A comparison of automated scanning electron microscopy (ASEM) and acoustic attenuation spectroscopy (AAS) instruments for particle sizing

•Two independent particle sizing instruments yield similar particle size distributions.•Particle size distributions in the vendor specified range for standard materials.•Statistical comparisons demonstrate importance of comparing statistical significance. The objective of this work is to compare par...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Colloids and surfaces. A, Physicochemical and engineering aspects Physicochemical and engineering aspects, 2015-08, Vol.479 (C), p.46-51
Hauptverfasser: Aichele, Clint P., Venkataramani, Deepika, Smay, James E., McCann, Melinda H., Richter, Scott, Khanzadeh-Moradllo, Mehdi, Aboustait, Mohammed, Ley, M. Tyler
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 51
container_issue C
container_start_page 46
container_title Colloids and surfaces. A, Physicochemical and engineering aspects
container_volume 479
creator Aichele, Clint P.
Venkataramani, Deepika
Smay, James E.
McCann, Melinda H.
Richter, Scott
Khanzadeh-Moradllo, Mehdi
Aboustait, Mohammed
Ley, M. Tyler
description •Two independent particle sizing instruments yield similar particle size distributions.•Particle size distributions in the vendor specified range for standard materials.•Statistical comparisons demonstrate importance of comparing statistical significance. The objective of this work is to compare particle size distributions (PSD) measured by automated scanning electron microscopy (ASEM) and acoustic attenuation spectroscopy (AAS) instruments at Oklahoma State University (OSU). The techniques provide quantitative PSD measurements of dispersed systems of both hard and soft particles. Glass spheres, fly ash, and latex spheres are chosen to illustrate the range of materials that can be analyzed with these techniques. The variety of length scales and material property attributes investigated provides some insight about the consistency of the ASEM and AAS measurements for these types of particles. Although both instruments yield internally consistent PSD, rigorous statistical analysis shows that the two instruments can yield different results when measuring samples from the same batch of particles. The difference is not surprising given the different physics of each instrument. Nevertheless, the similarity in PSD hints at the validity of comparing absolute PSD and PSD changes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.03.052
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1250283</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0927775715002897</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0927775715002897</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8507854aa03494348991650a851ed2f5db869bb66c54ab85f70f46177a8a3dac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFv3CAQhVGVSN1s-hcqlFNzsAsGDL5lFW2bSKl6SHpGY4wbVmtYAa60-Qf518Xd5NzTHOZ78-Y9hD5TUlNC26-72oR9muMIdUOoqAmriWg-oBVVklWcie4MrUjXyEpKIT-ii5R2hBAuZLdCrxtswnSA6FLwOIwY5hwmyHbAyYD3zv_Gdm9NjmU9ORNDMuFwxF82j9sf1xj8gMGEOWVnMORs_QzZFTQd_mne4c3jNXY-5ThP1ueExxBxMS2qvcXJvRSbS3Q-wj7ZT29zjX592z7d3lUPP7_f324eKsMbnisliFSCAxDGO8646jraCgJKUDs0oxh61XZ937amQL0SoyQjb6mUoIANYNgaXZ3uhvK0TsZla55N8L48rGkjSKNYgdoTtARO0Y76EN0E8agp0UvreqffW9dL65owXVovwpuT0JYIf5yNi4P1xg4uLgZDcP878RcS8JDt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of automated scanning electron microscopy (ASEM) and acoustic attenuation spectroscopy (AAS) instruments for particle sizing</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Aichele, Clint P. ; Venkataramani, Deepika ; Smay, James E. ; McCann, Melinda H. ; Richter, Scott ; Khanzadeh-Moradllo, Mehdi ; Aboustait, Mohammed ; Ley, M. Tyler</creator><creatorcontrib>Aichele, Clint P. ; Venkataramani, Deepika ; Smay, James E. ; McCann, Melinda H. ; Richter, Scott ; Khanzadeh-Moradllo, Mehdi ; Aboustait, Mohammed ; Ley, M. Tyler</creatorcontrib><description>•Two independent particle sizing instruments yield similar particle size distributions.•Particle size distributions in the vendor specified range for standard materials.•Statistical comparisons demonstrate importance of comparing statistical significance. The objective of this work is to compare particle size distributions (PSD) measured by automated scanning electron microscopy (ASEM) and acoustic attenuation spectroscopy (AAS) instruments at Oklahoma State University (OSU). The techniques provide quantitative PSD measurements of dispersed systems of both hard and soft particles. Glass spheres, fly ash, and latex spheres are chosen to illustrate the range of materials that can be analyzed with these techniques. The variety of length scales and material property attributes investigated provides some insight about the consistency of the ASEM and AAS measurements for these types of particles. Although both instruments yield internally consistent PSD, rigorous statistical analysis shows that the two instruments can yield different results when measuring samples from the same batch of particles. The difference is not surprising given the different physics of each instrument. Nevertheless, the similarity in PSD hints at the validity of comparing absolute PSD and PSD changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0927-7757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.03.052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acoustic spectroscopy ; Automated scanning electron microscopy ; Concentrated dispersions ; Particle size distribution ; Particulates</subject><ispartof>Colloids and surfaces. A, Physicochemical and engineering aspects, 2015-08, Vol.479 (C), p.46-51</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8507854aa03494348991650a851ed2f5db869bb66c54ab85f70f46177a8a3dac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8507854aa03494348991650a851ed2f5db869bb66c54ab85f70f46177a8a3dac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.03.052$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1250283$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aichele, Clint P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkataramani, Deepika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smay, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCann, Melinda H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanzadeh-Moradllo, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aboustait, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ley, M. Tyler</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of automated scanning electron microscopy (ASEM) and acoustic attenuation spectroscopy (AAS) instruments for particle sizing</title><title>Colloids and surfaces. A, Physicochemical and engineering aspects</title><description>•Two independent particle sizing instruments yield similar particle size distributions.•Particle size distributions in the vendor specified range for standard materials.•Statistical comparisons demonstrate importance of comparing statistical significance. The objective of this work is to compare particle size distributions (PSD) measured by automated scanning electron microscopy (ASEM) and acoustic attenuation spectroscopy (AAS) instruments at Oklahoma State University (OSU). The techniques provide quantitative PSD measurements of dispersed systems of both hard and soft particles. Glass spheres, fly ash, and latex spheres are chosen to illustrate the range of materials that can be analyzed with these techniques. The variety of length scales and material property attributes investigated provides some insight about the consistency of the ASEM and AAS measurements for these types of particles. Although both instruments yield internally consistent PSD, rigorous statistical analysis shows that the two instruments can yield different results when measuring samples from the same batch of particles. The difference is not surprising given the different physics of each instrument. Nevertheless, the similarity in PSD hints at the validity of comparing absolute PSD and PSD changes.</description><subject>Acoustic spectroscopy</subject><subject>Automated scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Concentrated dispersions</subject><subject>Particle size distribution</subject><subject>Particulates</subject><issn>0927-7757</issn><issn>1873-4359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFv3CAQhVGVSN1s-hcqlFNzsAsGDL5lFW2bSKl6SHpGY4wbVmtYAa60-Qf518Xd5NzTHOZ78-Y9hD5TUlNC26-72oR9muMIdUOoqAmriWg-oBVVklWcie4MrUjXyEpKIT-ii5R2hBAuZLdCrxtswnSA6FLwOIwY5hwmyHbAyYD3zv_Gdm9NjmU9ORNDMuFwxF82j9sf1xj8gMGEOWVnMORs_QzZFTQd_mne4c3jNXY-5ThP1ueExxBxMS2qvcXJvRSbS3Q-wj7ZT29zjX592z7d3lUPP7_f324eKsMbnisliFSCAxDGO8646jraCgJKUDs0oxh61XZ937amQL0SoyQjb6mUoIANYNgaXZ3uhvK0TsZla55N8L48rGkjSKNYgdoTtARO0Y76EN0E8agp0UvreqffW9dL65owXVovwpuT0JYIf5yNi4P1xg4uLgZDcP878RcS8JDt</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Aichele, Clint P.</creator><creator>Venkataramani, Deepika</creator><creator>Smay, James E.</creator><creator>McCann, Melinda H.</creator><creator>Richter, Scott</creator><creator>Khanzadeh-Moradllo, Mehdi</creator><creator>Aboustait, Mohammed</creator><creator>Ley, M. Tyler</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>A comparison of automated scanning electron microscopy (ASEM) and acoustic attenuation spectroscopy (AAS) instruments for particle sizing</title><author>Aichele, Clint P. ; Venkataramani, Deepika ; Smay, James E. ; McCann, Melinda H. ; Richter, Scott ; Khanzadeh-Moradllo, Mehdi ; Aboustait, Mohammed ; Ley, M. Tyler</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-8507854aa03494348991650a851ed2f5db869bb66c54ab85f70f46177a8a3dac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acoustic spectroscopy</topic><topic>Automated scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Concentrated dispersions</topic><topic>Particle size distribution</topic><topic>Particulates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aichele, Clint P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkataramani, Deepika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smay, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCann, Melinda H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanzadeh-Moradllo, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aboustait, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ley, M. Tyler</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Colloids and surfaces. A, Physicochemical and engineering aspects</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aichele, Clint P.</au><au>Venkataramani, Deepika</au><au>Smay, James E.</au><au>McCann, Melinda H.</au><au>Richter, Scott</au><au>Khanzadeh-Moradllo, Mehdi</au><au>Aboustait, Mohammed</au><au>Ley, M. Tyler</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of automated scanning electron microscopy (ASEM) and acoustic attenuation spectroscopy (AAS) instruments for particle sizing</atitle><jtitle>Colloids and surfaces. A, Physicochemical and engineering aspects</jtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>479</volume><issue>C</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>46-51</pages><issn>0927-7757</issn><eissn>1873-4359</eissn><abstract>•Two independent particle sizing instruments yield similar particle size distributions.•Particle size distributions in the vendor specified range for standard materials.•Statistical comparisons demonstrate importance of comparing statistical significance. The objective of this work is to compare particle size distributions (PSD) measured by automated scanning electron microscopy (ASEM) and acoustic attenuation spectroscopy (AAS) instruments at Oklahoma State University (OSU). The techniques provide quantitative PSD measurements of dispersed systems of both hard and soft particles. Glass spheres, fly ash, and latex spheres are chosen to illustrate the range of materials that can be analyzed with these techniques. The variety of length scales and material property attributes investigated provides some insight about the consistency of the ASEM and AAS measurements for these types of particles. Although both instruments yield internally consistent PSD, rigorous statistical analysis shows that the two instruments can yield different results when measuring samples from the same batch of particles. The difference is not surprising given the different physics of each instrument. Nevertheless, the similarity in PSD hints at the validity of comparing absolute PSD and PSD changes.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.03.052</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0927-7757
ispartof Colloids and surfaces. A, Physicochemical and engineering aspects, 2015-08, Vol.479 (C), p.46-51
issn 0927-7757
1873-4359
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1250283
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Acoustic spectroscopy
Automated scanning electron microscopy
Concentrated dispersions
Particle size distribution
Particulates
title A comparison of automated scanning electron microscopy (ASEM) and acoustic attenuation spectroscopy (AAS) instruments for particle sizing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T23%3A14%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20automated%20scanning%20electron%20microscopy%20(ASEM)%20and%20acoustic%20attenuation%20spectroscopy%20(AAS)%20instruments%20for%20particle%20sizing&rft.jtitle=Colloids%20and%20surfaces.%20A,%20Physicochemical%20and%20engineering%20aspects&rft.au=Aichele,%20Clint%20P.&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=479&rft.issue=C&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=46-51&rft.issn=0927-7757&rft.eissn=1873-4359&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.03.052&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_osti_%3ES0927775715002897%3C/elsevier_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0927775715002897&rfr_iscdi=true