Future land use threats to range‐restricted fish species in the United States

AIM: Land use change is one major threat to freshwater biodiversity, and land use change scenarios can help to assess threats from future land use change, thereby guiding proactive conservation decisions. Our goal was to identify which range‐restricted freshwater fish species are most likely to be a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diversity & distributions 2016-06, Vol.22 (6), p.663-671
Hauptverfasser: Januchowski-Hartley, Stephanie R., Holtz, Lauren A., Martinuzzi, Sebastian, McIntyre, Peter B., Radeloff, Volker C., Pracheil, Brenda M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 671
container_issue 6
container_start_page 663
container_title Diversity & distributions
container_volume 22
creator Januchowski-Hartley, Stephanie R.
Holtz, Lauren A.
Martinuzzi, Sebastian
McIntyre, Peter B.
Radeloff, Volker C.
Pracheil, Brenda M.
description AIM: Land use change is one major threat to freshwater biodiversity, and land use change scenarios can help to assess threats from future land use change, thereby guiding proactive conservation decisions. Our goal was to identify which range‐restricted freshwater fish species are most likely to be affected by land use change and to determine where threats to these species from future land use change in the conterminous United States are most pronounced. LOCATION: United States of America. METHODS: We focused on range‐restricted freshwater fish species, identified which of these species are considered threatened based on either the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN)'s Red List or the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and compared their distributions to patterns of future land use changes by 2051 under three scenarios. RESULTS: We found that 14% of the range‐restricted species had >30% of their distribution area occupied by intensive land use in 2001, and this number increased from 27 to 58% by 2051 depending on the land use scenario. Among the 57 species most likely to be strongly affected by intensive land use, only 26% of these species are currently listed as threatened on the IUCN Red List, and 12% are listed as threatened under the ESA. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Our approach demonstrates the value of considering future land use change scenarios in extinction risk assessment frameworks and offers guidelines for how this could be achieved for future assessments.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ddi.12431
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1261334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24817499</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24817499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4761-8439b5eae215c2b03f3670a8bcbcd815271684ad1cdb0c3079ea637ea3b29483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFu1DAQBuAIgUQpHHgARASXckjrsR07PkKXditV7aGtOFqOM-l62SZbjyPaG4_AM_IkuAR6QMIXW_q_sWamKF4D24d8Drou7AOXAp4UOyA1r6SS_Gl-C6UqU4N6XrwgWjPGhKj5TnF-NKUpYrlxQ1dOhGVaRXSJyjSW0Q3X-PP7j4iUYvAJu7IPtCppiz4glWHIGsurITxEF8klpJfFs95tCF_9uXeLy6PPl4fL6vT8-OTw42nlpVZQNVKYtkaHHGrPWyZ6oTRzTetb3zVQcw2qka4D37XMC6YNOiU0OtFyIxuxW7ybvx0pBUs-d-BXfhwG9MkCVyCEzGhvRts43k55CHsTyOMmz4rjRBa0YUYLxnmm7_-h63GKQ54gq0ZprgxXWX2YlY8jUcTebmO4cfHeArMP67d5_fb3-rM9mO23sMH7_0O7WJz8rXgzV6wpjfGxgssGtDQm59WcB0p495i7-NUqLXRtv5wd2-UZGA2LT3aZ_dvZ92607joGslcXnIFiDGohtRG_AL3_pv8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1786726926</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Future land use threats to range‐restricted fish species in the United States</title><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Januchowski-Hartley, Stephanie R. ; Holtz, Lauren A. ; Martinuzzi, Sebastian ; McIntyre, Peter B. ; Radeloff, Volker C. ; Pracheil, Brenda M.</creator><contributor>Visconti, Piero ; Visconti, Piero</contributor><creatorcontrib>Januchowski-Hartley, Stephanie R. ; Holtz, Lauren A. ; Martinuzzi, Sebastian ; McIntyre, Peter B. ; Radeloff, Volker C. ; Pracheil, Brenda M. ; Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States) ; Visconti, Piero ; Visconti, Piero</creatorcontrib><description>AIM: Land use change is one major threat to freshwater biodiversity, and land use change scenarios can help to assess threats from future land use change, thereby guiding proactive conservation decisions. Our goal was to identify which range‐restricted freshwater fish species are most likely to be affected by land use change and to determine where threats to these species from future land use change in the conterminous United States are most pronounced. LOCATION: United States of America. METHODS: We focused on range‐restricted freshwater fish species, identified which of these species are considered threatened based on either the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN)'s Red List or the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and compared their distributions to patterns of future land use changes by 2051 under three scenarios. RESULTS: We found that 14% of the range‐restricted species had &gt;30% of their distribution area occupied by intensive land use in 2001, and this number increased from 27 to 58% by 2051 depending on the land use scenario. Among the 57 species most likely to be strongly affected by intensive land use, only 26% of these species are currently listed as threatened on the IUCN Red List, and 12% are listed as threatened under the ESA. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Our approach demonstrates the value of considering future land use change scenarios in extinction risk assessment frameworks and offers guidelines for how this could be achieved for future assessments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12431</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Science</publisher><subject>biodiversity indicators ; BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Endangered Species Act ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; extinction risk ; Fish ; Freshwater ; global change ; IUCN Red List ; Land use ; scenario planning ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Diversity &amp; distributions, 2016-06, Vol.22 (6), p.663-671</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4761-8439b5eae215c2b03f3670a8bcbcd815271684ad1cdb0c3079ea637ea3b29483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4761-8439b5eae215c2b03f3670a8bcbcd815271684ad1cdb0c3079ea637ea3b29483</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1661-917X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24817499$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24817499$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fddi.12431$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1261334$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Visconti, Piero</contributor><contributor>Visconti, Piero</contributor><creatorcontrib>Januchowski-Hartley, Stephanie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holtz, Lauren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinuzzi, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, Peter B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radeloff, Volker C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pracheil, Brenda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Future land use threats to range‐restricted fish species in the United States</title><title>Diversity &amp; distributions</title><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><description>AIM: Land use change is one major threat to freshwater biodiversity, and land use change scenarios can help to assess threats from future land use change, thereby guiding proactive conservation decisions. Our goal was to identify which range‐restricted freshwater fish species are most likely to be affected by land use change and to determine where threats to these species from future land use change in the conterminous United States are most pronounced. LOCATION: United States of America. METHODS: We focused on range‐restricted freshwater fish species, identified which of these species are considered threatened based on either the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN)'s Red List or the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and compared their distributions to patterns of future land use changes by 2051 under three scenarios. RESULTS: We found that 14% of the range‐restricted species had &gt;30% of their distribution area occupied by intensive land use in 2001, and this number increased from 27 to 58% by 2051 depending on the land use scenario. Among the 57 species most likely to be strongly affected by intensive land use, only 26% of these species are currently listed as threatened on the IUCN Red List, and 12% are listed as threatened under the ESA. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Our approach demonstrates the value of considering future land use change scenarios in extinction risk assessment frameworks and offers guidelines for how this could be achieved for future assessments.</description><subject>biodiversity indicators</subject><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Endangered Species Act</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>extinction risk</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>global change</subject><subject>IUCN Red List</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>scenario planning</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MFu1DAQBuAIgUQpHHgARASXckjrsR07PkKXditV7aGtOFqOM-l62SZbjyPaG4_AM_IkuAR6QMIXW_q_sWamKF4D24d8Drou7AOXAp4UOyA1r6SS_Gl-C6UqU4N6XrwgWjPGhKj5TnF-NKUpYrlxQ1dOhGVaRXSJyjSW0Q3X-PP7j4iUYvAJu7IPtCppiz4glWHIGsurITxEF8klpJfFs95tCF_9uXeLy6PPl4fL6vT8-OTw42nlpVZQNVKYtkaHHGrPWyZ6oTRzTetb3zVQcw2qka4D37XMC6YNOiU0OtFyIxuxW7ybvx0pBUs-d-BXfhwG9MkCVyCEzGhvRts43k55CHsTyOMmz4rjRBa0YUYLxnmm7_-h63GKQ54gq0ZprgxXWX2YlY8jUcTebmO4cfHeArMP67d5_fb3-rM9mO23sMH7_0O7WJz8rXgzV6wpjfGxgssGtDQm59WcB0p495i7-NUqLXRtv5wd2-UZGA2LT3aZ_dvZ92607joGslcXnIFiDGohtRG_AL3_pv8</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Januchowski-Hartley, Stephanie R.</creator><creator>Holtz, Lauren A.</creator><creator>Martinuzzi, Sebastian</creator><creator>McIntyre, Peter B.</creator><creator>Radeloff, Volker C.</creator><creator>Pracheil, Brenda M.</creator><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1661-917X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Future land use threats to range‐restricted fish species in the United States</title><author>Januchowski-Hartley, Stephanie R. ; Holtz, Lauren A. ; Martinuzzi, Sebastian ; McIntyre, Peter B. ; Radeloff, Volker C. ; Pracheil, Brenda M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4761-8439b5eae215c2b03f3670a8bcbcd815271684ad1cdb0c3079ea637ea3b29483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>biodiversity indicators</topic><topic>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Endangered Species Act</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>extinction risk</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>global change</topic><topic>IUCN Red List</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>scenario planning</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Januchowski-Hartley, Stephanie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holtz, Lauren A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinuzzi, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, Peter B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radeloff, Volker C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pracheil, Brenda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Januchowski-Hartley, Stephanie R.</au><au>Holtz, Lauren A.</au><au>Martinuzzi, Sebastian</au><au>McIntyre, Peter B.</au><au>Radeloff, Volker C.</au><au>Pracheil, Brenda M.</au><au>Visconti, Piero</au><au>Visconti, Piero</au><aucorp>Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Future land use threats to range‐restricted fish species in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>663</spage><epage>671</epage><pages>663-671</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>AIM: Land use change is one major threat to freshwater biodiversity, and land use change scenarios can help to assess threats from future land use change, thereby guiding proactive conservation decisions. Our goal was to identify which range‐restricted freshwater fish species are most likely to be affected by land use change and to determine where threats to these species from future land use change in the conterminous United States are most pronounced. LOCATION: United States of America. METHODS: We focused on range‐restricted freshwater fish species, identified which of these species are considered threatened based on either the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN)'s Red List or the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and compared their distributions to patterns of future land use changes by 2051 under three scenarios. RESULTS: We found that 14% of the range‐restricted species had &gt;30% of their distribution area occupied by intensive land use in 2001, and this number increased from 27 to 58% by 2051 depending on the land use scenario. Among the 57 species most likely to be strongly affected by intensive land use, only 26% of these species are currently listed as threatened on the IUCN Red List, and 12% are listed as threatened under the ESA. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Our approach demonstrates the value of considering future land use change scenarios in extinction risk assessment frameworks and offers guidelines for how this could be achieved for future assessments.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Science</pub><doi>10.1111/ddi.12431</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1661-917X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1366-9516
ispartof Diversity & distributions, 2016-06, Vol.22 (6), p.663-671
issn 1366-9516
1472-4642
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1261334
source Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects biodiversity indicators
BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH
Endangered & extinct species
Endangered Species Act
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
extinction risk
Fish
Freshwater
global change
IUCN Red List
Land use
scenario planning
Wildlife conservation
title Future land use threats to range‐restricted fish species in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T22%3A57%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Future%20land%20use%20threats%20to%20range%E2%80%90restricted%20fish%20species%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=Januchowski-Hartley,%20Stephanie%20R.&rft.aucorp=Oak%20Ridge%20National%20Laboratory%20(ORNL),%20Oak%20Ridge,%20TN%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=663&rft.epage=671&rft.pages=663-671&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ddi.12431&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_24P%3E24817499%3C/jstor_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1786726926&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24817499&rfr_iscdi=true