The Northwest Geysers EGS Demonstration Project, California: Pre-stimulation Modeling and Interpretation of the Stimulation
The Northwest Geysers Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) demonstration project aims to create an EGS by directly and systematically injecting cool water at relatively low pressure into a known High Temperature (280–400 °C) Zone (HTZ) located under the conventional (240 °C) geothermal steam reservoir a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Mathematical geosciences 2015-01, Vol.47 (1), p.3-29 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 29 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Mathematical geosciences |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Rutqvist, Jonny Dobson, Patrick F. Garcia, Julio Hartline, Craig Jeanne, Pierre Oldenburg, Curtis M. Vasco, Donald W. Walters, Mark |
description | The Northwest Geysers Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) demonstration project aims to create an EGS by directly and systematically injecting cool water at relatively low pressure into a known High Temperature (280–400 °C) Zone (HTZ) located under the conventional (240 °C) geothermal steam reservoir at The Geysers geothermal field in California. In this paper, the results of coupled thermal, hydraulic, and mechanical (THM) analyses made using a model developed as part of the pre-stimulation phase of the EGS demonstration project is presented. The model simulations were conducted in order to investigate injection strategies and the resulting effects of cold-water injection upon the EGS system; in particular to predict the extent of the stimulation zone for a given injection schedule. The actual injection began on October 6, 2011, and in this paper a comparison of pre-stimulation model predictions with micro-earthquake (MEQ) monitoring data over the first few months of a one-year injection program is presented. The results show that, by using a calibrated THM model based on historic injection and MEQ data at a nearby well, the predicted extent of the stimulation zone (defined as a zone of high MEQ density around the injection well) compares well with observed seismicity. The modeling indicates that the MEQ events are related to shear reactivation of preexisting fractures, which is triggered by the combined effects of injection-induced cooling around the injection well and small changes in steam pressure as far as half a kilometer away from the injection well. Pressure-monitoring data at adjacent wells and satellite-based ground-surface deformation data were also used to validate and further calibrate reservoir-scale hydraulic and mechanical model properties. The pressure signature monitored from the start of the injection was particularly useful for a precise back-calculation of reservoir porosity. The first few months of reservoir pressure and surface deformation data were useful for estimating the reservoir-rock permeability and elastic modulus. Finally, although the extent of the calculated stimulation zone matches the field observations over the first few months of injection, the observed surface deformations and MEQ evolution showed more heterogeneous behavior as a result of more complex geology, including minor faults and fracture zones that are important for consideration in the analysis of energy production and the long-term evolution of the EGS system |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11004-013-9493-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1254437</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1660098575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-2f15fa2c5bebe25cec74847fc5589c4a4335b4c9c41456c482062e53f9be70103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoso-PkDvAW9eLCaaT7aepN1XQW_QD2HbJy6XbrJmmSRxT9vpKIiCJ5mmDzvTGbeLNsFegSUlscBUuA5BZbXvGb5ciXbgKrkeVULtvqVS1jPNkOYUiqBCdjI3h4mSG6cj5NXDJGMcBnQBzIc3ZMznDkbotexdZbceTdFEw_JQHdt47xt9UkqYh5iO1t0PXTtnrBr7TPR9olc2oh-7jH2b64hMc26_8a3s7VGdwF3PuNW9ng-fBhc5Fe3o8vB6VWueSliXjQgGl0YMcYxFsKgKXnFy8YIUdWGa86YGHOTUuBCGl4VVBYoWFOPsaRA2Va21_d16a8qmDaimRhnbdpHQSE4Z2WCDnpo7t3LIt1CzdpgsOu0RbcICqSktK5EKf6BCi6lkKxI6P4vdOoW3qZtE8UZUC4BEgU9ZbwLwWOj5r6dab9UQNWHvaq3VyV71Ye9apk0Ra8JibXP6H90_lP0Du5YqCk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1643104611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Northwest Geysers EGS Demonstration Project, California: Pre-stimulation Modeling and Interpretation of the Stimulation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rutqvist, Jonny ; Dobson, Patrick F. ; Garcia, Julio ; Hartline, Craig ; Jeanne, Pierre ; Oldenburg, Curtis M. ; Vasco, Donald W. ; Walters, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Rutqvist, Jonny ; Dobson, Patrick F. ; Garcia, Julio ; Hartline, Craig ; Jeanne, Pierre ; Oldenburg, Curtis M. ; Vasco, Donald W. ; Walters, Mark ; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>The Northwest Geysers Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) demonstration project aims to create an EGS by directly and systematically injecting cool water at relatively low pressure into a known High Temperature (280–400 °C) Zone (HTZ) located under the conventional (240 °C) geothermal steam reservoir at The Geysers geothermal field in California. In this paper, the results of coupled thermal, hydraulic, and mechanical (THM) analyses made using a model developed as part of the pre-stimulation phase of the EGS demonstration project is presented. The model simulations were conducted in order to investigate injection strategies and the resulting effects of cold-water injection upon the EGS system; in particular to predict the extent of the stimulation zone for a given injection schedule. The actual injection began on October 6, 2011, and in this paper a comparison of pre-stimulation model predictions with micro-earthquake (MEQ) monitoring data over the first few months of a one-year injection program is presented. The results show that, by using a calibrated THM model based on historic injection and MEQ data at a nearby well, the predicted extent of the stimulation zone (defined as a zone of high MEQ density around the injection well) compares well with observed seismicity. The modeling indicates that the MEQ events are related to shear reactivation of preexisting fractures, which is triggered by the combined effects of injection-induced cooling around the injection well and small changes in steam pressure as far as half a kilometer away from the injection well. Pressure-monitoring data at adjacent wells and satellite-based ground-surface deformation data were also used to validate and further calibrate reservoir-scale hydraulic and mechanical model properties. The pressure signature monitored from the start of the injection was particularly useful for a precise back-calculation of reservoir porosity. The first few months of reservoir pressure and surface deformation data were useful for estimating the reservoir-rock permeability and elastic modulus. Finally, although the extent of the calculated stimulation zone matches the field observations over the first few months of injection, the observed surface deformations and MEQ evolution showed more heterogeneous behavior as a result of more complex geology, including minor faults and fracture zones that are important for consideration in the analysis of energy production and the long-term evolution of the EGS system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1874-8961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-8953</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11004-013-9493-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Chemistry and Earth Sciences ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer Science ; Coupled processes ; Deformation ; Density ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquakes ; EGS ; Enhanced geothermal systems ; Fluid injection ; Geomechanics ; GEOSCIENCES ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Geothermal ; Geothermal energy ; Geothermal power ; Geysers ; High temperature ; Hydrogeology ; Induced seismicity ; Injection ; Mathematical models ; Modeling ; Northwest ; Physics ; Porosity ; Reservoirs ; Seismic activity ; Special Issue ; Statistics for Engineering ; Stimulation</subject><ispartof>Mathematical geosciences, 2015-01, Vol.47 (1), p.3-29</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-2f15fa2c5bebe25cec74847fc5589c4a4335b4c9c41456c482062e53f9be70103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-2f15fa2c5bebe25cec74847fc5589c4a4335b4c9c41456c482062e53f9be70103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11004-013-9493-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11004-013-9493-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1254437$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rutqvist, Jonny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobson, Patrick F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartline, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanne, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldenburg, Curtis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasco, Donald W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walters, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>The Northwest Geysers EGS Demonstration Project, California: Pre-stimulation Modeling and Interpretation of the Stimulation</title><title>Mathematical geosciences</title><addtitle>Math Geosci</addtitle><description>The Northwest Geysers Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) demonstration project aims to create an EGS by directly and systematically injecting cool water at relatively low pressure into a known High Temperature (280–400 °C) Zone (HTZ) located under the conventional (240 °C) geothermal steam reservoir at The Geysers geothermal field in California. In this paper, the results of coupled thermal, hydraulic, and mechanical (THM) analyses made using a model developed as part of the pre-stimulation phase of the EGS demonstration project is presented. The model simulations were conducted in order to investigate injection strategies and the resulting effects of cold-water injection upon the EGS system; in particular to predict the extent of the stimulation zone for a given injection schedule. The actual injection began on October 6, 2011, and in this paper a comparison of pre-stimulation model predictions with micro-earthquake (MEQ) monitoring data over the first few months of a one-year injection program is presented. The results show that, by using a calibrated THM model based on historic injection and MEQ data at a nearby well, the predicted extent of the stimulation zone (defined as a zone of high MEQ density around the injection well) compares well with observed seismicity. The modeling indicates that the MEQ events are related to shear reactivation of preexisting fractures, which is triggered by the combined effects of injection-induced cooling around the injection well and small changes in steam pressure as far as half a kilometer away from the injection well. Pressure-monitoring data at adjacent wells and satellite-based ground-surface deformation data were also used to validate and further calibrate reservoir-scale hydraulic and mechanical model properties. The pressure signature monitored from the start of the injection was particularly useful for a precise back-calculation of reservoir porosity. The first few months of reservoir pressure and surface deformation data were useful for estimating the reservoir-rock permeability and elastic modulus. Finally, although the extent of the calculated stimulation zone matches the field observations over the first few months of injection, the observed surface deformations and MEQ evolution showed more heterogeneous behavior as a result of more complex geology, including minor faults and fracture zones that are important for consideration in the analysis of energy production and the long-term evolution of the EGS system.</description><subject>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Coupled processes</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>EGS</subject><subject>Enhanced geothermal systems</subject><subject>Fluid injection</subject><subject>Geomechanics</subject><subject>GEOSCIENCES</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Geothermal</subject><subject>Geothermal energy</subject><subject>Geothermal power</subject><subject>Geysers</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Induced seismicity</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Northwest</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Special Issue</subject><subject>Statistics for Engineering</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><issn>1874-8961</issn><issn>1874-8953</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoso-PkDvAW9eLCaaT7aepN1XQW_QD2HbJy6XbrJmmSRxT9vpKIiCJ5mmDzvTGbeLNsFegSUlscBUuA5BZbXvGb5ciXbgKrkeVULtvqVS1jPNkOYUiqBCdjI3h4mSG6cj5NXDJGMcBnQBzIc3ZMznDkbotexdZbceTdFEw_JQHdt47xt9UkqYh5iO1t0PXTtnrBr7TPR9olc2oh-7jH2b64hMc26_8a3s7VGdwF3PuNW9ng-fBhc5Fe3o8vB6VWueSliXjQgGl0YMcYxFsKgKXnFy8YIUdWGa86YGHOTUuBCGl4VVBYoWFOPsaRA2Va21_d16a8qmDaimRhnbdpHQSE4Z2WCDnpo7t3LIt1CzdpgsOu0RbcICqSktK5EKf6BCi6lkKxI6P4vdOoW3qZtE8UZUC4BEgU9ZbwLwWOj5r6dab9UQNWHvaq3VyV71Ye9apk0Ra8JibXP6H90_lP0Du5YqCk</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Rutqvist, Jonny</creator><creator>Dobson, Patrick F.</creator><creator>Garcia, Julio</creator><creator>Hartline, Craig</creator><creator>Jeanne, Pierre</creator><creator>Oldenburg, Curtis M.</creator><creator>Vasco, Donald W.</creator><creator>Walters, Mark</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>The Northwest Geysers EGS Demonstration Project, California: Pre-stimulation Modeling and Interpretation of the Stimulation</title><author>Rutqvist, Jonny ; Dobson, Patrick F. ; Garcia, Julio ; Hartline, Craig ; Jeanne, Pierre ; Oldenburg, Curtis M. ; Vasco, Donald W. ; Walters, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-2f15fa2c5bebe25cec74847fc5589c4a4335b4c9c41456c482062e53f9be70103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Coupled processes</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>EGS</topic><topic>Enhanced geothermal systems</topic><topic>Fluid injection</topic><topic>Geomechanics</topic><topic>GEOSCIENCES</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Geothermal</topic><topic>Geothermal energy</topic><topic>Geothermal power</topic><topic>Geysers</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Induced seismicity</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Northwest</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Special Issue</topic><topic>Statistics for Engineering</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rutqvist, Jonny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dobson, Patrick F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartline, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanne, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldenburg, Curtis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasco, Donald W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walters, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Mathematical geosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rutqvist, Jonny</au><au>Dobson, Patrick F.</au><au>Garcia, Julio</au><au>Hartline, Craig</au><au>Jeanne, Pierre</au><au>Oldenburg, Curtis M.</au><au>Vasco, Donald W.</au><au>Walters, Mark</au><aucorp>Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Northwest Geysers EGS Demonstration Project, California: Pre-stimulation Modeling and Interpretation of the Stimulation</atitle><jtitle>Mathematical geosciences</jtitle><stitle>Math Geosci</stitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>3-29</pages><issn>1874-8961</issn><eissn>1874-8953</eissn><abstract>The Northwest Geysers Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) demonstration project aims to create an EGS by directly and systematically injecting cool water at relatively low pressure into a known High Temperature (280–400 °C) Zone (HTZ) located under the conventional (240 °C) geothermal steam reservoir at The Geysers geothermal field in California. In this paper, the results of coupled thermal, hydraulic, and mechanical (THM) analyses made using a model developed as part of the pre-stimulation phase of the EGS demonstration project is presented. The model simulations were conducted in order to investigate injection strategies and the resulting effects of cold-water injection upon the EGS system; in particular to predict the extent of the stimulation zone for a given injection schedule. The actual injection began on October 6, 2011, and in this paper a comparison of pre-stimulation model predictions with micro-earthquake (MEQ) monitoring data over the first few months of a one-year injection program is presented. The results show that, by using a calibrated THM model based on historic injection and MEQ data at a nearby well, the predicted extent of the stimulation zone (defined as a zone of high MEQ density around the injection well) compares well with observed seismicity. The modeling indicates that the MEQ events are related to shear reactivation of preexisting fractures, which is triggered by the combined effects of injection-induced cooling around the injection well and small changes in steam pressure as far as half a kilometer away from the injection well. Pressure-monitoring data at adjacent wells and satellite-based ground-surface deformation data were also used to validate and further calibrate reservoir-scale hydraulic and mechanical model properties. The pressure signature monitored from the start of the injection was particularly useful for a precise back-calculation of reservoir porosity. The first few months of reservoir pressure and surface deformation data were useful for estimating the reservoir-rock permeability and elastic modulus. Finally, although the extent of the calculated stimulation zone matches the field observations over the first few months of injection, the observed surface deformations and MEQ evolution showed more heterogeneous behavior as a result of more complex geology, including minor faults and fracture zones that are important for consideration in the analysis of energy production and the long-term evolution of the EGS system.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11004-013-9493-y</doi><tpages>27</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1874-8961 |
ispartof | Mathematical geosciences, 2015-01, Vol.47 (1), p.3-29 |
issn | 1874-8961 1874-8953 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1254437 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Chemistry and Earth Sciences Computational fluid dynamics Computer Science Coupled processes Deformation Density Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earthquakes EGS Enhanced geothermal systems Fluid injection Geomechanics GEOSCIENCES Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Geothermal Geothermal energy Geothermal power Geysers High temperature Hydrogeology Induced seismicity Injection Mathematical models Modeling Northwest Physics Porosity Reservoirs Seismic activity Special Issue Statistics for Engineering Stimulation |
title | The Northwest Geysers EGS Demonstration Project, California: Pre-stimulation Modeling and Interpretation of the Stimulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T03%3A55%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Northwest%20Geysers%20EGS%20Demonstration%20Project,%20California:%20Pre-stimulation%20Modeling%20and%20Interpretation%20of%20the%20Stimulation&rft.jtitle=Mathematical%20geosciences&rft.au=Rutqvist,%20Jonny&rft.aucorp=Lawrence%20Berkeley%20National%20Laboratory%20(LBNL),%20Berkeley,%20CA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=3-29&rft.issn=1874-8961&rft.eissn=1874-8953&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11004-013-9493-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1660098575%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1643104611&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |