh-38O50PoGyW_KAnhod1XDzvz6nNxgQZ0yJkHnARf0IBQzj3BGblGX517IYQNQ59foWsWCBAkCAZoH6vZPMrTQmVYJXimMiUzmY9lmcZ4PlHlcZ-PowyPVCFxHpUSx0omSRqnMisLnKgcF-WfafpXjnCUjfCT-i2nfTTKSjUrcLF4nB37RjjNcJTmt-iyXm6cvTvPG7RIZBlPvKkap3E09QwI6LyVz1nFTRVaX1Comb8MDICtCIiQiyAIfG5r43NqhkysTLXiQwLWgK2pD9QyuEHfT72N69bamXVnzbNpdjtrOk0BBBdhD_04Qfu2-XewrtPbtTN2s1nubHNwmor-UUAYkE-grD8qJOKI_jyhpm2ca22t9-16u2zfNCX6aEz3xvTJWA_fn3sPq62tPtB3RfAfwr-HVA</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Bellamy, M B</creator><creator>Hiller, M M</creator><creator>Dewji, S A</creator><creator>Veinot, K G</creator><creator>Leggett, R W</creator><creator>Eckerman, K F</creator><creator>Easterly, C E</creator><creator>Hertel, N E</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>COMPARISON OF MONOENERGETIC PHOTON ORGAN DOSE RATE COEFFICIENTS FOR STYLIZED AND VOXEL PHANTOMS SUBMERGED IN AIR</title><author>Bellamy, M B ; Hiller, M M ; Dewji, S A ; Veinot, K G ; Leggett, R W ; Eckerman, K F ; Easterly, C E ; Hertel, N E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c383t-b542d4cd9e5813f25a6c33ed03894866654efc541c728bcdb4703ec3ef1531e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Air</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Body Burden</topic><topic>Electrons</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Organs at Risk</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY</topic><topic>Radiation Protection</topic><topic>Radiometry - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bellamy, M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiller, M M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewji, S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veinot, K G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leggett, R W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckerman, K F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Easterly, C E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hertel, N E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bellamy, M B</au><au>Hiller, M M</au><au>Dewji, S A</au><au>Veinot, K G</au><au>Leggett, R W</au><au>Eckerman, K F</au><au>Easterly, C E</au><au>Hertel, N E</au><aucorp>Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COMPARISON OF MONOENERGETIC PHOTON ORGAN DOSE RATE COEFFICIENTS FOR STYLIZED AND VOXEL PHANTOMS SUBMERGED IN AIR</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>172</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>367-374</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>As part of a broader effort to calculate effective dose rate coefficients for external exposure to photons and electrons emitted by radionuclides distributed in air, soil or water, age-specific stylized phantoms have been employed to determine dose coefficients relating dose rate to organs and tissues in the body. In this article, dose rate coefficients computed using the International Commission on Radiological Protection reference adult male voxel phantom are compared with values computed using the Oak Ridge National Laboratory adult male stylized phantom in an air submersion exposure geometry. Monte Carlo calculations for both phantoms were performed for monoenergetic source photons in the range of 30 keV to 5 MeV. These calculations largely result in differences under 10 % for photon energies above 50 keV, and it can be expected that both models show comparable results for the environmental sources of radionuclides.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>26838066</pmid><doi>10.1093/rpd/ncv548</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0144-8420 |
| ispartof | Radiation protection dosimetry, 2016-12, Vol.172 (4), p.367-374 |
| issn | 0144-8420 1742-3406 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1338489 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adult Air Algorithms Body Burden Electrons Humans Male Models, Theoretical Monte Carlo Method Neoplasms - radiotherapy Organs at Risk Phantoms, Imaging Photons RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY Radiation Protection Radiometry - methods Radiotherapy Dosage Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods |
| title | COMPARISON OF MONOENERGETIC PHOTON ORGAN DOSE RATE COEFFICIENTS FOR STYLIZED AND VOXEL PHANTOMS SUBMERGED IN AIR |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T10%3A58%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COMPARISON%20OF%20MONOENERGETIC%20PHOTON%20ORGAN%20DOSE%20RATE%20COEFFICIENTS%20FOR%20STYLIZED%20AND%20VOXEL%20PHANTOMS%20SUBMERGED%20IN%20AIR&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Bellamy,%20M%20B&rft.aucorp=Oak%20Ridge%20National%20Lab.%20(ORNL),%20Oak%20Ridge,%20TN%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=172&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=367-374&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/ncv548&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1826659080%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826659080&rft_id=info:pmid/26838066&rfr_iscdi=true |