On the relationships among cloud cover, mixed‐phase partitioning, and planetary albedo in GCMs

In this study, it is shown that CMIP5 global climate models (GCMs) that convert supercooled water to ice at relatively warm temperatures tend to have a greater mean‐state cloud fraction and more negative cloud feedback in the middle and high latitude Southern Hemisphere. We investigate possible reas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of advances in modeling earth systems 2016-06, Vol.8 (2), p.650-668
Hauptverfasser: McCoy, Daniel T., Tan, Ivy, Hartmann, Dennis L., Zelinka, Mark D., Storelvmo, Trude
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 668
container_issue 2
container_start_page 650
container_title Journal of advances in modeling earth systems
container_volume 8
creator McCoy, Daniel T.
Tan, Ivy
Hartmann, Dennis L.
Zelinka, Mark D.
Storelvmo, Trude
description In this study, it is shown that CMIP5 global climate models (GCMs) that convert supercooled water to ice at relatively warm temperatures tend to have a greater mean‐state cloud fraction and more negative cloud feedback in the middle and high latitude Southern Hemisphere. We investigate possible reasons for these relationships by analyzing the mixed‐phase parameterizations in 26 GCMs. The atmospheric temperature where ice and liquid are equally prevalent (T5050) is used to characterize the mixed‐phase parameterization in each GCM. Liquid clouds have a higher albedo than ice clouds, so, all else being equal, models with more supercooled liquid water would also have a higher planetary albedo. The lower cloud fraction in these models compensates the higher cloud reflectivity and results in clouds that reflect shortwave radiation (SW) in reasonable agreement with observations, but gives clouds that are too bright and too few. The temperature at which supercooled liquid can remain unfrozen is strongly anti‐correlated with cloud fraction in the climate mean state across the model ensemble, but we know of no robust physical mechanism to explain this behavior, especially because this anti‐correlation extends through the subtropics. A set of perturbed physics simulations with the Community Atmospheric Model Version 4 (CAM4) shows that, if its temperature‐dependent phase partitioning is varied and the critical relative humidity for cloud formation in each model run is also tuned to bring reflected SW into agreement with observations, then cloud fraction increases and liquid water path (LWP) decreases with T5050, as in the CMIP5 ensemble. Key Points: Cloud cover and mixed‐phase parameterizations have compensating effects on planetary albedo in GCMs. Models that maintain liquid to lower temperatures have less cloud cover. This compensation affects both the climate mean‐state and cloud feedback.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2015MS000589
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1251713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808703752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4711-8c7718add9668a026ef8a25c15b904976b78fe21afca2822c77c4f6ca4e763b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90b1OHDEQB_BVlEghhC4PYEGT4o6MZ9cfW6LThQ9xogBqx-ed5Yz27I29B6HjEXjGPAl7uhQoBdVM8dPoPzNF8Y3DMQfAHwhcLK4BQOj6Q7HH6wqnWEn58U3_ufiS8z2AlBLFXvHrKrBhRSxRZwcfQ175PjO7juGOuS5uGubiA6UJW_s_1Px9fulXNhPrbRr81vtwN2E2NKzvbKDBpidmuyU1kfnATmeL_LX41Nou08G_ul_c_pzfzM6ml1en57OTy6mrFOdT7ZTi2jZNLaW2gJJabVE4LpY1VLWSS6VbQm5bZ1EjjtxVrXS2IiXLpSj3i8Pd3JgHb7LzA7mViyGQGwxHwRUvR_R9h_oUf28oD2bts6Numz1usuEatIJSCRzp0X_0Pm5SGFcwiDVgKUoOo5rslEsx50St6ZNfj1cwHMz2J-btT0Ze7vij7-jpXWsuThZzBBxjvwKjNoyY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2290235310</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the relationships among cloud cover, mixed‐phase partitioning, and planetary albedo in GCMs</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>McCoy, Daniel T. ; Tan, Ivy ; Hartmann, Dennis L. ; Zelinka, Mark D. ; Storelvmo, Trude</creator><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Daniel T. ; Tan, Ivy ; Hartmann, Dennis L. ; Zelinka, Mark D. ; Storelvmo, Trude ; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, it is shown that CMIP5 global climate models (GCMs) that convert supercooled water to ice at relatively warm temperatures tend to have a greater mean‐state cloud fraction and more negative cloud feedback in the middle and high latitude Southern Hemisphere. We investigate possible reasons for these relationships by analyzing the mixed‐phase parameterizations in 26 GCMs. The atmospheric temperature where ice and liquid are equally prevalent (T5050) is used to characterize the mixed‐phase parameterization in each GCM. Liquid clouds have a higher albedo than ice clouds, so, all else being equal, models with more supercooled liquid water would also have a higher planetary albedo. The lower cloud fraction in these models compensates the higher cloud reflectivity and results in clouds that reflect shortwave radiation (SW) in reasonable agreement with observations, but gives clouds that are too bright and too few. The temperature at which supercooled liquid can remain unfrozen is strongly anti‐correlated with cloud fraction in the climate mean state across the model ensemble, but we know of no robust physical mechanism to explain this behavior, especially because this anti‐correlation extends through the subtropics. A set of perturbed physics simulations with the Community Atmospheric Model Version 4 (CAM4) shows that, if its temperature‐dependent phase partitioning is varied and the critical relative humidity for cloud formation in each model run is also tuned to bring reflected SW into agreement with observations, then cloud fraction increases and liquid water path (LWP) decreases with T5050, as in the CMIP5 ensemble. Key Points: Cloud cover and mixed‐phase parameterizations have compensating effects on planetary albedo in GCMs. Models that maintain liquid to lower temperatures have less cloud cover. This compensation affects both the climate mean‐state and cloud feedback.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1942-2466</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-2466</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2015MS000589</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Albedo ; Atmospheric models ; Atmospheric temperature ; Climate ; Climate models ; climate sensitivity ; Cloud albedo ; Cloud cover ; cloud feedback ; Cloud formation ; cloud fraction ; Clouds ; Feedback ; GEOSCIENCES ; Global climate ; Ice ; Ice clouds ; mixed‐phase ; Parameterization ; Physics ; Radiation ; Reflectance ; Relative humidity ; Simulation ; Supercooled water ; Temperature</subject><ispartof>Journal of advances in modeling earth systems, 2016-06, Vol.8 (2), p.650-668</ispartof><rights>2016. The Authors.</rights><rights>2016. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4711-8c7718add9668a026ef8a25c15b904976b78fe21afca2822c77c4f6ca4e763b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4711-8c7718add9668a026ef8a25c15b904976b78fe21afca2822c77c4f6ca4e763b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2015MS000589$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2015MS000589$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1251713$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Daniel T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Ivy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Dennis L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zelinka, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storelvmo, Trude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>On the relationships among cloud cover, mixed‐phase partitioning, and planetary albedo in GCMs</title><title>Journal of advances in modeling earth systems</title><description>In this study, it is shown that CMIP5 global climate models (GCMs) that convert supercooled water to ice at relatively warm temperatures tend to have a greater mean‐state cloud fraction and more negative cloud feedback in the middle and high latitude Southern Hemisphere. We investigate possible reasons for these relationships by analyzing the mixed‐phase parameterizations in 26 GCMs. The atmospheric temperature where ice and liquid are equally prevalent (T5050) is used to characterize the mixed‐phase parameterization in each GCM. Liquid clouds have a higher albedo than ice clouds, so, all else being equal, models with more supercooled liquid water would also have a higher planetary albedo. The lower cloud fraction in these models compensates the higher cloud reflectivity and results in clouds that reflect shortwave radiation (SW) in reasonable agreement with observations, but gives clouds that are too bright and too few. The temperature at which supercooled liquid can remain unfrozen is strongly anti‐correlated with cloud fraction in the climate mean state across the model ensemble, but we know of no robust physical mechanism to explain this behavior, especially because this anti‐correlation extends through the subtropics. A set of perturbed physics simulations with the Community Atmospheric Model Version 4 (CAM4) shows that, if its temperature‐dependent phase partitioning is varied and the critical relative humidity for cloud formation in each model run is also tuned to bring reflected SW into agreement with observations, then cloud fraction increases and liquid water path (LWP) decreases with T5050, as in the CMIP5 ensemble. Key Points: Cloud cover and mixed‐phase parameterizations have compensating effects on planetary albedo in GCMs. Models that maintain liquid to lower temperatures have less cloud cover. This compensation affects both the climate mean‐state and cloud feedback.</description><subject>Albedo</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Atmospheric temperature</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>climate sensitivity</subject><subject>Cloud albedo</subject><subject>Cloud cover</subject><subject>cloud feedback</subject><subject>Cloud formation</subject><subject>cloud fraction</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>GEOSCIENCES</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Ice clouds</subject><subject>mixed‐phase</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Reflectance</subject><subject>Relative humidity</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Supercooled water</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><issn>1942-2466</issn><issn>1942-2466</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp90b1OHDEQB_BVlEghhC4PYEGT4o6MZ9cfW6LThQ9xogBqx-ed5Yz27I29B6HjEXjGPAl7uhQoBdVM8dPoPzNF8Y3DMQfAHwhcLK4BQOj6Q7HH6wqnWEn58U3_ufiS8z2AlBLFXvHrKrBhRSxRZwcfQ175PjO7juGOuS5uGubiA6UJW_s_1Px9fulXNhPrbRr81vtwN2E2NKzvbKDBpidmuyU1kfnATmeL_LX41Nou08G_ul_c_pzfzM6ml1en57OTy6mrFOdT7ZTi2jZNLaW2gJJabVE4LpY1VLWSS6VbQm5bZ1EjjtxVrXS2IiXLpSj3i8Pd3JgHb7LzA7mViyGQGwxHwRUvR_R9h_oUf28oD2bts6Numz1usuEatIJSCRzp0X_0Pm5SGFcwiDVgKUoOo5rslEsx50St6ZNfj1cwHMz2J-btT0Ze7vij7-jpXWsuThZzBBxjvwKjNoyY</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>McCoy, Daniel T.</creator><creator>Tan, Ivy</creator><creator>Hartmann, Dennis L.</creator><creator>Zelinka, Mark D.</creator><creator>Storelvmo, Trude</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>American Geophysical Union (AGU)</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>On the relationships among cloud cover, mixed‐phase partitioning, and planetary albedo in GCMs</title><author>McCoy, Daniel T. ; Tan, Ivy ; Hartmann, Dennis L. ; Zelinka, Mark D. ; Storelvmo, Trude</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4711-8c7718add9668a026ef8a25c15b904976b78fe21afca2822c77c4f6ca4e763b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Albedo</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Atmospheric temperature</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>climate sensitivity</topic><topic>Cloud albedo</topic><topic>Cloud cover</topic><topic>cloud feedback</topic><topic>Cloud formation</topic><topic>cloud fraction</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>GEOSCIENCES</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Ice clouds</topic><topic>mixed‐phase</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Reflectance</topic><topic>Relative humidity</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Supercooled water</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Daniel T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Ivy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Dennis L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zelinka, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storelvmo, Trude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Journal of advances in modeling earth systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCoy, Daniel T.</au><au>Tan, Ivy</au><au>Hartmann, Dennis L.</au><au>Zelinka, Mark D.</au><au>Storelvmo, Trude</au><aucorp>Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the relationships among cloud cover, mixed‐phase partitioning, and planetary albedo in GCMs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of advances in modeling earth systems</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>650</spage><epage>668</epage><pages>650-668</pages><issn>1942-2466</issn><eissn>1942-2466</eissn><abstract>In this study, it is shown that CMIP5 global climate models (GCMs) that convert supercooled water to ice at relatively warm temperatures tend to have a greater mean‐state cloud fraction and more negative cloud feedback in the middle and high latitude Southern Hemisphere. We investigate possible reasons for these relationships by analyzing the mixed‐phase parameterizations in 26 GCMs. The atmospheric temperature where ice and liquid are equally prevalent (T5050) is used to characterize the mixed‐phase parameterization in each GCM. Liquid clouds have a higher albedo than ice clouds, so, all else being equal, models with more supercooled liquid water would also have a higher planetary albedo. The lower cloud fraction in these models compensates the higher cloud reflectivity and results in clouds that reflect shortwave radiation (SW) in reasonable agreement with observations, but gives clouds that are too bright and too few. The temperature at which supercooled liquid can remain unfrozen is strongly anti‐correlated with cloud fraction in the climate mean state across the model ensemble, but we know of no robust physical mechanism to explain this behavior, especially because this anti‐correlation extends through the subtropics. A set of perturbed physics simulations with the Community Atmospheric Model Version 4 (CAM4) shows that, if its temperature‐dependent phase partitioning is varied and the critical relative humidity for cloud formation in each model run is also tuned to bring reflected SW into agreement with observations, then cloud fraction increases and liquid water path (LWP) decreases with T5050, as in the CMIP5 ensemble. Key Points: Cloud cover and mixed‐phase parameterizations have compensating effects on planetary albedo in GCMs. Models that maintain liquid to lower temperatures have less cloud cover. This compensation affects both the climate mean‐state and cloud feedback.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/2015MS000589</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1942-2466
ispartof Journal of advances in modeling earth systems, 2016-06, Vol.8 (2), p.650-668
issn 1942-2466
1942-2466
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1251713
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Albedo
Atmospheric models
Atmospheric temperature
Climate
Climate models
climate sensitivity
Cloud albedo
Cloud cover
cloud feedback
Cloud formation
cloud fraction
Clouds
Feedback
GEOSCIENCES
Global climate
Ice
Ice clouds
mixed‐phase
Parameterization
Physics
Radiation
Reflectance
Relative humidity
Simulation
Supercooled water
Temperature
title On the relationships among cloud cover, mixed‐phase partitioning, and planetary albedo in GCMs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A03%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20relationships%20among%20cloud%20cover,%20mixed%E2%80%90phase%20partitioning,%20and%20planetary%20albedo%20in%20GCMs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20advances%20in%20modeling%20earth%20systems&rft.au=McCoy,%20Daniel%20T.&rft.aucorp=Lawrence%20Livermore%20National%20Laboratory%20(LLNL),%20Livermore,%20CA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=650&rft.epage=668&rft.pages=650-668&rft.issn=1942-2466&rft.eissn=1942-2466&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2015MS000589&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1808703752%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2290235310&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true